Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Social group wikipedia , lookup
Index of sociology articles wikipedia , lookup
Social development theory wikipedia , lookup
Symbolic interactionism wikipedia , lookup
Sociology of terrorism wikipedia , lookup
Structural functionalism wikipedia , lookup
History of sociology wikipedia , lookup
Differentiation (sociology) wikipedia , lookup
Sociology of knowledge wikipedia , lookup
Sociology of culture wikipedia , lookup
Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 3, Lecture 1 Topic: Course Overview Overview In Week 3 we explore three sociological issues very close to each one of us – education, religion, and family. First, we attempt to define the family by comparing the ideas of kinship systems, extended and nuclear families. Through an exploration of the functionalist, conflict/feminist, and symbolic interactionist sociological theories of the family and snapshots of diversity among contemporary American families, marriage and divorce, and family violence, a deeper understanding of the changing family in a changing society emerges. Sociologist Emile Durkheim puts forth his theories of the functions of religion and other sociological theorists do the same but, as expected, from entirely different points of view, but not before we ask and attempt to answer the crucial question, “What is religion in and to society?” We explore an understanding of religion and holding a religious worldview in terms of its sociological meaning to the individual and to the individual in society. We then move on to education. We ask if education really matters. In the big scheme of things, does our social origin effect the type of occupation we will pursue and eventually inhabit? Are ethnic and gender inequality non-issues in regard to a person’s educational and social mobility in the 21st century? Our exploration of education in society, through a closer look at sociological theories and an attempt to debunk several of society’s myths regarding education, brings us full circle to face the disturbing realities found in the answers to such questions. SO1200_W3_L1_S1_G1 Families, Education, and Religion Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 3, Lecture 2 Topic: Families and Intimate Relationships Families (1 of 3) What is the traditional family? Of course, the nuclear family of dad, mom, baby, and dog, comes to mind, but so does the reality that for as many examples of the ideal family we all hope for there are as many examples of the types of dysfunctional families we struggle in and with. Suppose you were to ask a room full of people from various walks of life to tell you about their family experiences growing up? One of them might tell you how they were lucky to have a mother and father who cared about them, who nourished them, and who saw to all of their personal and social needs and, because of this, they realize the importance of the family helping them along the road of life. Another might tell you how hard it was for them as a child, because they never knew her dad (her mother became pregnant in high school and her boyfriend wanted no part of it). She only remembers how hard her mother struggled to make ends meet and how much she missed having a father growing up. Another might say how difficult it was to grow up with parents who didn’t get along well and how he was both relieved and devastated when they finally split up and went their separate ways — how difficult it could be to spend your childhood going from mom’s place to dad’s and never knowing when the next move would be. At the same time, parents in the room might speak of the joys and tremors of raising children in a family or someone in the room might speak of the difficulties of marriage and how challenging it is to get along with the spouse’s immediate family through many valiant efforts to do so. Families define an individual, who in turn defines the society. It is the family that we learn how to love, how to hate, how to express our joys and sorrows, and most importantly how to survive in a society. And we learn all these through our interactions with the other members of the family, our kins. To be able to understand the family, and its position in the greater microcosm of society, we must try and understand how families were formed and how individual relationships gradually transformed into close knit familial relationships. SO1200_W3_L2_S1_G1: Sidebar Graphic Title: What is a Family? A family is a composite unit developed by people through relationships to live together, commit economically, and help care for the young. It is through a family that a sense of identity is formed. . Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 3, Lecture 2 Topic: Families and Intimate Relationships Families (2 of 3) SO1200_W3_L2_S2_G1: In the ancient times as society was evolving, people needed a secure system for perpetuation of their kind, and set of rules to define the granting of property rights as well the Sidebar Graphic maintenance of bloodlines. To address this concern and to bind society is a stronger bond Title: Exogamy and the tradition of marriage emerged, which even till date holds strong. Endogamy SO1200_W3_L2_S2_G2: Main Page Static Graphic Title: What is Marriage? Graphic Text: The state of being united legally and emotionally in a relationship to a person, approved by society, where both individuals involved have certain rights and obligations Families and kinships are formed from marital alliances. Our parents, aunts and uncles, brothers and sisters, grandmothers and grandfathers, husbands and wives, sons and daughter, brothers-in law and sisters-in-law, in short, all people whom we call family are either connected to us through marital alliances or are conceived through marriage. Although marriage is a universal concept, the manner in which it can be interpreted worldwide may differ to quite an extant. For instance, here in the United States the only legally accepted form of marriage is monogamy, where two people, usually a man and a woman are married to each other. Serial monogamy, where a person has several spouses in a lifetime but is legally married to only one person at a time, is a commonly observed in western countries. In other parts of the world, societies are often seen practicing polygamy, where one individual is married to two or more members of the opposite sex. In polygyny, practiced in a number of Islamic societies, one man is married to two or more women. The reason for this marital pattern is that for centuries the Arab world has been a strictly patriarchal society where the women place is only in her man’s house. However, with constant tribal strife and wars, common to the region, men would die leaving their women unguarded and alone in the hostile area. Therefore, it only made sense to practice polygyny, where a man took care of a number of wives. And even if the husband were to pass away in another one of those tribal wars, the family of wives, with their strength in numbers would well be able to sustain themselves as well as their children in the hostile Arab desert. Exogamy is defined as marriage outside of a specific group. For example, Jennifer, a Presbyterian Irish-American, marries Jonathan, a lawyer of African-American descent whose family is settled in Philadelphia for generations. However, at the same time, there are societies that have for generations practiced polyandry, where one woman is married to two or more men. For example, the Pahari Endogamy is defined as (literally translated to “from the mountains”) people, living in the lower sections of the marriage within a specific Himalayas in India, Nepal, Sikkim, and Bhutan, have been practicing polyandry through cultural, social, religious, and generations. The rationale for this marriage pattern too is quite interesting. It has been usually observed that polyandry in practiced in cultures settled in the hills. There is always an ethnic group. For example, acute shortage of land that can be cultivated on in mountains, and in order to keep the land in Martha, a Jewish-American, the family and to prevent it from getting divided among posterity, the brothers in a family get marries Chad, another Jewish American. married to one woman. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 3, Lecture 2 Topic: Families and Intimate Relationships Families (3 of 3) Families are a part of what sociologists call kinship systems or patterns of relationship which help us understand family’s relationships to one another. SO1200_W3_L2_S3_G1: Sidebar Graphic SO1200_W3_L2_S3_G2: Main Page Graphic Title: Understanding Kinship Graphic Text: Kinship is a social network formed by people with common ancestral ties, marriage alliances, or adoption. Title: Families of Orientation and Procreation Preindustrial societies functioned through a close sense of kinship, and it was through the kinship systems that the sense of family has emerged. Parents would hand over their land and livelihood to their children who would then do the same. Kinship systems also determined descent in the family system. There are three forms of descent that kinship system defines: Title: Patrilineal, Matrilineal, and Bilateral Kinship Systems Patrilineal kinship systems descend through the father, matrilineal kinship systems through the mother, and bilateral kinship systems through both. We see the patrilineal system of kinship in societies that are largely pastoral in nature; for example, the Durrani Pashtun nomads roaming the western parts of Afghanistan. They are characterized by their patrilineal organization where not only is kinship descent traced through males, but also almost all property is inherited through men. People in patrilineal societies recognize that they are related to their mothers and their maternal relatives, but major property is not transmitted through maternal relations, and relationships with them tend to be primarily emotional Family of Orientation: A family formed rather than economic or political. when a person is born into that family. Jim is born to Beth and Tom Brown. For Jim, The Ashanti, a section of the people, also known as the Akans in Ghana, which is his family of Beth, Tom, and himself is the located in the western region of Africa, traces the matrilineal kinship of descent. family of orientation. Matrilineal descent is not to be confused with the idea of matriarchy, which is a tradition in which community power lies with the women, usually the mothers of a community. In matrilineal