Download Center Reaction Development of the Anti

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

T cell wikipedia , lookup

Immune system wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup

Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup

Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup

Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup

Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup

Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup

Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup

Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup

Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Immunomics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
This information is current as
of June 16, 2017.
A Periarteriolar Lymphoid Sheath-Associated B
Cell Focus Response Is Not Observed During the
Development of the Anti-Arsonate Germinal
Center Reaction
Kalpit A. Vora, Kathleen M. Tumas-Brundage and Tim Manser
J Immunol 1998; 160:728-733; ;
http://www.jimmunol.org/content/160/2/728
Subscription
Permissions
Email Alerts
This article cites 41 articles, 23 of which you can access for free at:
http://www.jimmunol.org/content/160/2/728.full#ref-list-1
Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at:
http://jimmunol.org/subscription
Submit copyright permission requests at:
http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html
Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at:
http://jimmunol.org/alerts
The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by
The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.,
1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of
Immunologists All rights reserved.
Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606.
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 16, 2017
References
A Periarteriolar Lymphoid Sheath-Associated B Cell Focus
Response Is Not Observed During the Development of the
Anti-Arsonate Germinal Center Reaction1
Kalpit A. Vora, Kathleen M. Tumas-Brundage, and Tim Manser2
D
istinct areas in secondary lymphoid organs are known to
support early primary B cell proliferation and differentiation during humoral immune responses (1– 4). The
currently accepted model explaining the genesis of these early
events in the mouse spleen, and their relationship to the germinal
center (GC)3 reaction has been based on work done using model
T-dependent (TD) hapten-soluble protein conjugates (1, 2). Elegant studies conducted by Kelsoe’s group using the genetically
restricted response to the hapten (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl
(NP) conjugated to chicken gamma globulin (CGG) have shown
that within days of immunization, NP-specific B cells enter the
CD4 T cell-rich splenic outer periarteriolar lymphoid sheath
(PALS) and establish extrafollicular foci, subsequently differentiating into Ab-forming cells (AFCs), which ultimately reach 100 to
200 cells in size (5). Most low-affinity serum Abs produced early
after immunization are presumed to originate from this PALSassociated focus reaction (6). It has been postulated that Ab produced by such foci binds cognate Ag, forming immune complexes
Department of Microbiology and Immunology and the Kimmel Cancer Institute,
Thomas Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107
Received for publication July 17, 1997. Accepted for publication October
2, 1997.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI23739 to
T.M., and K.A.V. was supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant
5-T32-CA 09678.
2
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Tim Manser, Kimmel Cancer Institute, BLSB 708, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address: [email protected]
3
Abbreviations used in this paper: GC, germinal center; Ars, p-azophenylarsonate; PALS, periarteriolar lymphoid sheath; AFC, antibody-forming cell; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; CGG, chicken gamma-globulin; NP, (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl; TD, T-dependent; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; TBS, Trisbuffered saline; PNA, peanut agglutinin.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists
that are deposited on follicular dendritic cells (FDC). This deposition is thought to be critical for the initiation of the GC
reaction (7, 8). Work conducted by Cerny’s group using another
TD Ag, p-nitrophenyl-6-(O-phosphocholine)hydroxyhexonatekeyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), has shown the absence of
splenic AFC foci in nu/nu mice, clearly demonstrating the T
cell dependence of this reaction (9). Jacob and Kelsoe (10) also
demonstrated that B cells in neighboring PALS foci and GCs
can have common clonal origins. Based on the time of appearance of PALS foci and GC, they postulated that a few activated
cells from the PALS develop locally into AFC foci and also
seed adjacent GCs.
Recent data have questioned the generality of this model. In an
analysis of the primary immune response to vesicular stomatitis
virus (VSV), no viral-specific PALS foci were observed, even
though virus-specific B cells were routinely found in GC (4). However, the initial stages of this response appear to be T cell independent. Therefore, it remains to be ascertained whether the
PALS-associated focus reaction is a necessary step in primary TD
B cell proliferation and differentiation, or whether this requirement
is limited to immune responses to hapten-protein conjugates.
