* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 9 Rotational dynamics
Brownian motion wikipedia , lookup
Hunting oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Sagnac effect wikipedia , lookup
Inertial frame of reference wikipedia , lookup
Uncertainty principle wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Jerk (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Center of mass wikipedia , lookup
Fictitious force wikipedia , lookup
Routhian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Four-vector wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Tensor operator wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector wikipedia , lookup
Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup
Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Accretion disk wikipedia , lookup
Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Angular momentum wikipedia , lookup
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Angular momentum operator wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 10 Angular momentum 10-1 Angular momentum of a particle 1. Definition Consider a particle of mass m and linear momentum P at a position r relative to the origin o of an inertial frame we define the “angular momentum” L of the particle with respect to the origin o to be L r P z y (10-1) r x m P Its magnitude is L rp sin (10-2) where is the smaller angle between r and P , we also can write it as L pr rp Note that , for convenience r and P are in xy plane. 2. The relation between torque and angular momentum Differentiating Eq(10-1) we obtain dL dr dP P r r F dt dt dt (10-6) dr d r Here P v P 0 v , the dt dt dP F and dt Eq(10-6) states that “the net torque acting on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of its angular momentum. Sample problem 10-1 A particle of mass m is released from rest at point p (a) Find torque and angular momentum with respect to origin o (b) Show thatthe relation yield a correct P r dL dt b o m result . y mg x Solution: (a) mgb z 0 ( b is the moment arm) L r m v bmgt z 0 d L (b) bmg z 0 dt 10-2 Systems of particles 1.To calculate the total angular momentum L of a system of particle about a given point, we must add vectorially the angular momenta of all the individual particles about this N point. L L1 L2 LN Ln (10-8) As time goes on, L n 1 may change. That is dL d d L1 L2 n dt dt dt Total internal torque is zero because the torque resulting from each internal action- reaction force dL pair is zero. Thus n ext dt (10-9) That is: “the net external torque acting on a system of particles is equal to the time rate of change of the total angular momentum of the system.” Note that: (1) the torque and the angular momentum must be calculated with respect to the same origin of an inertia reference frame. (2) Eq(10-9) holds for any rigid body. d P and dL 2. F dt dt F// P P// Suppose a force F acts on a particle which moves with momentum P . We can resolve F into two components, as shown in Fig 10-3: F P P P P Fig 10-3 The component F// gives a changein momentum p // , which changes the magnitude of P ; on the other hand, the F gives that changes an increment P the direction of P . The same analysis holds for the action of a torque L , as shown in Fig 10-4. In t this case L must be parallel to . We once again resolve (a) into two components // L // and L . The component // // changes the L in magnitude but not in direction (Fig 10 4a ). The component (b) gives an increment L L , which changes the direction of Fig 10-4 L but not its magnitude (Fig10-4b). L // L L L L L An example of the application of Eq(10-9) for rotational dynamics is shown in Fig 10-5. In Fig 10-5, a student pushes tangentially on the wheel with a force f at its rim, inorder to make it spin faster. {The (// L ) due to f increases the magnitude of L .} Fig 10-5a N r o f F L mg In Fig 10-5b, we have release one support of the axis. There are two forces acting: a normal force N ' at the supporting point o, which gives no torque about o, and the wheel’s weight acting downward at the Cm. Fig 10-5b N' L O’ L mg The torque about point o due to the weight is perpendicular to L and its effect is to change the direction of L . Note that: (1).Eq(10-9) holds when and L are measured with respect to the origin of an inertial reference frame. (2). Eq(10-9) would not apply to an arbitrary point which is moving in complicated way. However if the reference point is chosen to be the Cm of the system, even though this point may be accelerating, then Eq(10-9) does hold. 10-3 Angular momentum and angular velocity 1.Angular momentum and angular Fig 10-6a velocity Fig10-6a shows a single particle r' of mass m attached to a rigid m massless shaft by a rigid, ' massless arm of length r perpendicular to the shaft. The particle moves at constant speed y v in a circle of radius r ' . V x We imagine the experiment to be done in a region of negligible gravity, so that the only force acting on the particle is centripetal force exerted by the arm r ' . The shaft is confined to the z axis by two thin ideal bearings (frictionless). Let the lower bearing define