* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Using cryo-electron microscopy to determine thermodynamic and
Survey
Document related concepts
Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Physical organic chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Thermodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Spinodal decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Transition state theory wikipedia , lookup
Chemical imaging wikipedia , lookup
Vapor–liquid equilibrium wikipedia , lookup
Chemical thermodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Particle-size distribution wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Chemical equilibrium wikipedia , lookup
Stability constants of complexes wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 www.elsevier.com/locate/cocis Using cryo-electron microscopy to determine thermodynamic and elastic properties of membranes Ryan van Zanten, Joseph A. Zasadzinski * Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Ca 93106-5080, United States Available online 10 October 2005 Abstract Both cryo transmission electron and freeze-fracture microscopy provide the high resolution images necessary to elucidate the structures and size distributions of spontaneous vesicles formed from cationic and anionic surfactant mixtures, lipid and polymer mixtures, and mixed lipid and protein mixtures. From the size distributions and structures, estimates of the elastic and thermodynamic properties of the membrane can be determined to begin to relate molecular properties to bilayer parameters. D 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction An important and still open question is whether unilamellar vesicles can ever be at thermodynamic equilibrium, or are simply a metastable organization on the way towards multilamellar liposomes (or more properly, lamellar phase dispersions in excess water) [1&&,2&&,3,4&&,5,6&,7&]. In order for unilamellar vesicles to be stable relative to a multilamellar phase, the bilayer interactions must be repulsive to neutral so that the system does not prefer a multilamellar stacking with a well-defined layer spacing. Recently, there have been reports of three distinct ways that unilamellar vesicle phases can be stabilized with respect to multilamellar phases [1&&,4&&,8,9&], although questions of ultimate thermodynamic equilibrium will likely require a significantly longer wait than a typical graduate student lifetime. The first way to stabilize vesicles is for the surfactant bilayer to develop a spontaneous curvature [1&&]. For this to occur, there must be an asymmetry in the composition of the inner and outer monolayers (hence, this can only occur in surfactant mixtures), because the respective curvatures of the monolayers in a vesicle are opposite in sign but nearly equal in magnitude whenever the bilayer thickness is small compared to the vesicle radius [5&,10&&]. Vesicles whose curvatures are similar to the * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 805 893 4769; fax: +1 805 893 4731. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (R. van Zanten), [email protected] (J.A. Zasadzinski). 1359-0294/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2005.09.001 spontaneous curvature have a lower energy than the corresponding flat lamellae. If the bending constant is sufficiently large, variations from the spontaneous curvature are sufficiently unfavorable that multilamellar vesicles are prohibited, especially at low concentrations where entropy also favors unilamellar vesicles. Hence, a monodisperse population of unilamellar vesicles at equilibrium implies that stabilization results from a spontaneous curvature and a large bending constant (Fig. 1) [1&&,2&&,11&]. At higher concentrations, or in the presence of attractive bilayer interactions, this mechanism can lead to stable vesicles with a quantized number of bilayers as the interaction energy can overcome the increase in curvature energy for a limited deviation away from the spontaneous curvature [1&&]. At sufficiently high concentrations, however, packing constraints lead to a coexistence of vesicles with a multilamellar phase [12&&]. In the second mechanism, vesicles can be stabilized by the gain in entropy resulting from the large number of finite sized vesicles as opposed to a few large lamellae or an intermediate number of multilamellar liposomes. This will always be the case at sufficiently low surfactant concentration, although in practice, the concentration may need to be vanishingly small to stabilize vesicles [5&]. At higher surfactant concentrations, the bilayer elastic constant, j, must be of order k BT or less to favor vesicles in the absence of a spontaneous curvature. A low value for the bending constant is one way to generate sufficient repulsive steric interactions to overcome van der Waals attraction between bilayers. The repulsive Helfrich undulation interaction between bilayers is inversely proportional to the 262 R. van Zanten, J.A. Zasadzinski / Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 Fig. 1. (a) Cryo-TEM image and (b) measured size distribution fit to Eq. (2) of vesicles formed from mixtures of sodium perfluorooctanoate (FC7) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (4 : 1 wt : wt, 2 total wt.