* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Paper - Astrophysics - University of Oxford
Dark matter wikipedia , lookup
Fermi paradox wikipedia , lookup
History of the telescope wikipedia , lookup
History of supernova observation wikipedia , lookup
Dark energy wikipedia , lookup
Nebular hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam wikipedia , lookup
History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
James Webb Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
History of gamma-ray burst research wikipedia , lookup
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Modified Newtonian dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Physical cosmology wikipedia , lookup
European Southern Observatory wikipedia , lookup
Malmquist bias wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical naming conventions wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard cosmology wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Space Interferometry Mission wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Chronology of the universe wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Planetary habitability wikipedia , lookup
Cosmic distance ladder wikipedia , lookup
Gamma-ray burst wikipedia , lookup
Astrophotography wikipedia , lookup
Observable universe wikipedia , lookup
Planetary system wikipedia , lookup
H II region wikipedia , lookup
Lambda-CDM model wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Highlights from the Science Case for a 50-100m Extremely Large Telescope Isobel Hook, University of Oxford On behalf of the OPTICON European ELT science working group Keywords:Terrestrial Exoplanets; Galaxy evolution; Cosmology and cosmological constants ABSTRACT We present an overview of the science case for a 50-100m Extremely Large Telescope. This was the subject of a meeting in Marseilles, France in November 2003, attended by about 50 European astronomers. Four key scientific themes were identified by the participants: terrestrial planets in extra-solar systems; stellar populations across the Universe; building galaxies since the darkest ages; the first objects and re-ionisation structure of the Universe. Although by no means an exhaustive list of science areas in which ELT will have a great impact, these cases provide examples where an ELT can make a dramatic advance in our understanding of the Universe around us. This paper describes these highlighted science themes and the challenging demands they place on ELT performance. See http://wwwastro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~imh/ELT/ for more information, including the full list of participants in this work. 1. TERRESTRIAL PLANETS IN EXTRA-SOLAR SYSTEMS: ARE WE UNIQUE? How common is life that we see around us on Earth? How many planetary systems resemble our own Solar System? How common are terrestrial planets like the Earth? How many lie on orbits we would regard as habitable? And on how many can biomarkers - the chemical signatures left by biological processes – be detected? We are fortunate to be living at the first moment in the last 2000 years of human inquiry in which these fundamental questions can be addressed scientifically. A 50-100m European Large Telescope will make possible a detailed understanding of how planet formation is related to the conditions believed to be required for life as we know it. The enormous light-gathering power of such a telescope, combined with the ultra-sharp images expected from Adaptive Optics, will allow an unprecedented level of discovery and understanding. Astronomers will be able to draw a continuous thread from the earliest times of our own Solar nebula, through the gaseous disks of young stars that are the cradle of new planets, to the end state of mature planetary systems around 1000 of the nearest stars in a search for Earth-like analogues. Most of the breakthroughs in this ambitious endeavour require extremely high levels of contrast suppression (106 – 1010) in order to detect faint planetary signatures in the vicinity of a bright parent star. Indeed, confirming the feasibility of these scientific requirements is a major goal of the proposed European Large Telescope design study. With an ELT of 50-100m class it would become possible to not only directly detect (by imaging) earth-like planets orbiting other stars, but also study large numbers of them in detail (via spectroscopy). The main elements of such a study include the following (discussed in more detail below). • • A large survey: A survey of the surroundings of about 1000 stars will give a large enough dataset to draw meaningful conclusions on the rarity of terrestrial planets. To survey this many stars requires observing out to distances of about 30 parsecs from us (~100 light years). At these distances the projected separation between the star and its planets becomes very small (less than 0.1 arcsec) and an extremely large telescope is needed to resolve them. Measuring planet properties: By obtaining spectra of exo-planets can we determine their surface properties (are they liquid or solid?) and search for "bio-markers" such as water, oxygen and carbon dioxide. Again • • • an extremely large telescope is needed to collect sufficient light from a faint planet to be able to analyse it spectroscopically. Measuring planet orbits : Multiple observations of each exo-planetary system will reveal the orbits of the planets, i.e. their period and eccentricity. These parameters are also related to a planet's ability to support life. Studying entire exo-planetary systems : While searching for terrestrial planets, an ELT will also detect the larger giant gas planets (equivalents of Saturn and Jupiter) in the exo-system. From this we can determine how common are systems with multiple planets of varying sizes (like our own solar system). We can also characterize the systems in different environments, such as around metal-poor stars, white dwarfs, massive stars and brown dwarfs. Disentangling the planet formation processes : An ELT could be used to study planets in the habitable regions around newborn, low-mass "T Tauri" stars. These stars are typically located at distances of 150 pc and beyond, so a resolution of 2 milliarcsecond is needed to properly sample their habitable regions. . 