Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Evidence for magma entrapment below oceanic crust from deep seismic reflections in the Western Somali Basin Daniel Sauter1, Patrick Unternehr2, Gianreto Manatschal1, Julie Tugend1, Mathilde Cannat3, Patrick Le Quellec2, Nick Kusznir4, Marc Munschy1, Sylvie Leroy5, Jeanne Mercier de Lepinay1, James W. Granath6, and Brian W. Horn7 Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7516, Université de Strasbourg, 1 rue Blessig, 67084 Strasbourg cedex, France 2 TOTAL–Exploration and Production, 2 place Jean Millier, La Défense 6, F-92078 Paris la Défense cedex, France 3 Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS UMR 7154, Université Paris Diderot, 1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris cedex 05, France 4 Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK 5 UPMC Institut des Sciences de la Terre de Paris, CNRS UMR 7193, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France 6 Granath & Associates Consulting Geology, 2306 Glenhaven Drive, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80126, USA 7 ION Geophysical, 2105 City West Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77042, USA 1 INTRODUCTION Mantle upflow, decompression, and melting beneath mid-ocean ridges result in the formation of new oceanic crust. The extraction of magma and formation of new oceanic lithosphere occurs over a zone a few tens of kilometers wide at the ridge axis. However, the processes controlling magma focusing and extraction, which lead to the generation of the magmatic crust, are still poorly constrained and debated (e.g., Kelemen et al., 2000). The main reason for this uncertainty is that the mantle structure beneath mid-ocean ridges is inaccessible to direct observations and our knowledge of melt generation, and its delivery to the crust or retention in the mantle, is mostly derived from field investigations of ophiolites and thus constrained by indirect observations. Here we present a >200-km-long seismic reflection section (ION BasinSPAN line; www .iongeo.com/Data_Library/) located within the Western Somali Basin offshore eastern Africa (Fig. 1). This section images the sub-oceanic lithosphere with high resolution beneath an inferred extinct seafloor spreading center. The aim of this paper is to describe the geometry of strong reflections that can be imaged to depths of >30 km below the top basement (>16 s two-way traveltime, TWTT) and to discuss their nature as well as the insights that they provide on the magmatic plumbing system associated with the generation of oceanic crust. Ophiolites expose large sections that enable the study of mantle-crust relationships. However, even the best-exposed mantle section in Oman does not extend deeper than ~10 km below the Moho (Boudier and Coleman, 1981). There, the crust-mantle transition zone (Moho transition zone, MTZ) is characterized by dunitic-troctolitic layers as much as 1200 m thick which have been interpreted as frozen melt channels along the paleo–lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (Rabinowicz and Ceuleneer, 2005). The analysis of troctolites in Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Hole U1309D at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge suggests that they were formed by continuous input of melt into a mushy reacting matrix, similar to melt impregnation of mantle 38°E 40°E 42°E 44°E 46°E 48°E Western Somali Basin Kenya 4°S 8°S Tanzania 6°S 10°S bas Kerim n 12°S grabe M0y M5o M10y Davie Ridge ABSTRACT Our understanding of melt generation, migration, and extraction in the Earth’s mantle beneath mid-oceanic ridges is mostly derived from geodynamic numerical models constrained by geological and geophysical observations at sea and field investigations of ophiolites, and is therefore restricted to the oceanic crust and the shallow part of the mantle. Here we use a >200-km-long, deep seismic reflection section to image with high resolution the sub-oceanic lithosphere within the Western Somali Basin (offshore eastern Africa) where spreading ceased at ca. 120 Ma. The location of the failed spreading axis is inferred from both seismic data and gravity data. Several groups of strong reflections are imaged to depths of >30 km below the top of the oceanic crust. We interpret the deepest reflectors, within the mantle, as resulting from frozen melt bodies which may be relicts of a paleo–melt channel system located at the base of the