Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cognitive Psychology Workbook Name: Group: Exam Dates: King Edward VI Psychology Department 1 Contents Specification ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction to Cognitive Psychology ..................................................................................................... 5 Content – Memory .................................................................................................................................. 7 Multi-Store Model of Memory................................................................................................................ 9 Evidence for the Multi-Store Model: .................................................................................................... 10 Peterson & Peterson (1959) ................................................................................................................. 10 Other Evidence for the Multi-Store Model: Cases of Amnesia............................................................. 12 Evidence against the Multi-Store Model .............................................................................................. 13 Levels of Processing (LOP) Model of Memory ...................................................................................... 14 Evidence for Levels of Processing: ........................................................................................................ 15 Craik & Tulving (1975)* ......................................................................................................................... 15 More evaluation for Levels of Processing ............................................................................................. 17 Comparison: theories of memory ......................................................................................................... 18 Forgetting .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Cue-Dependent Forgetting ................................................................................................................... 20 Evidence for Cue Dependent Forgetting:....................................................................................... 21 Godden and Baddeley (1975)* ....................................................................................................... 21 More evaluation of Cue Dependent Forgetting.................................................................................... 23 Trace Decay ........................................................................................................................................... 24 Evaluation of Trace Decay ..................................................................................................................... 25 Comparison: theories of forgetting ...................................................................................................... 26 Key issue – Eye Witness Testimony ...................................................................................................... 27 *denotes a key study that must be known in detail King Edward VI Psychology Department 2 Specification 1 – Definition of the approach 1a: Define cognitive psychology showing understanding that the approach is about the role of cognition/cognitive processes in human behaviour. 1b: Define and use psychological terminology accurately and appropriately including the terms: i information processing, ii memory, iii forgetting, iv storage, v retrieval. 2 – Methodology/How Science Works 2a: Identify, describe and apply the following terms:i natural, laboratory and field experiment, ii independent variable (IV) and dependent variable (DV), iii experimental hypothesis, iv directional (one tailed) and non-directional (two tailed), v repeated measures, matched pairs and independent groups design, vi operationalisation of variables, vii counterbalancing, viii randomisation, ix order effects. 2b: Describe and evaluate, including strengths and weaknesses, the experimental method (laboratory, natural, field) in terms of: i experimental control (including the effects of situational and participant variables), ii objectivity, iii reliability, iv validity, v experimenter effects, vi demand characteristics. 3 - Content 3a: Describe and evaluate the Levels of Processing framework for memory research (Craik and Lockhart, 1972) and one other theory or model of memory (other than cue dependent theory). Suitable examples: reconstructive memory (Bartlett, 1932) multi-store model of memory (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968) working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974) Spreading-activation Model of Semantic Memory (Collins & Loftus, 1975). b Describe and evaluate the Cue Dependent Theory of Forgetting (Tulving, 1974) and one other theory of forgetting. Suitable examples: displacement trace decay interference theory. 4 – Studies in detail 4a:Describe and evaluate in detail Godden and Baddeley’s (1975) study of cue dependent forgetting/memory and one other study of memory or forgetting in the Cognitive Approach. This must be selected from the following: Peterson & Peterson (1959) Suppression of rehearsal and the role of interference Craik and Tulving (1975) Levels of processing Ramponi et al (2004) Levels of processing effects on involuntary or implicit recall and age. King Edward VI Psychology Department 3 5 – Key issues 5a: Describe one key issue of relevance to today’s society and apply concepts, theories and/or research (as appropriate) drawn from the Cognitive Approach to explain the issue. Suitable examples: flashbulb memory reliability of eyewitness testimony the use of the cognitive interview. Note: in examination, students may be given stimulus material from a key issue to explain using concepts, theories and/or research (as appropriate) from the Cognitive Approach. 6 – Evidence of practice: short experiment 6a: Devise and conduct one practical, which must be an experiment, to gather data relevant to a topic covered in the Cognitive Approach for this course. This experiment must be designed and conducted according to ethical principles. Suitable examples: interference task on short-term memory levels of processing task state or context dependency forgetting task. 6b: Comment on the research design decisions. 