1.1. Terrestrial Planets and their Planetary Environments Only nine years ago, the first planet around a star other than the Sun was detected indirectly. Today, over 120 extra-solar planets are known, the vast majority of which are unlike the planets in our own Solar System. In the next ten years, astronomers using current 8-10m class telescopes expect to perform the first direct detections of gaseous giant planets, using advanced adaptive optics and coronagraphic techniques to suppress the glare from the planets’ parent stars by factors of up to 107. It is the next generation of 50-100m extremely large telescopes, however, that will address critical issues associated with details of gas giants similar to our own Jupiter and Saturn, and, importantly, questions about terrestrial (Earthlike) planets. Only these giant telescopes will have the light collecting power and the unprecedented resolution (suppression levels of up to 1010) required to search many hundreds of nearby stars for the telltale light from faint terrestrial planets. Specifically, such a telescope would be able to directly collect and analyse the light from terrestrial planets orbiting nearby stars in ``habitable zones’’ (masses < 10MEARTH and temperatures~270-320K). By imaging over several epochs, the orbits of these planets can be mapped. Variations in their photometric properties then can be used to determine the albedos (reflectivities), and thereby the surface temperatures on detected planets. For large gas giants, rings like those around Saturn would reveal themselves as changes in the phase light curve of a planet (Fig. 1). On different timescales, the influence of planetary rotation and weather on the surface brightness of exoplanets can be used to estimate variability in surface conditions, especially when combined with spectra capable of detecting the signatures of molecular tracers associated with life in our Solar System. Only the next generation of ELT will be able to detect the faint features indicative of rings, weather, and rotation in planets similar to those in our own Solar System. Assuming that ~1% of stars may have terrestrial planets in orbits undisrupted by eccentric gas-giant companions, an ELT must be capable of searching stars as distant as 30pc for terrestrial planets in order to produce a meaningfully large sample of detections. At 30pc, the Earth-Sun separation (1 AU) subtends an angle of 33 milliarcseconds (mas). To good approximation, the brightness difference between a star and habitable terrestrial planet is 25 magnitudes in the visible, and slightly less in the near-infrared, requiring suppression ratios of 1010 over a 20300 mas orbital range. It is exciting to note that meeting this science requirement would allow the simultaneous detection of all planets in a 30pc distant system identical to our own, excepting only Mercury and Pluto. Fig. 1: Light reflected from a Saturn-analogue as a function of its position on its orbit, assuming that the inclination of the orbit relative to the observer is 45 degrees. The solid line shows the phase light curve without rings; crosses denote the case with rings. Note that rings generate complicated brightness and shadow variations as a function of orbit phase (shown in negative in the right frame). The peak of the light curves for a Saturn analogue orbiting as close as 1 AU from its parent star would require a brightness suppression of greater than 107 for detection. Credit: Dyudina et al, Australian National University. More modest suppression ratios will allow the detection of signatures generated by planets just forming around other stars. As material in the dusty proto-planetary disks known to encircle young stars begins to collapse gravitationally to form planets, empty (and thus dark) circular gaps, or lanes, are created at discrete positions. Telescopes with sufficient resolving power and moderately high suppression ratios, will be able to detect and these planetary birthplaces at disk locations where habitable planets may be born. A suppression factor of 106 or more is required to see a dark lane from a forming Earth-analogue against the background glare of its parent star (Fig 2). Fig 2: Simulated signal generated by an Earth-analogue orbiting a small star as it forms in a disk of material illuminated by the parent star. The disk brightness is shown on a logarithmic scale versus distance from the star; at the position of the terrestrial planet (1 AU) a dark lane is present. Credit: Ryuichi Kurosawa and Tim Harris, Exeter University. 