%). Spontaneous vesicles of this composition are almost monodisperse and have R 0 = 23 T 0.5 nm and K = 6 T 2 k BT [1&&]. A narrow size distribution is consistent with stabilization by the energetic costs of deviating from the spontaneous curvature due to the high value of the bending constant. bending elastic constant [5&,13&]. The smaller the bending constant, the larger are the repulsive interactions between layers; if the bending constant is of order k BT, the net interaction between bilayers is repulsive, and multilamellar vesicles are prohibited [1&&]. A polydisperse population of unilamellar vesicles at equilibrium implies that stabilization results from entropy and a low bending constant [1&&,11&]. Again, at sufficiently high concentrations, packing constraints lead to a coexistence of vesicles with a multilamellar phase [9&]. In the third mechanism, strong, long-range interactions between the bilayers prevent the formation of a stable multilamellar phase [4&&,14,15&]. Double-layer electrostatic interactions can stabilize vesicles against aggregation at sufficiently low salt concentrations [4&&14,15&]. The best example of this mechanism involves mixtures of ion-pair amphiphiles (typically a hydroxide and an acid surfactant pair) whose counterions combine to form water [4&&,14,15&]. As a result, the background electrolyte concentration remains small (¨10 7 Fig. 2. Icosahedral vesicle formed from a mixture of cetyltrimethylammonium hydroxide and myristic acid. These vesicles formed from ion-pair amphiphiles (typically a straight-chain hydroxide surfactant with a straight chain fatty acid) whose counterions combine to form water make extremely rigid bilayers with strong electrostatic interactions. The curvature is confined to defect sites such as the edges and pores (center) where bending is possible [4&&]. molar) and electrostatic interactions between the bilayer are large. Large, polyhedral vesicles have been imaged with pores at the vertices of the rigid sheets from mixtures of fatty acids and hyroxide surfactants (Fig. 2) [4&&]. These vesicles are only stable at relatively low surfactant concentrations in the absence of any added salt. Sufficient repulsive interactions between bilayers can also be generated by adding polymer-lipids such as polyethyleneglycol dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-DPPE); PEG-DPPE can stabilize vesicles by steric interactions and lead to unilamellar vesicles at low concentrations [8]. The sizes and size distributions of such electrostatically or sterically stabilized vesicles cannot be simply related to the bending elasticity or other bilayer parameters [15&]. For vesicles stabilized by the first two mechanisms, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) is an especially useful way to determine both the thermodynamic and elastic properties of the vesicle bilayers. Direct imaging at Fig. 3. Cylinders, discs and spherical vesicles coexisting in mixtures of FC7 and CTAB (as in Fig. 1). This is one of the few systems where a Gaussian curvature modulus could be measured so that the two individual elastic constants could be determined [2&&]. For the cylinders and spheres to coexist, 12j ; 8kj̄. From Fig. 1, K =j + j̄ / 2 = 6 k BT for FC7 : CTAB vesicles. Combining the two results gives j = 5 T 1 k BT and j̄ = 2 T 1 k BT. Cylinders and discs have been confirmed by small angle X-ray diffraction measurements; the discs are a left-over intermediate of vesicle growth from micelles [33&&]. R. van Zanten, J.A. Zasadzinski / Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 Fig. 4. Cryo-TEM micrographs of cubosomes of glycerol monooleate containing small fractions of a ethylene oxide copolymer. The bulk phases were prepared in the two-phase region between a bicontinuous cubic phase and excess water. The cubosomes can be used as drug delivery systems. Bar represents 100 nm [41&&]. low temperature by cryo-TEM and the related imaging of freeze-fracture replicas of rapidly frozen samples (FF-TEM), can be used to directly view the different microstructures of most self-assembled surfactant systems to resolutions of about 2 nm. There have been several recent reviews showing the ability of cryo-TEM to image different amphiphilic systems [16 –18]. However, the additional step of quantifying the image to determine the complete vesicle size distribution and mean sizes and shapes can provide information on the bending constants of the bilayer, as well as suggesting whether or not the vesicle size distribution is consistent with that predicted at equilibrium [1&&,2&&,11&]. In addition to providing information on the entire size distribution, direct imaging techniques allow the observation of coexisting or complex microstructures (Figs. 2 – 4) that may confuse indirect methods such as scattering [2&&]. For evaluating both size distributions and complex structures, direct imaging avoids the need for model-dependent interpretation of scattering data [9&]. For vesicle phases, direct imaging methods agree rather well with information obtained by scattering techniques, which diminishes the concern over sample preparation and imaging artifacts [11&]. However, for best results, multiple microscopy techniques should be combined with light, X-ray and neutron scattering to provide the most reliable evaluation of structural data. 2. Measuring bilayer bending constants The starting point for the description of bilayer organization in solution is the harmonic approximation to the bending free-energy: " # 1 1 1 2 2 1 FB ¼ X dA j þ þ j̄ ð1Þ 2 R1 R2 R0 R1 R2 Eq. (1) was derived from the limiting