lithosphere and formerly feeding the failed ridge axis. Other reflectors within the mantle may correspond to melt bodies injected into major shear zones along the Davie fracture zone. Another group of reflectors, located below a 8–5-km-thick oceanic crust, is interpreted as marking a fossil melt-rich crust-mantle transition zone as much as 3 km thick. This interpretation implies an inefficient extraction of melt out of the mantle, which is favored by the combination of a slow spreading rate and a high magma budget. Comoros 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 km Figure 1. Crustal thickness map of the Western Somali Basin based on gravity inversion. Blue colors indicate typical oceanic crustal thicknesses. Crustal thickness of western Somali Basin increases in ocean-continent transition zones and toward oceanic islands. Dashed black lines show gravity lineations indicating spreading directions. White lines indicate inferred location of extinct spreading axis. Seismic section (ION BasinSPAN line; www.iongeo.com/Data_Library/) is shown by red line. Colored squares indicate marine magnetic anomalies M0y–M10y (see the Data Repository [see footnote 1]). peridotites observed at the MTZ in ophiolites (Drouin et al., 2009). Seismic imaging has previously been used to give insights into the deep structure of present-day spreading systems. At the Juan de Fuca Ridge (offshore western North America), seismic reflection data show molten sills within the lower crust (Canales et al., 2009) and frozen melt lenses in a 2-km-thick MTZ (Nedimović et al., 2005). Although very rare, in domains of GEOLOGY, June 2016; v. 44; no. 6; p. 1–4 | Data Repository item 2016133 | doi:10.1130/G37747.1 | Published online XX Month 2016 © 2016 Geological Society America. permission to copy, contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY 44 | ofNumber 6 For | Volume | www.gsapubs.org 1 GEOLOGICAL SETTING Seafloor spreading began in the Western Somali Basin in Jurassic time, separating Madagascar and India from Africa (Seton et al., 2012) (Fig. 1). Spreading was slow (<~20 km/m.y. halfspreading rate) and ceased shortly after the time of the M0 marine magnetic anomaly (Aptian) (Seton et al., 2012). However, the location of the isochrons and of the extinct spreading axis is debated (see the GSA Data Repository1). Gravity lineations suggest a north-south direction of spreading before the extinction and a NNE–SSW direction during an earlier stage of spreading (see also Fig. DR1 in the Data Repository). The seismic section strikes NNW-SSE across a small basin bounded to the west by the Tanzanian continental margin and to the southeast by the Davie Ridge (Fig. 1). It crosses the northern end of the Davie Ridge and of the Kerimbas graben, a possible seaward extension of the East African Rift System (Mougenot et al., 1986) (Fig. 1). The Davie Ridge is inferred to be the topographic expression left by the north-south motion of Madagascar relative to Africa and is known to have been reactivated several times from the Late Cretaceous up to the present time (Mascle et al., 1987). NEW SEISMIC DATA The time-migrated seismic section presented in this paper (Fig. 2; Fig. DR3) shows thin crust, interpreted as oceanic, beneath a thick sedimentary cover. Beneath the oceanic crust, within the mantle, are several groups of laterally coherent strong seismic reflections, which can be traced without difficulty to at least 16 s TWTT (~30 km beneath the oceanic top basement). In detail, three sets of reflectors (R3N, R3M, and R3S) can be identified between ~9 s and ~12.5 s depth. R3N and R3M are dipping 1 GSA Data Repository item 2016133, supplementary methods for the acquisition parameters of the seismic section, thermal modelling, and gravity inversion, is available online at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2016 .htm, or on request from editing@geosociety.org or Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301, USA. Two-way traveltime (s) A2 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 km N S 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 B2 Two-way traveltime (s) active convergence, dipping reflections are seen to penetrate into the uppermost mantle (Carton et al., 2014). These deep reflections are commonly interpreted to be linked to serpentinization of mantle rocks along deep fault planes (Carton et al., 2014). Kilometer-scale structures linked to migration and/or crystallization of melts have not been imaged so far within the uppermost oceanic mantle. However, numerical models predict that melt percolates along a thermal boundary layer at the base of the lithosphere toward the ridge axis (Hebert and Montési, 2010) while the off-axis portion of the distributed melt network may remain largely trapped within the mantle (Lizarralde et al., 2004). 