Another complication in the interpretation of data pertaining to the
relationship between the PALS focus and GC reactions has emerged
from the studies of Klinman’s group (11), who suggested that separate
B cell lineages nucleate early AFC and GC reactions, and give rise to
primary Ab and memory B cell responses, respectively. In this regard,
in the anti-NP response of C57BL/6 mice primary Abs predominantly
bear the l1 light chain, whereas secondary Abs are predominantly of
the k isotype (12). In other words, the major clonotypes dominating
the primary anti-NP response do not dominate the anamnestic responses to this hapten. Not all anti-hapten responses display such a
“repertoire shift.” During the primary anti-Ars ( p-azophenylarsonate)-KLH response of A/J mice, a single anti-Ars clonotype (expressing a single combination of VH, D, JH, Vk, and Jk gene segments,
0022-1767/98/$02.00
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 16, 2017
The behavior of p-azophenylarsonate (Ars)-specific B cell clones during the primary T cell-dependent splenic response of A/J
mice was investigated using an immunohistochemical approach. The earliest Ars-specific B cells were observed as isolated cells
in the red pulp by day 3 after immunization with Ars-keyhole limpet hemocyanin, (KLH) and at day 6, large clusters of
Ars-specific B cells were first detected in germinal centers, which continued to be observed for an additional 8 to 15 days.
Surprisingly, no Ars-specific B cell foci were observed in or near the CD4 T cell-rich periarteriolar lymphoid sheath (PALS)
during the entire primary response. Nevertheless, A/J mice immunized with (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl-chicken gamma
globulin (NP-CGG) or Ars-CGG mounted robust splenic (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl or CGG-specific PALS-associated focus reactions, respectively. In contrast, no Ars-specific PALS B cell foci were detected in A/J mice immunized with Ars-CGG.
These data add to a growing body of evidence indicating that B cell proliferation and differentiation in CD4 T cell-rich microenvironments are not prerequisites for the GC reaction. Taken together with previous results obtained using other model Ags,
the data suggest that the specificity of the B cell Ag receptor may strongly influence the lymphoid microenvironment in which
a B cell clone first undergoes Ag-driven clonal expansion and differentiation. The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 728 –
733.
The Journal of Immunology
729
termed “canonical”) becomes predominant, and subsequently continues to dominate anamnestic responses (13). Since this clonotype fulfills the criteria of a true “memory clonotype,” we investigated the
development of splenic foci and GCs by this and other anti-Ars clonotypes during the primary anti-Ars-KLH response of A/J mice.
Materials and Methods
Ag and immunization
A/J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor,
ME). Mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility in microisolator
cages, and provided autoclaved food and water. Mice (8 –10 wk old) were
immunized i.p. (100 mg/mouse) with NP13 (Cambridge Research Biochemicals, Cheshire, U.K.)-CGG, Ars8-CGG (Sigma Chemical Co., St.
Louis, MO), or Ars-KLH (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), all precipitated in
alum, for induction of primary responses.
Immunohistochemistry
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 16, 2017
Spleens were removed at indicated time intervals after immunizations and
embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Fisher Scientific, Bridgewater,
NJ) by flash freezing in a 2-methylbutane bath cooled with liquid N2.
Frozen spleens were stored at 270°C until sectioned. Six-micron sections
were cut on a cryostat microtome, and thaw mounted onto 0.05% polyLlysine (Sigma Chemical Co.)-coated slides. Sections were air dried, fixed
in ice-cold acetone for 10 min, air dried a second time, and stored at
270°C.
Frozen sections were thawed and rehydrated in Tris-buffered saline
(TBS) for 20 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by immersing sections in 0.3% v/v aqueous H2O2 solution. Sections were then
blocked with 5% BSA and 0.1% Tween-20 in TBS and stained with biotinylated mAbs anti-l1 Ls136 (10), or anti-idiotypic Abs E4 or AD8 (14).
Ars-BSA-biotin (1.5 mg/ml) was used for staining Ag-specific cells. NPCGG-biotin (1 mg/ml) in a solution containing CGG (10 mg/ml) was used
to stain NP-specific cells in sections derived from mice immunized with
NP-CGG. CGG-specific cells in sections from Ars-CGG-immunized mice
were stained with NP-CGG-biotin (1 mg/ml) only. All slides were incubated with biotinylated Abs or Ags for 1 h, washed in TBS-BSA, and then
incubated with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (Southern Biotechnologies, Birmingham, AL) for 1 h. PNA (peanut agglutinins) coupled to horseradish peroxidase (E-Y Laboratories, San Mateo, CA) was used to identify
GCs. Bound alkaline phosphatase and horseradish peroxidase activities
were visualized using Napthol AS-MX/Fast Blue BB and 3-aminoethylcarbazole (Sigma Chemical, St Louis) respectively.
