* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Bone Marrow Norepinephrine Release in the Spleen and Cells and
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
This information is current as of June 18, 2017. Activation of Antigen-Specific CD4+ Th2 Cells and B Cells In Vivo Increases Norepinephrine Release in the Spleen and Bone Marrow Adam P. Kohm, Yueming Tang, Virginia M. Sanders and Stephen B. Jones J Immunol 2000; 165:725-733; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.2.725 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/165/2/725 Subscription Permissions Email Alerts This article cites 44 articles, 17 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/165/2/725.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 References Activation of Antigen-Specific CD4ⴙ Th2 Cells and B Cells In Vivo Increases Norepinephrine Release in the Spleen and Bone Marrow1 Adam P. Kohm,2* Yueming Tang,2†‡ Virginia M. Sanders,*§ and Stephen B. Jones3†‡¶ L ymphocyte function is closely regulated by several immune system-related mechanisms, including cytokines and cell-cell interactions that play a critical role in modulating both the intensity and the type of immune response to a specific Ag (reviewed in Ref. 1). In addition to these immune regulatory mechanisms, dynamic interactions that occur between the immune system and nervous system create additional regulatory mechanisms by which the normal functioning of each system is influenced (2– 4). Thus, lymphocyte function is closely regulated by a combination of mechanisms associated with both the immune and nervous systems. Norepinephrine (NE)4 is a signaling molecule of the sympathetic nervous system that is released from sympathetic nerve terminals, which are found in all organ systems, including the primary and secondary lymphoid organs (5–7). Upon release from the nerve terminal, NE binds to high affinity 2-adrenergic receptors (2AR) that are expressed on various immune cell populations. Previous studies at both protein and mRNA levels have shown that while B cells (8) and clones of CD4⫹ Th1 cells (9, 10)5 express a *Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, †Department of Physiology, ‡The Burn and Shock Trauma Institute, §Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and ¶Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153 Received for publication February 15, 2000. Accepted for publication April 26, 2000. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1 This work was supported in part by research funds from the National Institutes of Health (Grants MH53562 (to S.B.J.) and AI37326 (to V.M.S.)) and the American Cancer Society (Grant RPG-96-067-04-CIM to V.M.S.). 2 A.P.K. and Y.T. contributed equally to this work. functional 2AR, clones of Th2 cells do not, providing a mechanism by which NE can selectively regulate the function of specific immune cell populations. For example, depletion of NE in scid mice that were reconstituted with Ag-specific 2AR-negative Th2 cell clones and 2AR-positive B cells resulted in decreased serum levels of Ag-specific IgM and IgG1, splenic follicular cell expansion, and germinal center formation (8) in response to immunization compared with reconstituted NE-intact scid mice. Hence, it appears that NE stimulation of the 2AR expressed on B cells is essential for maintaining an optimal Th2 cell-dependent Ab response in vivo. However, for NE to influence immune cell function, it must be released at the immediate site of action, since it is either rapidly degraded by catechol-O-methyltransferase and monoamine oxidase, diffused into the circulation, or taken back up into the nerve terminal following release (reviewed in Ref. 11). Therefore, if NE is to influence the Th2-dependent Ab response in vivo, it is critical to determine whether mechanisms exist for enhancing the normal low level of NE release within the microenvironment in which immune cells are responding to a soluble protein Ag. Previous studies suggest that immune cell activation by either infectious challenge (12–14) or SRBC immunization (15, 16) results in a higher level of NE release in lymphoid organs. Importantly, in the previous SRBC studies investigating NE release, the rate of NE release was inferred from observations that SRBC administration resulted in lower tissue NE concentrations, and this observation could be interpreted as the result of either an enhanced level of NE release, a suppressed level of NE production, or a suppressed level of NE reuptake by the nerve terminal. However, Fuchs et al. (17) reported that immunization of mice with SRBC enhanced the concentration of the dopamine metabolite, 3,4-dihyroxyphenylacetic 3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Stephen B. Jones, The Burn and Shock Trauma Institute, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153. E-mail address: [email protected] Abbreviations used in this paper: NE, norepinephrine; 2AR, 2-adrenergic receptor; KLH, key hole limpet hemocyanin; TNP, trinitrophenyl; FLU, fluorescein. 4 Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists 5 A. P. Kohm, N. Morley, M. A. Swanson, and V. M. Sanders. Selective expression of 2-adrenergic receptor mRNA in CD4⫹ Th1 cells, but not Th2 cells. Submitted for publication. 0022-1767/00/$02.00 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 The neurotransmitter norepinephrine (NE) binds to the 2-adrenergic receptor (2AR) expressed on various immune cells to influence cell homing, proliferation, and function. Previous reports showed that NE stimulation of the B cell 2AR is necessary for the maintenance of an optimal primary and secondary Th2 cell-dependent Ab response in vivo. In the present study we investigated the mechanism by which activation of Ag-specific CD4ⴙ Th2 cells and B cells in vivo by a soluble protein Ag increases NE release in the spleen and bone marrow. Our model system used scid mice that were reconstituted with a clone of keyhole limpet hemocyanin-specific Th2 cells and trinitrophenyl-specific B cells. Following immunization, the rate of NE release in the spleen and bone marrow was determined using [3H]NE turnover analysis. Immunization of reconstituted scid mice with a cognate Ag increased the rate of NE release in the spleen and bone marrow 18 –25 h, but not 1– 8 h, following immunization. In contrast, immunization of mice with a noncognate Ag had no effect on the rate of NE release at any time. The cognate Ag-induced increase in NE release was partially blocked by ganglionic blockade with chlorisondamine, suggesting a role for both pre- and postganglionic signals in regulating NE release. Thus, activation of Ag-specific Th2 cells and B cells in vivo by a soluble protein Ag increases the rate of NE release and turnover in the spleen and bone marrow 18 –25 h after immunization. The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 725–733. 