6c: Collect, present and comment on data gathered including using measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode), measures of dispersion (at least range), bar graph, histogram, frequency graph as relevant. Methods: Note: students must be prepared to answer exam questions focused on practical work, which will include questions about the practical exercises themselves and questions about the general methodological issues that are specified for this particular unit. This will include the following requirement: Identify, describe and apply the following: i natural, laboratory and field experiment, ii independent and dependent variables, iii experimental (directional and non-directional) hypothesis, iv repeated measures, matched pairs and independent groups designs, v control over participant and situational variables, vi measures of central tendency, vii measures of dispersion (at least range), viii bar graph, histogram and frequency graph as ways to present data collected, ix experimenter effects and demand characteristics, x objectivity, validity, reliability, xi operationalization, xii counterbalancing, randomisation, order effects. King Edward VI Psychology Department 4 Introduction to Cognitive Psychology What is Cognitive Psychology What are the assumptions of the cognitive approach? History of the cognitive approach: Applications of the cognitive approach: King Edward VI Psychology Department 5 Glossary of terms Information Processing Memory Forgetting Storage Retrieval Structural processing Phonetic processing Semantic processing Encoding specificity principal Complete the table with the definitions of the words listed and add any other words as you learn more about the cognitive approach. King Edward VI Psychology Department 6 Content – Memory What is memory? Why do we have memory? What would life be like without memory? Why is memory of interest to the police and courts? King Edward VI Psychology Department 7 What is your 1st childhood memory? When you have learnt more about memory you can assess your own memory – why is it likely to be accurate or not? In the space below draw a diagram of the front of the Hall. This shouldn’t be too hard, you see it every day! King Edward VI Psychology Department 8 Multi-Store Model of Memory Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968) Diagram Description Primary effect King Edward VI Psychology Department Recency effect 9 Evidence for the Multi-Store Model: Peterson & Peterson (1959) Aim Procedure Findings Conclusions King Edward VI Psychology Department 10 Evaluation of Peterson & Peterson (1959) GRAVE Generalisability Reliability Application Validity Ethics King Edward VI Psychology Department 11 Other Evidence for the Multi-Store Model: Cases of Amnesia Amnesia caused by… Effect on Memory HM Clive Wearing Other studies that support the Multi-Store Model King Edward VI Psychology Department 12 Evidence against the Multi-Store Model There is some evidence that the Multi-Store model is too simplistic. For example, long term memory can be split up into different sorts of long term memory. Semantic For example… Episodic For example… Procedural For example… The case of Clive Wearing could be used as evidence against MSM. KF Flash bulb memories Levels of Processing Use of lab experiments King Edward VI Psychology Department 13 Levels of Processing (LOP) Model of Memory Craik and Lockhart (1972) Description of the theory: What are the two original levels of processing? This was extended into 3 levels of processing. What are they? 1 1 2 2 3 King Edward VI Psychology Department 14 Evidence for Levels of Processing: Craik & Tulving (1975)* Aim Procedure Findings Conclusions King Edward VI Psychology Department 15 Evaluation of other Craik & Tulving GRAVE Generalisability Reliability Application Validity Ethics King Edward VI Psychology Department 16 More evaluation for Levels of Processing Better than Multi-Store Modell because…. Hyde and Jenkins (1971) Application to real life Evidence against Levels of Processing Still to simple? Morris et al. (1977) Clive Wearing Description not explanation King Edward VI Psychology Department 17 Comparison: theories of memory Multi-Store Memory Levels of Processing Comparison issue King Edward VI Psychology Department 18 Forgetting What is forgetting? Why can’t we just remember everything? Why do we forget some things and not others? ? King Edward VI Psychology Department 19 Cue-Dependent Forgetting What is cue-dependent forgetting? Different types of cue-dependent forgetting: Context-dependent forgetting: State-dependent forgetting: Context-dependent forgetting Give an example of each: State-dependent forgetting King Edward VI Psychology Department 20 Evidence for Cue Dependent Forgetting: Godden and Baddeley (1975)* Aim Procedure Findings Conclusions King Edward VI Psychology Department 21 Evaluation of Godden and Baddeley (1975) GRAVE Generalisability Reliability Application Validity Ethics King Edward VI Psychology Department 22 More evaluation of Cue Dependent Forgetting Anecdotal Evidence Smith (1985) Schab (1990) Hertz (1997) Duka et al. (2000) Miles & Hardman (1998) Lang et al. (2001) Application Evidence against Cue Dependency Criticisms of the studies used to provide support Not a complete explanation King Edward VI Psychology Department 23 Trace Decay What is Trace Decay? How does this theory support the Multi-Store Model of memory? Give an example… King Edward VI Psychology Department 24 Evaluation of Trace Decay Evidence for theory: Evidence against theory: Application: King Edward VI Psychology Department 25 Comparison: theories of forgetting Cue-Dependent Trace Decay Comparison issue King Edward VI Psychology Department 26 Key issue – Eye Witness Testimony Is eyewitness testimony reliable? Describing the issue… What do we mean by the term ‘witness?’ What is eyewitness testimony? What will happen to a witness after they have seen an event? Why is it important that eyewitness testimony is reliable? King Edward VI Psychology Department 27 Applying concepts to the issue…. Leading Questions Loftus (1975) Barn Loftus & Palmer (1974) Car crash Weapon Focus Loftus (1987) Case Study Case of Ronald Cotton Theories of memory and Forgetting Multi-store Model Levels of Processing Cue Dependent Forgetting Displacement Reconstructive Memory Motivated Forgetting King Edward VI Psychology Department 28 King Edward VI Psychology Department 29