Microdissection of GC, DNA amplification, and sequencing
Idiotope-positive GCs were microdissected from different areas of a stained
section obtained from a single spleen using a micromanipulator (Carl Zeiss,
Thronwood, NY)-controlled capillary pipette, essentially as described earlier by Jacob and Kelsoe (10). Briefly, scraped tissue containing 50 to 100
cells was placed in tubes containing 15 ml of H2O and 5 ml of PBS. To this
mixture, 5 ml of 2 mg/ml proteinase K (Fisher Biotech, Bridgewater, NJ)
was added and the mixture was incubated at 37°C overnight. The following
day, proteinase K was inactivated by heating at 95°C for 20 min, and then
the lysate was subjected to two rounds of PCR amplification. The PCR was
carried out using Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk,
CT) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Both rounds of PCR contained
40 iterative cycles (95°C for 1 min, 56°C for 30 s, 72°C for 3 min). The
primersusedforthefirstroundwereasfollows:59VHProm1(59-GAGCACACT
GCTGTCTGACC-39), which hybridizes to the 59 flanking region of the VH
promoter; and 39 JH3– 4Int (59-TCACAAGAGTCCGATAGACC-39), hybridizing in the intron between JH3 and JH4. Two microliters of the first
round products were amplified for 40 additional cycles using the following
primer combination: 59 VHProm2EcoRI (59-GACGAATTCAGTCCTTC
CTCTCCAGTT-39), which is internal to VHProm1; and 39 HindIIIBack
(59-GACTTCAAGCTTCAGTTCTGGC-39), internal to JH3– 4Int. The amplified products were gel purified, digested, and cloned into EcoRI-HindIIIlinearized pBluescript vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The cloned fragments were sequenced using Sequenase (United States Biochemicals,
Cleveland, OH) and the internal primers CDR2, hybridizing in the CDR 2
region (59-GCCCTTGAACTTCTCATTG-39) and JH2–3Int, hybridizing in
the intron between JH2 and JH3 (59CCTAGTCCTTCATGACCTGA-39).
FIGURE 1. A typical staining pattern of an A/J spleen section obtained 9 days after immunization with Ars-KLH in alum. A single follicle stained for Ars-binding cells (blue) is shown in panel A. The same
follicle stained with anti-idiotypic Abs E4 (blue) and AD8 (blue) in
tandem sections are shown in panels B and C, respectively. The GC is
stained red in panel C (PNA). The central arteriole (ca) is marked for
orientation. Note that Ars-BSA-biotin nonspecifically binds to the marginal sinuses, hence giving a blue border to the follicle in panel A.
Original magnification: 3100.
Results
A PALS-associated B cell focus reaction does not form
during the primary immune response of A/J mice to the
hapten Ars
To investigate the early events associated with the anti-Ars humoral immune response in the spleen, we immunized groups of
730
GERMINAL CENTER FORMATION IN THE ABSENCE OF PALS FOCI
FIGURE 2. Comparison of CDR3 sequences of VH genes recovered from two different microdissected GC from an A/J spleen section obtained
10 days after immunization with Ars-KLH. The sequences shown are compared with a consensus canonical germline sequence composed of
sequences of the canonical VHIdCR gene segment, the DFL16.1 gene segment, and the JH2 gene segment in the CDR3 region. Nucleotides that vary
among canonical VH genes due to differences in joining site and N region addition are indicated by an “N.” Nucleotide identity is indicated by
a dash, and differences are shown explicitly. The numbers specify amino acid codons, starting from the mature amino terminal end. Only one
representative sequence is shown for GC 1, as three different clones obtained from GC 1 had identical sequence. Three clones from GC 2 showed
three different sequences, which are depicted as GC 2 a, b, and c. The nucleotide differences in the core D region (codons 101–106) are most likely
due to somatic mutation. Scattered point mutations were also observed in the VH region (not shown).
A/J mice can develop an NP-specific PALS-associated focus
reaction
To assess whether the A/J strain had a generic defect in supporting
PALS-associated focus reactions, we immunized groups of mice
with NP-CGG in alum. This particular antigenic preparation had
been shown to support a vigorous splenic focus reaction at the
edges of the PALS in C57BL/6 mice (10). A robust NP-specific
splenic focus reaction was observed in A/J mice during the primary response to NP-CGG, as seen by staining with NP-CGGbiotin in the presence of excess unlabeled CGG (Fig. 3A). The
Ag-specific B cells in these foci bore the l1 light chain (Fig. 3B)
analogous to what has been reported for the anti-NP response in
C57BL/6 mice. To confirm that these focus reactions were in the
outer regions of the PALS, parallel sections were stained with an
anti-CD4 mAb. As can be seen in Figure 3C, the NP-binding l11
foci are located at the edges of the CD41 T cell-rich PALS region.
