Download Conservative forces

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gibbs free energy wikipedia , lookup

Mass wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum potential wikipedia , lookup

First observation of gravitational waves wikipedia , lookup

Internal energy wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to general relativity wikipedia , lookup

Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear physics wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Time in physics wikipedia , lookup

Conservation of energy wikipedia , lookup

Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup

Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup

Weightlessness wikipedia , lookup

Negative mass wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear force wikipedia , lookup

Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Speed of gravity wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup

History of subatomic physics wikipedia , lookup

Gravity wikipedia , lookup

Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Anti-gravity wikipedia , lookup

Potential energy wikipedia , lookup

Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup

Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
A conservative force has the following properties
1. The work done by a conservative
force on a particle moving between
two points does not depend on the
path taken by the particle.
1. yes
2. The net work done by a conservative
force on a particle moving around a
closed path is zero.
1. yes
3. There exists a scalar function, the
potential energy U(x,y,z), so that the
force at any point can be calculated
from the negative gradient of the
potential energy function.
B
G
2 W21 = ∫ F ⋅ dl
2 G
1
2. no
1
A
B
1
2. no
2 W21 +W12 = 0
AG
r G G
G
G
G
1. yes U (r ) = − ∫ F ⋅ dl + U (r0 ) ⇔ F = −∇U
G
r0
2. no
Fx = −
4. The force at any point in space
defines a vector field. The curl of this
vector field is zero everywhere.
1. yes
5. The force at any point in space
defines a vector field. The divergence
of this vector field is zero everywhere.
1. yes
2. no
2. no
∂U
∂U
∂U
, Fy = −
, Fz = −
∂x
∂y
∂z
For any scalar field U: ∇ × (∇U ) = 0
Example:
(∇ × F )z = ⎛⎜⎜ ⎛⎜⎜ ∂∂Fyx ⎞⎟⎟ − ⎛⎜⎜ ∂∂Fxy ⎞⎟⎟ ⎞⎟⎟
G
⎠ ⎝
⎠⎠
⎝⎝
⎛ ⎛ ∂ 2U ⎞ ⎛ ∂ 2U ⎞ ⎞
⎟⎟ = 0
⎟−⎜
= ⎜−⎜
⎜ ⎜ ∂x∂y ⎟ ⎜ ∂y∂x ⎟ ⎟
⎠⎠
⎠ ⎝
⎝ ⎝
Not necessarily.
An electric potential V at a position r is related to the electric potential energy U of a
test charge q at the position r through
V = U/q.
A good way to visualize a potential in two dimensions is to think of a landscape.
For each point in the x-y plane, the height (z-coordinate) indicates the value of the
potential energy V(x,y).
Which of the figures (a)-(d) represents a possible landscape for an electric dipole in
two dimensions? (The colored lines in the figures are lines of constant potential.)
1. (a)
(a)
2. (b)
3. (c)
(b)
4. (d)
(c)
(d)
The gravitational potential V at a position r is related to the gravitational potential
energy U of a test mass m at the position r through
V = U/m.
Which of the figures (a)-(d) represents a possible landscape for the potential of two
point masses in two dimensions?
The gravitational force is always attractive;
1. (a)
2. (b)
3. (c)
4. (d)
bringing a mass closer to another one
always lowers the potential energy.
If you know the potential energy of a
particle everywhere in space, you can
calculate the force from the negative
gradient of the potential energy.
In a landscape, the negative gradient
points in the direction of the steepest
decline. This is the direction in which a
ball would roll if you released it from rest
on a hill side. The steeper the hill, the
larger the net force on the ball.
(a)
For the potential energy landscape of
figure (a), where is the force the
strongest?
For figure (a), where is the force the
weakest? (pick one of the previous
answers)
5.
1. Left of center, near the dark red lines.
2. Right of center, near the dark blue
lines.
For figure (a), where is the potential
energy the highest?
1.
3. The force has the same magnitude
throughout.
4. In the center, near the bright red lines.
5. Way to the left, outside the figure.
For figure (a), where is the potential
energy the lowest?
2.
The potential energy is an important concept in simulations because it allows us to
calculate the force on each particle due to interactions with other particles, with walls,
with external fields (electric, gravitational), etc.
Imagine you have three particles, 1, 2, and 3, each of mass m and charge q, in the
electric field of a parallel plate capacitor near the surface of the earth.
a) how many contributions are there to the potential energy of particle 1?
4–8
b) what are these contributions
(names are fine, no need for equations)
1. Electric, due to the electric field
of the capacitor
G
E
+
2
3
1
(a)
(b)
2. Electric, due to particle 2
3. Electric, due to particle 3
4. Gravitational, due to Earth
Earth
5. Gravitational, due to particle 2
6. Gravitational, due to particle 3
7. Intermolecular, due to plate (a)
8. Intermolecular, due to plate (b)
−
Van-der-Waals interactions are important
only at very small distances (10-9 m)