* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Glaciers caused zooplankton mortality?
The Marine Mammal Center wikipedia , lookup
Marine debris wikipedia , lookup
Marine larval ecology wikipedia , lookup
Marine life wikipedia , lookup
Deep sea fish wikipedia , lookup
Abyssal plain wikipedia , lookup
Blue carbon wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup
Marine biology wikipedia , lookup
Marine pollution wikipedia , lookup
Beaufort Sea wikipedia , lookup
Arctic Ocean wikipedia , lookup
Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup
Ecosystem of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre wikipedia , lookup
Journal of Plankton Research Vol.20 no.7 pp.1233-1240, 1998 Glaciers caused zooplankton mortality? J.M.Weslawski and J.Legezyriska Institute of Oceanology Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot 81-912 Powstancdw Warszawy 55, Poland Abstract Dead zooplankton were found in grab samples collected in Kongsfjorden (79°N, Svalbard archipelago) in summer of 199S and 1996. The concentration of dead plankters reached over 500 individuals of copepods and 130 individuals of Themisto per square metre. The biomass of dead zooplankton reached 0.17 g C m~2 locally, and was not correlated with the depth of the locality, nor with the surface salinity. The bulk of sedimented plankton was, however, found behind the sill of the inner fjord basin. We assume that massive discharge of glacial waters in summer causes mass mortality of surface zooplankton, which drift away and sink in the inner fjord pool, thus supplying benthic communities with organic carbon. Introduction The sinking zooplankton are regarded by sedimentologists as 'swimmers' into sediment traps, and most often treated as an artefact or disturbance in carbon flux measurements (Michaels et aL, 1990; Wakeham et aL, 1993). There are some published accounts on sedimenting zooplankton, but most of these papers deal with open ocean and great depths (Seiler and Brandt, 1997). There are no quantitative data on the plankton sink from Arctic fjords; however, fjords have often been supposed to be the sites of mass plankton mortality in freshwater frontal zones (Hartley and Fisher, 1936; Dunbar, 1951; Bousfield et aL, 1975; Kaartvedt and Aksnes, 1992). In the Spitsbergen fjords, stranded belts of dead zooplankton (mostly copepods and chaetognaths) have commonly been observed during low tide in the inner fjord basins in the peak of summer (authors' personal observations). Dead plankters were also seen on the surface of the water close to the glacier cliffs. These phenomena have not, however, been measured quantitatively. Rakusa-Suszczewski (1992) observed 'krill, salpae and seaweeds' stranded on the shore of a glaciated Antarctic fjord (Admiralty Bay). German observations have revealed numerous plankters on the top of sediment in grab samples in the Central Arctic (LKronecke, personal communication). We believe that intensive freshwater mixing following the ice melt in the Arctic acts as an important factor in plankton mortality. The aim of this study is to present a quantitative estimation of zooplankton sedimentation to the seabed in a glacier-fed Arctic fjord. Method Samples were collected from R/V 'Oceania' during a summer cruise to Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, in July 1995 and 1996. Triplicate Van Venn grab (0.35 X 0.4 m opening) samples were collected from 20 to 320 m depth, throughout the fjord area. Samples were washed on a 0.5 mm screen. The water for washing samples was pumped through double sets of 0.5 mm metal sieves, to exclude contamination with larger organisms from the sea. Washed samples were preserved in 4% © Oxford University Press 1233 Fig. 1. Sampling stations and dead plankton on the sea bed. Segmented looplankton mgC/m2 26-60 0-10 Glaciers caused zooplankton mortality? buffered formaldehyde and analysed 4 months later in the laboratory. Zooplankton were separated from benthos, identified, counted and weighed wet with 1 mg accuracy. Plankton were sampled at seven stations (Figure 1) with a vertically hauled (bottom to surface) WP-2 net with 200 \un mesh. The sample from station 5 was analysed according to standard mesozooplankton procedure. Samples from other stations were sieved through 0.5 mm mesh to sort out minor plankton, only Calanus and Themisto specimens