The intensity of the staining of the cells in these foci suggests that
many were AFC.
Ars-CGG-immunized A/J mice develop CGG-specific PALS
foci but not Ars-specific PALS foci
Earlier work has indicated the requirement of CD4 T cells for the
PALS-associated focus reaction (9). Most studies on the focus reaction have used the TD carrier protein CGG (9, 10), and it has
been proposed that the molecular form of the Ag can affect the
immune response (15). Therefore, it was of interest to determine
whether a different carrier for the Ars hapten had any effect on the
development of the focus reaction. Since we knew that CGG was
compatible with focus formation in A/J and C57BL/6 mice, we
immunized A/J mice with Ars coupled to CGG. Staining of spleen
sections with NP-CGG-biotin revealed the presence of CGG-specific focus reactions (Fig. 4A) in these mice. These foci appeared
to be composed predominantly of AFC and were present at the
edges of the CD41 T cell-rich PALS region (Fig. 4B) as revealed
by anti-CD4 staining. However, E41 and AD81 GCs present in
the same histologic section were accompanied by only a few individual Id1 cells in the adjacent follicles, PALS, and red pulp
(Fig. 4, C and D).
Discussion
Previous models explaining the early events in TD splenic B cell
responses segregate the responding B cell population mainly into
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 16, 2017
A/J mice with Ars-KLH in alum, and at different time points processed their spleens for immunohistochemical analysis, as described in Materials and Methods. The majority of clonotypes participating in the primary anti-Ars response express the CRI-A
(IdCR) Id. All Abs bearing this IdCR are encoded by a single VH
gene segment (VHIdCR) (13). Splenic cryosections were stained for
B cells expressing Abs capable of binding Ars-BSA and expressing idiotopes recognized by the anti-IdCR mAbs E4 and AD8. E4
recognizes all somatically mutated and unmutated forms of canonical V regions (14). All Abs encoded by the VHIdCR gene segment
in unmutated form are AD81. A majority of early primary anti-Ars
Abs are AD81 (14).
The earliest Ars-specific B cells observed after immunization
were seen as isolated cells in the red pulp at day 3. Large clusters
of Ars-specific B cells were first detected by day 6 in GCs, and
such GCs continued to be observed through day 14. No PALSassociated foci specific for Ars or expressing the E4 or the AD8
idiotopes could be detected at days 3, 6, 9, 12, or 16 of the primary
immune response (at least three mice were examined per time
point). In this analysis we observed more than 60 E41 and 50
AD81 GCs, averaging approximately five independent GCs per
spleen from days 6 through 16. A typical staining pattern observed
in a splenic cryosection at day 9 in an Ars-KLH-immunized spleen
is shown in Figure 1. The Ag-specific GC stained with Ars-BSA
(blue) is shown in Figure 1A, and the same GC in parallel sections
stained with anti-idiotypic Abs E4 or AD8 (blue) is shown in Figure 1, B and C, respectively. Ars-specific GCs were usually accompanied by scattered Id-positive cells in adjacent regions of the
white and red pulp, some of which were brightly staining and
could be AFCs (Fig. 1, B and C). The vast majority of the Ars-,
E4-, and AD8-stained cells in the white pulp are confined to the
GC, demonstrating the complete absence of a PALS-associated
focus reaction.
The identity of the B cell clonotypes in the E4- and AD8-positive GCs was confirmed by microdissection-PCR analysis. PCR
amplification of the rearranged VH genes from several Id1 microdissected GCs showed that the Abs expressed in these GC were
encoded by the VHIdCR gene segment. A detailed analysis of two
E41, AD81 GCs from different areas of the same spleen section
revealed that both contained B cells expressing canonical anti-Ars
heavy chain genes (Fig. 2). Moreover, these heavy chain genes
contained many somatic mutations, consistent with participation of
the resident clonotypes in the B memory cell pathway (data not
shown).
The Journal of Immunology
two distinct spatial compartments: foci containing AFC at the periphery of the PALS, and GCs in the lymphoid follicles (1, 2).
Based on the kinetics of appearance of these two locales of B cell
proliferation and differentiation, it was suggested that PALS-associated B cell activation and proliferation first occurred in the
PALS, and the products of this response locally differentiated into
AFC and also seeded the adjacent GC reaction (10). Moreover, the
Ab produced by the AFC in PALS foci has been implicated in the
formation of immune complexes whose deposition in the follicle is
thought to be involved in initiation of the GC reaction (6 – 8). In
contrast, our data demonstrate that the only locale of extensive
focal proliferation and differentiation during the primary TD antiArs response of A/J mice is the GC.
