Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Foreign-exchange reserves wikipedia , lookup
Foreign exchange market wikipedia , lookup
Currency War of 2009–11 wikipedia , lookup
Purchasing power parity wikipedia , lookup
Currency war wikipedia , lookup
Fixed exchange-rate system wikipedia , lookup
Bretton Woods system wikipedia , lookup
International status and usage of the euro wikipedia , lookup
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup
8 The Falling Dollar Umberto Bifulco, IV Introduction The United States began as a fragile nation, economically. Through the passage of time it has become an economic powerhouse, built on the pillars of a free market economy. U.S. economic policy has shaped global currency markets and contributed to the strength of the U.S. economy. However, recent developments in the global economy put pressure on U.S. currency and have forced a weakened U.S. Dollar to compete against foreign currencies. Up until recently, the U.S. Dollar was falling in value and we, as a nation, must recognize the problems that could develop as a result. The following questions act as a basis for a discussion on U.S. Economic Policy and the issue of a weak dollar. The thesis of this discussion is two pronged. First, an assessment of the current situation, its causes and implications, is necessary. Second, an analysis is necessary to isolate what circumstances need to be in place, in order for the US Dollar to fully rebound. This analysis must include the government’s involvement in the currency value issue and the Federal Reserve System’s policy approach must be explored. Finally, the following questions are raised and answers suggested to further clarify the topic. Why does the decline of the Dollar matter and to what degree should policy makers be involved in attempts to correct the problem? Factors Contributing to the Weakening Dollar A decline in value of the Dollar may be viewed as an increase in the number of Dollars that must be exchanged for another currency, or conversely, a decrease in the number of units of a foreign currency that must be exchanged for a U.S. Dollar. Exchange rates between the Dollar and other currencies are expressed to reflect these relative values [see appendix A for current rates and Appendix B for historical rates]. While the value of the dollar has increased in recent history relative to other major currencies, its long decline has not been entirely counteracted, not have the reasons for its decline up until recently been reversed. There are a variety of explanations offered for the decrease in value of the U.S. Dollar internationally. A major reason often cited is the increase in U.S. government debt. “The largest buyers of U.S. government debt have been the central banks of the Asia-Pacific. The central banks of Japan and China alone hold more than $1 trillion of U.S. Treasury bonds as foreign currency reserves. Worldwide foreign central banks hold some $1.3 trillion of U.S. government debt. If private debt is added, the United States is the world's largest debtor nation, with some $3.7 trillion in net foreign debt, as of the start of this year, likely well over $4 trillions by now” (Is a USA Economic Collapse Due in 2005?, 2004). 9 Another frequently cited cause is the ongoing current account deficit, or excess of imports over exports (Baumol et al, 2005). In a recent news release, the U. S. Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that the November 2005 deficit in goods and services totalled $64.2 billion, up $5.2 billion from one year earlier (News Release: U. S. International Trade in Goods & Services, 2006). “Other countries’ economies benefit from sending their goods to eager American buyers, and the United States in turn sends massive amounts of dollars abroad to pay for those goods. The trouble is that there are now more dollars than foreigners want to hold….So when surplus dollars are sold for Euros, Yen or Pounds, then the dollar drops in value against those currencies” (Samuelson, 2005). Other factors include the value of other assets available to foreign nations other than the dollar, the March 2000 collapse of the dotcom market, the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001, and how consumer confidence was affected by the war in Iraq (Why is the US Dollar Weakening? Internal and external factors combined to drive the American dollar down in 2003, 2003). In addition, factors such as the successful creation of the European Union (EU) and the European Monetary Union (EMU), the emergence of China as an economic power to be reckoned with, and the stock market scandals caused by Enron, WorldCom, and the fall of Arthur Anderson which lead to a change in accounting policy for corporations and set new standards of accountability to senior management, all have impacted U.S. trade and the value of the dollar. These factors all influence investor confidence and desirability of U.S. goods and investments. The lack of desirability of U.S. production and investments, combined with the existence of alternative sources of goods and investments, mean that demand for dollars to purchase in the U.S. declines and must negatively influence the value of the Dollar relative to other currencies (Melvin, 2004). Options for Strengthening the Dollar Economic theory suggests that a decline in the value of a currency should promote interest in a nation’s exports as those exports become relatively cheaper for foreigners to buy. At the same time, imports become more expensive causing