726 ACTIVATION OF Ag-SPECIFIC LYMPHOCYTES INCREASES NE RELEASE restricted interaction between the Th2 cell and the B cell to precipitate the observed Ag-induced release of NE. Finally, since administration of the ganglionic blocker, chlorisondamine, only partially blocked the Ag-induced release of NE, the effect of immune cell activation on the level of NE release appears to be in part mediated by immune cell-derived factors acting on either the CNS, postganglionic nerve, or the local nerve terminal found within the microenvironment of the responding Th2 cells and B cells. Materials and Methods Animals Six-week-old female C.B.17/ICR scid and BALB/c mice were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). All mice were provided autoclaved pellets and water ad libitum. Mice were permitted 2 wk to acclimate to their environment before being manipulated and were used at 8 wk of age in all experiments. The scid mice were housed under a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle in microisolater cages contained within a laminar flow system to maintain a specific pathogen-free environment. Reagents and Abs Picrylsulfonic acid (2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid), OVA, and fluorescein (FLU) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). KLH was obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). TNP-KLH and FLU-OVA were prepared at a haptenation ratio of 17–24 TNP or FLU molecules/KLH or OVA carrier molecule. T cell clones The Th2 cell clone BAC 3.2 was maintained as described previously (9). Viable cells were obtained before use by centrifugation over Lympholyte-M (Accurate, Westbury, NY) 8 –14 days after Ag stimulation. Clones were maintained in IL-2-containing medium and were used at least 3 days after an exposure to IL-2. The BAC 3.2 clone was tested for the presence of Mycoplasma contamination (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) and was found to be negative. TNP-specific B cell preparation The procedures for enrichment of unprimed TNP-specific B lymphocytes from spleens of nonimmunized mice were adapted from those described by Snow et al. (26) as modified by Myers et al. (27). All procedures were performed at 4°C, except for RBC haptenation and enzyme treatment, which were performed at 37°C. Briefly, horse RBCs (Colorado Serum, Denver, CO) were haptenated with 20 mg of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid/ml of packed RBCs. Spleen cell/haptenated horse RBC suspensions were prepared, and rosette-forming B lymphocytes were separated by velocity and density sedimentation using a discontinuous Percoll gradient. The lymphocyte-bound RBCs were removed by a mild trypsin-pronase treatment, and the lymphocytes were collected over Lympholyte-M (Cedarlane, Ontario, Canada). The lymphocytes recovered at the end of the procedure were incubated overnight to allow for re-expression of surfaceassociated molecules before additional experimentation. Phenotypic and functional characterization of the unprimed TNP-specific B cells have been presented previously, and the resultant cell population contains ⬃85–90% TNP-specific B cells (28). Cell transfer and immunization All animals received both KLH-specific BAC 3.2 Th2 cells and TNPspecific B cells. Each cell type was prepared for adoptive transfer at 2 ⫻ 106 cells in 50 l of PBS. T and B cell dilutions were prepared separately and were combined only at the time of injection. Cells were injected i.v. into the lateral tail vein in a total volume of 100 l of PBS. One week after cell reconstitution, mice received primary immunizations i.p. with 100 g of TNP-KLH, FLU-OVA, or saline delivered in the adjuvant TiterMax Gold (CytRx, Norcross, GA), which does not induce nonspecific inflammatory cytokine production. In addition, all mice received 25 Ci of [3H]NE (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) i.p. in 200 l of saline plus 0.01% ascorbate either at the time of or 17 h following Ag administration. In some experiments mice received an i.p. injection of the ganglionic blocker, chlorisondamine (5 mg/kg in saline; Sigma). Spleen, bone marrow, and heart samples were collected from the mice either 1 or 8 h following [3H]NE administration and were stored at ⫺80°C until time Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 acid, in the spleen, which is a metabolic indication that the administration of SRBC enhanced NE production and release. Also, the soluble products released during infectious challenge, e.g., IL-1, have been shown to stimulate NE release (21), suggesting a role for macrophage-derived products in modulating NE release in lymphoid organs. Thus, while previous studies suggested that administration of an infectious organism, particulate Ag, or an inflammatory cytokine to mice stimulates NE release in lymphoid organs, no studies have shown that the administration of a soluble protein Ag plays a role in modulating NE release in the spleen or bone marrow. One complication for studies designed to examine such an effect is that the frequency of Ag-specific Th and B cells that are able to respond to a specific soluble protein Ag is much lower than the frequency of cells that are able to respond to immunization with either an infectious organism or SRBC. If the release of cytokines from activated immune cells is important for triggering NE release via either a CNS-mediated (20, 21) or local (22) mechanism, such a low frequency of responding cells may restrict the level of cytokines released to such a degree that it is difficult to detect NE release during an Ag-specific response. To increase the frequency of responding Ag-specific Th2 and B cells, we used a model system in which scid mice (23), which normally lack T and B lymphocytes, were reconstituted with clones of KLH-specific Th2 cells and TNP-specific B cells isolated from the spleens of unimmunized mice. We have previously reported that immunization of reconstituted scid mice with the