The lack of PALS foci in this response is not due to a generic
deficiency of A/J mice in mounting a focus reaction. A/J mice
immunized with NP-CGG did support a vigorous NP-specific
PALS focus reaction, whose timing of appearance and locale were
identical to that observed in the anti-NP response of C57BL/6 mice
(5, 10). Moreover, the nature of the protein carrier did not influence the focus reaction, as Ars-specific PALS foci were not observed in A/J mice immunized with Ars-CGG. However, in these
mice, CGG-specific PALS foci could be readily detected. These
CGG-specific PALS foci did not express the l1 light chain, thus
ruling out the possibility that focus formation is restricted to l1bearing B cell clones (16).
Interestingly, the primary serum anti-Ars Ab response is much
slower to develop than responses to other haptens, such as phosphorylcholine and NP (17–19). We found that in A/J mice immunized with 100 mg of Ars-CGG in alum, no l-bearing anti-Ars Abs
were detected in the primary response, and total k-bearing anti-Ars
Ab reached a concentration of only 200 to 300 mg/ml by day 13 of
this response. In contrast, A/J mice immunized with 100 mg of
NP-CGG in alum mounted a rapid serum anti-NP response, in
which l-bearing Ab reached 600 to 700 mg/ml by day 13. Moreover, k-bearing anti-NP Abs had risen to approximately 5 to 10
times the level of l-bearing anti-NP Abs by this time (data not
shown). This high level of anti-NP serum Ab (k and l) during the
early anti-NP response is correlated with the large PALS-associated AFC foci present at this time during the response. Conversely,
the absence of an AFC focus reaction during the anti-Ars primary
response may account for the very low serum Ab titers generated
during the early stages of this response. Our results provide a possible explanation for these observations, in that GC development
may be a prerequisite for AFC formation in the absence of an early
PALS focus reaction (20). Interestingly, anti-Ars AFC cell clusters
are observed in the red pulp during the secondary anti-Ars response (K. Vora and T. Manser, manuscript in preparation). However, these clusters are far less compact than the PALS-associated
AFC foci observed during the primary anti-NP response.
A review of previously published data suggests that the absence
of focal PALS-associated B cell proliferation and differentiation
during the primary immune response may not be unique to the
anti-Ars response. Bachmann et al., studying the BALB/c splenic
response to VSV, also observed that VSV-specific B cell foci were
not induced in the T cell areas but rather in the primary B cell
follicles and in the red pulp near the marginal zone (4). Moreover,
during the primary immune response of rats to alum precipitated
DNP-spider crab hemocyanin, Liu et al. (21) observed only occasional hapten binding B cell blasts in the splenic T cell zone during
the first week following immunization, even though DNP-specific
B cells did populate GC. These observations are consistent with
ours in indicating that initial Ag-driven B cell activation leading to
GC formation in normal mice need not take place in the PALS.
Differences in locale of proliferation and differentiation, as well
as migration patterns of B cell clones, could be influenced by many
factors. These include B cell clones arising from distinct lineages
(11), differential dependence on T cell help for priming, site of Ag
localization (3, 4), surface Ig affinity for Ag (22, 23), surface Ig
engagement of self-Ag (24), or prior activation by cross-reactive
foreign Ags (25). Moreover, such factors need not be mutually
exclusive. With regard to these issues, there are certain interesting
similarities and differences between the major B cell clonotypes
responding to NP and Ars in C57BL/6 and A/J strains of mice,
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 16, 2017
FIGURE 3. Representative histologic analysis of parallel spleen sections obtained from an A/J mouse at day 8 after immunization with
NP-CGG in alum. Three parallel sections were stained for NP-binding
cells (blue, panels A and C ), l1 light chain-bearing cells (blue, panel
B ), GC cells (red, panels A and B ), and CD41 T cells (red, panel C ). ca,
central arteriole; F, AFC focus; T, CD41 T cells. Original magnification: 3100.
731
732
GERMINAL CENTER FORMATION IN THE ABSENCE OF PALS FOCI
respectively. The “starting affinities” for their cognate epitopes of
the Ag receptors expressed by both these clonotypes (VH186.2-l1
anti-NP and canonical anti-Ars) in the preimmune repertoire are
similar (;Ka of 105 M21) (26, 27) and hence would not appear to
account for their differential behavior upon Ag stimulation. These
differences in clonotype behavior also could not be easily ascribed
to differences in Ag localization (4), as A/J mice immunized with
Ars-CGG (the anti-NP response was also studied using CGG as
carrier) do form CGG-specific foci while still lacking
Ars-specific foci.