U.S. consumers to buy domestic production instead. In this way, a declining currency will rebound of its own accord, requiring no intervention (Mishkin, 2004). Additionally, international investors should be attracted to investments denominated in dollars as their native currencies will buy larger shares of those investments, though as will be seen, there is risk associated with investment in securities denominated in a currency that continues to decline. Evidence, as seen in the appendices regarding the continued decline in the value of the dollar, gives rise to some concern that letting the market system work is not having the desired effect. Also, contributing factors such as increased outsourcing of production, an increasing federal debt, and the ongoing and generally growing trade deficit, may offset any market forces that put upward pressure on the value of the dollar. 10 Should some policy intervention be considered, the value of the dollar can theoretically be influenced by both the Federal Reserve System (Fed) and the Federal Government. The Fed manages what is known as the monetary base but money is expanded and contracted by lending and borrowing between the public and the banking sector. Interest rates are inversely related to the volume of money in circulation, and while the Fed may target rates, currently targeting the Federal Funds Rate, interest rates are subject to many influences and complete control is not possible (Mishkin 2004). The Fed also holds foreign currencies and can influence the value of the dollar internationally by buying and selling those currencies, but follows a policy of freely floating exchange rates for the most part. Central Banks around the world, acting in conjunction with their respective governments, may cooperate with each other to maintain the value of different currencies including the dollar, again by buying those currencies currently experiencing a decline in value (Melvin, 2004). The Fed conducts its operations based on its monetary policy objectives and with the goals of the Federal government in mind. With respect to its exchange rate actions, as Melvin notes, “the role of various central banks is to conduct foreign exchange operations for central governments” (2004). The Executive and Legislative Branches of the government have influence over trade, through legislation and treaties enacted with trading partners. Current emphasis in trade policy is to extend trade free zones to encourage U.S. exports, though experience with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) indicates that such treaties and agreements may as easily encourage imports as exports. The President has no true power beyond influencing morale and offering encouragement regarding the strength of the U.S. economy and the currency (Burns et al, 2004). In addition, the President may actively campaign for trade agreements under consideration. That such campaigning does occur indicates that the Federal Government does have some concerns regarding the issue of U.S. trade and international financial standing. Why the Decline Matters One of the problems created by this value decline occurs when U.S. companies want to buy foreign goods, products, services, or raw materials they need to spend more money to buy the same volume of goods and services. Many U.S. companies outsource at least part of their production today, generally to lower production costs. The benefit should be a decrease in prices of goods for U.S. consumers. A devalued dollar, however, reduces these cost savings for U.S. producers and consumers do not see the lower prices that they might have with a stronger dollar. Further, much of what Americans buy is in fact imported, as evidenced by the trade deficit. Prices for imports must also rise with the decline in the value of the dollar. Even domestic travelers going abroad need to spend more U.S. Dollars to buy the foreign currency of locations visited because the U.S. dollar does not have the buying power it did years ago. 11 This also matters, because as noted, fewer foreign investors may choose the United States as their preferred place of investment, putting further downward pressure o the value of the dollar. International investors, seeing a continued decline in the U.S. Dollar understand that such a decline, should it continue, puts at risk their investment gains. Given the increased availability of investment alternatives, either U.S. investments must offer higher rates of return or lose the invested capital that comes from abroad. Lack of investment from abroad can have not only an adverse affect on the future value of the dollar, but also on domestic unemployment, inflation, and Gross Domestic Product (Melvin, 2004). “A recent survey by Central Banking Publications of 65 central banks… found that two thirds are moving away from dollars toward euros. Private investors could also desert the dollar,” and thus, our rank will fall in the global market place (Samuelson, 2005). So this begs the question for the future, could oil prices which are now set in Dollars, be set in Euro. Even with the recent difficulties for the Euro, the United States is no longer seen as the only safe haven for investors. The number of nations participating in the single currency is large now, and will potentially grow larger. [See Appendix C] Conclusion In conclusion, some concern must be felt regarding the value of the Dollar and its decline’s impact on the U.S. economy. Many Americans believe that the U.S. economy is impervious to