kinship, however, women do have a certain importance, but male members of the matrilineage exercise power and authority. The only difference is that the kinship is traced through female members. Property is even sometimes bequeathed through maternal relations. For instance, a maternal uncle in the family will bequeath his property to his sister’s son. Members of families in post-industrialized nations, on the other hand, trace their descent from both the mother and the father, thus following bilateral kinship. For example, the system of descent that we trace in the United States is bilateral where we have equal rights to both parents’ properties. Family of Procreation: A family formed when a person is adopted into that family. Jim is an orphan. He is adopted by Beth and Tom Brown. The family that is formed after he is adopted is his family of procreation. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 3 Topic: Sociological Theories of the Family Sociological Theories of the Family (1 of 3) Sociologists who study family, formed through marriage, and systems of kinship, are the first to realize just how complicated it is to try and pen down just what the family is all about. Is the family about stability or change, complexity or simplicity, psychologically healthy or detrimental? Lets us see how sociological theories have attempted to understand the purpose of a family and the reasons for why the family is sometimes not able to sustain itself. SO1200_W3_L3_S1_G1: Side Bar Graphic Functionalist theorists believe that families meet the needs of society to socialize children and reproduce new members and are organized around a harmony of interests. The family demarcates sexual behavior, for instance through established familial ties incest taboos, such as sexual relations between parents and their children, and between brothers and sisters, and is prohibited. Economic, social, and psychological stability is also provided by the family where the head of the household provides economic stability for the family members, thus insuring psychological security. Sociology of family is the subdiscipline of sociology that attempts to describe and explain patters of family life and variations in family structure Functionalists believe that breakdown in external support systems may push a family towards experiencing social disorganization. For instance, let’s say Chad and Jane have been married for 20 years and have two sons, Dan and Marty. Chad, who has been working as a production manager in an automobile factory loses his job because the company decides to shift its production to China. He collects unemployment for a year while looking for a job the entire time. In spite of all his efforts, Chad is unable to get a job that is respectable and fits his professional needs. Finally, he settles to work as a server in one of the hip restaurants in town. Jane, on the other hand, is a systems analyst doing very well professionally and is expecting a promotion. There is an instant clash of interest and ego between the couple. Chad is ashamed of his job because he ends up serving his friends and family who have, for years, been eating at this restaurant. What makes the matter even more complicated is the stark difference in status so far his wife and he are concerned. They are now looking into a possible divorce settlement. The external economic support that was responsible for their economic, social, and psychological well-being broke when Chad lost his job, consequently resulting in social disorganization of the family. Title: Sociology of Family Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 3 Topic: Sociological Theories of the Family Sociological Theories of the Family (2 of 3) Conflict and Feminist theorists believe that families reinforce and support power relations in society and inculcate values consistent with the needs of dominant institutions. Families change as the economic organization of society changes. In addition, according to them families are gendered institutions that reflect the gender hierarchies in society and are a primary agent of gender socialization. They believe that families involve a power imbalance between men and women and that they evolve in new forms as the society becomes more or less egalitarian. In the example of Chad and Jane, discussed in the previous lecture, we see a example of conflict and feminist perspective in play. Conflict theory states that families, because patriarchal in structure, maintain gender demarcations. On this ground, the proponents of patriarchy, vis-à-vis the man, although not opposed completely to the woman in the house working to earn money, is not to comfortable either when his social standing is uprooted when the woman ascends in social status. When Jane, the systems analyst is looking to climb the corporate ladder through an upcoming promotion, Dan is not able to handle the sudden rise in status, especially when he is waiting on customers at a local restaurant. As a result, he demands a divorce, thus breaking the social construct called marriage. Symbolic interactionist theorists believe families emerge as people interact to meet basic needs and develop meaningful relationships and that families are where people learn social identities through their