Download The role of coronary microvascular disorder in congestive heart failure

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute wikipedia , lookup

Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup

Rheumatic fever wikipedia , lookup

Angina wikipedia , lookup

Heart failure wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308: H814–H815, 2015;
doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00118.2015.
Editorial Focus
The role of coronary microvascular disorder in congestive heart failure
Georges E. Haddad, Sana Chams, and Nour Chams
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, District of Columbia
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. E. Haddad, Dept.
Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, Howard Univ., 520 W. St.
NW, Washington, DC 20059 (e-mail: [email protected]).
H814
play(s) a key role in the development of heart failure: myocytes, extracellular matrix, and/or vasculature?
Coronary arterial disease is a main cause of heart failure. But
most published research and techniques have been focusing on
coronary arterial main branches, and only recently has microvascular dysfunction been getting more attention (6, 14, 16).
Coronary microvascular dysfunction was observed in patients
with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. But its detailed role in
heart failure is not very clear because accurate quantitative
assessment of microvascular function and myocardial ischemia
is not easily feasible in clinical practice and bench research,
especially in rodents (1, 12). Microvascular obstruction, index
of microcirculatory resistance, and hyperemic microvascular
resistance were widely used parameters to identify microcirculation dysfunction. Invasive methods were based on principle of thermodilution or Doppler flow with guide wires (1),
whereas noninvasive positron emission tomography (PET)
served as a gold standard for noninvasive assay of myocardial
blood flow (5, 11). However, there is no solid proof to directly
correlate coronary microvascular dysfunction to ischemic heart
failure in vivo in human patients and animals to date, which is
probably due to the lack of proper model and the need for more
advanced finer techniques.
In this current issue of the American Journal of PhysiologyHeart and Circulatory Physiology, Chen and colleagues (8)
reported their serial studies on coronary arterial disorder in
congestive CHF in rats. The authors showed successive vascular changes of coronary arteries from main, middle, and
small arterial branches to arterioles and capillaries in the CHF
model. Heart failure was induced by chronic aortic constriction
with ischemia-reperfusion followed by aortic debanding. Their
main hypothesis is that the development of heart failure is
associated with vascular disorders that occur in not only main
branches of the coronary artery but also arterioles and capillaries. The capillary structural disorders found in CHF hearts
were diverse to include stenosis, nonlinear arrangement, curled
shape, drastic changes in diameter, proliferation, and roughened surface texture. Capillary disorder can be one of the
critical contributing factors to the energy starvation that leads
to the reduction of intrinsic contractile properties of the underlying myocytes. However, it is still a big challenge to simultaneously assess myocardial contractility and microvascular
blood flow in rodent animals.
Future studies on the role of coronary microcirculation
disorder (CMD) in CHF should involve the assessment of 1)
the correlation between the degree and range of CMD and heart
failure, specifically, the impact of the regional CMD on the
global cardiac pumping function of the heart (contractility) by
using invasive and noninvasive techniques; 2) the relationship
between narrowing (atherosclerotic) of the main arteries and
the impact on distal and proximal capillary disorders, which
assess the importance of the global coronary blood flow reserve
to the regional blood flow disorder, as well as to microvascular
and endothelial dysfunction; and 3) an evaluation of the impact
0363-6135/15 Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society
http://www.ajpheart.org
Downloaded from http://ajpheart.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017
heart failure are coronary heart disease
(coronary artery atherosclerosis), hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and heart valve disease (4). Accordingly, the most common models of heart failure are coronary arterial occlusion,
temporally (partially) or permanently (completely); aortic constriction or high-salt feeding; gene-deficient and knockout
models; and mitral, aortic regurgitation (10). Each model of
heart failure has its pros and cons versus the respective human
condition. Left anterior descending artery ligation is the most
widely used model; however, in the myocardial infarction
model, distal myocardial tissue to the occlusion site was almost
normal, especially in rodent animals, even a couple of months
postocclusion (7). Aortic constriction offers a good model for
myocyte hypertrophy in mice, rats, swine, and dogs. However,
the occurrence of congestive heart failure (CHF) post-aortic
constriction depends on the degree of aortic stenosis and the
overload duration (3). Left ventricle function could be preserved up to 4 mo post-aortic banding (even with 72% aortic
constriction) with collagen fiber accumulation in the interstitial
and perivascular space (7). Despite that, gene-deficient and
knockout rodent models were globally used in heart failure
research, and no individual gene-deficient and knockout models could bring a breakthrough in the treatment of heart failure,
probably because of a simple reason: heart failure is not a
disease induced by monogene/protein (4).
Advances in heart failure treatment have been mostly
achieved in surgical progress, like coronary artery stents,
bypass, heart assistant devices, or heart transplantation. However, limitations associated with angioplasty and stent have
been the restenosis that can occur within 6 mo after the initial
procedure. The chance of restenosis is from 25 to 40% (9).
Heart failure research in pharmacological management has
been largely dispirited. There have been many advances in
studying myocyte contractility, but inotropic agents just could