case for thermotropic smectic phases [19] by Helfrich over 30 years ago and is 263 generally accepted to describe monolayer and bilayer deformations [5&,20&&]. R 1 and R 2 are the principle radii of curvature (for spherical vesicles, R 1 = R 2 = R, the vesicle ¯ radius), R 0 is the spontaneous radius of curvature, j and j are the mean and Gaussian bending constants, respectively, and A is the area of the bilayer. The harmonic approximation is appropriate when the bilayer thickness (¨3– 4 nm) and the Debye length [21] for ionic surfactants, are small compared to R 1 and R 2 (> 30 nm). The two elastic constants, j and j̄, play very different roles in ¯ determining bilayer organization. The magnitude of j determines the energy needed to bend the bilayer away from its spontaneous radius of curvature, R 0. For single component or otherwise symmetric bilayers, 1 / R 0 = 0 by symmetry [5&,10&&,13&,19]; a non-zero bilayer curvature is only possible when non-ideal surfactant mixing causes the interior and exterior monolayers of the bilayer to have different compositions or environments [5&,10&&]. On the other hand, j̄ only influences the topology (and hence the number) of the structures formed [2&&]. The Gauss – Bonnet theorem states that the integral of the Gaussian curvature over a given surface only depends¯ on the genus of the structure [22]. Hence, the magnitude of j has little effect at equilibrium as long as structural fluctuations take place at constant topology or vesicle number. However, transformations between discs and closed spheres or between spheres and cylinders are influenced by j̄ [2&&]. Although Eq. (1) has become the accepted description of the energetics of bilayer organization, there are relatively few measurements of j and almost no measurements of j̄ for surfactant or lipid bilayer structures. Moreover, there are no generally accepted methods for determining these elastic constants. j̄ is especially difficult to measure as it influences topological transformations between structures such as discs, spheres, and toroids [2&&], the distribution of material between vesicles [1&&,5&,10&&], or the transition between lamellar and L3 phases. However, j̄ does not influence the more readily measured fluctuations of an equilibrium structure. A key requirement to the understanding and possible control of surfactant structural organization is developing both experimental and theoretical tools to relate R 0, j, and j̄ to surfactant molecular structure and solution conditions. For macroscopic vesicles (>10 microns) j has been measured by both micropipette aspiration [23] and video imaging of membrane fluctuations [24] , but there is not good agreement between the two sets of values. These techniques limit the investigation to structures on the order of microns due to experimental limitations. Forming large vesicles requires special non-reversible methods, and there are additional questions as to whether the inside and outside monolayers reach their preferred area per molecule over the course of the experiments [23]. Shape fluctuations can also be observed for sub-micron vesicles using quasi-elastic light scattering, but it has been difficult to extract reasonable values of j from the data [25&]. Spontaneous vesicles from mixtures of anionic and cationic surfactants are much better suited for cryo-TEM examination of the vesicle size distribution [1&&,2&&,9&]. In the vesicle 264 R. van Zanten, J.A. Zasadzinski / Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 regions of the phase diagram, the size distributions are independent of aging and method of formation, suggesting that the vesicles are at least metastable for long times (the most stable systems have maintained the same size distribution for 5 years in our hands) if not at true equilibrium [9&]. This allows the use of free-energy minimizing mass-action models in conjunction with Eq. (1) to relate the size distribution to R 0, j and j̄ [1&&,2&&,9&,11&]: CN ¼ 8pK r0 2 1 CM exp kB T R R22 r 0 ð2Þ C N (= X N / M) is the molar or number fraction of vesicles of size N and C M is the mole fraction of vesicles of radius r 0. For spherical vesicles of radius, R, the size distribution is determined by the sum of the bending constants, K, and the spontaneous curvature: 2K ¼ 2j þ j̄ r0 ¼ 2j þ j̄ R0 2j ð3Þ The individual constants, j and j̄, cannot be determined independently from the size distribution. A consequence of Eqs. (2) and (3) is that vesicles stabilized by thermal fluctuations (K ¨ k BT) have a much broader size distribution than vesicles stabilized by the spontaneous curvature (K H k BT). This is the opposite of vesicle size distribution models that do not include a spontaneous curvature; larger bending constants predict more polydisperse vesicles of larger size [11&,26]. If the size distribution is narrow, Eq. (2) resembles a Gaussian distribution and K can be simply related to R 0 (which is given by the mean, <R>, of the size distribution) and the standard deviation, r [26,27&&]: 2 kB T R0 K¼ ð4Þ 16p r Eq. (4) can give a rough estimate of the parameters, but a more reliable measure is to fit the entire size distribution measured by cryo-TEM to Eq. (2) to determine the best values of K and R 0 [1&&,11&] (Fig. 1). However, it is possible to estimate <R> and r from an analysis of freeze-fracture images of vesicles and use Eq. (4) to determine R 0 and K [1&&,26]. 