1.2. What more will we learn? In addition to the light curve and orbit mapping described above that will yield the planet’s orbital period and eccentricity, surface brightness and rotation period, low-resolution spectroscopy with a 50-100m European Large Telescope would allow astronomers and planetary scientists to obtain spectra from terrestrial planets in order to examine their possible atmospheres. In particular, broad molecular features are expected to be present in an atmosphere with temperatures of a few hundred Kelvin; their absence in terrestrial exoplanets may rule out the presence of an atmosphere. The signatures of O2, O3, H2O, CO, CO2, CH4 are accessible in the optical and near-infrared, and provide vital information on the atmospheres, habitability, and indeed the presence of biospheres, of terrestrial planets. If the planet has no atmosphere, allowing a direct glimpse at the surface, low-resolution spectra from an ELT would provide important information on the mineralogy and geology of the planetary surface. In summary, a critical goal for a European Large Telescope is to directly detect light from planets similar to those in our own Solar System, including Earth-analogues. If the required technical challenges can be met, the prospects for research of international scientific importance, spreading across multiple disciplines – astronomy, planetary science, optics, astrobiology and biology – are enormous. Indeed, entirely new fields in extra-Solar Planetary Science and Astrobiology will flourish, giving humankind a new perspective on the Universe and its own position within it. 2. STELLAR POPULATIONS ACROSS THE UNIVERSE 2.1. Formation of stars across the Universe When did stars form? To answer this basic question we can make use of the fact that every star must eventually die. Indeed the more massive stars die in spectacular supernova explosions that can outshine a whole galaxy. With an ELT these explosions can be seen to such vast distances (corresponding to redshift about 10) that their light has taken most of the age of the Universe to reach us. The frequency of these explosions is directly related to the number of stars that have formed - the rate of "core-collapse" Supernovae (those of types II and Ib/c) gives a direct measurement of the death rate of stars more massive than 8 solar masses, and thermonuclear supernovae (Type Ia) are the result of the death of moderate mass stars (3-8 solar masses). Measuring the rate of supernova explosions across the Universe is a direct way to determine when stars form and in what quantities. Current methods to measure the star-formation history of the universe often rely on measurements of ultraviolet emission from stars or optical emission lines (such as H-alpha), which are produced by only the most massive stars, larger than about 40 solar masses. However the supernova method is sensitive to more normal-mass stars which make up the majority. 2.1.1. An example supernova observing campaign with an ELT In the following example we show how an ELT could be used to discover and follow distant supernovae. For this example we assume the design parameters of the 100m OWL telescope1. First we calculate the expected number of SNe in a typical OWL field (2arcmin x 2arcmin). Based on previous work,2,3 the a priori expectation of SN explosions is 8 (+/-4) per yr up to z~10. Since the typical light-curve width around maximum in the rest-frame is about 15-20 days and most SNe will occur at z<6, the typical light-curve width in the observer frame will be about 100-140 days. Therefore, taking 4 exposures at intervals of about 3 months, one would expect to detect about 6-8 SNe in a typical OWL field. In addition, from the computed rate4 of 3.9x10-6 pair-instability supernovae per second per square degree (at z=20), we estimate to detect, over a 50 fields survey, up to 7 SNe originating from the very first generation of stars (Pop III star population). Next we calculate the time needed to complete the search and follow-up campaign. A 50-field survey is suitable to obtain a statistically significant number of SNe for each z-bin. The survey would consist of imaging 50 fields (200 sq arcmin) in the J(1h each), H(1h each) and K(1h each) bands at 4 different epochs for the `Supernova search', complemented by 3 epochs in the K band for the photometric follow-up of about 350 SNe up to z ~ 10. An additional 4h would be needed to obtain the spectroscopic classification up to z~ 4.5/5. The Grand Total time is therefore 4 x 3h x 50(=600h) + 3hx50(=150h) + 4hx50(=200h)= 950h+10% for overheads ~1050h or 130 nights (equivalent to 4 months) to study 400 SNe (200 of which would be followed spectroscopically). This is comparable to the size of current HST Treasury Programs (~ 450 orbits). Fig 3. Simulated Hubble diagram, normalised to a cosmological model for an empty Universe, for supernovae out to redshift 10. The points at z<2 are taken from recent Type Ia Supernova studies5,6. The points at z>1 represent simulated observations with a 100m ground-based ELT. Black circles represent core-collapse supernovae, visible to z~10, while pink squares show how Type Ia supernovae populate the diagram out to z~4.5. The dispersion of the simulated observations is representative of the photometric errors and it does not include the intrinsic scatter in the luminosity at maximum of the respective SN populations. In addition to providing a measurement of the Star-formation history of the universe as described in the text, distant Type Ia supernovae (and also TypeII SNe if calibrated by the expanding photoshere method) can be used as standard candles to measure cosmological parameters including the equation of state of the dark energy component, which is causing the current acceleration of the Universe. The most distant supernovae can also be used as bright background sources to study the ionisation history of the universe (see section 4). Figure credit: Massimo Della Valle and Roberto Gilmozzi. In summary, a supernova sample measured with a 100m class ELT provides a measurement of the star formation rate up to z~10 which is • independent from other possible determinations, • More direct, because the initial mass function extrapolation is much smaller, and, possibly, • More reliable, because it is based on counting SN explosions, i.e. explosion of STARS, rather than relying on identifying and measuring correctly the source of ionization (if using the H-alpha flux) or the source of UV continuum. 