interactions with others. Families are places where people negotiate their roles and relationships with each other and they change as people develop new understandings of family life. It is the individual in the family who, according to the symbolic interactionist, builds the family and a sense of belonging for the other family members through their interactions. For instance, children who grow up within dysfunctional families, where both parents are completely devoted to their career and have very little time for the children or even each other as husband and wife, fail to understand and even relate to what family bondage is. The inability to interact eventually leads to the breakdown of the family. Course: Principles of Sociology SO1200_W3_L3_S2_G1: Side Bar Graphic Title: Family as a Gendered Institution Graphic text: In the family, a man, the patriarchal head, is responsible for providing economic stability, making important decisions, and providing leadership; he gains status because he is the breadwinner. A woman, on the other hand, is simply required to bear children and care for and nurture them. Because there is no direct economic ramification attached to the role of the wife or mother, and it is looked at as unpaid labor, her contribution is devalued. Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 3 Topic: Sociological Theories of the Family Sociological Theories of the Family (3 of 3) The Postmodernist perspective looks at family to understand what kind of effect has technology had on the structure of family and familial relationships. With the advent of technology and a fast paced lifestyle anything and everything that we may want is easily available; we never realize the value of what we have. Family relations are taken for granted, emotions and emotional demands are put off for the next day, and the family is not what we come back to after a hard days work, but a place that we stop for a while so that we can start again the next day. SO1200_W3_L3_S3_G1: Main Page Static Graphic Title: Urbanity in the Postmodernistic Family Urbanity is another characteristic of the postmodern family When the pressures of the outside world overwhelm our personal familial space, family dynamics change. Demographically families do not look the same as they did as few as 20 years ago. Today, married couples are smaller in proportion to the number of households; single-parent households are growing in number; divorced and people never before married are growing in numbers. Another staggering statistic is that it has become common for many people to spend more time caring for their elderly parents than they did caring for their children growing up. SO1200_W3_L3_S3_G1: Main Page Animated Graphic Title: Consider the following unique family configurations, unheard-of 50 years ago and popular today in contrast to the traditional idea of a nuclear family. Instruction Text: Click each tab to learn Woman-Headed Households Eighty-eight percent of single-parent households are headed by women; onequarter of all children live with one parent. High rates of pregnancy among teens and an equally high divorce rate are the two primary causes of these high numbers. Sociological Alarm: Many sociologists, and people in general, believe the growing number of woman-headed households signals a breakdown of the family and, consequently, of society. Sociological Benefit: An alternate view voices the opinion that such a trend favors the breakdown of historical barriers designed to suppress a woman’s stride for independence. Married-Couple Families We all recall going on a vacations with our families, and right in the middle of a beach Volley ball game with our kids, our cell phone rings and the boss is on the line asking about the document that they forgot to have us look at before we left for our vacation. Because of easy access to just about everyone at anytime time of the day, boundaries between the public and the private sphere are becoming invisible. Consequently, this is negatively affecting family life where the previously clear distinction between work-time and familytime is lost. The number of married-couple families who form commuter marriages — one partner lives in a different city than the other because their jobs require it — and two-income marriages — both partners work while children are in daycare — is increasing phenomenally. Sociological Alarm: Conservatives wonder who is raising society’s children and whether or not two-incomes actually find justification in the end with the cost of daycare and other expenses necessary to maintain such a lifestyle. Sociological Benefit: Many argue that such sociological arrangements allow both partners to achieve levels of independence not traditionally available. Stepfamilies \ The rise in divorce and remarriage rates is accompanied by the rise of stepfamily situations also. Nearly 40 percent of all marriages involve stepchildren. Sociological Alarm: As families expand with children and stepchildren, parents find them more difficult to manage. There are also issues of jealousy, competition, and intimacy among families consisting of strangers coming together.Sociological Benefit: A family’s ability to adapt in diverse situations can prepare its members for society’s difficulties