3. Experimental results Relating the size distribution of vesicles to their elastic constants is experimentally complex and requires extensive cryo-TEM imaging, followed by the rather tedious analysis of the size distribution. Hence, the number of available bending constants of different systems is still rather small. The first attempts at using cryo-microscopy to estimate bending elastic constants was by Denkov et al. [27&&] who examined a rather complex vesicle system incorporating several lipids and proteins. While the vesicles involved were probably not at equilibrium, the distribution was stable for weeks. The population was quite monodisperse, resulting in a value of K ¨ 5 k BT. Systems of spontaneous vesicles made from mixtures of anionic and cationic surfactants (also known as catanionic vesicles) are likely the best hope for a systematic use of cryoTEM analysis of size distributions to measure bilayer elastic properties. Such vesicles form spontaneously [9&,12&&], the final size distribution is independent of the method of vesicle formation [1&&,2&&,11&,26] and changes only slightly with time after an initial period of equilibration [7 &,9&]. Hence, the assumptions involved in deriving Eqs. (1) –(4) are reasonably well met, although the ultimate question of equilibrium is still open. The first system examined was a 3 : 7 (wt : wt) mixture of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, cation) with sodium octyl sulfonate (SOS, anion) at 2 wt.% total surfactant in water. The measured size distribution was well fit by Eq. (2) for values of R 0 = 37 T 3 nm and K = 0.7 T 0.2 k BT. For the 7 : 3 CTAB : SOS, R 0 = 30 T 2 nm and K = 0.2 T 0.1 k BT. Changing the surfactants to a 3 : 7 mixture of cetyltrimethylammonium tosylate (CTAT) and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS) resulted in an equally good fit of Eq. (2) to the size distribution for R 0 = 36 T 1 nm and K = 0.54 T 0.05 k B T. For 7 : 3 CTAT: SDBS, R 0 = 55 T 10 nm and K = 0.15 T 0.03 k BT. There are two conclusions to draw from this limited data: it appears that surfactant mixing leads to low bending constants and bilayers with an excess of cationic surfactant have lower bending constants than bilayers with excess anionic surfactant. A number of molecular parameters have been theoretically predicted to influence the bilayer elasticity. For example, the tosylate counterion of CTAT is hydrophobic, and remains strongly associated with the surfactant aggregate in solution. Inserting the tosylate into the membrane effectively increases the area per surfactant headgroup, which is predicted to reduce membrane rigidity [28,29]. However, the bromide counterion of CTAB is much less hydrophobic, so this does not explain the lower bending constants observed in the CTAB excess bilayers. SDBS is a branched chain aromatic surfactant; such branching can influence hydrocarbon packing in the bilayer interior, which may in turn affect the bending rigidity. It is theoretically predicted that branched hydrocarbons pack more loosely in the bilayer, and thus are more accommodating to the gauche hydrocarbon conformations associated with membrane deformations [30,31]. Molecular relaxation (chain rearrangement and flip-flop) in the bilayer could be enhanced by the presence of branched hydrocarbons. However, there is little difference between the K measured for the branched SDBS and the straight chain SOS. Hence, mixing surfactants by itself is apparently sufficient to lower the bending rigidity to ¨k BT [30,31]. As a result, most spontaneous vesicles formed from mixtures of anionic and cationic hydrocarbon surfactants are stabilized against formation of multilamellar phases by Helfrich steric interactions [1&&], the second mechanism discussed in the Introduction. However, before making too many conclusions regarding the influence of molecular structure on bending elasticity, it R. van Zanten, J.A. Zasadzinski / Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 must be noted that the vesicle size distributions measure K = j + j̄/ 2. There are very few predictions on how j̄ changes ¯ with molecular architecture and j can be either positive or negative, while j must always be positive [20&&]. K can remain small as observed for the cationic –anionic vesicles if both j and j̄ increase in magnitude, but with opposite signs. What really is necessary is another method of measuring either j or j¯ independently so that the variation of the individual parameters with molecular structure can be ascertained. Brocca et al. [25 &] have measured the shape fluctuations of ¨100 nm diameter phospholipid vesicles by light scattering, but have not been able to relate the observed fluctuations directly to a value of j. Another route may be analysis of the small angle X-ray scattering from the chemically similar multilamellar phases of the cation –anion surfactant pair. The X-ray line shape depends on the value of j [26,32]; however, it is not known how the bending elasticity depends on overall surfactant concentration. One clear example of the effect of surfactant chemistry on bending elasticity occurs for mixtures of sodium perfluorooctanoate (FC7) and CTAB (4 : 1 wt : wt, 2 total wt.