not improve cardiac dysfunction. The fibrosis inhibitors such
as the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, like candesartan (15) and irbesartan, did not show a beneficial effect in a
patient with CHF (13, 18). To date, there is no single drug
regimen that could effectively reverse cardiac dysfunction.
Despite the fact that gene therapy and stem cells therapy offer
great promise for heart failure treatment, uncertainties and
controversies still remain, including the high-yield transgene
expression/stem cell implantation in the heart and long-term
utility. In that regard, the obvious question is, What type of
cells can be regenerated to strengthen cardiac performance:
myocytes or endothelial cells (capillaries)? Do the regenerated
cells or repaired LV part (ischemic area or remote area) play a
key role in the overall progression of the heart failure and to
what extent (2, 17)? This largely addresses our predicament in
understanding heart failure: Which cardiac component(s)
COMMON CAUSES OF
Editorial Focus
H815
of novel therapies, such as AAV.VEGFa transgene, stem cell
therapies, and antiangina (ivabradine and ranolazine) therapies.
9.
GRANTS
This work was supported in part by Research Centers in Minority Institutions Division of Research Infrastructure Grants 1 R15 AA019816-01A1 and
8 G12MD007597.
10.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
11.
G.E.H. conception and design of research; G.E.H. and S.C. analyzed data;
G.E.H., S.C., and N.C. interpreted results of experiments; G.E.H., S.C., and
N.C. drafted manuscript; G.E.H., S.C., and N.C. edited and revised manuscript;
G.E.H. approved final version of manuscript.
12.
REFERENCES
13.
1. Amier RP, Teunissen PF, Marques KM, Knaapen P, van Royen N.
Invasive measurement of coronary microvascular resistance in patients
with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI. Heart 100:
13-20, 2014.
2. Bartunek J, Behfar A, Dolatabadi D, Vanderheyden M, Ostojic M,
Dens J, El Nakadi B, Banovic M, Beleslin B, Vrolix M, Legrand V,
Vrints C, Vanoverschelde JL, Crespo-Diaz R, Homsy C, Tendera M,
Waldman S, Wijns W, Terzic A. Cardiopoietic stem cell therapy in heart
failure: the C-CURE (Cardiopoietic stem Cell therapy in heart failURE)
multicenter randomized trial with lineage-specified biologics. J Am Coll
Cardiol 61: 2329 –2338, 2013.
3. Boluyt MO, Robinson KG, Meredith AL, Sen S, Lakatta EG, Crow
MT, Brooks WW, Conrad CH, Bing OH. Heart failure after long-term
supravalvular aortic constriction in rats. Am J Hypertens 18: 202–212,
2005.
4. Braunwald E. Heart failure. JACC Heart fail 1: 1–20, 2013.
5. Camici PG. Advances in SPECT and PET for the management of heart
failure. Heart 96: 1932–1937, 2010.
6. Cecchi F, Sgalambro A, Baldi M, Sotgia B, Antoniucci D, Camici PG,
Sciagra R, Olivotto I. Microvascular dysfunction, myocardial ischemia,
and progression to heart failure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2: 452–461, 2009.
7. Chen J, Chemaly ER, Liang LF, LaRocca TJ, Yaniz-Galende E,
Hajjar RJ. A new model of congestive heart failure in rats. Am J Physiol
Heart Circ Physiol 301: H994 –H1003, 2011.
8. Chen J, Yaniz-Galende E, Kagan HJ, Liang L, Hekmaty S, Giannarelli C, Hajjar RJ. Abnormalities of capillary microarchitecture in a
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
AJP-Heart Circ Physiol • doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00118.2015 • www.ajpheart.org
Downloaded from http://ajpheart.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
rat model of coronary ischemic congestive heart failure. Am J Physiol
Heart Circ Physiol 308: 2015. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00583.2014.
Dangas G, Kuepper F. Cardiology patient page. Restenosis: repeat
narrowing of a coronary artery: prevention and treatment. Circulation 105:
2586 –2587, 2002.
Houser SR, Margulies KB, Murphy AM, Spinale FG, Francis GS,
Prabhu SD, Rockman HA, Kass DA, Molkentin JD, Sussman MA,
Koch WJ; American Heart Association Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology. Animal models of heart
failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ
Res 111: 131–150, 2012.
Kaufmann PA, Camici PG. Myocardial blood flow measurement by
PET: technical aspects and clinical applications. J Nucl Med 46: 75–88,
2005.
Koudstaal S, Jansen Of Lorkeers SJ, van Slochteren FJ, van der Spoel
TI, van de Hoef TP, Sluijter JP, Siebes M, Doevendans PA, Piek JJ,
Chamuleau SA. Assessment of coronary microvascular resistance in the
chronic infarcted pig heart. J Cell Mol Med 17: 1128 –1135, 2013.
Massie BM, Carson PE, McMurray JJ, Komajda M, McKelvie R, Zile
MR, Anderson S, Donovan M, Iverson E, Staiger C, Ptaszynska A,
Investigators IP. Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved
ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 359: 2456 –2467, 2008.
Olivotto I, Girolami F, Sciagra R, Ackerman MJ, Sotgia B, Bos JM,
Nistri S, Sgalambro A, Grifoni C, Torricelli F, Camici PG, Cecchi F.
Microvascular function is selectively impaired in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sarcomere myofilament gene mutations. J Am
Coll Cardiol 58: 839 –848, 2011.
Onishi K, Dohi K, Koji T, Funabiki K, Kitamura T, Imanaka-Yoshida
K, Ito M, Nobori T, Nakano T. Candesartan prevents myocardial fibrosis
during progression of congestive heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
43: 860 –867, 2004.
Petersen JW, Pepine CJ. Microvascular coronary dysfunction and ischemic heart disease: Where are we in 2014? Trends in cardiovascular
medicine, 2014.
Schachinger V, Erbs S, Elsasser A, Haberbosch W, Hambrecht R,
Holschermann H, Yu J, Corti R, Mathey DG, Hamm CW, Suselbeck
T, Werner N, Haase J, Neuzner J, Germing A, Mark B, Assmus B,
Tonn T, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM, Investigators RA. Improved clinical
outcome after intracoronary administration of bone-marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction: final 1-year results of the
REPAIR-AMI trial. Eur Heart J 27: 2775–2783, 2006.
Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray
JJ, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J, Investigators C, Committees. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and
preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial.
Lancet 362: 777–781, 2003.