Download Regional

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup

Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup

Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Capacity Building for Improving
the Quality of GHG Inventories
Europe /CIS Region
Katarina Mareckova
UNDP-GEF regional project manager
Panama, UNFCCC workshop, 28 Oct. 2004
Content
 Introduction
 Why
 Global context
 Regional context
 What we do
 Main objectives
 Regional Priority Areas
 How we do it
 Organization
 Products
 Linkages
12 Participating countries
Albania
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Croatia
Georgia
Macedonia
Moldova
Mongolia
Slovenia
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Global context : UNFCCC, GEF
 Strengthen
the capacity of participating
countries to improve the quality of their national inventories in the
context of their commitments as parties to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change
o
o
decisions 10/CP.2, 11/CP.2, 2/CP.4, 10/CP.4, 10/CP.5
FCCC/CP/2001/L.2 and L.4, articles 4.1(a)(b) and 12.1(a) of the Convention
 Improvement
of EFs and data
o non-Annex I parties are “encouraged to formulate cost-
effective national and, where appropriate, regional
programmes aimed at the improvement of local emission
factors and appropriate data gathering.”
Decision 10/CP.2
Regional context

Emissions in region are increasing and
uncertainties in GHG emissions
assessed as high

Low level of awareness by decision
makers
 Missing
long term strategies
 Remaining problems with institutional
arrangements
 Limited resources and capacity
 Communication barriers, data gaps
10 outputs are defined
within the project
What we do (Main objectives)
1. Strengthen institutional arrangements for
compiling, archiving, updating and
managing greenhouse gas inventories
2. Create sustainable inventory processes
[Tools, expertise]
3. Enhance technical capacity for preparing
national inventories
4. Improve national methodologies and
emission factors
Organization
UNOPS
NCSU
Executing agency
UNDP -implementing agency
technical experts,
regional experts
-Regional PM
-Project
assistant
-IT support
NITL
UNDP COs
National institutions
experts
National steering body
Project Steering
Committee
Technical Advisory
Committee
UNFCCC secretariat,
IPCC TSU,
EEA…
Approach under regional project






Review of national objectives and priorities
Development of detailed national
workplans; harmonize schedule,
deliverables
Iterative process
No duplication
(1NC->top-up ->regional project ->SNC)
Complementary approach
Focus on 4 regional key sources
1.
2.
3.
4.
CO2 emissions from mobile combustion sources
CH4 from solid waste treatment
Fugitive CH4 emissions from oil and gas
CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation
How we do it (1)



the project includes common activities for all
participating countries carried out under a regional
umbrella
countries may choose the remaining activities to
carry out based on national priorities
concept of key sources of emissions
(allows the approach to be replicated for use in other
regions with only minor modifications )

trainings, training materials, templates, guidance
materials, networking, distribution of good
examples,…
Regional activities








Regional website established
On line assistance to the countries (technical,
managerial)
UNDP-GEF knowledge network (broad
involvement of international A1 experts )
Database of regional inventory experts
Revision of countries’ products
Development of awareness strategy and
materials
(Peer review of national inventories)
NSCU Handbook
Regional Database of Experts
Regional activities (2)

Workshops, trainings (4-5 regional), training
materials






Simple questionnaires - assessment of current status in
region
Long-term inventory strategies
Documentation, archiving [QA/QC, GP in inventory
documentation]
Data collection strategies, alternative methods
Improvement of regional EFs (excel tool to calculate waste
emissions, simplified method for calculation of country
specific EFs,..
Awareness campaign strategy – set up in progress
Deliverables –
countries’ key products