Both the predominant anti-NP and anti-Ars clonotypes participate in the primary immune response, but only canonical Ars
clones dominate memory responses. This “repertoire shift” in the
anti-NP response could be due to the fact that most members of the
prevalent primary clonotype terminally differentiate as AFC in
PALS-associated foci, and hence cannot dominate memory responses. This repertoire shift is not unique to the NP system. Several laboratories have independently observed that a major clonotype present during the early primary immune response does not
dominate memory responses (28 –32). Hence, it is possible that the
majority of anti-Ars clonotypes is a member of a memory lineage
of B cells, and therefore contributes to serum Ab production only
late in primary responses, and during memory humoral
responses (11).
Perhaps the most powerful immunoregulation brought to bear
on responding B cells is mediated by CD4 T cells. Therefore,
quantitative and perhaps qualitative differences in the T cell help
received by responding B cell clones might drastically alter their
“in situ behavior.” That quantitative differences in T cell help can
influence responding B cell behavior is supported by several previous studies. During the primary immune responses to the haptens
DNP and oxazolone in carrier-primed animals, Liu et al. (21) observed hapten-specific B cell foci in the outer layers of the PALS
and extending into the red pulp. These large clusters of B cells
were not seen in the primary response of animals that had not been
carrier primed. In contrast, the early anti-VSV response is T independent, probably explaining the observation that B cell foci
specific for this virus develop in the T cell-poor red pulp (4). Moreover, Wang et al. observed that during the immune response to
fluorescein-conjugated a(1—.6) dextran, a T-independent type-II
Ag, large PALS foci did not form, while Ag B cells could be found
in GCs (16).
Even though development of both GC and AFC foci require T
cells, the type and number of T cells required to support these B
cell differentiation pathways are clearly different. Small numbers
of residual and abnormal T cells in nu/nu mice and g/d T cells in
TCRa2/2 mice are sufficient to support the GC/memory pathway
in the absence of a detectable AFC response (9, 33). Several studies on the origin and characteristics of GC CD4 T cells have indicated that these cells may be functionally distinct from other
CD4 T cells (34, 35). Additionally, Kelsoe’s group (36, 37) have
shown that murine splenic GC T cells are immigrants from the
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 16, 2017
FIGURE 4. CGG-specific foci are observed after immunization of A/J mice with Ars-CGG in alum. Results obtained from staining of parallel
sections from a spleen taken 9 days after immunization are shown. Panel A shows CGG-specific staining (blue) of foci and GCs (also stained with
PNA-red). Panel B shows staining of a parallel section with CGG (blue) and anti-CD4 (red). No Ars-specific foci are detected around E41 (blue
cells, panel C ) or AD81 (blue cells, panel D ) GCs (stained red (PNA) in both panels C and D ) in a different area of a parallel section from the same
spleen. F, AFC focus; ca, central arteriole; T, CD41 T cells. Original magnification: 3100.
The Journal of Immunology
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Garnett Kelsoe and his coworkers for lessons on spleen
sectioning and immunohistochemistry. We are grateful to all members of
the Manser Laboratory for their many indirect contributions to this work.
References
1. Kosco-Vilbois, M. H., D. Gray, H. Zentgraf, J. Gerdes, and J-Y. Bennefoy. 1997.
To ’B’ or not to ’B’ a germinal center. Immunol. Today 18:225.
2. Kelsoe, G. 1996. Life and death in germinal center. Immunity 4:107.
3. MacLennan, I. C. M. 1994. Germinal centers. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:117.
4. Bachmann, M. F., B. Odermatt, H. Hengartner, and R. M. Zinkernagel. 1996.
Induction of long-lived germinal centers associated with persisting antigen after
viral infection. J. Exp. Med. 183:2259.
5. Jacob, J., R. Kassir, and G. Kelsoe. 1991. In situ studies of the primary immune
response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. I. The architecture and dynamics of
responding cell populations. J. Exp. Med. 173:1165.
6. Smith, K. G., T. D. Hewiston, G. J. V. Nossal, and D. M. Tarlington. 1996. The
phenotype and fate of the antibody forming cells of the splenic foci. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:444.
7. Nossal, G. J. V. 1994. Differentiation of the secondary B-lymphocyte repertoire:
the germinal center reaction. Immunol. Rev. 137:172.
