* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Changes to AAFCO Profiles for Dogs and Cats
Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup
Interactome wikipedia , lookup
Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Specialized pro-resolving mediators wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Protein purification wikipedia , lookup
Basal metabolic rate wikipedia , lookup
Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup
Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Fatty acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Changes to AAFCO Profiles for Dogs and Cats Dennis E. Jewell, PhD, Dipl. ACAN Sr. Fellow Nutrition Scientist Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc What they need? So what do theydoneed? What are the changes? • • • • • • Introduction Energy Protein Fat Minerals Vitamins So are the changes big? Introduction • • • Changes are based on new scientific publications and the National Research Council’s Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats (2006) Changes are evolutionary not so revolutionary They are comprehensive, influencing all of the nutrients listed Introduction • • • The committee consisted of Dr. Burkholder (FDA) as the committee chair and 9 other members It was broken into three parts – Canine (CNE), Feline (FNE), and Protocol Evaluation The committee has completed it’s work with expectation that the protocols and profiles will be in the 2016 OP Introduction • There was no change in the scope of the profiles: Only two lifestages (growth and lactation, and maintenance) – There is no breed specific recommendation although large breed dog is broken out – They still apply to healthy animals and do not have specific recommendations for foods designed to aid in the management of disease – Introduction • The AAFCO profiles do not define optimum nutrition Formulating a food according to the protocols is only one part of nutritionally sound, scientifically adequate product development – Companies may need or may choose to perform additional testing to substantiate claims – Precisely Balanced Nutrition So what was decided about energy? Energy • Energy calculation through Modified Atwater was maintained – The committee had access to data showing a good relationship between modified Atwater calculations and measured ME • • Average difference from measured <5% Average bias was small (<2%) Predictive Equations variation of Canine ME from measured metabolizable energy (Mean + Standard Error) Deltaa Absolute Deltab Deltaa Absolute Deltab Deltaa Modified Atwater aThe Absolute Deltab NRC New Equations mean of the differences of each individual test from the tested metabolizable energy value (all foods 3126, dry 3723 canned 978 kcal/kg). bThe mean of the absolute values of the differences of each individual test from the tested metabolizable energy value. Energy • The committee also considered and had access to the variability of energy consumption between pets within a species Does energy use vary between pets? Energy Consumption Distribution of Cats 13 Energy Consumption Distribution of Dogs 14 Energy • The energy recommendation was: Change the energy correction in dog food from 3500 to correct to 4000 kcal ME/kg – Change the energy correction in cat food from correcting above 4500 kcal ME/kg to correct when over 4000 ME/kg (still correcting to 4000 kcal/kg) – Did protein minimums or maximums change? Protein • Dogs and cats do not need “protein” but rather the amino acids that make up protein Nevertheless, using normal ingredients it is reasonable to state a minimum protein concentration – Specific amino acid minimums are also added to assure protein quality – Protein • There were only small changes in total protein minimums (canine growth increased by 0.5%) The presumed digestibility of protein as in other nutrients can be calculated by dividing the AAFCO minimum into the NRCs requirement (In the case of protein resulting in 80% digestibility) – There were specific amino acid changes adding methionine and phenylalanine – Lysine, threonine, tryptophan histidine increased – Protein • The amount of dietary protein was based on the NRC and shown adequate for all protein related needs Lean body mass in dogs was maintained in dogs fed a 14% 4000 Kcal ME/kg food – Lean body mass was maintained in cats fed a 26%, 4000 ME food – How much protein is needed for a dog? Body Lean (grams) Lean Body Maintenance at 14% Dietary Protein in the Dog Circulating albumin (mg/dL) Albumin increases at 14% Dietary Protein in the Dog How much protein is needed for a cat? 23 Body Lean (grams) Lean Body Maintenance at 26% Dietary Protein in the Cat Circulating albumin (mg/dL) Albumin increases at 26% Dietary Protein in the Cat Protein • There was no need to increase the amount of protein above current recommendations What about fat? Fat and Fatty Acids • The CNE and FNE changed minimums CNE increased total fat +0.5% (to 8.5 and 5.5) – CNE increased linoleic acid (to 1.3 and 1.1 for growth and reproduction, and maintenance) – FNE and CNE added specific minimums for n3 fatty acids including both alpha-linolenic and EPA+DHA for growth and reproduction – Fat and Fatty Acids • • • Fat is “required” in pet foods because it imparts the matrix for fat soluble vitamin transport and absorption Fat is “required” in pet foods as it imparts palatability Fat is “required” in pet foods as it contains essential fatty acids Fatty Acid Introduction and Background • Membrane structure • Barrier function (prevent water loss) • Bestows fluidity • Precursor of short-lived molecules (prostanoids, eicosanoids) N-3 Fatty Acids Are Required for Optimal Growth Introduction and Background to n-3 Fatty acids • DHA is directly incorporated into neural tissue • EPA (20:5 n-3) and DHA (22:6 n-3) consumption results in partial replacement of the n- 6 family (Arachidonic acid, 20:4 n-6) in cell membranes. • Decreased production of the n-6 family derived mediators of inflammation (LTB4 and PGE2). Establishing Neural Health Feeding a High Development food with high n-3 fatty acids (DHA) resulted in improved psychomotor abilities through navigating a T maze (weaving & jumping through hoops) The response criteria is amount of time required to get to the reward Establishing Neural Health The Effect of Food on Time Through Obstacles a Time (seconds) Low DHA a Medium DHA b High DHA Months of Age (weaned at 2 months) a,bMeans with different superscripts are different Fatty Acids modulate Inflammation Both n-3 and n-6 fatty acids are further metabolized into specific signaling molecules The CNE set a maximum on the ratio of the sum of linoleic plus arachidonic to the sum of alpha-linolenic, EPA and DHA at 30:1 n-3 Fatty Acids Modulate Markers of Inflammation d 2100 10.5 1800 9.75 a a c a,b 1650 8.25 a,b 1500 7.5 b,c 1350 (TBXB2 pg/mg 9.0 1200 6.75 6.0 b 5.25 1050 900 4.5 750 3.75 3.0 600 a 450 (EPA (mg/dL) 1950 2.25 a 300 1.5 150 0.75 0 Control C + AA C + AA + 0.45 FO C: control C+AA: control + amino acids C+AA+0.45FO: control + amino acids + 0.45% fish oil C+AA+0.90FO: control + amino acids + 0.90% fish oil C+AA+1.35FO: control + amino acids + 1.35% fish oil C+AA+0.9 FO C+AA+1.35 FO a,b,c,dMeans with different superscripts are different (P<0.05) Hall, Brockman and Jewell, Veterinary Immunology and Pathology, 2011 n-3 Fatty Acids modulate Inflammation A compound which influences inflammation (PGE2) is reduced from immune cells Wander RC, et al. J Nutr 1997 So What about minerals? And, what’s the importance of calcium in large breed dogs? Minerals • • • There were significant changes to the calcium minimum and maximum levels The CNE stated that Large and Giant Breed food would meet the profile at 0.9% Calcium and 0.75% Phosphorus The CNE also set a maximum level of calcium at 1.8% for large breed dogs. Minerals • • • Iron has been modified to agree with the NRC and FEDIAF The upper limit for iron was removed because of a practical and scientific reason (digestibility can vary from 10 to 100%, and upper limit was extrapolated) This is an example of the need for nutrition knowledge independent of the profiles. Minerals • • • Copper was modified increasing only the amount required for growth Copper from copper oxide is excluded because it is unavailable This is another example of the limitation of the profiles as copper optimum is clearly different for normal dogs vs dogs with copper storage disease What about vitamins? Vitamins • • There was no change to the minimum for fat soluble vitamins in the dog. The FNE decreased the minimum for A and D while increasing the maximum for D Vitamins • The upper level of vitamin E was removed as there was no information regarding vitamin E toxicity in dogs but rather value was imparted in foods with E at or above the old upper limit Measuring Cognitive Function In Dogs Measuring Cognitive Function In Dogs Measuring Cognitive Function In Dogs Number of errors Food with High Dietary Vitamin E Reduces Errors Landmark Position Immune Cell DNA Comet Assay (Head DNA, %) 99% 93% 78% 64% 36% Immune Cell DNA Protection Percent Head DNA 85 80 Control 500E + C 1000E + C 1500E + C 75 70 65 60 Canine Feline Canine and feline both had a significant linear effect (P<.05). Vitamins • • • • Note what the profiles do and do not do They provide a structure with universal acceptance on what is complete and balanced nutrition They do not provide an answer for optimum nutrition for every animal They do not remove the need of the professional designing the food So what can we conclude about the profiles? Conclusions • Overall • It was reasonable to rewrite the profiles because of advances in pet nutrition • The committee successfully fulfilled their obligation Conclusions • Energy • Modified Atwater calculations are acceptable estimates of dietary energy • Foods need to be adjusted for nutrient density when they are over 4000 kcal/kg Conclusions • Protein • Small changes in protein minimum for puppies and specific amino acids • Continued moderate protein levels provide for complete and balanced nutrition Conclusions • Fat • Small changes of total fat minimums (which probably all foods currently meet) • The addition of n-3 fatty acids, including in the dog an n-6 to n-3 fatty acid ratio Conclusions • Minerals • Significant changes in calcium minimums and maximums to better deal with the special condition of large breed dogs • Other minerals were moderated – minimum and maximums still require the application of nutritional knowledge Conclusions • Vitamins • Changes in minimum concentrations with many now aligning with the NRC • A number of upper limits were removed (such as dietary E in dog food) for practical and scientific reasons Changes to AAFCO Profiles Will Improve the Health of Pets