2.2. Resolved stellar populations in a representative sample of the Universe How did the beautiful galaxies that we observe around us come to be formed? This remains one of the outstanding questions in modern astronomy. It is now believed likely that mergers between galaxies play an important part in the build-up of the galaxies we see today. If so, we would expect to see evidence of these past mergers. Recent studies of individual stars in our own Milky Way galaxy have revealed populations of stars with distinct ages and composition. These distinct populations are thought to be remnants of previous mergers, and give clues as to when the main mergers in the Milky-Way's history happened. Up until now these studies have been limited to our own Galaxy and its nearest neighbours. However it is unknown whether these are special cases and whether the merger history is similar for all galaxy types. In particular, our own galaxy is a spiral galaxy, and no examples of large elliptical galaxies are within reach of current telescopes for this type of study. To study a representative section of the Universe requires reaching at least the nearest large galaxy clusters which contain large elliptical galaxies. This means observing galaxies in the Virgo or Fornax clusters at distances of 16 or 20 Mega-parsecs respectively. The challenge here is twofold. Firstly individual stars at these distances appear very faint (about V=35 magnitudes). Secondly the stars must be individually resolved from each other in order to determine their ages and chemical composition. As in the case of detecting faint planets, both these challenges are addressed in parallel with an extremely large telescope - the sheer collecting area allows the colours (hence ages and chemical composition) of very faint stars to be measured (by imaging), and the diameter of the telescope allows the image of each star to be sufficiently sharp that they can be separated even in crowded regions, provided the telescope is equipped with an adaptive optics system that allows it to observe close to the diffraction limit. Simulations by P. Linde and by Frayn7 demonstrate the accuracy with which 50m and 100m ground-based telescopes respectively are able to recover the colour magnitude diagram of individual stars observed in distant galaxies (see Figure 4). One of the most important age-metallicity indicators is the position of the main-sequence turnoff in in the colour-magnitude diagram. Figure 4 (right panel) shows the distance to which the main sequence turn-off could be observed at as a function of the age of the stellar population (older populations have fainter mainsequence turnoff). The thick lines show the expected range of a 30m (lower line) and 100m telescope (upper line). Since the distance modulus of the Virgo cluster is approximately m-M=+31.0 mag, this diagram shows that a 30m telescope could detect the main-sequence turnoff at Virgo distances for only the youngest stars. To observe this in populations of any age requires a larger, 100m telescope. Figure 2 Left : simulation by P. Linde of the colour-magnitude diagram of a stellar population at a distance of 5Mpc, as observed through narrow-band filters with a 50m ground-based telescope. Right: Maximum distance to which the main sequence turn-off can just be resolved as a function of population age and limiting magnitude7. The thicker lines represent the limiting magnitude that can be reached with a 30m (lower line) and 100m (upper line). Thus to detect the main sequence turn off for all stellar ages at the distance of Virgo (distance modulus of approximately m-M=+31.0) requires a 100m class telescope. 3. BUILDING GALAXIES SINCE THE DARKEST AGES: THE GROWTH AND EVOLUTION OF HIGH REDSHIFT GALAXIES How have galaxies grown from the first cosmological seeds? Our current understanding of this process relies on measuring the star-formation history of the Universe. However, because this is an integral quantity, it does not tell us much about how galaxy growth and evolution relates to their final or current mass. Predicting star-formation rates does not involve any details of how star-formation proceeded within any individual galaxy or class of galaxies, and indeed several radically different kinds of models for the growth of galaxies can provide good fits to these data. Today, we do not know much of the detailed physics of galaxies in the distant Universe or how starformation proceeded within any individual galaxy. More fundamentally, simply studying the baryonic component of galaxies is inadequate since the mass of any structure in the Universe is dominated by dark matter, and because of the complexity of the physical processes that control the growth of galaxies (shocks, feedback from massive stars and AGN, merging, interplay between dark and baryonic matter etc.). One of the major goals for the future of astrophysics is to map the distribution and growth of both the baryonic and dark matter components of galaxies at moderate to high redshift (z=1.5-5). This can be accomplished with a 100m-class telescope by mapping out the spatially resolved kinematics, star-formation, and chemical abundances of galaxies as well as measuring the kinematics of their satellite objects (both their internal kinematics and their velocity relative to the most massive component). In addition, kinematic decomposition of galaxies into disk/bulge components would allow us to reliably trace the build up of both components - and test the influences of environment on galaxy star formation and morphology. This is a unique avenue to understand the growth and evolution of both the baryonic and dark matter components of high redshift galaxies. 