4 courtesy of ION distance along the profile (km) seafloor sediments 6 top basement 8 10 U1 U2 GI Moho R1 R2 12 14 Davie Ridge Extinct Ridge axis ? R3N R3S R3M R4 16 Figure 2. Seismic reflection time section in the Western Somali Basin (A) and corresponding interpretation (B) (see Fig. 1 for location). U1–U2 and R1–R4 are units and groups of reflectors, respectively, discussed in text. Dashed gray line marked “GI Moho” is gravity-inversed Moho (see the Data Repository [see footnote 1]). Small red arrows indicate local onlap of sediments on volcanic edifices. ION—www.iongeo.com. northward while R3S is dipping southward. Both R3N and R3S correspond to a series of bright reflectors below 11 s depth while R3M is less well defined. Between 120 km and 230 km distance along the profile, R4 is defined by a group of strong reflectors, as much as 0.75 s thick. It shallows from 16 s to 13 s to the south where it almost joins R3N at 230 km distance. R4 and R3N are separated by only a 0.5 s vertical offset. The seismic section shows contrasting types of basement relief. From 110 to 195 km distance along the line, faults are almost absent and the top basement is smooth and highly reflective. Southward, the top basement is less reflective with increasing faulting to 250 km distance where two large southward-dipping normal faults are associated with >1.5-s-thick rotated blocks that bear numerous strong reflectors. Further to the south, the top basement quickly shallows across a series of large north-dipping faults bounding tilted blocks characterized by strong reflectors. These conjugate south- and north-dipping faults define a graben-type structure between 270 and 300 km distance. Below the top basement, the shallowest reflectors (R1) are bright, smooth, and continuous between 110 km and 180 km distance. Although they can be observed southward, they are attenuated and interleaved by 5–10 km gaps of transparent crust. They define an upper unit (U1), which is nearly transparent and decreases in thickness from ~2.5 s TWTT at 120 km to ~1.5 s at 180 km distance. Between 180 and 250 km distance the thickness of U1 does not change significantly. South of 250 km distance, U1 is barely defined. Between 107 and 160 km distance, a lower unit (U2) is clearly defined by a set of discontinuous reflectors (R2) with contrasting relief and reflectivity. The strength of these reflectors weakens progressively southward toward 250 km distance. R2 is located at constant TWTT (11 s north of 140 km and 10.8 s south of 170 km) except between 140 and 170 km distance where it shallows roughly in the same way as R1, resulting in a mean thickness of ~1 s for U2. Contrasting with U1, U2 is not transparent and includes many small chaotic reflectors. As much as ~5 s of thick sediments cover the basement toward the north end of the line. Southward their thickness decreases by half. Local onlaps of sediments on volcanic edifices indicate passive infill. The basal reflectors also show a regional southward downlap onto the top basement away from the Davie Ridge. This regional downlap might reveal a southward progressively decreasing basement age. DISCUSSION The Top Basement The change in polarity of the normal faults at the top basement and the downlap geometry 2www.gsapubs.org | Volume 44 | Number 6 | GEOLOGY A N 150 0 10 depth (km) Crustal Reflections The position and nature of reflectors R1 and R2 are intriguing, as the Moho is usually assumed to correspond to a sharp boundary at the base of the crust. In order to test which of the two reflectors may correspond to the Moho, we determined crustal thicknesses by gravity anomaly inversion (Figs. 1 and 2; Figs. DR4– DR7). This method incorporates a thermal gravity anomaly correction, a parameterization of decompression melting to predict volcanic additions, and a correction for sedimentary thickness (Chappell and Kusznir, 2008). The gravityderived Moho, converted to the time domain, falls between R1 and R2 (see also Fig. DR8 for the depth-domain comparison of R1 and R2 and the gravity-derived Moho). We therefore suggest that unit U1 is made of igneous