cognate Ag TNP-KLH results in MHC-restricted, Ag-specific Ab production, splenic follicular cell expansion, and germinal center formation in vivo (8). NE turnover analysis (24, 25) provides an estimate of dynamic changes in sympathetic nerve activity that cannot be gained by the determination of tissue NE concentration alone. This is because the rate of NE release is balanced by the rate of NE synthesis, resulting in constant tissue levels over a wide range of sympathetic nerve activity (24). In the previous studies that measured the effect of infectious challenge, particulate Ags, or inflammatory cytokines on the NE concentration in lymphoid organs, limited information was provided about the activity of sympathetic nerves and their release of NE. In addition, experimental conditions that induced detectable changes in tissue NE concentrations suggest that sympathetic nerve activity was so great that homeostatic balance was lost, NE release outstripped synthesis, and tissue levels of NE may have been exhausted. In addition, experimental conditions that do not induce detectable reductions in tissue NE concentrations provide little information about the level of NE release, except that the steady state dynamics of the nerve terminal were not interrupted. Hence, the lack of any observed changes in the tissue concentration of NE provides no information about the level of sympathetic nerve activity and the resulting level of NE release within the microenvironment in which the immune cells are responding to Ag challenge. Therefore, to more accurately measure the specific rate of NE release in immune organs, the present study was performed using a pulse-chase technique that measures the rate of disappearance of tissue [3H]NE over time. In addition, when experimental conditions induced a significant change in the rate of [3H]NE release over time, the rate of NE turnover was calculated. To investigate the role of Ag-specific Th2 cells and B cells in evoking NE release in the spleen and bone marrow during a Th2dependent immune response, a model system was used in which Ag-specific Th2 cells and B cells were adoptively transferred into scid mice (8). In this report we show that activation of Ag-specific Th2 cells and B cells by a soluble cognate Ag increases NE release in the spleen and bone marrow by 18 h following immunization. These results also show a critical role for an Ag-specific, MHC- The Journal of Immunology 727 of analysis. Bone marrow samples were immediately mixed with HCl and then stored at ⫺80°C until the time of analysis. NE and [3H]NE analysis Tissue samples were homogenized in 1.0 ml of cold 0.4 M perchloric acid using a Polytron tissue homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY) and centrifuged. The supernatant was adjusted to pH 8.4 with 1 M Tris buffer (pH 10) and was mixed with activated acid-washed alumina. The alumina was washed with water, and alumina-bound NE was eluted with 0.2 M acetic acid. The concentration of NE in the elute was measured by electrochemical detection following HPLC separation (HPLC and EC systems from BioAnalytical Systems, West Lafayette, IN). The recovery of NE from alumina was ⬃85% efficient. Aliquots of alumina elutes (0.1 ml) were mixed in 5.0 ml of scintillation cocktail (Bio-Safe II, RPI, Mount Prospect, IL) and counted for 3H in a scintillation counter (LS 6500, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). The specific activity of the [3H]NE (cpm per nanogram of NE) was calculated as the quotient of [3H]NE present in the tissue and the total tissue NE content. Data analysis and statistics Results NE release in the spleen and bone marrow following immunization with a soluble protein Ag FIGURE 1. The effect of immunization on the rate of NE release in scid mice reconstituted with Ag-specific Th2 cell clones and B cells 1– 8 h following Ag exposure. The scid mice were reconstituted with 2 ⫻ 106 cells of both KLH-specific Th2 cell clones (BAC 3.2) and TNP-specific B cells. One week following reconstitution, mice were immunized i.p. with either 100 g of TNP-KLH or adjuvant-only (TiterMax Gold). In addition, all mice received 25 Ci of [3H]NE i.p. delivered in saline plus 0.1% ascorbate at the time of Ag administration. One and 8 h following Ag administration, spleen (A), bone marrow (B), and heart (C) samples were collected for determination of NE specific activity (log cpm of [3H]NE per nanograms of NE), and the slope of the resultant line is a direct reflection of the rate of NE release. F, Mice receiving adjuvant only; E, mice immunized with TNP-KLH. Each point represents the mean ⫾ SEM for specific activity of organs from six mice per experiment; r values are the calculated least square regression coefficients using raw data points for each line. See Table I for NE tissue levels. To determine whether immunization of mice with a soluble protein Ag influences the rate of NE release from sympathetic nerve terminals, the rate of NE release was determined in the spleen, bone marrow, and heart following immunization of mice with a soluble protein Ag. One week following cell reconstitution with KLH-specific Th2 cells and TNP-specific B cells, scid mice were immunized with TNP-KLH at time zero and administered 25 Ci of [3H]NE 1 h before tissue sample collection at the first of two time points spanning an 8-h period. Tissue samples were collected either at 1 and 8 h or at 18 and 24 h following immunization for NE turnover analysis. The rate of NE release is reflected by the slope of the line resulting from plotting the specific activity of tissue NE ([3H]NE per picograms of NE) as a function of time following immunization and is independent of the relative NE specific activity of each group. No significant difference was observed in the rate of NE release (Fig. 1 and Table I) 1– 8 h following Ag exposure in the spleen, bone marrow, and heart compared with that Table I. The effect of immunization on the rate of NE release in scid mice reconstituted with Ag-specific Th2 cell clones and B cells 1– 8 h following Ag exposurea Group n Tissue NEb (ng/g) Slopec p Value of Sloped Spleen Adjuvant only TNP-KLH 6 6 2130 ⫾ 366 2169 ⫾ 228 ⫺0.0110 ⫺0.0210 ⬍0.363 Bone marrow Adjuvant only TNP-KLH 6 6 3.93 ⫾ 0.32 4.11 ⫾ 0.51 ⫺0.0202 ⫺0.0225 ⬍0.705 Heart Adjuvant only TNP-KLH 6 6 848 ⫾ 96 813 ⫾ 77 ⫺0.0186 ⫺0.0119 ⬍0.237 a The experimental design is described in the legend to Fig. 1. Tissue NE