3.1. Our Current Understanding of Dark Matter and the Growth of Galaxies. A local census of the distribution of the baryonic mass reveals – albeit with large uncertainties -- that of the baryons presently locked in stars, a majority reside in spheroids (as opposed to disks8). When and how did all these baryons come to reside in spheroids and disks? There are two competing explanations. The classical pictures are the ``monolithic collapse''9 versus the (hierarchical) merging model10. The hierarchical picture of galaxy formation and evolution is, for many excellent reasons, widely favored11. It predicts that small galaxies formed first and that massive galaxies grew at later times by the accretion and merging with smaller (proto-)galaxies. Monolithic collapse, as the name suggests, is a simple process in that the gas collapses over a few crossing times and the starformation proceeds rapidly. When including realistic feedback mechanisms from the intense star-formation, such collapse is the stretched out to about 1 Gyr. The debate is not between which model is correct since merging obviously plays an important role in galaxy evolution. The real questions are “how did star formation proceed in galaxies?”, “are there galaxies that formed anti-hierarchically?”, and “is our understanding of the hierarchical frame work complete?”. Unlike the complexity and the large number of (non-linear) physical processes that are involved in the growth of the baryonic component of galaxies, the growth of the dark matter component should be through simple gravitational, non-dissipative accretion and merging of individual ``clumps'' of dark matter. While it is true that the processes involved for the dark matter can also take on a highly non-linear character and can interact with the baryonic matter, these are driven by the large scale distribution of dark matter which is not uniform but is simply set by the initial conditions of the early universe. However, all these effects are soluble using complex codes and large computers with the only limitation that there is a size and mass scale beyond which the current generation of super computers can not yet model. One of the best ways of addressing which hypothesis of galaxy formation and evolution is correct is to not only study the baryonic but also study the growth of the dark matter component of galaxies as a function of epoch. 3.2. The Challenge This is indeed a challenging and ambitious goal and one that will demand us to be at the edge of what is technologically feasible even with a large aperture 30-100m. Why is this? To map the dark matter halos of galaxies from redshifts from when the universe was half to only twenty percent of its current age (z approximately 1 - 3) requires us to obtain spectra of very faint and physically small galaxies. This is necessary because we wish to probe the dynamics of galaxies in the halos and also obtain redshifts of possible background sources that have been lensed by the gravitational potential of individual galaxies. Through such measurements, it is possible to estimate statistically the halo masses of the galaxies. Coupled with spatially resolved measurements of the dynamics of the parent (most massive) galaxy in the halo, it is possible then to construct a mass versus radius relation for galaxies as a function of their estimated baryonic mass and angular momentum. Of course, since any one halo is likely to be populated by several tens of galaxies, many of which may be too faint to obtain the required measurements, one would have to attach many galaxies with similar total baryonic mass contents. Making such measurements would then yield the total dark matter mass and the fraction contributed by the baryons ("the bias factor"). In addition, the measurement of the dynamics of the objects in the halo would allow us to estimate the likely merging time scale and thus the likely rate of growth of mass and angular momentum of the parent galaxy. The galaxies in individual halos will be moving relative to the parent galaxy at velocities of several tens of km/s. Low mass star-forming local galaxies that populate the halos at low redshift typically have emission line luminosities (in H-alpha, [OIII]5007, [OII]3727, which are the strongest optical emission lines in low mass, low metallicity galaxies that are likely to be the most appropriate targets in the halos) of 10 39-40 ergs/s/cm2. The typical flux of halo galaxies at z=3 would then be about 10-19 to 10-20 ergs/s/cm2. Thus, even on an 100m, the integration time is likely to be nights for each field. As described below in the section on design requirements, this project would considerably benefit from a spectrograph equipped with several integral field units (IFUs). 4. THE FIRST OBJECTS AND THE RE-IONISATION STRUCTURE OF THE UNIVERSE A key goal of astrophysics is to understand how and when the first objects in the universe formed, the nature of these objects and how they contributed to ionizing and enriching the gas that pervades the Universe. The combination of results from WMAP with observations of the highest redshift quasars known today have raised the most tantalizing question of the reionization history of the universe during the period from the very early Universe (possibly as early as redshift 17) to somewhat later times at redshift about 6. Possibilities include two reionization epochs, due to the first generation of massive stars and then later the first quasars and galaxies, or a slower, highly inhomogeneous reionization period. This can be probed by the discovery of the first objects and the effects of their mechanical feedback on either their close environment or the intergalactic medium (IGM). This metal pollution has several consequences for structure formation in the IGM as well as for the second generation of massive stars. A major challenge is the faintness of these first objects which is a very strong driver for the next generation of ELTs with very high sensitivity in the near infra-red. The first ``fairly bright'' objects are not only markers of the beginning of the reionization epoch, but are also crucial for