rocks and that some additional low-density magmatic material is heavily embedded in unit U2. U1 could then correspond to a magmatic crust and U2 to a MTZ made of numerous trapped melt bodies within the mantle, responsible for the reflective character of U2. Sequences as much as 1 s thick of laterally discontinuous reflectors have been described below slow-spreading crust and have been attributed to a complex MTZ with series of mafic and ultramafic lenses producing alternating bands of high and low reflectivity (Morris et al., 1993). Bright subhorizontal reflections have also been imaged below the oceanic Moho on the flanks of the Juan de Fuca Ridge and have been interpreted as originating from frozen gabbro lenses in the oceanic mantle (Nedimović et al., 2005). In slow-spreading environments, melt is thought to be emplaced at and above the lithosphereasthenosphere boundary within the mantle and later partly extracted to form a magmatic crust (Cannat, 1996; Lizarralde et al., 2004). The detailed structure and composition of dunites of the Oman ophiolites point to the development of a dunitic layer by melt segregation (Rabinowicz and Ceuleneer, 2005). The underlying harzburgites show large volumes of crystallization products of lateral extent reaching 1 km and more (Rabinowicz and Ceuleneer, 2005). We suggest that unit U2 could correspond to a mantle section partly replaced by magmatic products, which would explain the absence of bands of reflectors and the chaotic pattern of reflectivity within U2 (Fig. 3). This interpretation implies an inefficient extraction of melt out of the mantle, which is favored by the combination of a slow spreading rate and a high magma budget (Lizarralde et al., 2004). Such a melt-rich environment is supported by the observation that reflector R2 is marked by stronger reflectivity where unit U1 is the thickest and the top basement is devoid of faults. We attribute both the southward decrease in thickness of U1 and the weaker reflectivity of R2 to a smaller magma budget. Assuming a crustal velocity of 6.5 km/s for both U1 and U2 results in a ~3 km thickness for the MTZ (U2) while the crustal 20 175 distance (km) 200 225 250 275 S Ridge axis U1 R1 U2 R2 30 40 rising mantle R4 magmatic crust depleted mantle melt bodies flow lines melt pathways along the lithosphereasthenosphere boundary B depth below top basement (km) of the sediments observed on the northern part argue for the location of an extinct spreading axis between 250 and 300 km distance. There, the seismic line crosses a lineated gravity low on the free-air anomaly map, which is commonly observed over extinct slow-spreading-rate ridges (Fig. DR1). We therefore tentatively interpret the different basement characters as resulting from changes in seafloor spreading processes. The smooth and highly reflective top basement devoid of faults between 110 and 195 km suggests a high magmatic budget. By contrast, to the south, the less reflective, more rough and fault-controlled top basement indicates a lower magmatic budget. There, the alternating strong and weak reflectors within the highly rotated blocks could correspond to volcano-sedimentary sequences (hyaloclastites interlayered with turbidites and hemipelagic sediments). Alternatively, this change in the top basement faulting pattern may indicate a later overprint along the Davie fracture zone. 0 150 200 225 250 275 C 700° °C 10 0 110 20 30 175 ector R4 refl 40 Figure 3. Schematic illustration of magma transport and entrapment and/or extraction up to seafloor in western Somali Basin (A) and isotherms calculated using a half-space cooling model of oceanic lithosphere compared to R4 group of reflectors (B). U1 and U2 are units defined by reflectors R1 and R2. Blue and green lines show isotherms calculated with spreading axis located at 270 km and 290 km distance, respectively, along seismic reflection profile. GEOLOGY | Volume 44 | Number 6 | www.gsapubs.org thickness (U1) varies from ~8 to ~5 km, leading to a dramatic variation of the total melt thickness from ~11 km to ~5 km although gravity inversion suggests less variation. Part of this change in the magma budget can be the result of the southward approach of the seismic section to the Davie Ridge, as thinner crust occurs at segment ends close to transform faults. Focusing of melt delivery at slow-spreading segment centers may also result in crustal thickness variations of as much as 5 km (e.g., Niu et al., 2015). The