values are the mean ⫾ SEM. Slope of the line representing the log cpm of [3H]NE/pg of tissue NE. d The p value of the slope in comparison to the slope of adjuvant-only controls. b c Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 To determine NE turnover rates (rate constant ⫻ tissue NE), the specific activity of tissue NE ([3H]NE per picograms of NE) after radiolabeled injection was plotted as a function of time. The decay of specific activity is a first-order function, a straight line with a negative slope, and decay lines were calculated by the method of least squares (29). The rate constant represents the fraction of the NE pool replaced per unit time (h⫺1). Rate constants (k) were calculated from the slope of logarithm of the specific activity vs time relationship (0.434 [k] ⫽ slope). Data are expressed as the mean ⫾ SEM. Differences between the slopes of the regression lines were tested by Student’s t test, using the pooled SE of sample regression (30). p ⬍ 0.05 was accepted as achieving statistical significance. 728 ACTIVATION OF Ag-SPECIFIC LYMPHOCYTES INCREASES NE RELEASE Role of Ag-specific Th2 cells and B cells in stimulating the Ag-induced release of NE FIGURE 2. The effect of immunization on the rate of NE release in scid mice reconstituted with Ag-specific Th2 cell clones and B cells 18 –25 h following Ag exposure. The scid mice were reconstituted with 2 ⫻ 106 cells of both KLH-specific Th2 cell clones (BAC 3.2) and TNP-specific B cells. One week following reconstitution, mice were immunized i.p. with either 100 g of TNP-KLH or adjuvant only. In addition, all mice received 25 Ci of [3H]NE i.p. delivered in saline plus 0.1% ascorbate 17 h following Ag administration. Eighteen and 25 h following Ag administration, spleen (A), bone marrow (B), and heart (C) samples were collected for determination of the rate of NE release as NE turnover rate (nanograms per gram per hour; inset). F, Mice receiving adjuvant only; E, animals receiving the Ag TNP-KLH. Each point represents the mean ⫾ SEM for specific activity of organs from five mice per experiment; r values are the calculated least square regression coefficients using raw data points for each line. The p values are indicated when significant. See Table II for NE tissue levels. To determine whether Ag-induced activation of Th2 cells and B cells in our model system was critical for inducing the measured increase in NE release in the spleen and bone marrow, scid mice were reconstituted with KLH-specific Th2 cell clones and TNPspecific B cells and immunized with the cognate Ag TNP-KLH, the noncognate Ag FLU-OVA, or adjuvant only, using TiterMax Gold adjuvant, which does induce nonspecific inflammatory cytokine production. As shown in Fig. 3A and Table III, immunization of mice with FLU-OVA failed to significantly increase the rates of NE release and NE turnover in the spleen in comparison to adjuvant-only controls. Similarly, in the bone marrow (Fig. 3B and Table III), administration of FLU-OVA also failed to significantly enhance the rates of NE release and NE turnover in comparison to adjuvant-only controls. As in previous experiments, administration of either TNP-KLH or FLU-OVA had no significant effect on the tissue concentration of NE in the spleen, bone marrow, or heart Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 in adjuvant-only controls. Interestingly, the level of NE specific activity was significantly lower in all bone marrow samples compared with that in the heart and spleen, and this observation is consistent with a previous report (12). However, the mechanism responsible for this lower level of specific activity is currently unknown, but it may involve factors such as local blood flow rates and patterns, differences in local nerve terminal uptake mechanisms, or differences in the level of sympathetic innervation (31). Finally, no significant differences were observed in the tissue concentration of NE between mice receiving either Ag or adjuvantonly injections (Table I). Thus, these results suggest that Ag administration did not significantly alter the rate of NE release in the spleen, bone marrow, and heart at 1– 8 h following Ag exposure. The possibility existed that activation of the Ag-specific Th2 and B cell populations was responsible for altering the rate of NE release via a mechanism that was triggered at times later than 8 h following Ag exposure. For example, APC require at least 8 –12 h for Ag homing, uptake, processing, and presentation to a Th cell in vivo (32–34); thus, immune cell-derived soluble products may not be produced within 8 h of immunization. Therefore, the rate of NE release was determined in the spleen, bone marrow, and heart 18 –25 h following immunization. As shown in Fig. 2A and Table II, immunization of mice with the cognate Ag TNP-KLH significantly enhanced the rate of NE release in the spleen ( p ⬍ 0.01) compared with that in adjuvant-only controls. Even though NE specific activity was lower in mice receiving TNP-KLH, this exerted no influence on measurement of the rate of NE release (24, 25). In agreement with these data, cognate Ag administration significantly enhanced the rate of NE turnover in the spleen (Fig. 2A, inset, and Table II) and bone marrow (Fig. 2B and Table II) compared with that in adjuvant-only controls. Interestingly, Ag administration enhanced the rate of NE release in the heart to varying levels. Finally, and most importantly with regard to previous findings, Ag administration had no significant effect on the total amount of NE in the tissues (Table II), indicating that Ag stimulation did not impair the mechanisms responsible for maintaining the local stores of NE within the tissue. Thus, administration of the soluble protein Ag TNP-KLH to scid mice reconstituted with KLH-specific Th2 cell clones and TNP-specific B cells significantly enhanced the rate of NE release and NE turnover in the spleen and bone marrow 18 –25 h after Ag exposure. The Journal of Immunology 729 Table II. The effect of immunization on the rate of NE release in scid mice reconstituted with Ag-specific Th2 cell clones and B cells 18 –25 h following Ag exposurea Group n Tissue NEb (ng/g) Slopec p Value of Sloped Spleen Adjuvantonly TNP-KLH 5 5 2163 ⫾ 325 2007 ⫾ 247 ⫺0.0128 ⫺0.0371 ⬍0.01 Bone marrow Adjuvantonly TNP-KLH 5 5 4.27 ⫾ 0.31 4.26 ⫾ 0.38 ⫺0.0193 ⫺0.0403 ⬍0.01 Heart Adjuvantonly TNP-KLH 5 5 793 ⫾ 16 803 ⫾ 18 ⫺0.0133 ⫺0.0321 ⬍0.057 a The experimental design is described in the legend to Fig. 2. b Tissue NE values are the mean ⫾ SEM. c Slope of the line representing the log cpm of [3H]NE/pg of tissue NE. d The p value of the slope in comparison to the slope of adjuvant-only controls. Effect of ganglionic blockade on the Ag-specific enhancement of NE release and turnover in the spleen and bone marrow The NE-containing sympathetic nerve terminals that innervate immune organs originate from cell bodies located in local sympathetic ganglia lying close to the spinal cord. The function of these ganglia is to receive input signals from nerves that originate in the CNS. Therefore, any signal from the CNS destined for delivery to immune organs via sympathetic innervation must travel through the local sympathetic ganglion, for example, the splanchnic ganglion for the spleen. On the other hand, it has also been proposed that NE release from sympathetic nerve terminals may be regulated by stimulation of cytokine receptors expressed on sympathetic nerve terminals (22). In this case, NE release in the spleen and bone marrow would be regulated locally, as opposed to regulated by signals originating from the CNS, thus eliminating the requirement for the high levels of cytokine necessary to precipitate alterations in CNS activity. To investigate the role of signals from the CNS in mediating the Ag-induced increase in the rate of NE release and turnover in the spleen and bone marrow, some mice received injections of the ganglionic blocker chlorisondamine (5 mg/kg) at the time of [3H]NE administration to interrupt signal transmission through sympathetic ganglia. As shown in Fig. 4A and Table IV, administration of chlorisondamine partially blocked the Ag-induced enhancement of the rated of NE release and NE turnover compared with those in mice receiving TNP-KLH alone. In addition, chlorisondamine partially blocked the Ag-induced enhancement of the rates of NE release and NE turnover in the bone marrow in comparison to mice receiving TNP-KLH only. In contrast, chlorisondamine (Fig. 4C) completely blocked the cognate Ag-induced increase in the rates of NE release and turnover (Table IV) in the heart in comparison to adjuvant-only controls. Finally, administration of chlorisondamine had no effect on tissue NE content (Table IV). Thus, ganglionic blockade partially prevents the Ag-induced enhancement of the rates of NE release and NE turnover in the spleen and bone marrow. Discussion In this study we show that administration of a cognate soluble protein Ag (TNP-KLH) to scid mice reconstituted with KLH-specific Th2 cell clones and TNP-specific B cells enhances the rates of NE release and turnover in the spleen and bone marrow 18 –25 h following immunization (Fig. 5). Interestingly, administration of a noncognate Ag that is not recognized by either the Ag-specific Th2 cell clones or B cells used to reconstitute the scid mice in our model system failed to enhance NE release in the spleen or bone marrow. Finally, administration of the ganglionic blocker, chlorisondamine, partially prevented the Ag-induced activation of NE release and turnover in the spleen and bone marrow. Previous studies (12–14) have demonstrated that infectious challenge enhances NE release within lymphoid organs as well as NE levels in the circulation and suggested that macrophage-derived cytokines were involved. For example, macrophage activation is critical for successful clearance of infection, and upon activation, these cells produce significant levels of the inflammatory Table III. Specificity of the Ag-induced increase in NE release in reconstituted scid mice 18 –25 h following Ag exposurea Group n Tissue NEb (ng/g) Slopec p Value of Sloped Spleen Adjuvant only TNP-KLH (cognate Ag) FLU-OVA (noncognate Ag) 6 6 6 1634 ⫾ 16 1534 ⫾ 83 1677 ⫾ 43 ⫺0.027 ⫺0.057 ⫺0.034 ⬍0.004 ⬍0.122 Bone marrow Adjuvant only TNP-KLH (cognate Ag) FLU-OVA (noncognate Ag) 6 6 6 4.25 ⫾ 0.29 4.12 ⫾ 0.19 4.32 ⫾ 0.14 ⫺0.010 ⫺0.037 ⫺0.011 ⬍0.0001 ⬍0.680 Heart Adjuvant only TNP-KLH (cognate Ag) FLU-OVA (noncognate Ag) 6 6 6 893 ⫾ 52 881 ⫾ 34 907 ⫾ 47 ⫺0.021 ⫺0.035 ⫺0.027 ⬍0.310 ⬍0.412 a The experimental design is described in the legend to Fig. 3. Tissue NE values are the mean ⫾ SEM. Slope of the line representing the log cpm of [3H]NE/pg of tissue NE. d The p value of the slope in comparison to the slope of adjuvant-only controls. b c Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 (Table III). Thus, immunization of mice with the cognate Ag TNPKLH, but not the noncognate Ag FLU-OVA, significantly enhanced the rate of NE release and NE turnover in the spleen and bone marrow. 730 ACTIVATION OF Ag-SPECIFIC LYMPHOCYTES INCREASES NE RELEASE Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 FIGURE 3. Specificity of the Ag-induced increase in NE release in reconstituted scid mice18 –25 h following Ag exposure. The scid mice were reconstituted with 2 ⫻ 106 cells of both KLH-specific Th2 cell clones (BAC 3.2) and TNP-specific B cells. One week following reconstitution, mice were immunized i.p. with 100 g of the cognate Ag TNP-KLH, the noncognate Ag FLU-OVA, or adjuvant only. In addition, all mice received 25 Ci of [3H]NE i.p. delivered in saline plus 0.1% ascorbate 17 h following Ag administration. Eighteen and 25 h following Ag administration, spleen (A), bone marrow (B), and heart (C) samples were collected for determination of the rate of NE release as NE turnover rate (nanograms per gram per hour; inset). F, Mice receiving adjuvant only; E, mice receiving the specific Ag TNP-KLH; Œ, mice receiving the irrelevant Ag FLU-OVA. Each point represents the mean ⫾ SEM for specific activity of organs from six mice per experiment; r values are the calculated least square regression coefficients using raw data points for each line. The p values are indicated when the slope is significant. See Table III for NE tissue levels. FIGURE 4. Effect of ganglionic blockade on Ag-specific induction of NE release in the spleen and bone marrow. The scid mice were reconstituted with 2 ⫻ 106 cells of both KLH-specific Th2 cell clones (BAC 3.2) and TNP-specific B cells. One week following reconstitution, mice were immunized i.p. with either 100 g of the specific Ag TNP-KLH or adjuvant only. In addition, all mice received 25 Ci of [3H]NE i.p. delivered in saline plus 0.1% ascorbate 17 h following Ag administration. Eighteen and 25 h following Ag