remaining on the screen were counted. Zooplankton data are presented as the number of individuals or biomass in the water column from the surface to the bottom under 1 m2. Dry weight of plankton was taken as 0.2 (20%) of wet weight and organic carbon as 0.06 (6%) of the wet weight. Hydrological data are from Beszczyriska et al. (1997). As surface salinity gradient, we assume the difference between surface and near-bottom salinity. Surface sediment plume indicating the extension of glacial meltwater was arbitrarily classified into three categories (1, <10 mg mineral matter dm"3; 2, between 11 and 25 mg dm"3; 3, >25 mg mineral matter dm"3), data on suspensions were taken from M.Zajaczkowski and L.Kotwicki (personal communication). Study area Kongsfjorden is situated at 79°N and opens to the west to the North Atlantic-Greenland Sea (Figure 1). The fjord is divided into two parts: an inner basin of 50-80 m depth, separated by a 40 m deep sill from the outer basin of 300-400 m depth. Warm (+5°C) Atlantic and cooler (+2°C) coastal Spitsbergen waters enter the fjord in surface and intermediate layers, while cold (-1.2°C) near-bottom waters are of local origin. The hydrology of Kongsfjorden is presented in detail by Weslawski et al. (1991) and Beszczyriska et al. (1997). Large, extensively melting glaciers (Kongsbreen, Kongsvegen) are situated at the end of the fjord and discharge ~1 km3 of fresh water annually with a seasonal peak in July (Lefauconnier et al., 1994; Weslawski et al, 1995; Beszczyriska et al, 1997). Results The amount of dead plankton in benthic grab samples is presented in Figure 1. The biomass ranged from 0.01 to 2.8 g wet weight m~2 (Table I). The highest values were found in the southern fjord basin close to the Kongsbreen, while dead plankton were less abundant in samples collected at the northern branch of the fjord, close to the Kongsvegen glacier. Dead plankton were scarce in the outer fjord part (Figure 1). The amount of dead plankton on the bottom was not correlated with depth, nor with the amount of plankton in the water column (Figure 2) or local surface salinity gradient (Table I). Five species of Copepoda and two pelagic Amphipoda species were present in the benthic samples (Table II). All copepods were in the older stages of development (from copepodite 3 onward); amphipods were represented by subadult specimens of 5-8 mm length (Table II). Species on the fjord bottom, as well as their relative abundance, were similar to those in the water column above (Table 1235 J.M.Wfslawsld and J.Legezynska go ooooooooooooooooooo S o •Of* §•'6 O.T3 6^ 33 II? o .8 Is I J3 O CO * 2 t^ cd O5 1236 H i/j io irt t*; oo oo nnHonrifO Glaciers caused zooplankton mortality? Fig. 2. Amount of Calanus in water column below m2 along the sampling profile (plankton net) with an indication of the amount of dead specimens found on 1 m2 of the sea bed (grab samples). Station numbers refer to Figure 1. II). Exceptions were Pseudocalanus spp., which dominated in the plankton samples; but were absent in the benthic material, and Themisto libellula which was more frequent (6%) in grab samples than in the water column (0.4%). Discussion The first question is to what extent our samples represent actually dead zooplankton ('sinkers') or are biased by the method. When lowered down to the bottom, a Van Venn grab may collect some zooplankton on its way. In such a case, the amount of plankton in the sample would be proportional to the amount of plankton in the water column, which was not the case (Figure 2). The contamination of sample with water during washing was excluded. Final verification may come from the sediment traps only. Sediment traps of 0.01 m2 area were deployed at 40 m depth for 6-12 h (M.Zajaczkowski and L.Kotwicki, personal communication) and no zooplankton were found in traps. The thickness of the surface water layer with sharp salinity gradient (below 25 p.p.t.) measured <3 m close to the glacier in Kongsfjorden (Beszczynska et al, 1997). According to Weslawski et al.. (1991) and our present observations, the average number of plankters larger than 2 mm inhabiting 1 m3 at the surface ranges from 100 to 200 individuals (making around 450 specimens in the 3-mthick surface brackish layer). Considering the sinking rate of Arctic copepods as 120 m in 24 h (Poltermann, 1997), 50% of mortality in the