%) Spontaneous vesicles of this composition (Fig. 1) are almost monodisperse and have R 0 = 23 T 0.5 nm and K = 6 T 2 k BT [1&&]. However, reducing the length of the fluorinated surfactant to 6 carbons (sodium perfluorohexanoate, FC7) with CTAB at the same 4 : 1 weight ratio reduces K to 0.5 k BT, the same order of magnitude as for the hydrogenated surfactant mixtures. If they are long enough, the rigid fluorine tails increase the bending elasticity of the membrane by an order of magnitude compared to similar mixed hydrogenated surfactants [1&&]. The higher rigidity of the bilayer leads to higher energy penalties for deviations from the spontaneous curvature, and an essentially monodisperse vesicle population. The CTAB/FC7 vesicles are stabilized against multilamellar liposome formation by the high energy costs of deviating from the spontaneous curvature [1&&], the first mechanism discussed in the Introduction. To independently test the validity of Eq. (1) and a nonzero spontaneous curvature, salt was added to the rigid, FC7/ CTAB vesicle system. Simple calculations based on the same Helfrich elastic energy and mass action models suggest that attractive forces between the bilayers can overcome slight deviations from the spontaneous curvature, leading to a distribution of vesicles with two bilayers [1&&]. These vesicles with a discrete number of bilayers confirm that the spontaneous curvature is non-zero; no other explanation can lead to a stable distribution of vesicles with a discrete number of layers. This confirms that the vesicles are stabilized by the combination of a spontaneous curvature and a large elastic constant [1&&]. Adding salt to the vesicles with the lower bending constants did not alter the distribution of vesicles, confirming that the repulsive Helfrich interaction [13 &] was sufficient to stabilize the vesicles against forming multilamellar phases. The rigid fluorinated/hydrogenated vesicles also establish an equilibrium with disks and cylindrical objects [2&&] (Fig. 3). This is one of the few systems where a Gaussian curvature 265 modulus could be measured so that the two individual elastic constants could be determined [2&&]. For the cylinders and spheres to coexist, 12j ; 8kj̄. The analysis of the size distribution of the FC7 : CTAB vesicles showed that K = j + j̄/ 2 = 6 k BT. Combining the two results gives j = 5 T 1 k BT and j̄ = 2 T 1 k BT [2]. Cylinders and discs have been confirmed by small angle X-ray diffraction measurements; the discs are a left-over intermediate of vesicle growth from micelles [33&&]. A large value of bending elasticity also appears to be important to the structure and stability of giant polyhedral vesicles formed from mixtures of ion-pair amphiphiles (typically a straight-chain hydroxide surfactant with a straight chain fatty acid) whose counterions combine to form water [4 &,14,15 &] (Fig. 2). In the high temperature, fluid state, the ionpaired surfactants exhibit in-bilayer miscibility, as is the case for the catanionic vesicles described earlier. However, as the temperature is lowered, the mixed surfactants crystallize into polygonal frozen bilayers at fixed mole ratios of anion to cation. Any excess of anion or cation is expelled from the growing crystal and accumulates at the polygonal edges and vertices of the polygonal vesicles; these edges and vertices then act as defect sites where the bilayer curvature can be concentrated [4 &&,14,15 &]. For these crystallized bilayers, j is estimated to be of order 200 k BT from the in plane coherence length of the faceted bilayers [15 &]. These giant polyhedral vesicles are stabilized against aggregation by the low background electrolyte concentration, which leads to large, repulsive electrostatic interactions between the bilayers. The vesicles are unstable at higher concentrations, or in the presence of added electrolytes. 4. Phase behavior of spontaneous vesicles Cryo-TEM is also necessary to validate vesicle microstructure; it is more than a complement to scattering techniques. The vesicle lobe in several phase diagrams of catanionic mixtures has been mapped by using EM to image structure; cryo-TEM and freeze-fracture can readily distinguish between unilamellar vesicles and multilamellar liposomes [1&&,2&&,4&&,9&,11&,15&,34]. It is difficult, if not impossible, to characterize unilamellar vesicles without direct imaging; scattering methods are usually not sufficient, especially for polydisperse systems less than a micron in diameter [9 &]. The micelle to vesicle transition has also been explored using cryo-TEM by a number of investigators, as has the equilibrium between micelles, vesicles and discs. In several studies, direct imaging shows the coexistence of micelles and vesicles, bringing up the concept of a critical aggregation concentration versus just a critical micelle concentration [35]. One of the intermediate structures in the micelle to vesicle transition are bilayer discs; discs have been shown to coexist with vesicles in a number of these catanionic systems [2&&,14,36]. Small angle X-ray scattering studies have shown the importance of discs in the transition from micelles to bilayer structures [33&&]. The lamellar to vesicle unbinding 266 R. van Zanten, J.A. Zasadzinski / Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 transition of charged membranes has been explored using FF-TEM, elucidating the thermodynamics of this phase change [37]. The phase behavior of other surfactants has been investigated with cryo-TEM, revealing that bilayer-forming phases result from several different amphiphiles and mixtures. The addition of certain amphiphiles suppresses the lamellar phase, causing multilamellar vesicles to form [38]. Vesicles form spontaneously from