probing the inhomogeneous structure and metal enrichment of the IGM from metal absorption lines in their spectra due to intervening ionized structures of the IGM. The short-lived gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are an obvious population that can be detected up to z~15-20. Explosions of population III stars (events fainter than GRBs) can be used to probe the IGM at z ~<12, although this population is rapidly disappearing with time for regions with metal enrichment higher than 1/10000 of the solar value. Although the epoch of quasar formation is a fully open question, the SLOAN quasars at redshifts around 6 are powered by supermassive black holes, thus intermediate mass black holes (corresponding to quasars of intermediate luminosity) must exist at earlier epochs (up to at least redshifts of about 10). These rare objects will be detected by dedicated missions/telescopes in the case of GRBs and the supernovae resulting from the explosions of population III stars. The highest redshift quasars will be discovered during the next decade by the JWST space mission. As shown below, probing the physics of the IGM at redshifts from 10 to 20 requires intermediate/high resolution spectroscopy in the near IR, which can only be carried out with telescopes of the 60-100m class due to the predicted low fluxes of these first "background" objects. 4.1. Very high redshift galaxies The first galaxies compete with the first quasars for the reionization of the IGM. Although less luminous than quasars, they are far more numerous and can be directly investigated with ELTs. Candidate star-forming galaxies out to redshift about 6 have already been discovered and a few have been confirmed spectroscopically. These galaxies are high-redshift analogues of Lyman Break Galaxies at redshift of 3 and are resolved on 0.1-0.2 arcsec scales. The objects detected thusfar typically have AB magnitudes of i=25.5 and z'=25.5 at a surface density of 500 and 160 per square degree, per unit redshift at z=5.5 and z=6.0 respectively. Identical objects at z=9 and 16 would have magnitudes of JAB=27 and KAB=28 respectively. Such very high-redshift objects would be detectable with JWST by broad-band photometric Lyman-Break techniques. However, only a 100m-class ELT can provide key diagnostics of both the inter-stellar medium and stellar populations in these galaxies by intermediate resolution spectroscopy in the near IR (to z~ 15-17). Such objects are expected to exist out to z>10 for two main reasons. Firstly, analysis of the Cosmic Microwave Background results from Wilkinson-MAP indicates that the reionization of hydrogen in the universe was underway at z>10, this reionization being caused by ultra-violet emission from the first objects. Secondly, the amount of time between z=10 and z=6.5 is so short in cosmological terms, there is simply too little time to go from a universe containing no galaxies to the universe we see at z=6.5. Galaxies analogous to those already discovered at 5<z<6.5 will certainly be detectable by ELTs, out to z>10 for apertures of 100m assuming no dramatic evolution in their number density. These objects are often spatially resolved on spatial scales of 0.1-0.2 arcsec. For observing these objects to z=8-9, a 100m telescope will be slightly more effective than the planned JWST, assuming it is launched. However, large-aperture ground based telescopes are particularly effective when studying spatially-unresolved objects, as discussed below. 4.2. Very high redshift GRBs, Supernovae and QSOs The extremely fine diffraction limit of large apertures concentrates the light from unresolved objects such that there is little or no effective background contamination from sky emission. Shortward of 3 microns, an ELT will be far superior to any planned orbiting observatory at studying these objects, being able to do so in a more flexible way given the instrumentation possibilities of a ground-based ELT. The brightest high-redshift populations that can be best investigated with an ELT are Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), population III SNe and their massive star progenitors, and QSOs. They allow the identification of the early sites of star and black hole formation and are also ideal candidates to probe the high redshift interstellar (ISM) and intergalactic (IGM) medium. All such studies are key to understanding how the Universe was reionized and how the first stars galaxies and AGN formed and evolved. For ground-based surveys, the strong HI absorption by the IGM implies observations in the near IR: J to K bands for z~9, H and K bands for z~12 and K band for z~16. Spectroscopic observations in the near IR of the first objects can be performed with ELTs at different resolution and signal to noise for the 3 populations of object. In Table 1 we compare theoretical signal-to-noise estimates for various types of object observed with a 100m and 30m ground-based telescope, derived using the ESO on-line ELT exposure time calculator. Cosmological parameters of ΩM=0.3, ΩΛ=0.7 and H0=70 km s-1 Mpc-1 have been assumed. 4.2.1. Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) The more luminous GRB afterglows at z=10 should have fluxes at l~2µm of 30µJy and 1.5 µJy at 1 and 10 days after the burst respectively, while mean expected fluxes are 1.5 and 0.04 µJy at 1 and 10 days after the burst12. For GRBs at z=10, spectroscopic observations of similar quality can be obtained with 30 and 100m telescopes although at different times after the burst. As shown in Table 1, for a spectral resolution R=104 a 30m telescope could not observe the bulk of the GRB population at 10 days after the burst (but could observe very bright GRBs and/or GRBs within ~1 day of the burst). 