crises that befall other nations and are inclined to view the declining value of the dollar as a minor inconvenience with no potential for creating larger problems. Others perceive that, while a problem, it is the nature of a free market system to correct problems like a depreciated dollar without intervention by government or monetary authorities. Still others believe that our international troubles stem from other nations, rather than our own practices. The first step of solving any problem, however, is admitting there is one, and it is not other nations that should be blamed. Rather, it is our lack of an adaptive response to big emerging markets such as the EU, India or China, and our own habits of exporting production and choosing to import so much of what we consume, as well as our reliance on foreign sources of energy, which seems to promote the greatest threat. Minimally, the decline of the dollar should be acknowledged and treated with the same attention that is accorded to the threat of terrorism. Furthermore, because the government derives its power from its economy, it is vital for the security and well being of the American people and the further development of our nation. Everything comes from the economy; jobs, military spending, infrastructure. It is essential for American as a whole to spur the economy in order to insure a quality standard of living and provide a safety net for future generations to come. The U.S. needs a better assessment of where it presently stands internationally in terms of its economic well-being, and should develop a strategy to better protect U.S. jobs, Gross Domestic Product, and the Dollar. 12 References Baumol, W., & Blinder, A. (2005). Macroeconomics: principles and policy. 10th ed. Mason,Ohio: Thompson Learning; South-Western. Burns, J.M., et al. (2004). Government by the people. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; Prentice Hall. Canadian Centre for Cyber Citizenship, (2003). Why is the us dollar weakening? internal and external factors combined to drive the american dollar down in 2003. Retrieved March 30, 2005, from MapleLeafWeb Web site: www.mapleleafweb.com/features/economy/loonie_rebounds/american.html. European Central Bank, (n.d.). The euro area. Retrieved Jan. 23, 2006, from European Central Bank Web site: www.ecb.int/bc/intro/html/map.en.html. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, (2006). U.s./euro foreign exchange rate. Retrieved Jan. 22, 2006, from FRED® II Web site: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/EXUSEU.txt. Is a usa economic collapse due in 2005?. (2004). Retrieved March 16, 2005, from Ballotpaper.org Web site: www.ballotpaper.org/archives/000568.html. Melvin, M. (2004). International money and finance. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson; AddisonWesley. Mishkin, F. (2004). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson;Addison-Wesley. Samuelson, R. (2005). Bottom dollar. Newsweek, March 31, 38-48. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, (2006). News release: u.s. international trade in goods & services. Retrieved Jan. 22, 2006, from BEA News Web site: www.bea.doc.gov/bea/newsrel/tradnewsrelease.htm. Yahoo! Finance, (2006). Euro to u.s. dollar exchange rate. Retrieved Jan. 22, 2006, from Yahoo! Finance Currency Converter Web site: http://finance.yahoo.com/currency/convert?amt=1&from=EUR&to=USD&submit =Convert. . 13 Appendix A Value of US Dollar: Euros per Dollar Note: Exchange rate represented as Euros per Dollar. This graph depicts how the value of the Dollar is generally in decline against the Euro, at least up to November 2005. (Euro to U.S. Dollar Exchange Rate, 2006) 14 Appendix B Title: Series ID: Source: Release: Seasonal Adjustment: Frequency: Units: Date Range: DATE VALUE 2002-12-01 2003-01-01 2003-02-01 2003-03-01 2003-04-01 2003-05-01 2003-06-01 2003-07-01 2003-08-01 2003-09-01 2003-10-01 2003-11-01 2003-12-01 2004-01-01 2004-02-01 2004-03-01 2004-04-01 2004-05-01 2004-06-01 2004-07-01 2004-08-01 2004-09-01 2004-10-01 2004-11-01 2004-12-01 2005-01-01 2005-02-01 2005-03-01 2005-04-01 2005-05-01 2005-06-01 2005-07-01 2005-08-01 2005-09-01 2005-10-01 2005-11-01 2005-12-01 1.0194 1.0622 1.0785 1.0797 1.0862 1.1556 1.1674 1.1365 1.1155 1.1267 1.1714 1.1710 1.2298 1.2638 1.2640 1.2261 1.1989 1.2000 1.2146 1.2266 1.2191 1.2224 1.2507 1.2997 1.3406 1.3123 1.3013 1.3185 1.2943 1.2697 1.2155 1.2041 1.2295 1.2234 1.2022 1.1789 1.1861 U.S. / Euro Foreign Exchange Rate EXUSEU Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System G.5 Foreign Exchange Rates Not Applicable Monthly U.S. Dollars to One Euro 2002-12-01 to 2005-12-01 (U.S./Euro Foreign Exchange Rate, 2006) 15 Appendix C The euro area: Participating countries 12 Member States of the European Union are participating in the single currency: • • • • • • Belgium Germany Greece Spain France Ireland • • • • • • Italy Luxembourg The Netherlands Austria Portugal Finland Non-participants: Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom are members of the EU but are not currently participating in the single currency. Denmark, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Slovenia and Slovakia are members of the exchange rate mechanism II (ERM II). This means that the Danish krone, the Estonian kroon, the Cyprus pound, the Latvian lats, the Lithuanian litas, the Maltese lira, the Slovenian tolar and the Slovak koruna are linked to the euro. It is expected that in the future more countries will join ERM II. (The euro area, n.d.)