southward magma budget decrease can also be partly attributed to the extinction of spreading (Louden et al., 1996). Deep Reflections within the Mantle Either magmatic or tectonic processes could be responsible for the formation of deep mantle reflections. We first discuss the possibility that reflectors R3 and R4 are produced by an accumulation of frozen melt. Because they underlie oceanic crust, it is unlikely that they represent a pre-breakup inherited structure. Because they shallow toward the inferred frozen ridge axis, we suggest that they are genetically related to the spreading processes in the Western Somali Basin. The cooling of the oceanic lithosphere after the extinction of spreading, which is enhanced close to the transform margin, could be responsible for the preservation of the pathways along which melt migrated toward the paleo– ridge axis. Numerical models suggest that melt travels from >20 km depth in the mantle up to the crust along the base of the lithosphere, which acts as a melt-impermeable freezing boundary (e.g., Hebert and Montési, 2010). We therefore explore the geometry of the mantle reflectors and examine if they could be explained by a sloped isotherm becoming shallower toward the spreading axis. We use a simple half-space cooling model to calculate the 1100 °C isotherm at the time of cessation of spreading, i.e., the paleo– base of the lithosphere. This type of model of conductive heat transfer cannot account for the thermal structure of the axial region of spreading ridges where the oceanic crust is strongly cooled by hydrothermal circulation. We therefore restrict our analysis to the deepest mantle reflections and show that R4 lies close to the calculated paleo–~1100 °C isotherm (Fig. 3). Although this geometry is rather persuasive, the fit is approximate and hence the interpretation of R4 as melt channels along the base of the lithosphere may be based on circumstantial evidence. Tectonic processes could also produce mantle reflections. In this case either serpentinization of mantle rocks or injection of melt along deep fault planes could generate the seismic reflectivity within the uppermost mantle. However, it is unlikely that fluids would serpentinize mantle rocks at 30 km depth below top basement (Qin and Singh, 2015). We therefore suggest that a magmatic event, posterior to the extinction of 3 seafloor spreading, could have resulted in the injection of melt into major shear zones. Volcanic intrusions have been observed on seismic reflection profiles of the Davie Ridge south of 9°S (Mougenot et al., 1986). We therefore suggest that R3 reflections could have been produced by Cretaceous volcanic activity similar to that observed in western Madagascar and along the Mozambique Channel (Bassias and Leclaire, 1990). The reactivation of north-south fracture zones in the Somali and Mozambique Basins during Late Cretaceous times has been related to the onset of motion between India and Madagascar (Mascle et al., 1987). The reactivation of a major transform fault such as the Davie fracture zone may have tapped a connection to deep lithospheric fissures and thus channel magma from the top of the asthenosphere up to the crust within the fracture zone. We finally suggest that both magmatic and tectonic processes are not mutually exclusive: the deepest reflectors R4 may result from frozen melt bodies which may be relicts of a paleo–melt channel system located at the base of the lithosphere and feeding the failed ridge axis, while the R3 reflectors may correspond to melt bodies injected into major shear zones along the Davie fracture zone. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank ION Geophysical for permitting publication of the seismic line. Funding was partly provided by TOTAL and support by the Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers–CNRS, the Modeling of Margins MM3 Consortium, and the University of Strasbourg. Constructive reviews by Juan Pablo Canales, Dieter Franke, and Tim Minshull are gratefully acknowledged. REFERENCES CITED Bassias, Y., and Leclaire, L., 1990, The Davie Ridge in the Mozambique Channel: Crystalline basement and intraplate magmatism: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie: Monatshefte, v. 2, p. 67–90. Boudier, F., and Coleman, R.G., 1981, Cross section through the peridotite in the Samail ophiolite, southeastern Oman Mountains: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 86, p. 2573–2592, doi: 