4.2.2. Population III SNe Massive stars (140-260 MSUN) should explode as very bright supernovae and could then be detectable from the ground out to z~16 for about one month after the explosion, and at even higher redshift thus longer observed duration from space. Theoretical models4 give peak AB magnitudes of 25.5 at z=20 for λobs in the range 1.5-5µm. From this we derive fluxes of 650, 440 and 300 nJy at λobs =1.2µm (z~9), 1.6µm (z~12) and 2.1µm (z~16), respectively. For a broad range of rest-frame UV frequencies, the monochromatic luminosities of population III SNe remain about constant for a substantial fraction of the time. Thus different signal-to-noise will be obtained with 30 and 100m telescopes for a similar spectral resolution. High spectral resolution data (R~104) are needed to derive the physical properties of the ISM and IGM at z>10. As shown in Table 1, such studies can only be conducted with ELTs of very large size (70-100m). 4.2.3. QSOs : The bright 6.0<z<6.5 QSOs discovered in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS13) have magnitudes z’AB~20 or νrest x Lνrest ~ 5x1046 erg s-1 at λrest= 1300Å. Assuming that they radiate at the Eddington limit, their black-hole mass is equal to M/MSUN=Led/(1.3x1038erg s-1) ~ 4x108. There are very few such objects: currently 6 in 2870 deg2. Fainter QSOs, up to z~5, have been searched for in the COMBO-17 survey14 and the luminosity function of z~5 QSOs has roughly the same luminosity dependence (L-1.5) as that found at z~3. For a population one hundred times fainter than the z~6 SDSS QSOs, the expected fluxes are 200, 140 and 95 nJy at z~9 (1.2µm), z~12 (1.6µm) and z~16 (2.1µm) respectively. It should noted that QSOs with rest-frame monochromatic luminosities equal to those of z’AB~24 QSOs at z~6 would have apparent fluxes similar to those of population III SNe at the same redshift. Black-hole masses, thus luminosities, of high-redshift QSOs are limited by the time available for mass accretion onto black-hole seeds. Even if the latter are massive (~103MSUN) population III stars, black-hole masses at z~10-15 may not exceed 105-106 MSUN15. Consequently, The UV luminosities of high redshift QSOs may be at most of ~1x1044erg s-1 which gives expected fluxes of 42 and 29 nJy at z~9 (1.2µm), and z~12 (1.6µm) respectively. QSOs at high redshift may be ten times less luminous than population III SNe. If so, they would be too faint to be observed with 30m telescopes at a spectral resolution of R=2x103 and JWST will be more efficient at lower spectral resolution (R~300). A spectral resolution of R=2x103 remains of interest to explore e.g. the metal-enrichment of the IGM at early times from the study of the CIV forest. This could be done with 100m telescopes. The minimum flux limits for a S/N=20 in 50 hr for spectroscopy at R=2x103 with 100m telescopes are shown in the lower three rows of Table 1. For Eddington rest-frame luminosities, these corresponds to black-hole masses of (1.5, 5 and 13) x105MSUN at z~9, 12 and 16, respectively. To get such high masses at z~16 would imply either seed black-holes at z~25-30 with masses larger than 103MSUN or efficient merging of black-holes in dense stellar clusters at early times. Object Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) at z=10, observed with R=104 • Very bright GRB 10 days after burst (similar to bulk of GRB population at 1 day after burst) • bulk of GRB population at +10 days • very bright GRB 1 day after burst Population III Supernova • at z~9 o observed with R=104 o observed with R=2x103 • at z~12 o observed with R=104 o observed with R=2x103 • at z~16 o observed with R=104 o observed with R=2x103 High redshift Quasar • at z~9 observed with R=2x103 • at z~12 observed with R=2x103 • at z~16 observed with R=2x103 ∆t (hr) 100m ∆t(hr) fνobs λobs (µJy) (µm) 1.5 2 K=23.6 40 1.8 15 15 0.04 30 2 2 K=27.4 K=20.3 15 90 X 40 X 2.7 0.65 1.24 J=24.4 40 1.7 40 75 0.44 1.60 H=24.8 40 4 40 X 8 X 0.30 2.1 K=25.2 40 14 40 X 50 X 20 70 X X X X X X 0.008 0.019 0.033 1.24 1.60 2.1 mAB J=29.1 H=28.2 K=27.6 S/N 20 20 20 50 50 50 S/N 30m Table 1: Estimated signal to noise ratios and exposure times needed to observe various types of very high redshift object (GRBs, Population III supernovae and quasars) with a 100m and a 30m ground-based telescope. Entries marked by “X” are infeasible observations with a 30m telescope. Credit: based on observability calculations by Jacqueline Bergeron and Malcolm Bremer. 5. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS The most demanding requirements on the telescope design are set by the goal of detecting and characterising extra-solar planets. These are challenging observations even for a 100m-class telescope because of the extreme contrast between the bright central star and the faint planets near to it. As described in section 1, if the Sun-Earth system were observed at a distance of 30 parsecs, the "Earth" would appear at a projected separation of only 33 milli-arcseconds from its parent star, but the star would be 10 orders of magnitude brighter. To make these observations feasible requires very tight control of scattered light within the telescope and instrument system. Careful study of the telescope design (for example alignment of mirror segments) and performance of adaptive optics systems and wavefront control in general are needed. However, initial studies of the expected point spread function show that exo-planet detectability limits are very promising. Apart from the sheer collecting area of an ELT (which is needed to study such faint planets), the main advantage of larger telescope size is that the diffraction limit is smaller, giving cleaner separation between the star and its faint companion planets. This is one of the main drivers towards the largest telescope size possible. The study of resolved stellar populations in galaxies far beyond our Local Group also derives the telescope requirements to