* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture 28: Physical symbol system
Wizard of Oz experiment wikipedia , lookup
John Searle wikipedia , lookup
Computer chess wikipedia , lookup
Human–computer chess matches wikipedia , lookup
Computer Go wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Hubert Dreyfus's views on artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Existential risk from artificial general intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Intelligence explosion wikipedia , lookup
Chinese room wikipedia , lookup
Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Course Seminar - CS 344 Physical Symbol System Hypothesis Gagan Deep Kaur Roll No. 07408802 Physical Symbol System A PSS consists of - Symbols - set of entities that are physical patterns - Symbol Structures - number of instances/tokens related in some physical way - Processes – operate on these expressions to produce other expressions S1 Symbol CC$7899ABVV S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 Symbol Structures “Expressions” S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 S20 S21 S22 S23 S24 S25 S26 S27 S28 S29 S30 At any given time, a PSS contains - collection of expressions - processes to operate on these expressions creation, modification, reproduction, destruction Collection of “Expressions” Physical Symbol System Key Concepts Designation – the symbol/expressions can refer to something else. Interpretation – the expressions can refer to its own computational processes which the system can evoke and execute Examples of Symbol Systems System Symbol Expressions Processes Logic And, Or, Not, Propositions (T/F) Rules of Inference Algebra +, -, *, /, y, z, 1, 2, 3…. Equations (2+3=5) Rules of Algebra Digital Computer 0, 1 00000111000….. Program -----Chess Chess Pieces Position of pieces on the board Legal Chess Moves Physical Symbol System Hypothesis - By Allen Newell and Herbert Simon “A physical symbol system has the necessary and sufficient means for general intelligent action” Claims - Human thinking is a kind of symbol manipulation - Symbol manipulation necessary for intelligence - Machines can be intelligent, because - Symbol manipulation is sufficient for intelligence Core assumption of Strong AI Grounds of PSS Brain similar with a physical symbol system Psychological Experiments – decision making, learning processes Running AI programs –chess, checkers, theorem proving, Clark – Productivity of Human Thoughts Examples of PSS System Symbol Expressions Processes Digital Computer 0, 1 00000111000….. Program -----Chess Chess Pieces Position of pieces on the board Legal Chess Moves Brain Encoded in brain Thoughts Mental Operations like thinking AI Program Data Data Data Merits Computationally possible to encode symbolic human knowledge Opened avenue for machine intelligence! Implications Appropriately programmed computer is capable of conscious thought Machines can understanding be made to think and have Can Physical Symbol Systems Think? genuine symbol manipulation = intelligence? Critiques Serial manipulation of discrete symbols (PSS) ≠ parallel and distributed processing (Human Brain) Dreyfus – Role of unconscious instincts than conscious symbol manipulation Searle’s Chinese Room Searle’s Chinese Room Searle’s Chinese Room Intelligence requires Understanding. Does the program understands the symbols that it uses? Does “symbols” have any meaning for the machine? Conclusion The question thus boiled down to this: Could a system think or understand just by having right sort of program? Is syntax enough to ensure “semantics” which is necessary for understanding. Can Physical Symbol System be Intelligent? References Clark, Andy, “Philosophical Implications”, Artificial Intelligence, Ed. Margaret Boden, Academic Press, California, 1996 Dreyfus, Hubert, What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of AI, Harper & Row, New York, 1979 Newell, Allen and Simon, Herbert, “Computer Science and Empirical Inquiry: Search and Symbols”, Mind Design II, Ed. John Hagueland, MIT Press, 1997, Searle, John, “Minds, Brains and Programs”, Minds I, Ed. Douglas Hofstadter, and Daniel Dennett, Basic Books, 2001, P. 282-306 Wikipedia, Stanford Encyclopedia Various Internet Sources For The Pictures!