10.1029/JB086iB04p02573. Canales, J.P., Nedimovic, M.R., Kent, G.M., Carbotte, S.M., and Detrick, R.S., 2009, Seismic reflection images of a near-axis melt sill within the lower crust at the Juan de Fuca ridge: Nature, v. 460, p. 89–93, doi:10.1038/nature08095. Cannat, M., 1996, How thick is the magmatic crust at slow spreading oceanic ridges?: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 2847–2857, doi: 10.1029/95JB03116. Carton, H., Singh, S.C., Hananto, N.D., Martin, J., Djajadihardja, Y.S., Udrekh, Franke, D., and Gae dicke, C., 2014, Deep seismic reflection images of the Wharton Basin oceanic crust and uppermost mantle offshore Northern Sumatra: Relation with active and past deformation: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 119, p. 32–51, doi:10.1002 /2013JB010291. Chappell, A.R., and Kusznir, N.J., 2008, Three-dimensional gravity inversion for Moho depth at rifted continental margins incorporating a lithosphere thermal gravity anomaly correction: Geophysical Journal International, v. 174, p. 1–13, doi:10.1111 /j.1365-246X.2008.03803.x. Drouin, M., Godard, M., Ildefonse, B., Bruguier, O., and Garrido, C.J., 2009, Geochemical and petrographic evidence for magmatic impregnation in the oceanic lithosphere at Atlantis Massif, MidAtlantic Ridge (IODP Hole U1309D, 30°N): Chemical Geology, v. 264, p. 71–88, doi:10.1016 /j.chemgeo.2009.02.013. Hebert, L.B., and Montési, L.G.J., 2010, Generation of permeability barriers during melt extraction at mid-ocean ridges: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 11, Q12008, doi:10.1029 /2010GC003270. Kelemen, P.B., Braun, M., and Hirth, G., 2000, Spatial distribution of melt conduits in the mantle beneath oceanic spreading centers: Observations from the Ingalls and Oman ophiolites: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 1, 1005, doi:10 .1029/1999GC000012. Lizarralde, D., Gaherty, J.B., Collins, J.A., Hirth, G., and Kim, S.D., 2004, Spreading-rate dependence of melt extraction at mid-ocean ridges from mantle seismic refraction data: Nature, v. 432, p. 744–747, doi:10.1038/nature03140. Louden, K.E., Osler, J.C., Srivastava, S.P., and Keen, C., 1996, Formation of oceanic crust at slowspreading rates: New constraints from an extinct spreading center in the Labrador Sea: Geology, v. 24, p. 771–774, doi:1 0. 1130/ 0091- 7613( 1996) 024<0771:FOOCAS>2.3.CO;2. Mascle, J., Mougenot, D., Blarez, E., Marinho, M., and Virlogeux, P., 1987, African transform continental margins: Examples from Guinea, the Ivory Coast and Mozambique: Geological Journal, v. 22, p. 537–561, doi:10.1002/gj.3350220632. Morris, E., Detrick, R.S., Minshull, T.A., Mutter, J.C., White, R.S., Su, W., and Buhl, P., 1993, Seismic structure of oceanic crust in the western North Atlantic: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 98, p. 13,879–13,903, doi:10.1029/93JB00557. Mougenot, D., Recq, M., Virlogeux, P., and Lepvrier, C., 1986, Seaward extension of the East African Rift: Nature, v. 321, p. 599–603, doi:10.1038 /321599a0. Nedimović, M.R., Carbotte, S.M., Harding, A.J., Detrick, R.S., Canales, J.P., Diebold, J.B., Kent, G.M., Tischer, M., and Babcock, J.M., 2005, Frozen magma lenses below the oceanic crust: Nature, v. 436, p. 1149–1152, doi:10.1038/nature03944. Niu, X., Ruan, A., Li, J., Minshull, T.A., Sauter, D., Wu, Z., Qiu, X., Zhao, M., Chen, Y.J., and Singh, S., 2015, Along-axis variation in crustal thickness at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (50°E) from a wide-angle seismic experiment: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 16, p. 468–485, doi:10.1002/2014GC005645. Qin, Y., and Singh, S.C., 2015, Seismic evidence of a two-layer lithospheric deformation in the Indian Ocean: Nature Communications, v. 6, 8298, doi: 10.1038/ncomms9298. Rabinowicz, M., and Ceuleneer, G., 2005, The effect of sloped isotherms on melt migration in the shallow mantle: A physical and numerical model based on observations in the Oman ophiolite: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 229, p. 231–246, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.09.039. Seton, M., et al., 2012, Global continental and ocean basin reconstructions since 200 Ma: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 113, p. 212–270, doi:10.1016/j .earscirev.2012.03.002. Manuscript received 1 February 2016 Revised manuscript received 3 April 2016 Manuscript accepted 6 April 2016 Printed in USA 4www.gsapubs.org | Volume 44 | Number 6 | GEOLOGY