administration, spleen (A), bone marrow (B), and heart (C) samples were collected for determination of the rate of NE release as NE turnover rate (nanograms per gram per hour; inset). F, Mice receiving adjuvant only; E, mice receiving the specific Ag TNP-KLH; Œ, mice receiving both the specific Ag TNP-KLH and the ganglionic blocker, chlorisondamine. Each point represents the mean ⫾ SEM for specific activity of organs from six mice per experiment; r values are the calculated least square regression coefficients using raw data points for each line. The p values are indicated when significant. See Table IV for NE tissue levels. The Journal of Immunology 731 Table IV. Effect of ganglionic blockade on Ag-specific induction of NE release in the spleen and bone marrowa Group n Tissue NEb (ng/g) Slopec p Value of Sloped Spleen Adjuvant only TNP-KLH TNP-KLH ⫹ chlorisondamine 6 6 6 755 ⫾ 43 715 ⫾ 78 770 ⫾ 54 ⫺0.015 ⫺0.054 ⫺0.028 ⬍0.0001 ⬍0.04 Bone marrow Adjuvant only TNP-KLH TNP-KLH ⫹ chlorisondamine 6 6 6 3.84 ⫾ 0.20 4.18 ⫾ 0.24 4.08 ⫾ 0.15 ⫺0.014 ⫺0.049 ⫺0.026 ⬍.0003 ⬍0.08 Heart Adjuvant only TNP-KLH TNP-KLH ⫹ chlorisondamine 6 6 6 810 ⫾ 46 765 ⫾ 34 762 ⫾ 48 ⫺0.026 ⫺0.051 ⫺0.029 ⬍0.001 ⬍0.39 a The experimental design is described in the legend to Fig. 4. Tissue NE values are the mean ⫾ SEM. Slope of the line representing the log cpm of [3H]NE/pg of tissue NE. d The p value of the slope in comparison to the slope of adjuvant-only controls. b c FIGURE 5. Model for Ag-induced NE release in lymphoid organs. 1, Administration of a soluble cognate Ag to scid mice reconstituted with Ag-specific Th2 and B cells activates Ag-specific cell populations. 2 and 3, Signals derived from activated Th2 and/or B cells induces an increase in NE release in the spleen (2) and bone marrow (3). 4, The Ag-induced increase in NE release was partially blocked by a ganglionic blocker, thus suggesting that signals originating from either the CNS or the preganglionic nerve were in part responsible for the enhanced level of NE release. We have previously reported (8) that NE stimulation of the 2AR expressed on B cells is necessary for the maintenance of optimal primary and secondary Th2 celldependent Ab responses in vivo (5). that a cognate interaction between Th2 cells and B cells is necessary for immunization-induced enhancement of NE release by a currently undetermined mechanism. The capacity of immune cell-derived cytokines to influence sympathetic nerve activity was originally suggested by an early study showing that peripheral administration of cytokines stimulates increased nerve activity in both the hypothalamus and brainstem (37). Recently, this study was further supported by the findings that cytokine receptors are present on various types of peripheral nerves, including sensory nerves (38), sympathetic nerves (39, 40), sympathetic ganglia (41, 42), and vagal nerve paraganglia (4), all of which are found outside the CNS. Therefore, the presence of cytokine receptors on peripheral nerves provides a potential mechanism by which local immune cell-derived cytokines produced in the periphery may transmit signals to the CNS or the peripheral nerve directly (see model in Fig. 5). Importantly, administration of the ganglionic blocker, chlorisondamine, completely blocked any effect of Ag administration on NE release in the heart, suggesting that the dose of chlorisondamine used in the current studies was sufficient to block ganglionic transmission. However, chlorisondamine only partially blocked the Aginduced enhancement of NE release and turnover in the spleen and Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 cytokines IL-1 (18) and TNF-␣ (19). Since peripheral administration of both cytokines has also been shown to evoke CNS activation (35, 36), it is likely that such experimental results involved macrophage activation, macrophage-derived cytokine modulation of CNS activity, and subsequent increased sympathetic nerve activity. If such a mechanism was involved in our reconstituted scid mouse model system, we would expect administration of a noncognate soluble protein Ag to induce alterations in the rate of NE release in the spleen and bone marrow, since this Ag would be processed by professional APC other than B cells. However, this expectation was not realized, suggesting that nonspecific activation of macrophages or other members of the innate immune system by a soluble protein Ag was not sufficient to induce alterations in NE release within the spleen and bone marrow when using our model system. More importantly, Ag administration induced NE release only when mice were challenged with the specific cognate Ag (TNP-KLH) recognized by both the Th2 cell clones and B cells present in our model system, suggesting that the production of inflammatory cytokines is not essential for NE release to occur. Thus, these findings suggest that macrophage activation and inflammatory cytokine production are not responsible for the soluble protein Ag-induced increase in sympathetic nerve activation and 732 ACTIVATION OF Ag-SPECIFIC LYMPHOCYTES INCREASES NE RELEASE that signaling mediators derived from the nervous system regulate immune cell function (reviewed in Ref. 46), it is not surprising that the peripheral immune system may transmit signals to the nervous system via local cytokine production or cell-cell interactions. By this type of mechanism, the CNS may differentially regulate immune cell function in the periphery depending on the intensity of the response to a specific Ag or the health of the entire body, such as during times of stress, disease, or trauma. Such actions of the CNS may influence the function of immune cells participating in responses above a certain threshold of intensity, whereas local immune system or nervous system mechanisms may be sufficient for regulating responses of lower intensity. If this should be the case, then bidirectional communication between the immune system and the nervous system would be critical in maintaining immune homeostasis in vivo. Acknowledgments We thank Joseph Podojil for critical reading of the manuscript. References 1. Clark, E. A., and J. A. Ledbetter. 1994. How B and T cells talk to each other. Nature 367:425. 2. Ader, R., D. Felten, and N. Cohen. 1990. Interactions between the brain and the immune system. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 30:561. 3. Besedovsky, H. O., and A. Del Rey. 1992. Immune-neuroendocrine circuits: integrative role of cytokines. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 13:61. 4. Goehler, L. E., J. K. Relton, D. Dripps, R. Kiechle, N. Tartaglia, S. F. Maier, and L. R. Watkins. 1997. Vagal paraganglia bind biotinylated interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: a possible mechanism for immune-to-brain communication. Brain Res. Bull. 43:357. 5. Calvo, W. 1968. The innervation of the bone marrow in laboratory animals. J. Anat. 123:315. 6. Reilly, F. D., P. A. McCuskey, M. L. Miller, R. S. McCuskey, and H. A. Meineke. 1979. Innervation of the periarteriolar lymphatic sheath of the spleen. Tissue Cell 11:121. 7. Williams, J. M., and D. L. Felten. 1981. Sympathetic innervation of murine thymus and spleen: a comparative histofluorescence study. Anat. Rec. 199:531. 8. Kohm, A. P., and V. M. Sanders. 1999. Suppression of antigen-specific Th2 cell-dependent IgM and IgG1 production following norepinephrine depletion in vivo. J. Immunol. 162:5299. 9. Sanders, V. M., R. A. Baker, D. S. Ramer-Quinn, D. J. Kasprowicz, B. A. Fuchs, and N. E. Street. 1997. Differential expression of the 2-adrenergic receptor by Th1 and Th2 clones: implications for cytokine production and B cell help. J. Immunol. 158:4200. 10. Ramer-Quinn, D. S., R. A. Baker, and V. M. Sanders. 1997. Activated Th1 and Th2 cells differentially express the 2-adrenergic receptor: a mechanism for selective modulation of Th1 cell cytokine production. J. Immunol. 159:4857. 11. Glowinski, J., and R. J. Baldessarini. 1966. Metabolism of norepinephrine in the central nervous system. Pharmacol. Rev. 18:1201. 12. Tang, Y., R. Shankar, R. Gamelli, and S. Jones. 1999. Dynamic norepinephrine alterations in bone marrow: evidence of functional innervation. J. Neuroimmunol. 96:182. 13. Pardini, B. J., S. B. Jones, and J. P. Filkins. 1983. Cardiac and splenic norepinephrine turnovers in endotoxic rats. Am. J. Physiol. 245:H276. 14. Jones, S. B., M. F. Kovarik, and F. D. Romano. 1986. Cardiac and splenic norepinephrine turnover during septic peritonitis. Am. J. Physiol. 250:R892. 15. Del Rey, A., H. O. Besedovsky, E. Sorkin, M. Da Prada, and S. Arrenbrecht. 1981. Immunoregulation mediated by the sympathetic nervous system II. Cell. Immunol. 63:329. 16. Besedovsky, H. O., A. Del Rey, E. Sorkin, M. Da Prada, and H. H. Keller. 1979. Immunoregulation mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. Cell. Immunol. 48:346. 17. Fuchs, B. A., K. S. Campbell, and A. E. Munson. 1988. Norepinephrine and serotonin content of the murine spleen: its relationship to lymphocyte -adrenergic receptor density and the humoral immune response in vivo and in vitro. Cell. Immunol. 117:339. 18. Herzyk, D. J., J. N. Allen, C. B. Marsh, and M. D. Wewers. 1992. Macrophage and monocyte IL-1 regulation differs at multiple sites: messenger RNA expression, translation, and post-translational processing. J. Immunol. 149:3052. 19. Herriott, M. J., H. Jiang, C. A. Stewart, D. J. Fast, and R. W. Leu. 1993. Mechanistic differences between migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and IFN-␥ for macrophage activation: MIF and IFN-␥ synergize with lipid A to mediate migration inhibition but only IFN-␥ induces production of TNF-␣ and nitric oxide. J. Immunol. 150:4524. 20. Wang, J., and A. J. Dunn. 1999. The role of interleukin-6 in the activation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis and brain indoleamines by endotoxin and interleukin-1. Brain Res. 815:337. Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 bone marrow, suggesting a role for signals originating above, as well as at the preganglionic cell body in regulating nerve activity in this model. One possible explanation of these results is that the immune cell-derived signals, which are most likely cytokines, do not act locally to enhance local NE release, but instead bind to cytokine receptors at an unknown site before the ganglion, e.g., on the preganglionic nerve terminal, to influence sympathetic nerve activity within the spleen and bone marrow. However, it is also possible that these cytokines might bind to their specific receptors on the local nerve terminal within the splenic or bone marrow microenvironment to initiate signals that must then be transmitted to either the CNS or the local ganglion before another signal is transmitted back to the local nerve terminal inducing NE release. This possibility is supported by two of the present findings. First, Ag administration induced a lower level of NE release in the heart compared with that in the spleen and bone marrow. Second, chlorisondamine completely blocked the Ag-induced alterations in sympathetic nerve activity in the heart. Since chlorisondamine failed to completely block the Ag-induced enhancement of sympathetic nerve activity in the spleen and bone marrow, it is possible that local cytokine production not only serves to initiate an afferent signal from the site of the immune response, but, in addition, modulates local nerve activity by binding to cytokine receptors on local nerve terminals or the postganglionic cell body. Of course, it is also possible that immune cell-nerve terminal interactions may occur after Ag exposure to induce NE release, a possibility that is testable using our model system. Thus, while signals from the ganglion represent a significant regulatory influence on sympathetic nerve activity in response to a specific cognate Ag, which is blocked by chlorisondamine, local cytokine receptor stimulation may also enhance NE release, which cannot be blocked by chlorisondamine. Thus, there may be multiple levels of cytokine-induced regulation of local sympathetic nerve activity and NE release within immune organs. The model system used in the present study will now help us to dissect the multiple levels of regulation of this immune cell-modulating neurotransmitter. Currently, it is not known whether the production of specific cytokines by Th2 and/or B cells mediates the Ag-induced enhancement of NE release. If cytokines are involved in our model system, the most likely source of the cytokines is the Th2 cell clone, which characteristically produces the cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10 (9, 43). In light of this possibility, the current findings may not occur in mice reconstituted with Th1 cell clones that characteristically produce IFN-␥ and IL-2 (9, 44). One possible mediator of the Ag-induced