also. Gay and Lesbian Households Research shows that gay and lesbian couples are less gender-stereotyped and more flexible than heterosexual couples. However, people with traditional understanding of the family do not see this kind of a family beneficial for either the child who is brought up in such a family or for society. Even more embroiled in this struggle is the ongoing debate of whether or not gay and lesbian marriages should be recognized by law. Several states, such as Vermont and Massachusetts, say they should, and at present, many others are struggling with an answer to the question.Sociological Alarm: Conservatives are deeply concerned about the implications of such relationships on children.Sociological Benefit: According to gay and lesbian activists, statistics show children raised in gay and lesbian homes are less likely to develop stereotypical gender roles, are more tolerant and open-minded of others, and, therefore, are better for society as a whole. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 4 Topic: Sociological Theories of Religion Understanding Religion (1 of 5) The six main world religions, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Title: Civil Religion Islam and Confucianism, have to say a lot about our society, our history The religion emerging after the separation and our culture. Religion is not removed from us; religion is an intrinsic part of the state and church resulted in what is of us. It defines us, tells the world our history, and talks about our cultural referred to as Civil Religion — a term understandings and misunderstandings. Since religion is an offshoot of our coined by sociologist Robert Bellah in the geographical and cultural definitions, each religion spews irregularities. late 1960s. And in an attempt to understand the diverseness of all religious philosophy and practices we more than often tend to misunderstand and then consequently stereotype. For example, ritualistic sacrifices of cattle in Hinduism would surely be misunderstood as grotesque and inhuman by people practicing Christianity. Try as we may, it is difficult to empathize with the religious worldview of another without filtering it through our own personal religious autobiographical bias and uncertainty regarding its authenticity. To understand the various religions in this world we first need to understand what we mean by religion. To answer this question we must begin by attempting to come to terms with the sociological term “religion.” Depending on whom we address the question, one answer we receive is likely to be diametrically opposed to another. Is religion born out of a desire, a longing to understand where we have been and where we are going? National values celebrated on days such as the Fourth of July and Memorial Day have same ritualistic fervor to it as would let’s say Hanukkah (the Jewish new year), or Divali (the Hindu new year). Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 4 Topic: Sociological Theories of Religion Understanding Religion ( 2 of 5) SO1200_W3_L4_S1_G1:Main Page Static Graphic SO1200_W3_L4_S1_G1:Side Bar Graphic Title: What is Religion? Title: Marxist Perspective on Religion The father of communism, Karl Marx Graphic Text: A system of supernatural constraint, sanction, and religious wrote: practice and a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith. One of the challenges of serious sociological study of the religions of the world we have discussed, according to an understanding of the vast diversity of world views, is learning to become keenly aware of a necessary balancing act. We must respect our own religious associations and those of others with enough poise to open up the forum for discussion and, yes, even debate. To create a “safe space” in which to do this, there needs to be a system that realistically reflects the way thinking about various religious traditions affects us as individuals and community. For a catholic to understand the true dictums propagated by Islam, not the ones by the fundamentalists who toot Islam as being only about Fatwa and jihad, would require them to look at Islam as a religion in itself, and not a parallel comparison with Christianity. A religion that was formed in response to the society and culture of people living in particular topographical region. Sociology should not be an attempt to relate the various world religions to one another in order to coalesce their beliefs into one harmonious whole. Rather, it is a study of religious worldviews at face value. In order to do so we need to, as students of sociology, understand how sociology and its theorist would interpret what religion intrinsically is, and attempt to answer the most important question that we as amateur sociologists should begin our quest of religion with — what is the role of religion in society. “…[R]eligion is the self-consciousness and the self-feeling of the man who has either not yet found himself, or else [having found himself] has lost himself again…it is the opium of the [lost man].” Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 5 Topic What is Religion? Understanding Religion( 3 of 5) Previously, when we spoke of Marx and his idea that religion is merely an SO1200_W3_L5_S2_G1 Title: Functionalist Perspective on “opium of the people,” we were introducing the theory of religion as a Psychological Construct, a theory that seeks to reintegrate men and Religion women who have been alienated by religious tradition back into a world where it’s safe to exist without the illusion or projection of something beyond this world. However, when forces above us strike, forces that we have no control over, we go looking for answers. SO1200_W3_L4_S2_G1: Main Page Static Graphic Religion and the Mystery of Death The writer Stephen Crane, also a master observer of psychological and social realities of his time, observed that in the harsh reality of death, there is a vivid revelation of the human spirit taken by storm. It demands answers of an imagined reality beyond this life. Whether we cry out to a God or gods we cannot see or consult the shaman’s paper spirits and listen for the voice of an ancestor to offer solace, we are simply looking for answers. At the same time, the functionalists suggest that religion is an adhesive that binds culture and people groups together. The functionalists view religion and social order as an integrative force in society and religious beliefs can provide cohesion in the social order by promoting a sense of collective consciousness. Religious practices and rituals reinforce a sense of social belonging. For example, Christmas, celebrated by Christians all over the world is now more of a cultural construct than a ritual. Many Christians who would generally term themselves as agnostics would still buy a Christmas tree, buy Christmas presents for the family,and share a According to the functionalists the lavish Christmas dinner. purpose of religion is to bind people in a cohesive group through sacred beliefs and rituals. It is through our religious bonding that we also develop a sense of cultural association to a group. The most important role that religion plays would be the maintenance of social control. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 5 Topic What is Religion? Understanding Religion( 4 of 5) The conflict theorist views religion and the social order as the basis for intergroup conflict; inequality in society is reflected in religious organizations, which are stratified by factors such as race, class, or gender, and religious beliefs can provide legitimation for oppressive social conditions. Religious practices and rituals define in-groups and out-groups, thereby defining group boundaries. Title: Conflict Perspective on Religion Graphic text: Through dictums of the Hinduism, society was broken into four social castes; namely, Brahmins (the priests), Kshatriya (the warriors), Vashyas (the merchants), and the Shudras (the people confined to lowerend jobs). All through time immemorial, the Shudras, considered the lowest in the social hierarchy were devoid of any interaction with the upper castes. This is a perfect example of what the conflict theorist propagate, that religion defines in-groups and out-groups. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 5 Topic What is Religion? Understanding Religion( 5 of 5) The symbolic interactionist, with the microlevel perspective, views religion and the social order as socially constructed and developed through social and historical change. Religious beliefs are socially constructed and subject to interpretations; they can also be learned through religious conversion and religious practices and rituals are symbolic activities that provide definitions of group and individual identity. At the microlevel perspective, symbolic interactionists view religion not as an institution that holds societies and cultures together, but as a symbolic identity that individuals use to identify with, thereby holding the cultural identity of the group together. Title: Practicality in Religion Many may identify a single ritual performed by a social or religious group as the "religion" of a particular people. In reality, however, the ceremony may merely be an extension of their day-to-day existence. Title: Religion and the Individual The symbol of Christianity — the cross, of Judaism — the star of David, and so on, helps the individual identify with the group and instills a sense of pride, thus maintaining the continuance of the religion. The individual through the associated symbols of religion and interpreted rituals, helps religion and the culture associated with it, survive. Even if the person is removed from the group and is relocated to a different land where there are no remnants of his religion, the symbols help maintain the sense of belonging and identity. For example, when soldiers travel overseas in an event of a war, they are often bid adieu with religious manifestos, such as a St, Patrick’s pendent or a lucky horse show, symbolizing safe journey and good luck. Such symbols help the soldier maintain his social ties and retain his identity For example, The Osages’ — a tribe with the group even though he far away from his loved ones. of southern Sioux Indians living in the Indian Territory in North America — spiritual principle of respect for life dictated that the decision to go to war against required an elevenday ceremony. On a more practical level this would allow time to reconsider one's decision and to consecrate the lives that might be lost as a result of it. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 4 Topic: Education and Social Class Education and Social Class How important is education to you, to your close friends, to your family? Title: Latent and Manifest Functions of education How important is schooling to others in your community-at-large, or to Americans in general, or the world as a whole? Is it important for you to complete a college education in order to experience the kind of lifestyle you want for yourself? Do you come from a socioeconomic background which favors your completing college and achieving this kind of life? SO1200_W3_L4_S1_G1 Title: Education at the Macrolevel and the Microlevel Perspectives At the macrolevel perpective, which is from the functionalist and the conflict theorists’ point-of-view, education is essential in maintaining and perpetuating the culture of a society across generations. At the microlevel perspective, which is from the symbolic interactionists’ point-of-view, education provides people with the basic skills and knowledge necessary to sustain them in society. The Manifest function of education is to socialize, transmit culture, maintain social control, create status, and grow and To answer the questions that we just raised, let’s take a closer look at the innovate. For instance, going to a university functionalist, conflict, symbolic interactionist, and the postmodernists for a bachelor’s degree, we understand what view of education in society. is culturally, socially and academically expected of us. We start by communicating The functionalist view is that education in society fulfills certain societal with our peers differently; our language needs for socialization and training; “sorts” people in society according to changes; we are made aware of what social their abilities. The functionalist believes schools inculcate values needed status we would like to have and what path by the society and take on functions that other institutions, such as the to adopt in order to attain it. family, originally fulfilled. The benefit of society is the ultimate goal of education. According to the functionalists society designs how the young The Latent function of education is are to be educated. matchmaking. Many of us have met our partners at some or the other educational The historic, Sultan Hassan Mosque and madrasa (School) was institution. The other latent function that constructed for Sultan Hassan bin Mohammad bin Qala'oun in 1256 AD education can be credited with is that it as a mosque and religious school for all sects. The building was makes us build our own social networks. We designed so that each of the four main Sunni sects (orthodox Muslim, or start making friends right from the day we Sunni rites, consisting of Shafite, Malikite, Hanefte and Hanbalite) has its start attending grade school. These social own school while sharing the mosque. The madrasa was originally groups formed at school at times last a introduced to Egypt to suppress non-orthodox Muslim sects. Through the lifetime. Education is also at times latently education of young minds in the teachings of the Quran, the Islamic holy responsible for fueling the growing book, the society ensured that there culture would survive in spite of attacks from neighboring non-Muslim kingdoms and well as the nonorthodox Muslim sects. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 6 generation gap. As the manifested function of growth and innovation comes out, we learn new things and gain a different perspective towards the world around us. This alienates us from our parents, since they may not have read the same books at schools as we have. Topic: Sociological Theories of Education Sociological Theories of Education The conflict view puts forth the idea that education in society reflects other inequities Title: Education and Class in society, including race, class, and gender inequality, and perpetuates such inequalities by tracking practices. Schools, the conflict view believes, are hierarchical institutions reflecting conflict and power relations in society and that often, social change threatens to put some groups at continuing disadvantage in the quality of education. For instance, it is well-documented that students from a lower economic class score lower on generalized tests such as SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) and the ACT (American College Test), i.e., students from families with income between $10,000 to $20,000 per year score an average of 442 on the verbal SAT and 456 on the math ACT, while students from families with an annual income of $80,000 to $90,000 score 557 SAT and 569 ACT in these areas. Education and social status has shown us obvious disparity, but what about education and ethnic and gender inequality? Let’s stay with data gathered from the SAT scores. In 2000 results show that American Indians scored an average of 482 verbal, while white Americans scored 528 verbal. African American students scored an average of 434 verbal, while Asian Americans scored an average of 499 verbal. In addition to breading social inequality, conflict theorist believes that educational institutions follow a hidden curriculum of transmitting cultural conformity. For instance in schools catering