8. Kunkl, A., and G. G. B. Klaus. 1981. The generation of memory cells. IV. Immunization with antigen-antibody complexes accelerates the development of Bmemory cells, the formation of germinal centers and the maturation of antibody
affinity in the secondary response. Immunology 43:371.
9. Stedra, J., and J. Cerny. 1994. Distinct pathways of B cell differentiation. I.
Residual T cells in athymic mice support the development of splenic germinal
centers and B cell memory without an induction of antibody. J. Immunol. 152:
1718.
10. Jacob, J., and G. Kelsoe. 1992. In situ studies of the primary immune response to
(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. II. A common clonal origin for periarteriolar
lymphoid sheath associated foci and germinal centers. J. Exp. Med. 176:679.
11. Linton, P.-J., D. J. Decker, and N. R. Klinman. 1989. Primary antibody-forming
cells and secondary B-cells are generated from separate precursor cell subpopulations. Cell 59:1049.
12. Reth, M., G. J. Hammerling, and K. Rajewsky. 1978. Analysis of the repertoire
of anti-NP antibodies in C57BL/6 mice by cell fusion. I. Characterization of
antibody families in the primary and hyperimmune response. Eur. J. Immunol.
8:393.
13. Manser, T., L. J. Wysocki, M. N. Margolies, and M. L. Gefter. 1987. Evolution
of antibody variable region structure during the immune response. Immunol. Rev.
96:141.
14. Manser, T., and M. L. Gefter. 1986. The molecular evolution of the immune
response: idiotope-specific suppression indicates that B cells express germ-lineencoded V genes prior to antigenic stimulation. Eur. J. Immunol. 16:1439.
15. Nossal, G. J. V., G. L. Ada, C. M. Austin, and J. Pye. 1965. Antigens in immunity. VIII. Localization of 125I-labeled antigens in the secondary response. Immunology 9:349.
16. Wang, D., S. Wells, A. Stall, and E. A. Kabat. 1994. Reaction of germinal centers
in the T-cell-independent response to bacterial polysaccharide a (1—.6) dextran. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2502.
17. Vora, K. A., and T. Manser. 1995. Altering the antibody repertoire via transgene
homologus recombination: evidence for global and clone-autonomous regulation
of antigen-driven B cell differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 181:271.
18. Imanishi, T., and O. Makela. 1974. Inheritance of antibody specificity. I. Anti(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl) acetyl of the mouse primary response. J. Exp. Med.
140:1498.
19. Claflin, J. L., R. Lieberman, and J. M. Davie. 1974. Clonal nature of the immune
response to phosphorylcholine. I. Specificity, class, and idiotype of phosphorylcholine-binding receptors on lymphoid cells. J. Exp. Med. 139:58.
20. Tew, J. G., R. M. DiLosa, G. F. Burton, M. H. Kosco, L. I. Kupp, A. Masuda, and
A. K. Sazkal. 1992. Germinal centers and antibody production in bone marrow.
Immunol. Rev. 126:100.
21. Liu, Y. J., J. Zhang, P. J. L. Lane, Y. T. Chan, and I. C. M. MacLennan. 1991.
Sites of specific B-cell activation in primary and secondary responses to T-cell
dependent and independent antigens. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:2951.
22. Klinman, N. R. 1972. The mechanism of antigenic stimulation of primary and
secondary clonal precursor cells. J. Exp. Med. 136:241.
23. Fish, S., M. Fleming, J. Sharon, and T. Manser. 1991. Different epitope structures
select distinct mutant forms of an antibody variable region for expression during
the immune response. J. Exp. Med. 173:665.
24. Cooke, M. P., A. W. Heath, K. M. Shokat, Y. Zeng, F. D. Finkelman,
P. S. Linsley, M. Howard, and C. C. Goodnow. 1994. Immunoglobulin signal
transduction guides the specificity of B cell-T cell interactions and is blocked in
tolerant self-reactive B cells. J. Exp. Med. 179:425.
25. Gu, H., D. Tarlington, W. Muller, K. Rajewsky, and I. Forster. 1991. Most peripheral B cells are ligand selected. J. Exp. Med. 173:1357.
26. Weiss, U., and K. Rajewsky. 1990. The repertoire of somatic antibody mutants
accumulating in the memory compartment after primary immunization is restricted through affinity maturation and mirrors that expressed in the secondary
response. J. Exp. Med. 172:1681.
27. Parhami-Seren, B., L. Wysocki, and M. N. Margolies. 1989. The amino acid
residues at the VH-D-JH junctions affect the affinity of anti-p-azophenylarsonate
antibodies. J. Immunol. 143:4090.