the origin o of our coordinate system. The upper bearing prevent the shaft from wobbling about the z axis. The angular velocity of the particle upward along the z axis no matter where the origin is chosen along the z axis. v v r ' r sin The angular momentum L of the particle with respect to the origin o is(shown in Fig 10-6b) L r P , not parallel to . L L If we choose the origin o P r' to lie in the plane of the circulating particle, then L L z // r otherwise, it is not. o y x Fig 10-6b Lz L sin rp sin rmv sin r mv mr ' '2 Now mr is the rotational inertial about z axis. Thus Lz I I '2 (10-10) of the particle Note that the vector relation L I correct in this case. (10-11) is not 2. Under what circumstance will L and point in the same direction? Let us add another particle of the same mass at same location as the (first) m1 , but in the opposite direction. m2 L1 L L2 P2 P1 m1 o Fig 10-7 The component L due to this second particle will be equal and opposite to that of the first one, and the two L vectors sum to zero. The two I z vectors in the same direction. Thus for this two-particles system, L// We can extend our system to a rigid body, made up of many particles. If the body is symmetric about the axis of rotation, which is called “axial symmetry”, L and are parallel then L I (10-12) (1). If L stands for the vector component Lz , then Eq(10-12) holds for any rigid body, symmetrical or not. (2). For symmetrical bodies, the upper bearing (Fig(10-6)) may be removed, and the shaft will remain parallel to the z axis. Any small asymmetry in the subject requires the second bearing to keep the shaft in a fixed direction, the bearing must exert a torque on the shaft, otherwise the shaft would wobble as the object rotates. Sample problem 10-2 Which has greater magnitude, the angular momentum of the Earth about its center or angular momentum about the center of its orbit. Lorb 23.5 Lrot Earth Sun Fig 10-8 2 T 5 2 2 2 I spin MR E 5 T Solution: I spin 2 MR E 2 Lrot T 24h 8.64 10 4 s 2 2 24 6 (5.98 10 kg) (6.37 10 m) 5 8.64 10 4 s 7.06 10 33 kg m 2 / s Lorb Rorb P I orb orb MRorb 2 2 Torb 2 (5.98 10 kg) (1.50 10 m) 3.16 10 7 s 2.67 10 40 kg m 2 / s 24 11 2 The orbital angular momentum Lorb is far greater then the rotational angular momentum Lrot . The Lorb points at right angles to the plane of the Earth ‘s orbit, while L is inclined at an angle of rot 23.5 to the normal to the plane. ( neglecting the very slow precession ). Sample problem 10-3 Solve the sample problem 9-10 bydirect dL application of Eq(10-9). ( ) dt Solution: Lz I mvR Applying z dLz yields dt d mgR ( I mvR) dt dv I mR dt 1 2 a mgR ( MR ) mRa 2 R 2mg a M 2m M o m y mg 10-4 Conservation of angular momentum 1. From ext ext dL (Eq (10-9)) , if dt 0 then L cons tan t Li L f (10-5) Eq(10-15) is the mathematical statement of the principle of conservation of angular momentum: “if the net external torque acting on a system is zero, the total vector angular momentum of the system remains constant” This is a general result that is valid for a wide range of system. It holds true in both the relativistic limit and in the quantum limit. Eq(10-9) is a vector equation and is equivalent to three one-dimensional equations. Any component of the angular momentum will be constant if the corresponding component of the torque is zero. Examples (1).The spinning skater A spinning ice skater pulls her arms close to her body to spin faster and extends them to spin slower. (2).The springboard diver (3). The rotating bicycle wheel and the spinning top (Section 10-5) 10-5 Spinning top z z z r sin L z L sin M precession circle o a the top mg r o b Fig 10-18 d o c L L o d dL Fig 10-18a shows a top spinning about its axis. The bottom point of the top is fixed at origin o. The axis of this spinning top will moves slowly about the vertical axis oz. This motion is called precession, and it arises from the configuration illustrated in Fig 10-4b, with gravity supplying the external torque. In fig 10-18b, the gravitational force Mg acting at the top’s Cm gives a torque about O of magnitude Mgr sin (10-18) which is perpendicular to the axis of the top and therefore perpendicular to L (Fig(10-18c). The torque can change the direction of L but not its magnitude. d L dt (10-19) The direction of d L is parallel to . If the top has axial symmetry, and if it rotates about its axis at high speed, then the angular momentum will be along the axis of rotation of the top. When L changes direction, the tip of the L vector and the axis of the top trace out a circle about the z axis. This motion is the precession of the top. In a time dt, the axis rotates through an angle (Fig10-18d), and thus the angular speed of d d precession P is P (10-20) dt From Fig10-18d, we see that dL dt (10-21) d L sin L sin d Mgr sin Mgr Thus P dt L sin L sin L (10-22) (1) The processional speed is inversely proportional to the angular momentum; the faster the top is spinning, the slower it will process. Conversely, as friction slows down the rotational angular speed, the processional angular speed increase. (2) The vector relationship of Eq(10-22) is (10-23) P L