to the poor sections of the city, you will often notice more stringent rules and ordinances as opposed to the ones in schools catering to the upwardly mobile section of society. The focus is on how students should have the ability and the patience to follow rules, rote memorize information without even understanding, and clear tests. Very little emphasis is given to individual creativity and analytical ability. Around the turn of the 20th Social class origin plays a key role in a person’s eventual occupational path, more so century, when most states didn’t than the effect of the level of education. For example, class and race work in favor of even require that their the upper class and help them from falling victim to “downward mobility,” whereas class constituents be educated, education was thought to be a and race work against the lower classes and block them from “upward mobility.” luxury reserved for children of Sure, class and race, maintains upward mobility, but how do you explain the disparity in the upper class. economic and social status and the ever-present glass ceiling. Conflict theory in mind how would you explain the revealing statistics of how the average income for women remains less than the average income of men based on the same educational levels for both. Consider the following median incomes by education and gender in dollars: Level of Schooling Men Women Less than 9th grade 9th to 12th grade (no diploma) High School graduate Some college, no degree Associate degree Bachelor’s degree Master’s degree Professional degree Doctorate degree 14, 139 (USD) 18,952 8,404 9,995 27,669 33,035 37,956 49,180 59,376 81,606 71,732 15,120 20,181 23,270 30,489 40,246 45,999 48,885 Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 6 Topic: Sociological Theories of Education Sociological Theories of Education As we know, the symbolic interactionists when studying a social phenomenon always Title: Labeling and Self look at the individual in the system unlike the functionalists or the conflict theorists who Fulfilling Prophecy view the impact of educational institution on society as whole. The individual is more important for the symbolic interactionists than the whole society or culture. Therefore, the symbolic interactionist puts forth the view that education in society emerges depending on the kind of social interaction between groups in schools. Schools are sites where social interaction between groups (such as teachers and students) influences chances of success or failure for individuals and groups. These interactions can have positive or negative bearing on the students development if new perceptions of formerly stereotyped groups are not curtailed and reexamined. This discourse of social persection now takes us to understand the concept of labeling — a process explained by the symbolic interactionists, where educational institutions Graphic Text: Labeling a brand students based on their intellectual capacities thus impacting the self confidence student as good or bad makes them behave and perform of the individual. academically as they are labeled. For instance, a student For example let’s say Mrs. Jones is teaching a class of 20 students in a public High when labeled as gifted and School. Out of the 20 students in her class, 8 are white Americans, 5 African intelligent, even if in actuality is Americans, 3 are Asian Americans, and 4 Arab Americans. She has observed in the not as bright, would outperform past years having worked with the African American students that they are on an average getting lower grades compared to the other students in class. She at this point, even the brightest students in labels the students as intellectually less capable than the rest. However, Loretta one of class. This is known as a self the five African American students is a talented painter. The teacher is not aware of her fulfilling prophecy. talent or her gift, and labels her incompetent by sending her to special education classes. Loretta is a bright kid, but her interest lies not in books and classroom activity, rather the outdoors where she can sketch and paint, something that she is really good at. But sending her to special education makes her feel that she is intellectually less than the other students, breaking her self confidence and quashing any desire whatsoever for pursuing a fulfilling career in the arts. Course: Principles of Sociology Lesson: Week 1, Lecture 6 Topic: Summary Summary In Week 3 we’ve learned that the nuclear family has competition more than ever before, for its accepted place in society, and that there are conservative efforts to counter such trends and more liberal attempts to support them and urge them on. We have also learned of the somewhat alarming reality that sociology shows us regarding the disappointing research that social origins still keep the lower classes from upward mobility and the higher classes safe from downward mobility. Religion, the most difficult of sociological phenomena, we have discovered is, like the family itself, undergoing phenomenal sociological changes especially in the forms of interreligious association and society’s utter disdain for the dogmatic and judgmental fabric which once defined its integration of the secular with the sacred.