dimeric arginine-based cationic surfactant solutions and bolaamphiphile/anionic surfactants [39,40]. Bicontinuous phases can also be explored by cryo-TEM allowing imaging of cubic phases which are also of interest for drug delivery applications (Fig. 4) [41&&]. The effect of PEG-lipids on the stability and structure of liposomes has been investigated with cryo-TEM, showing a change from a dispersed lamellar phase to a micellar phase, including discoidal micelles, depending on the molecular weight and the concentration of the PEG-lipid [42]. With the addition of PEG-lipid, flat bilayer discs can be the preferred structure due to the decoration of the bilayer rim with the PEG-lipid [43]. Triblock copolymers work well in maintaining the stability liposomal dispersions against aggregation [44]. The effect of PEG-lipids on equilibrium vesicles has also been explored and is shown to influence both the bilayer spontaneous curvature and elasticity [45]. Many fluorinated surfactants show a vesicle region, especially in mixtures with hydrogenated surfactants [1&&,2&&]. The different hydrophobic properties of fluorinated alkyl chains make these interesting systems to investigate. Vesicles have been seen in aqueous solutions of anionic fluorocarbon/ hydrocarbon surfactants [46]. Unique single-chain sugar-based fluorinated surfactants have also been seen to spontaneously produce a vesicle phase [47]. Both of these systems are interesting because vesicles form with only one surfactant present, which suggests that vesicle stabilization must not be due to a spontaneous curvature, which requires at least two components [5&]. An alternative explanation is that these nominally pure, sugar-based systems actually consist of a mixture of different isomers, which allows for a spontaneous curvature. 5. Stability of spontaneous vesicles The stability of spontaneous equilibrium vesicles has also been examined by cryo-TEM. In some systems, light scattering suggests that the vesicles continue to evolve slowly with time [7 &]. The diameter of vesicles has been shown to increase suggesting that they are not at Ftrue_ thermodynamic equilibrium. In other work, the size distributions measured between different samples prepared over months to years have provided similar size distributions [11&,26]. As shown in Ref. [11&], rather small changes in the number of large vesicles can skew the mean size measured by light scattering. Ref. [7 &] shows that the microstructure is altered after 2 months of aging, suggesting possible chemical changes to the surfactants. The actual phase boundaries between the single unilamellar phase and the coexisting multilamellar/unilamellar phase are difficult to determine with any certainty, and the least stable vesicle phases are often those at the highest total concentrations [7 &], where multilamellar phases are likely. Hence, there have been systems in which the size distribution is quite stable, and others that evolve slowly over time. In addition to being invariant with time, equilibrium requires that the phases and microstructure observed at a given concentration and temperature be independent of the method of sample preparation. One interesting technique is to form vesicles by a chemical reaction, without any input of energy either by shear forces or temperature changes [48&&]. Hao et al. [48&&] have shown that vesicles form spontaneously via chemical reactions that create the necessary anionic and cationic surfactants from various precursor. In the dilute regime, vesicles form spontaneously and remain stable for long periods of time. At higher concentrations, vesicles do not form spontaneously because the system is too concentrated for the vesicles to exist without a coexisting multilamellar phase [9 &]. Another interesting method is to use zinc as the counterion for the anionic surfactant and add hydrogen sulfide to the system [49]. The hydrogen sulfide protonates the surfactant, and the zinc ions precipitate by complexing with sulfur. This leaves a true ternary system in which spontaneous vesicles are created without the introduction of any outside energy, similar to the chemical synthesis scheme mentioned above. 6. Summary Cryo-TEM and freeze-fracture microscopy methods are invaluable to assign microstructure to complex surfactant mixtures, as well as to determine important bilayer parameters. As a complement to light, X-ray and neutron scattering, direct imaging provides unambiguous structural information and is perhaps the only method to identify unilamellar vesicles, cylindrical vesicles, discs, worm-like micelles, etc. coexisting in a single solution. With careful sample preparation, conservative image interpretation, and a systematic analysis of the images, it should be possible to begin to understand the relationship between molecular structure and bilayer elasticity, and from this understanding, develop new microstructures for applications in drug delivery, microreactors, catalysis, etc. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Hee-Tae Jung and Bret Coldren at UCSB, Eric Kaler and his group at the University of Delaware for ongoing collaborations, and M. Almgren and T. Zemb for generous use of their results on catanionic vesicles. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant #CTS0436124 and the Petroleum Research Foundation Grant #41016-AC7. R. van Zanten, J.A. Zasadzinski / Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 References and recommended readings [1] Jung HT, Coldren B, Zasadzinski JA, Iampietro DJ, Kaler EW. The && origins of stability of spontaneous vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:1353 – 7. [2] Jung HT, Lee YS, Kaler EW, Coldren B, Zasadzinski JA. Gaussian && curvature and the equilibrium between spheres, cylinders and discs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002;99:15318 – 22. These two papers present the first measurements of the spontaneous curvature, bending and Gaussian curvature moduli of spontaneous vesicles. [3] Xia Y, Goldmints I, Johnson PW, Hatton TA, Bose A. Temporal evolution of microstructures in aqueous CTAB/SOS and CTAB/HDBS solutions. Langmuir 2002;18:3822 – 8. [4] Dubois M, Deme B, Gulik-Krzywicki T, Dedieu JC, Vautrin C, Desert S, && et al. Self-assembly of regular hollow icosahedra in salt-free catanionic solutions. Nature 2001;411:672 – 5. This paper presents the first electrostatically stabilized, spontaneous polyhedral vesicles and a mechanism for their stability. [5] Safran SA. Statistical thermodynamics of soft surfaces. Surf Sci 2002;500: & 127 – 46. An excellent reference to the theory of bilayer and monolayer structure and dynamics. [6] Gradzielski M. Vesicles and vesicle gels — structure and dynamics of formation. J Phys Chem B Condens Mater Surf Interfaces Biophys 2003; 15:R655. [7] Almgren M, Rangelov S. Spontaneously formed nonequilibrium vesicles & of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and sodium octyl sulfate in aqueous dispersions. Langmuir 2004;20:6611 – 8. Presents possible alternative structures for the evolution of spontaneous vesicles. [8] Rovira-Bru M, Thompson DH, Szleifer I. Size and structure of spontaneously forming liposomes in lipid/PEG-lipid mixtures. Biophys J 2002;83:2419 – 39. [9] Kaler EW, Herrington KL, Iampietro DJ, Coldren B, Jung HT, & Zasadzinski JA. Phase behavior and microstructure in aqueous mixtures of cationic and anionic surfactants. In: Abe M, Scamehorn J, editors. Mixed surfactant systems. New York’ Marcel Dekker; 2005. p. 298 – 338. Recent review of vesicles formed from mixtures of cationic and anionic surfactants from a molecular mixing viewpoint. [10] Safran SA, Pincus PA, Andelman D, MacKintosh FC. Stability and && phase behavior of mixed surfactant vesicles. Phys Rev A 1991;43: 1071 – 8. Presents theory of mixed bilayers developing a spontaneous curvature, thereby stabilizing a vesicle phase. [11] Coldren BA, van Zanten R, Mackel MJ, Zasadzinski JA, Jung HT. & From vesicle size distributions to bilayer elasticity via cryo-transmission and freeze-fracture electron microscopy. Langmuir 2003;19: 5632 – 9. Relates size distributions of vesicles made by freeze-fracture TEM, cryo-TEM and light scattering to show the agreement and areas of possible artifact of each method. [12] Kaler EW, Murthy AK, Rodriguez BE, Zasadzinski JAN. Spontaneous && vesicle formation in aqueous mixtures of single-tailed surfactants. Science 1989;245:1371 – 4. Paper describing the first system of spontaneous vesicles from cationic and anionic detergent mixtures. [13] Helfrich W. Steric interaction of fluid membranes in multilayer systems. & Z Naturforsch 1978;33A:305 – 15. Paper describes the steric interactions between bilayers that result from bending fluctuations. [14] Dubois M, Gulik-Krzywicki T, Deme B, Zemb T. Rigid organic nanodisks of controlled size: a catanionic formulation. C R Acad Sci Ser II Fascicule C Chim 1 1998;9:567 – 75. & of special interest. && of outstanding interest. 267 [15] Dubois M, Lizunov V, Meister A, Gulik-Krzywicki T, Verbavatz JM, & Perez E, et al. Shape control through molecular segregation in giant surfactant aggregates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2004;101:15082 – 7. An excellent theoretical and experimental analysis of mixtures of true catanionic surfactants in bilayers. [16] Chiruvolu S, Naranjo E, Zasadzinski JA. Microstructure of complex fluids by electron microscopy. In: Herb CA, Prud’homme RK, editors. ACS symposium series. Washington, D.C.’ American Chemical Society; 1994. p. 86 – 104. [17] Danino D, Bernheim-Groswasser A, Talmon Y. Digital cryogenic transmission electron microscopy: an advanced tool for direct imaging of complex fluids. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2001;183 – 185: 113 – 22. [18] Almgren M, Edwards K, Karlsson G. Cryo transmission electron microscopy of liposomes and related structures. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2000;174:3 – 21. [19] Frank FC. Liquid crystals: on the theory of liquid crystals. Discuss Faraday Soc 1958;25:19 – 28. [20] Helfrich W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible && experiments. Z Naturforsch 1973;28c:693 – 703. The classic reference to the bending energy of bilayers and monolayers. [21] Israelachvili JN. Intermolecular and surface forces. 2nd ed. London’ Academic Press; 1992. [22] Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S. Geometry and the imagination. New York’ Chelsea; 1983. [23] Henriksen JR, Ipsen JH. Measurement of membrane elasticity by micropipette aspiration. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 2004;14:149 – 67. [24] Majhenc J, Bozic B, Svetina S, Zeks B. Phospholipid membrane bending as assessed by the shape sequence of giant oblate phospholipid vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1664:257 – 66. [25] Brocca P, Cantu L, Corti M, Del Favero E, Motta S. Shape fluctuations of & large unilamellar lipid vesicles observed by laser light scattering: influence of the small scale structure. Langmuir 2004;20:2141 – 8. This paper describes an early attempt at using light scattering of monodisperse vesicles to determine the bending elasticity by studying the membrane fluctuations. [26] B. Coldren, Phase behavior, microstructure and measured elasticity of catanionic surfactant bilayers. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Department of Chemical Engineering, 2002. [27] Denkov ND, Yoshimura H, Kouyama T, Walz J, Nagayama K. Electron && cryomicroscopy of bacteriorhodopsin vesicles: mechanism of vesicle formation. Biophys J 1998;74:1409 – 20. First paper to describe the method of determining bilayer parameters from vesicle size distributions. [28] Brasher LL, Herrington KL, Kaler EW. Electrostatic effects on the phase behavior of aqueous cetyltrimethlyammonium bromide and sodium octyl sulfate mixtures with added sodium bromide. Langmuir 1995;11: 4267 – 77. [29] Yatcilla MT, Herrington KL, Brasher LL, Kaler EW, Chruvolu S, Zasadzinski JA. Phase behavior of aqueous mixtures of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium octyl sulfate (SOS). J Phys Chem 1996;100:5874 – 9. [30] Szleifer I, Benshaul A, Gelbart WM. Chain packing statistics and thermodynamics of amphiphile monolayers. J Phys Chem 1990;94: 5081 – 9. [31] Szleifer I, Kramer D, Benshaul A, Gelbart WM. Molecular theory of curvature elasticity in surfactant films. J Chem Phys 1990;92:6800 – 17. [32] Warriner HE, Keller SL, Idziak SHJ, Slack NL, Davidson P, Zasadzinski JA, et al. The influence of polymer molecular weight in lamellar gels based on PEG lipids. Biophys J 1998;75:272 – 93. [33] Weiss TM, Narayanan T, Wolf C, Gradzielski M, Panine P, Finet S, et al. && Dynamics of the self-assembly of unilamellar vesicles. Phys Rev Lett 2005;94:038303 – 1. High speed mixing and small angle X-ray diffraction experiments show the intermediates and evolution from micelles to vesicles in catanionic mixtures. [34] Tanaka S, Kawasaki H, Suzuki MA, Annaka M, Nemoto N, Almgren M, et al. Vesicle formation in oleyldimethylamine oxide/sodium oleate mixtures. Colloid Polym Sci 2004;282:1140 – 5. 268 R. van Zanten, J.A. Zasadzinski / Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 10 (2005) 261 – 268 [35] Junquera E, del Burgo P, Arranz R, Llorca O, Aicart E. Aggregation phenomena on the ternary ionic – nonionic surfactant system: didodecyldimethylammonium bromide/octyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside/water. Mixed microaggregates, vesicles, and micelles. Langmuir 2005;21:1795 – 801. [36] Hao J, Yuan Z, Liu W, Hoffmann H. Aggregate transition from nanodisks to equilibrium among vesicles and disks. J Phys Chem B 2004;108: 19163 – 8. [37] Deme B, Dubois M, Gulik-Krzywicki T, Zemb T. Giant collective fluctuations of charged membranes at the lamellar-to-vesicle unbinding transition. Langmuir 2002;18:997 – 1004. [38] Montalvo G, Valiente M, Mortenson K, Gradzielski M. Structural changes induced in the surfactant system C12E4/benzyl alcohol/water by the admixture of the cationic surfactant cetylpyridinium chloride. J Colloid Interface Sci 2001;238:251 – 8. [39] Weihs D, Danino D, Pinazo-Gassol D, Perez L, Franses E, Talmon Y. Selfaggregation in dimeric arginine-based cationic surfactants solutions. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2005;255:73 – 8. [40] Yan Y, Xiong W, Huang J, Li Z, Li X, Li N, et al. Organized assemblies in bolaamphiphile/oppositely charged conventional surfactant mixed systems. J Phys Chem B 2005;109:357 – 64. [41] Rangelov S, Almgren M. Particulate and bulk bicontinuous cubic phases && obtained from mixtures of glycerol monooleate and copolymers bearing blocks of lipid-mimetic anchors in water. J Phys Chem B 2005;109: 3921 – 9. [42] Johnsson M, Edwards K. Liposomes, disks and spherical micelles: aggregate structure in mixtures of gel phase phosphatidylcholines and poly(ethylene glycol)-phospholipids. Biophys J 2003;85:3839 – 47. [43] Johansson E, Engvall C, Arfvidsson M, Lundahl P, Edwards K. Development and initial evaluation of PEG-stabilized bilayer disks as novel model membranes. Biophys Chem 2005;113:183 – 92. [44] Bergstrand N, Edwards K. Effects of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymers on structure and stability of liposomal dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine. J Colloid Interface Sci 2004;276:400 – 7. [45] Kang SY, Seong BS, Han YS, Jung HT. Self-organization of amphiphilic polymer in vesicle bilayers composed of surfactant mixtures. Biomacromolecules 2003;4:360 – 5. [46] Danino D, Weihs D, Zana R, Oradd G, Lindblom G, Abe M, et al. Microstructures of a hybrid anionic fluorocarbon/hydrocarbon surfactant. J Colloid Interface Sci 2003;259:382 – 90. [47] Pasc-Banu A, Blanzat M, Belloni M, Perez E, Mingotaud C, Rico-lattes I, et al. Spontaneous vesicles of single-chain sugar based fluoro-carbon surfactants. J Fluorine Chem 2005;126:33 – 8. [48] Hao J, Yuan Z, Liu W, Hoffmann H. In situ vesicle formation by a kinetic && reaction in aqueous mixtures of single-tailed catanionic surfactants. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:5105 – 12. Clever demonstration of vesicle formation with minimal shear by in situ chemical reaction. [49] Hao J, Yuan Z, Liu W, Abdel-Rahem R, Hoffmann H. Zn2+ induced vesicle formation. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:1168 – 72.