Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
State of matter wikipedia , lookup
Accretion disk wikipedia , lookup
Condensed matter physics wikipedia , lookup
Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Electric charge wikipedia , lookup
Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Neutron magnetic moment wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
127 Magnetic monopole and magnetic charge Subject: There are no particles that carry magnetic charge. It is said, that no magnetic monopoles exist. It follows, so it is argued, that a physical quantity „magnetic charge“ or „magnetic pole strength“ does not exist. Deficiencies: Let us first clarify two concepts: Magnetic charge density ρm: It is defined by μ0 div H = ρm! ! ! ! ! ! ! (1) Thus, the magnetic charge density describes the sources of the H field. Since we have μ0 div H = – div M# # # # # # # (2) it also signifies the sinks of the magnetization field. The volume integral of the magnetic charge density is called magnetic pole strength, magnetic charge or amount of magnetism. Magnetic monopole: The word is not used consistently. When it is said that no magnetic monopoles exist, one refers to particles, i.e. objects that carry magnetic charge (or whose pole strength is different from zero). Such „monopoles“ have not been found so far. But the word is also used as a name for the source of a magnetic „Coulomb field“, i.e. a magnetic field, whose field strength H decreases as 1/r 2. Such fields can be realized in any desired approximation. It is the field in the vicinity of a pole of bar magnet that is long and thin. Because of this ambiguity, in the following we shall not call a magnetically charged particle a „monopole“ but a „monopole particle“. To show the non-existence of the physical magnitude „magnetic charge“ it is usually argued that no monopole particles have been found. However, in order to explain what is meant by such a particle it is necessary to first introduce the physical quantity magnetic charge, for instance by means of equation (1). It is not possible to deduce the existence or non-existence of a physical quantity from an observation of nature. Physical quantities are human constructs or creations [1]. A physical quantity is introduced when it is advantageous; when it can serve for the description of natural phenomena. Actually it is advantageous to introduce a quantity „magnetic charge“. It is needed among other things: • to describe the fact, that no magnetic monopole particles exist; • to describe the fact, that the poles of a magnet carry equal and opposite charges at their poles; • to formulate Coulomb’s law for magnetic poles [2]. Certainly one could do without the introduction of magnetic charge. But then, instead of saying that no particles exist that carry magnetic charge, we had to formulate: „There are no particles for which the volume integral of the divergence of the magnetic field strength over a region of space that contains the particle is different from zero.“ By the way, one could get rid of the electric charge in the same way. Obviously nobody would do so. Origin: Magnetic charge is a time-honored physical quantity, which has been used with various names. At Coulomb’s time it was imagined that magnetism is caused by two magnetic fluids (in analogy with the electric phenomena, which were explained by two electric fluids). For both, the electric and the magnetic fluids, Coulomb discovered the inverse square law of the force [2]. Maxwell calls this quantity the „strength of a pole“ [3]: The repulsion between two like poles is in the straight line joining them, and is numerically equal to the product of the strengths of the poles divided by the square of the distance between them. On the next page he introduces the term „quantity of magnetism“, and he states: The quantity of magnetism at one pole of a magnet is always equal and opposite to that at the other, or more generally thus: In every Magnet the total quantity of Magnetism (reckoned algebraically) is zero. The term quantity of magnetism is also later used by Max Born [4]. Although it is easier to verify experimentally Coulomb’s law for magnetic than that for electric charge, the quantity has today almost completely disappeared from the text books. This happened together with the marginalization of the magnetic field strength. If the field strength is not used to describe a magnetic field the equation ! μ0 div H = ρm no longer can serve to get a feeling for the magnetic charge. Disposal: At school: Introduce magnetic charge right from the beginning of magnetostatics as an independent extensive physical quantity, in the same way as one introduces electric charge in electrostatics. The total magnetic charge of a magnet is zero. At university: First treat the relation ! μ0 div H = – div M Thereafter introduce magnetic charge as: ! ρm = μ0 div H . Friedrich Herrmann [1] G. Falk und W. Ruppel: Mechanik, Relativität, Gravitation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1973, p. 2 [2] C. A. Coulomb: Second Mémoire sur l’Électricitá et le Magnétisme, Où l’on détermine, suivant quelles loix le Fluide magnétique, ainsi que le Fluide électrique, agissent, soit par répulsion, soit par attraction. Mémoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, 1785, p. 593 [3] J. C. Maxwell, A treatise on electricity and magnetism, Volume two, Dover Publications, Inc, New York, 1954, p. 3-4 [4] M. Born, Die Relativitätstheorie Einsteins, Heidelberger Taschenbücher, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1969, p. 133