increase in sympathetic nerve activity may be IL-6 produced by the Th2 cell clones used in this model system. Although IL-6 does not affect the uptake of [3H]NE into sympathetic nerve terminals (22), IL-6 does exert concentration-dependent effects on sympathetic nerve activity. For example, 1 ng/ml of IL-6 stimulated, 10 ng/ml of IL-6 had no effect, and 100 ng/ml IL-6 inhibited [3H]NE release from sympathetic nerve terminals within 2 h of cytokine exposure. Thus, IL-6 may either enhance, inhibit, or have no effect on NE release in our model system. However, if similar findings are observed in animals reconstituted with Th1 cell clones, they would suggest that the critical signal responsible for influencing sympathetic nerve activity is produced by both Th1 and Th2 cells, such as IL-3 (44) or TNF-␣ (45). Finally, it is also possible that the B cell is the critical source of the immune cell-derived cytokine signals mediating the effects of Ag administration on NE release, thus eliminating the association of a Th cell subset specificity with the response. The current study supports the overall hypothesis that local immune responses generate important signals that regulate nervous system function. Since both in vitro and in vivo findings conclude The Journal of Immunology 35. Sapolsky, R., C. Rivier, G. Yamamoto, P. Plotsky, and W. Vale. 1987. Interleukin-1 stimulates the secretion of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor. Science 238:522. 36. Fleshner, M., L. Silbert, T. Deak, L. E. Goehler, D. Martin, L. R. Watkins, and S. F. Maier. 1997. TNF-␣-induced corticosterone elevation but not serum protein or corticosteroid binding globulin reduction is vagally mediated. Brain Res. Bull. 44:701. 37. Besedovsky, H., A. Del Rey, E. Sorkin, M. Da Prada, R. Burri, and C. Honegger. 1983. The immune response evokes changes in brain noradrenergic neurons. Science 221:564. 38. Neumann, H., H. Schmidt, E. Wilharm, L. Behrens, and H. Wekerle. 1997. Interferon ␥ gene expression in sensory neurons: evidence for autocrine gene regulation. J. Exp. Med. 186:2023. 39. Bai, Y., and R. P. Hart. 1998. Cultured sympathetic neurons express functional interleukin-1 receptors. J. Neuroimmunol. 91:43. 40. Marz, P., J. G. Cheng, R. A. Gadient, P. H. Patterson, T. Stoyan, U. Otten, and S. Rose-John. 1998. Sympathetic neurons can produce and respond to interleukin 6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3251. 41. Eneroth, A., K. Kristensson, A. Ljungdahl, and T. Olsson. 1991. Interferon-␥-like immunoreactivity in developing rat spinal ganglia neurons in vivo and in vitro. J. Neurocytol. 20:225. 42. Flamand, V., D. Abramowicz, M. Goldman, C. Biernaux, G. Huez, J. Urbain, M. Moser, and O. Leo. 1990. Anti-CD3 antibodies induce T cells from unprimed animals to secrete IL-4 both in vitro and in vivo. J. Immunol. 144:2875. 43. Swain, S. L. 1994. Generation and in vivo persistence of polarized Th1 and Th2 memory cells. Immunity 1:543. 44. Mosmann, T. R., H. Cherwinski, M. W. Bond, M. A. Giedlin, and R. L. Coffman. 1986. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J. Immunol. 136:2348. 45. Cherwinski, H. M., J. H. Schumacher, K. D. Brown, and T. R. Mosmann. 1987. Two types of mouse helper T cell clone. III. Further differences in lymphokine synthesis between Th1 and Th2 clones revealed by RNA hybridization, functionally monospecific bioassays, and monoclonal antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 166:1229. 46. Madden, K. S., V. M. Sanders, and D. L. Felten. 1995. Catecholamine influences and sympathetic neural modulation of immune responsiveness. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 35:417. Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 21. Shimizu, N., T. Hori, and H. Nakane. 1994. An interleukin-1--induced noradrenaline release in the spleen is mediated by brain corticotropin-releasing factor: an in vivo microdialysis study in conscious rats. Brain Behav. Immun. 7:14. 22. Ruhl, A., S. Hurst, and S. M. Collins. 1994. Synergism between interleukins 1 and 6 on noradrenergic nerves in rat myenteric plexus. Gastroenterology 107: 993. 23. Bosma, G. C., R. P. Custer, and M. J. Bosma. 1983. A severe combined immunodeficiency mutation in the mouse. Nature 301:527. 24. Brodie, B. B., E. Costa, A. Dlabac, N. H. Neff, and H. H. Smookler. 1978. Application of steady state kinetics to the estimation of synthesis rate and turnover times of tissue catecholamines. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 154:493. 25. Neff, N. H., T. N. Tozer, W. Hammer, E. Costa, and B. B. Brodie. 1968. Application of steady-state kinetics to the uptake and decline of [3H]NE in the rate heart. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 160:48. 26. Snow, E. C., E. S. Vitetta, and J. W. Uhr. 1983. Activation of antigen-enriched B cells. I. Purification and response to thymus-independent antigens. J. Immunol. 130:607. 27. Myers, C. D., V. M. Sanders, and E. S. Vitetta. 1986. Isolation of antigen-binding virgin and memory B cells. J. Immunol. Methods 92:45. 28. Vitetta, E. S., A. Bossie, R. Fernandez-Botran, C. D. Myers, K. G. Oliver, V. M. Sanders, and T. L. Stevens. 1987. Interaction and activation of antigenspecific T and B cells. Immunol. Rev. 99:193. 29. Costa, E., and N. H. Neff. 1970. Estimation of turnover rates to study the metabolic regulation of the steady-state levels of neuronal monoamines. In Handbook of Neurochemistry. A. Lajtha, ed. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 45–90. 30. Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochron. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames. 31. Felten, S. Y., D. L. Felten, D. L. Bellinger, S. L. Carlson, K. D. Ackerman, K. S. Madden, J. A. Olschowka, and S. Livnat. 1988. Noradrenergic sympathetic innervation of lymphoid organs. Prog. Allergy 43:14. 32. Kouassi, E., W. Boukhris, J. Descotes, P. Zukervar, Y. S. Li, and J. P. Revillard. 1987. Selective T cell defects induced by dopamine administration in mice. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 9:477. 33. Sanders, V. M., J. M. Snyder, J. W. Uhr, and E. S. Vitetta. 1986. Characterization of the physical interaction between antigen-specific B and T cells. J. Immunol. 137:2395. 34. Kawakami, K., and D. C. Parker. 1993. Antigen and helper T lymphocytes activate B lymphocytes by distinct signaling pathways. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:77. 733