turbid layer and 450 copepods as standing stock, one trap may collect 1 copepod during at least 12 h exposure. Hence, it is unlikely to collect zooplankton during 6 h exposure. The cause of plankton death in Kongsfjorden is uncertain. Lowered salinity in 1237 J-M.Westawski and J.Legezynska Table IL Share of zooplankton species in the water column (alive) and on the bottom (dead) in Kongsfjorden, summer 1996. Only specimens over 2 mm long are considered Taxon Calanus finmarchicus Calanus glaciate Calanus hyperboreus Paraeuchaeta norvegica Neoscolecitrix farrhanx Rhincalanus nasutus Metridia longa Pseudocalanus spp. CVI Themisto libellula Thysanoessa inermis Bradyidius sp. Total Station 5,:zooplankton in water column Vicinity of station 5, dead zooplankton nnr3 % nnr 2 % ISO 80 16 1 1 1 4 200 2 1 0 456 32.9 17.5 3.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.9 43.9 0.4 0.2 0 100 99 54 7 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 2 174 57 31 4 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 100 frontal zones is commonly reported as a main cause of marine organism mortality, and a range between 5 and 8 PSU is regarded as the critical salinity for both marine and freshwater species (Khlebovitsch, 1990). On the other hand, numerous neritic species withstand a salinity decrease from 30 to 1 PSU especially well in low temperatures (Thomas and White, 1969). Marine organisms exposed to low salinity receive an osmotic influx of water to compensate for the density difference (Aarset and Aunaas, 1987). This may lead to an increase in weight, disintegration of body organs, and eventual sinking of the plankter. A number of Arctic invertebrates exposed to salinity gradients in pack ice are known to be osmoregulators; however, Themisto libellula exposed to 6 PSU died instantly (Aarset and Aunaas, 1987). Another reason for death might be the ingestion of fine mineral particles, known among plankters exposed to turbid waters close to Arctic glaciers (Lewis and Syvitsky, 1983), which disturbs nutrition and breeding. Marine plankton entering brackish and turbid waters in a North Sea estuary show high mortality (Soetaert and Herman, 1994). The mechanism which may force marine plankton to mix with low-salinity waters in a glaciated fjord is the local upwelling or turbulence caused by catabatic winds forcing estuarine circulation. Such a phenomenon was commonly reported by ornithologists observing seabirds feeding (Hartley and Fisher, 1936; Dunbar, 1951; Mehlum and Gabrielsen, 1993). The percentage frequency of zooplankton species found in grabs was generally similar to those from the water column (Table II). Exceptional is the high share of Themisto spp. in grabs, compared to the amount in the water column, and the absence in benthic samples of Pseudocalanus spp. which is numerous in plankton. The first species was described to be a stenohaline osmoconformer (Aarset and Aunaas, 1987), with poor survival abilities in low salinity; the second species is known to inhabit brackish waters with salinities down to 6 PSU (Koszteyn and Kwasniewski, 1989); however, it is also possible that Pseudocalanus was sieved away on the 0.5 mm screen. 1238 Glaciers caused zooplankton mortality? When compared to organic sedimentation in Kongsfjorden, ranging from 50 to 300 mg C nr 2 day 1 (Zaj^czkowski and Kotwicki, in preparation), the dead plankton biomass seems to contribute 6-8% of total organic sedimentation. Compared to the mean biomass of benthic fauna (600-9000 mg C nr 2 , our own data; Weslawski et al, 1995), the dead plankton biomass contributes to some 10% of the benthic biomass in the inner fjord basin. The biomass of zooplankton in Kongsfjorden pelagial ranges from 0.3 to 6 g C m~2 (Weslawski et al, 1991; our own data from 1996) so the biomass of dead plankters constitutes 1-10% of the biomass in the water column above. The overall biomass of dead plankton in Kongsfjorden might be roughly estimated to 40 tonnes of fresh weight (based on 170 km2 of the fjord area, and distribution of the biomass as shown in Figure 1). Necrophagic (carrion feeder) animals are most likely to be those to benefit first from the sinking zooplankton. Necrophages are known to be abundant in polar waters; however, the disadvantage of this mode of feeding is the random occurrence of carrion on the sea bed (Presler, 1990). However, dead