* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Pythagorean Triples Historical Context: Suggested Readings
Survey
Document related concepts
John Wallis wikipedia , lookup
Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup
History of trigonometry wikipedia , lookup
Ethnomathematics wikipedia , lookup
Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup
Large numbers wikipedia , lookup
Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup
History of mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Location arithmetic wikipedia , lookup
List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Collatz conjecture wikipedia , lookup
Mathematics and architecture wikipedia , lookup
Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Pythagorean Triples Historical Context: • • • • When: ca. 500 B.C. Where: Samos, Greek Ionia Who: Pythagoras Mathematics focus: Investigation of numerical relations connected to right triangles. Suggested Readings: • • • • Pythagoras and his contributions to mathematics and philosophy: http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Pythagoras.html P. Davis’ “Number” (Scientific American, September 1964) or Chapter 13 in M. Kline’s (ed.) Mathematics in the Modern World (1968), pp. 89-97 NCTM’s Historical Topics for the Mathematics Classroom (1969): “Number beliefs of the Pythagoreans” (pp. 51-52) and “Figurate numbers” (pp. 53-57). Key search words/phrases: Pythagoras, Number mysticism, Pythagoreans, right triangle, number theory, Pythagorean triples Problem to Explore: • Investigation integral solutions to the equation a2 + b2 = c2, where these solutions also are the sides of a right triangle. Why This Problem is Important: • • Pythagorean triples are a direct consequence of the Pythagorean Theorem and are part of its rich history. Introduce the mathematical area known as number theory. Problem Solving Experiences: To Pythagoras and his followers, numbers were the quintessential model, being "the principle, source, and root of all things." In turn, Ore (1988, p. 166) suggests that “in view of the particular interest of the Pythagoreans in relations that could be expressed in whole numbers, it would appear natural that they should have investigated the problem of finding right triangles with integral sides.” The problem to explore: Given a right triangle with hypotenuse h and legs m and n, what integral triples (m, m, h) satisfy the equation a2 + b2 = c2 from the Pythagorean Theorem? Some quick examples are (3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), and (8, 15, 17). But, how can one approach the question systematically to explore the world of all possible integral triples (a, b, c)? As a starting point, the Pythagoreans investigated properties of special numbers known as triangular numbers, square numbers, etc. Consider this array showing the connection between 42 and 52: 4 4 4 1 4 From the array, we can make two Pythagorean-type observations: • 42 + (4 + 4 + 1) = 52, which suggests the generalization n2 + (2n + 1) = (n+1)2, an expansion of the trinomial (n+1)2 • The difference between successive squares of integers will be the odd numbers in sequence (e.g. 32 + 7 = 42, 42 + 9 = 52, 52 + 11 = 62) Furthermore, the equation n2 + (2n + 1) = (n+1)2 can be used to generate Pythagorean triples, but the term (2n+1) must be viewed as a perfect square. 1. Let m2 = (2n + 1), for n a positive integer. Rewrite the expression n2 + (2n + 1) = (n+1)2 in terms of m, then use it to produce Pythagorean triples for values of m = 3, 5, …, 13. Why does m have to be odd? Does this process generate all Pythagorean triples (a, b, c)? Proclus, an ancient Greek philosopher and commentator on Euclid’s Elements, claimed that the method used by Pythagoras “starts from odd numbers. For it makes the odd number the smaller of the sides about the right angle; then it takes the square of it, subtracts unity, and makes half the difference the greater of the sides about the right angle; lastly it adds unity to this and so forms the remaining side, the hypotenuse.” (Heath, 1956, p. 356) 2. Letting m be an odd number, show that the method used by Pythagoras is the same method as that generated in Problem #1. After describing Pythagoras’ approach, Proclus continues by describing the approach used by Plato, which “argues from even numbers. For it takes the given even number and makes it one of the sides about the right angle; then, bisecting this number and squaring the half of it, it adds unity to the square to form the hypotenuse, and subtracts unity from the square to form the other side about the right angle.” (Heath, 1956, p. 356) 3. Letting p be an even number, represent Plato’s method by a formula, then use it to produce Pythagorean triples for values of p = 4, 6, …14. Does it produce the same set of Pythagorean triples as Pythagoras’ method starting with an odd number? Also, examine other differences about some of the triples generated? Plato’s method introduces Pythagorean triples such as (6, 8, 10), which is a multiple of the Pythagorean triple (3, 4, 5). The latter is called a “primitive” solution, which occurs whenever the triple (a, b, c) has no common factors. 4. Explain why Pythagoras’ method will generate only primitive Pythagorean triples, while Plato’s method often generates non-primitive triples. Extension and Reflection Questions: Extension 1: A standard set of expressions for generating Pythagorean triples (a,b,c) is a = p2 – q2, b = 2pq, and c = p2 + q2, when p > q > 0. • Show that these expressions satisfy the Pythagorean Theorem. • When generating possible triples with these expressions, why ignore cases when p and q are not relatively prime? • Use these expressions to produce Pythagorean triples for values of p = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, where p and q are relatively prime. • Do these expressions generate any non-primitive Pythagorean triples? • Do these expressions pick up all of the Pythagorean triples produced by both Pythagoras’ and Plato’s methods? • Are any new Pythagorean triples produced that were not generated by either Pythagoras’ or Plato’s methods? Extension 2: The approach and expressions used to generate all Pythagorean triples (a,b,c) in Extension Problem #1 is similar to Euclid’s approach in Lemma 1 to Proposition 28 (Book X): To find two square numbers such that their sum is also square. His argument for generating a triple (a,b,c) is that one can start with two different composite numbers p and q such that (1) both are odd or both are even with p>q, and (2) pq = a2 for an integer a. Then, b = (p-q)/2 and c = (p+q)/2. Use examples, starting with x = 9 or x = 25, to show that Euclid’s method seems to work. Then, prove that Euclid’s method will always produce Pythagorean triples. Extension 3: The approach taken by Pythagoras in Problem #1 leads to another interesting relationship. Recall that all triangles generated by his method had an odd number as its smallest side and its other two sides differed by one. Prove that the circle inscribed in these triangles have integral radii. Remember, the center of the inscribed circle is formed by the common intersection of the angle bisectors. B D E G C A F Open-ended Exploration: Start with the four consecutive Fibonacci numbers 3, 5, 8, and 13. Multiply the two extremes (3x13), then double the product of the two inner numbers (2x5x8). The products 39 and 80 serve as the legs of a right triangle, whose hypotenuse 89 (e.g. 39 2 + 80 2 = 89 ) also happens to be a Fibonacci number. Finally, note that the product of the original four numbers 3x5x8x13 also equals 1560, which is the area of the triangle formed. Some exploration questions: • Will this work for any sequence of four consecutive Fibonacci numbers? Can you prove it using recursive notation for Fibonacci numbers? • Does a special relationship exist between the hypotenuse and the initial four numbers (i.e. given the four numbers, could you predict the hypotenuse)? • Explore and formulate a similar relationship starting with five consecutive Fibonacci numbers?