Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
4. Mechanisms of cellular drug uptake Drug movements by simple diffusion W.D. Stein. Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel It is clear that a large number of drugs and chemotherapeutic substances get into the target cell after crossing the cell's plasma membrane by simple diffusion. Two factors determine the permeability of a cell membrane for a particular drug: (i) the ability of the drug to dissolve in the cell membrane (i.e., its partition coefficient) and (ii) the rate at which the drug moves within the membrane (i.e. its diffusion coefficient). Studies of the basal permeability of the human red blood cell membrane enable one to sort out these two effects. By comparing a set of permeability coefficients with the partition coefficients for model solvents, one can determine which solvent is the best model for the partitioning properties of the rate-limiting step for movement across the cell membrane. It turns out that mono- and di-unsaturated hexadecanes model best this barrier. Having ascertained the best model for the partitioning behaviour of the membrane, one can attempt to calculate diffusion coefficients within the membrane. These show a steep size-dependence, suggesting that the membrane behaves as a thin polymeric sheet rather than as a simple solvent phase. Applying this model to the movement of cytotoxins as large as daunomycin suggests that the model applies also to this size range. But the data on transport rates for such large molecules are also consistent with movement by a flip-flop mechanism.Transport within the membrane can be considered in terms of Eyring's activation energy model. The flip-flop model is consistent with a scheme whereby one high energy barrier separates the two half-bilayers. The continuum model posits that a number of smaller activation energy barriers exist in series across the membrane. Partitioning into and out of the membrane has consequences also for an activation energy model. Binding of drugs to proteins in the plasma (such as serum albumen) can drastically lower the concentration of free drug and hence greatly reduce transport rates into the cell. The multidrug resistance pump, P-glycoprotein appears to be able to reduce the rate of influx of drugs into the cell, i.e. to decrease the membrane's permeability to the drug. The 'vacuum cleaner' model for P-glycoprotein seems to explain this behaviour. Passive and active transport of drugs across the plasma membrane of cells with active drug transport by ABC transporters A. Garnier-Suillerot. Laboratoire de Physicochimie Biomoleculaire et Cellulaire, Universite Paris Nord, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017 Bobigny, France Membrane proteins belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family of transport proteins play a central role in the defence of cells against toxic compounds. Two human members of the ABC family have been identified that can render mammalian tumor cells multidrug resistant: the MDR1 P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and the multidrug resistance protein (MRP1). Both proteins confer drug resistance by active, ATP-dependent extrusion of a range of cytotoxic drugs from the cell. Drug accumulation is the result of a balance between passive permeability of the membrane and the effect of an efflux pump (Pgp or MRP). In the search for new compounds able to overcome MDR, it is of prime importance to determine the molecular parameters whose modifications would lead to an increase in the influx and/or to a decrease in the P-glycoproteinmediated efflux. Several anthracyclines were used to analyse the respective contribution of the influx and the transporter-mediated efflux in their impaired accumulation in MDR cells (K562/Adr overexpressing P-gp and GLC4/Adr overexpressing MRP). For this purpose, a simple method based on a continuous spectrofluorometric monitoring of the decrease of the fluorescence signal of anthracyclines during incubation with living cells, was used. The influx of these drugs varies over a very large range (for instance the influx of idarubicin is 400 times higher than that of doxorubicin). As can be expected, the influx increases as the lipophilicity increases. In contrast, the efficiency of their P-gp (or by MRP1) mediated transport, determined as the ratio V M (maximum rate)/K m (Michaelis constant), is comparable. With this ratio being almost the same for the different drugs, it follows that the intracellular free cytosolic drug concentration depends mainly on their passive influx. Therefore, the different resistance factors obtained for these drugs are mainly due to differences in passive influx and not in P-gp-mediated or MRP-mediated efflux of these drugs. The effect of plasma membrane transport on the intracellular free drug concentration J. Lankelma. Free University Hospital, Dept. of Medical Oncology, Room BR 230, P.O. Box 7057,1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands When the free drug concentration in the extracellular fluid (Co) is raised stepwise, inward drug transport across the plasma membrane begins and the cytosolic free drug concentration (C,) rises. C, is assumed to rapidly equilibrate with the target concentration. If the molecules inside the cell distribute relatively rapidly so that the local intracellular free drug concentration (C,) is the same, everywhere in the cell, the cell can be described by a one-compartment model. The time it takes to reach the steady state depends on the turnover time for efflux. This turnover time (n) is proportional to the apparent cellular distribution volume (Vd). Vd depends on binding and sequestration in endosomes/lysosomes. Assuming that C, and C o are the concentrations of the transportable form of the molecule, only in the case of active drug pumping against a concentration gradient (e.g. by P-glycoprotein or multidrug resistance protein) will C, be less than Co at the steady state. When C , « KM and Michaelis-Menten kinetics for drug pumping is followed, C|/Co can be calculated from the dimensionless factor Vj^x/fKm.k) (in which k = permeation coefficient for passive transport, expresssed in / (106 cells min)" 1 ). In addition to the available methodology for measuring transport parameters we have developed a flowthrough-system and an in-cuvette transport assay for monolayer cells. With the first method we can measure C, and P-glycoprotein mediated pumping rate simultaneously. The latter method allows us to measure cellular efflux of a broad range of fluorescence probes. Examples will be presented. A drug pump can pump as a cytosolic drug pump and/or as a vacuum cleaner. The latter manifests as decreased cellular influx, in which case the drug is pumped out of a 'membrane-compartment'. At steady state, the contribution of lowering of Q by both modes cannot be distinguished. However, in a dynamic situation, when the extracellular drug concentration varies in time, the C, versus time profiles are different for the two modes, and it appears that a vacuum cleaner is especially effective in keeping Ci low. C, can be increased by drug pump inhibitors (reversers). Studies on inhibition of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance protein by reversers has indicated competitive and non-competitive inhibition. Distinguishing between these two mechanisms has not (yet) shown to be important for chemotherapy with blood concentrations, which are most of the time under the KM for drug pumping. More studies on the mechanisms of inhibition could lead to selective inhibitors with interesting therapeutic applications. It could be of advantage to selectively inhibit P-glycoprotein mediated drug transport, e.g. of the blood-brain-barrier. Carrier mediated transport of anti-neoplasties and the multiplicity of transport systems in mammalian cells I.D. Goldman. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine and Molecular Pharmacology Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chanin Two, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, U.S.A. A variety of antineoplastics utilize carrier transport mechanisms to traverse cells membranes. These agents are predominantly structural analogs of naturally occurring substrates that parasitize transport routes normally utilized by these substrates. Important examples are transporters that mediate translocation of nucleosides and antifolates. Transport carriers can be equilibrating or uphill. The former facilitate the rapid translocation of substrates across the cell membrane but do not directly utilize free energy to generate transmembrane gradients. Carriers that are intrinsically equilibrating can, however, generate gradients when the flow of one substrate is linked to energy-dependent flow of other substrates concentrated by a different transport mechanism. There are, in addition, transport processes that are directly linked to the release of free energy in the hydrolysis of ATP. Transport of most antineoplastics is usually mediated by several transport routes. Hence, unidirectional fluxes and steady-state levels achieved are determined by the net effect of these processes. For antifolates, in particular, uphill transport into the cell mediated by the reduced folate carrier is opposed by a high capacity anion exporter. The recent cloning of the reduced folate carrier has now permitted a very careful analysis of mutations that occur under antifolate selective pressure that result in impaired drug transport and consequent drug resistance. These analyses have provided very important structure-function insights and clarify how cells can lose the ability to transport a drug while preserving transport capacity for the natural species required to sustain growth. Finally, tranport systems control the rates of drug entry and exit from cells along with the steady-state concentrations achieved. Each of these parameters may play a critical role in determining drug efficacy based upon the relationship between transport and the interaction between the drug and its target or an intermediary catabolic or anabolic enzyme.