euphausids were found to be the main food item for abyssal Antarctic ophiurids (Sokolova, 1994). Necrophages in Spitsbergen fjords are represented by lysianassid amphipods inhabiting glacier bays in abundance (Weslawski, 1992). Strong turbidity, surface salinity gradient and resulting plankton mortality observed in glacier bays may create the predictable feeding ground for necrophages in the summer. Acknowledgements This project was partly funded by a grant from the Committee on Scientific Research no. PO4-95-09. We would like to thank Ms Kasia Dmoch for plankton analysis, and the crew and research team of R/V 'Oceania' for their assistance during two field seasons. References Aarset,A.V. and Aunaas.T. (1987) Osmotic responses to hyposmotic stress in the Amphipods Cammarus wilkitzkii, Onisimus glacialis and Parathemisto libellula from Arctic waters. Polar Bioi, 7,189-193. Beszczyriska.A., WeslawskiJ.M., Walczowski.W. and Zajaczkowski.M. (1997) Estimation of glacial meltwater discharge into Svalbard coastal waters. Oceanologia, 39,289-298. Bousfie!d,E.L., Filteau.G., O'Neill,M. and Gentes,P. (1975) Population dynamics of zooplankton in the middle St Lawrence estuary. In Cronin.LE. (ed.), Estuarine Research. Academic Press, New York, Vol. 1, pp. 325-351. Dunbar,MJ. (1951) Eastern Arctic waters. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can., 88,1-131. Hartley.C.H. and Fisher J. (1936) The marine foods of birds in an inland fjord region in West Spitsbergen. Part 2. Birds. /. Anim. EcoL, 5, 370-389. Kaartvedt,S. and Aksnes,D.L. (1992) Does freshwater discharge cause mortality of fjord living zooplankton? Estuarine Coastal Shelf ScL, 34,305-313. Khlebovitsch.V.V. (1990) Some physico-chemical and bological phenomena in the salinity gradient. Limnologica, 20, 5-8. KoszteynJ. and Kwasniewski,S. (1989) Comparison of fjord and shelf mesozooplankton communities of the southern Spitsbergen region. Rapp. P.-V. Cons. Int Explor. Mer, 188,164-169. Lefauconnier.B., HagenJ.O. and RudantJ.P. (1994) Flow speed and calving rate of Kongsbreen glacier, 70°N, Spitsbergen, Svalbard, using SPOT images. Polar Res., 13, 59-66. 1239 J.M.Westawski and J.Legezyriska Lewis.A.G. and SyvitskyJ.P.M. (1983) The interaction of plankton and suspended sediment in fjords. Sed. GeoL, 36,81-92. Mehlum,F. and Gabrielsen.G.W. (1993) The diet of high arctic seabirds in coastal and ice covered pelagic areas near Svalbard archipelago. Polar Res., 12,1-20. Michaels,A.F., Silver,M.W., Gowing,M.M. and Knauer.G.A. (1990) Cryptic zooplankton 'swimmers' in upper ocean sediment traps. Deep-Sea Res., 37,1285-1296. Poltermann.M. (1997) Biology and ecology of cryopelagic amphipods from Arctic sea ice. Ber. Polarforscfu. 225, 1-170. Presler.P. (1986) Necrophagous invertebrates of the Admiralty Bay, of King George Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Pol. Polar Res., 7, 25-61. Rakusa-Suszczewski,S. (1992) Admiralty Bay, Antarctic. Institute of Ecology PAS, Warsaw, pp. 1-287. Seiler.D. and Brandt.A. (1997) Seasonal occurrence of planktonic Crustacea in sediment trap samples at three depth horizons in the Greenland Sea. Polar BioL, 17,337-349. Soetaert.K. and Herman J*.MJ. (1994) On foot in the grave: zooplankton drift into the Westetschelde estuary (The Netherlands). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 105,19-29. Sokolova,M.N. (1994) Euphausiid 'dead body rain' as a source of food for abyssal benthos. Deep-Sea Res., 41,741-746. Thomas,M.L.H. and White.G.N. (1969) Mass mortality of estuarine fauna at Bideford, P.EJ., associated with abnormally low salinities. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 26,701-704. Wakeham,S.G., Hedges J.I., Lee.C. and Pease.T.K. (1993) Effects of poisons and preservatives on the composition of organic matter in a sediment trap experiment. / Mar. Res., 51,669-696. WeslawskiJ.M., Jankowski^A., Kwa£niewski,S., Swerpel.S. and Ryg,M. (1991) Summer hydrology and zooplankton in two Svalbard fjords. Pol. Polar Res., 12,445-460. WeslawskU.M., KoszteynJ., Zajaczkowski,M., WiktorJ. and Kwas"niewski,S. (1995) Fresh water in Svalbard fjord ecosystem. In Skjoldal,H.R., Hopkins.G, Erikstad.K.E. and Leinaas.H.P. (eds). Ecology of Fjords and Coastal Waters. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, pp. 229-241. Received on May 6, 1997; accepted on January 14,1998 1240