very large apertures and exquisite image quality. To study a representative section of the Universe requires observing individual stars in the nearest large galaxy clusters that contain large elliptical galaxies - i.e. the Virgo or Fornax galaxy clusters at distances of 16 or 20 Mega-parsecs respectively. The challenge here is twofold. Firstly individual stars at these distances appear very faint (about V=35 magnitudes). Secondly the stars must be individually resolved from each other in order to determine their ages and chemical composition. As in the case of detecting faint planets, both these challenges are addressed in parallel with an extremely large telescope - the diameter of the telescope allows the image of each star to be sufficiently sharp that they can be separated even in crowded regions. Producing smaller images also reduces the contamination from the sky background, and, in combination with the larger collecting area, allows observations of very faint point sources. However, to observe sufficiently faint stars to detect the main-sequence turnoff for stars of all ages in the Virgo cluster still requires a telescope of order 100m in size. A particular challenge here will be to provide AO-corrected images at optical wavelengths, which are needed for diagniostics of age and metallicity. However the field of view required is quite modest: taking the canonical value of one star per twenty resolution elements (to avoid too much confusion) and an image size of 2 milliarcsec, then even a 10 x 10 arcsec field of view will provide more than a million stars to work with. By contrast, the study of distant supernovae at cosmological distances requires a larger field of view because of the relative scarcity of these sources. As described in Section 2.1, a 100m with a 2arcmin x 2 arcmin field of view could find 6-8 supernovae per field per year out to redshift about 10 - therefore 50 fields are required for a sample of about 400 supernovae, and this would take about 130 nights. A smaller field area would force the survey to take proportionally longer - but any field size smaller than about 1 arcmin x 1 arcmin would lose the multiplex advantage. Again, some level of AO correction over this field is needed in order to make the observations sufficiently sensitive to point sources (a 50% strehl was assumed in the example above). An even larger field of view is needed to study extended dark matter haloes and the motion of galaxies within them. To encompass projected clustering scales (4 to 9 Mpc) at high redshift requires a field of view of about 10 x 10 arcmin. In this case the focal plane would not need to be fully instrumented or AO corrected, but deployable integral field units (IFUs) could pick off the crucial parts of the image such as the principal galaxies in the halo and its satellites. Large IFUs (up to few sq. arcsec.) would observe the spatially resolved dynamics of the large galaxies, while small IFUs (few tenths of sq. arcsec.) would be devoted to the spectroscopy of their (generally unresolved) satellites. AO correction could be concentrated at the key regions of the image. Development of such innovative instrumentation is essential to the success of an extremely large telescope because the physical dimensions involved and the sampling that is needed. To obtain exquisitely detailed velocity fields of large galaxies down to few hundreds of parsecs would require spatial sampling of 0.05 arcsec FWHM, and spectral resolution of R=10000+/-5000. Since the typical flux of the halo galaxies are expected to be about 10-19 to 10-20 ergs/s/cm2, the integration time is likely to be nights for each field, even on a 100m telescope. Finally, study of the ionisation structure of the universe at very high redshift (observed in absorption against the most distant observable sources) also requires spectral resolution of about R=10,000. Bright background sources will be rare, but with an ELT the more numerous fainter sources can be used. As mentioned above, large telescopes working close to the diffraction limit are particularly effective for observing faint unresolved sources. Thus very high redshift (z~10 to 16) Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs), Population III supernovae and Quasars are all ideal targets. Distant GRBs are potentially the brightest background targets, provided the telescope can be scheduled to allow for rapid response preferably observing within hours of the burst. For population III supernovae and the faint QSO population, only telescopes of very large size (70-100m) can obtain spectra of sufficient resolution for studies of the physical properties of the IGM and the "forest" of metal lines at redshifts above 10. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The European ELT science working group is supported by the Optical Infrared Coordination Network (OPTICON). REFERENCES 1. Dierickx, P. & Gilmozzi, R., 2000, proc. SPIE, 4004 2. Madau, P. Della Valle, M. and Panagia, N. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 17L 3. Miralda-Escude, J. & Rees, M., 1997, ApJ, 478, 57L 4. Heger, A., Woosley, S.E., Baraffe, I., Abel, T., 2001 (astroph/0112059) 5. Knop, R., et al., 2003, ApJ, 598, 102 6. Tonry, J.L. et al., 2003, ApJ, 594, 1 7. Frayn, C. 2003, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge 8. Fukugita, M., Hogan, C. J., & Peebles, P.J.E., 1998, ApJ, 503, 518 9. Eggen, O.J., Lynden-Bell, D., Sandage, A. R., 1962, ApJ, 136, 748. 10. Searle, L. & Zinn, R. 1978, ApJ, 225, 357 11. Ellis, R., 1998, Nat., 395, 3. 12. Lamb, D.Q. & Reichart, D. E. 2000, ApJL, 536, 1. 12. Fan, X. et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1649. 13. Wolf, C. Wisotski, L., Borch, A., Dye, S., Kleinheinrich, M., Meisenheimer, K., 2 003, A&A, 499, 514 14. Ricotti, M. & Ostriker, J.P., 2003, astro-ph/0311003.