28. Metzger, D. W., A. Miller, and E. E. Sercarz. 1981. Idiotypic repertoire of antihen eggwhite lysozyme antibodies probed with hybridomas: selection after immunization of an Idx marker common to antibodies of distinct epitope specificity.
J. Exp. Med. 154:701.
29. Berek, C., and C. Milstein. 1987. Mutation drift and repertoire shift in the maturation of the immune response. Immunol. Rev. 96:23.
30. Busto, P., R. Gerstein, L. Dupre, C. A. Giorgetti, E. Selsing, and J. L. Press. 1987.
Molecular analysis of heavy and light chains used by primary and secondary
anti-(T,G)-A–L antibodies produced by normal and xid mice. J. Immunol. 139:
608.
31. Kavaler, J., A. J. Caton, L. M. Staudt, and W. Gerhard. 1991. A B cell population
that dominates the primary response to influenza virus hemagglutinin does not
participate in the memory response. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:2687.
32. Minnerath, J. M., L. P. Wakem, L. L. Comfort, F. Sherman, and R. Jemmerson.
1995. The BALB/c mouse B-cell response to pigeon cytochrome c initiates as a
heteroclitic response specific for the self antigen mouse cytochrome c. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 92:12379.
33. Wen, L., W. Pao, F. S. Wong, Q. Peng, J. Craft, B. Zheng, G. Kelsoe, L. Dianda,
M. J. Owen, and A. C. Hayday. 1996. Germinal center formation, immunoglobulin class switching, and autoantibody production driven by “non alpha/beta” T
cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:2271.
34. Velardi, A., M. C. Mingari, L. Morreta, and C. E. Crossi. 1986. Functional analysis of cloned germinal center CD41 cells with natural killer cell-related features:
divergence from typical T helper cells. J. Immunol. 137:2808.
35. Butch, A. W., G-H. Chung, J. W. Hoffmann, and M. H. Nahm. 1993. Cytokine
expression by germinal center cells. J. Immunol. 150:39.
36. Zheng, B., S. Han, and G. Kelsoe. 1996. T helper cells in murine germinal centers
are antigen-specific emigrants that down regulate Thy-1. J. Exp. Med. 184:1083.
37. Zheng, B., S. Han, Q. Zhu, R. Goldsby, and G. Kelsoe. 1996. Alternative pathways for the selection of antigen-specific peripheral T cells. Nature 384:263.
38. Liu, Y-J. 1997. Sites of B lymphocyte selection, activation, and tolerance in
spleen. J. Exp. Med. 186:625.
39. Naparstek, Y., J. Andre-Schwartz, T. Manser, L. J. Wysocki, L. Breitman,
B. D. Stollar, M. L Gefter, and R. S. Schwartz. 1986. A single germline VH gene
segment of normal A/J mice encodes autoantibodies characteristic of systemic
lupus erythematosus. J. Exp. Med. 164:614.
40. Very, D., D. J. Panaka, D. Weissman, L. Wysocki, T. Manser, and
A. Marshak-Rothstein. 1993. Lack of connectivity between the induced and autoimmune repertoires of lpr/lpr mice. Immunology 80:518.
41. Zouali, M., P. Migliorini, and D. Stollar. 1987. Murine lupus anti-DNA antibodies cross-react with the hapten (4-hydroxy-5-iodo-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl, but immunization induced anti-DNA antibodies do not. Eur. J. Immunol. 17:409.
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on June 16, 2017
PALS, but have characteristics similar to a novel subset of thymocytes. Our results suggest that the primary Ars response occurs
primarily through the interaction of Ag B cells with GC T cell
help. This clearly questions the generality of the dogma that all
early B cell activation occurs in a T cell-rich
microenvironment (38).
Given all of these considerations, it seems clear that factors both
intrinsic and extrinsic to responding B cell clones can influence the
microenvironmental locale in which they initially proliferate and
differentiate during an immune response. However, the observation in our experiments that similar carrier-specific T cell help to
both Ars and NP clones is compatible with both GC (Ars) and
AFC/GC (NP) pathways clearly points to intrinsic differences in
the nature of the B cell clones that participate in these two responses. One such difference not related to their cognate foreign
Ags is the common anti-self (DNA and other Ags) reactivity associated with canonical and many other IdCR anti-Ars clonotypes
(39 – 41). Such reactivity could result in anti-Ars clones progressing to either a “pre-activated” or “anergized” phenotype after
emergence from the immature B cell pool. This prior ligand engagement could alter the subsequent behavior of these clonotypes
in TD foreign Ag-driven responses.
733