National manual of (inventory ) procedures compiled
National EFs documented and archived
2-3 improved emission factors
Uncertainties of key source emissions reduced
National long term inventory improvement strategy
developed
National QA/QC plan elaborated
Peer review reports compiled
National experts trained in good practice
Awareness campaign implemented
Experience after first year

all 12 countries significantly improved
documentation of national systems
=> sustainability increased







national inventory teams established
documentation of national IS – structure, links
between stakeholders
data flow charts, data gaps reduced, alternative
methods
draft manuals
short/long term strategies (3-5 years) draft in place
documentation of EFs used in inventories, improved
EFs
key source analyses, uncertainty assessment
Structure of the National Inventory
System
Ministry of Ecology and Natural
Resources (MENR):
National Lead Institution in charge with
preparation of the National
Communications and of GHG Inventories
State Hydrometeorological
Service (SHS): Office of the Focal
Point for UNFCCC in the RM
Climate Change Office (CCO)
within the MENR
National GHG Inventory Team:
Marius Ţăranu, NITL, expert on Key
Source Analysis
Uncertainty Analysis expert:
Elena Bicova, Institute of Energy
QA/QC expert: Vladimir Brega,
National Institute of Ecology
Data and document management
expert: Igor Bercu, CCO (MENR)
Task group for
Energy Sector
Task group leader – Bicova
Elena, Institute of Energy of
the Academy of Science of
Moldova
Consultant 1 – Svetlana
Suvorchina, Ministry of
Transport (MTC)
Consultant 2 – Maros Mura,
Department of Statistics and
Sociology (DSS)
Task group for
Industrial Processes
Task group leader –
Marius Ţăranu, Climate
Change Office
Task group for
Agriculture Sector
Task group leader –
Banaru Anatol, Research
Institute for Soil Science,
Agro-Chemistry and
Hydrology “N.Dimo”
Consultant 1 –
Constantin Filatov, State
Ecological Inspectorate
Consultant 2 –
Comarniţchi Valentina,
DSS
Consultant 1 – Orlov
Elena, Department of
Statistics and Sociology
Task group for
LULUCF Sector
Task group leader –
Ion Talmaci, Forest
Agency “Moldsilva”
Task group for
Waste Sector
Task group leader –
Tatiana Ţugui, CCO within
the MENR
Consultant 1 – Tamara
Guvir, Ministry of Ecology
and Natural Resources
Consultant 2 – Nina Popova,
IPROCOM State Design
Institute
Improvement of Agricultural Emissions Estimates and Implementation of Good Practice Elements in the
National Inventories, Third Regional Workshop, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, Hotel Sheraton, October7-8, 2004
FRAMEWORK FOR DATA COLLECTION
IN LIVESTOCK BREEDING
 The Department of Statistic and Sociology (DSS)
prepares annually Statistical Yearbooks (SY);
 SYs contain aggregated data for the whole
livestock breeding sector and disaggregated data
for each type of animal population;
 On regular bases, the DSS receives initial data
from juridical and physical entities;
 For accounting and reporting specific activity data,
periodical and annual statistics forms are
approved for each year through an Intern Order of
the DSS:
e.g.: Annual and Periodical Statistics Forms for
2004 year were approved through Order Nr. 108
from 17.09.2003.
Improvement of Agricultural Emissions Estimates and Implementation of Good Practice Elements in the
National Inventories, Third Regional Workshop, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, Hotel Sheraton, October7-8, 2004
Sample of Documentation (contd.)
Factors and other coefficients:
Weight units = 0,395 t/m3 (Regulating enactment
“Sanitation Rules and Norms” of Uzbekistan №0068-96
page 6, Table 2)
Share of wastes within different types of SWDS
• managed = 0,17
• unmanaged > 5 м = 0,04
• unmanaged < 5 м = 0,79
(data by Tashkent department «Heat Sources»)
Waste Morphological Compound:
Paper and Fabric = 22,8 %
Food waste = 38,4 %
Wood waste and straw = 4,9 %
(Regulating enactment “Sanitation Rules and Norms” of
Uzbekistan, №0068-96 page 5, Table 1)
Benefiting areas /activities



2nd National Communications under the
UNFCCC
Improved inventory quality for CDM / JI
projects
Improved inventories of non GHGs (SO2,
NOx, CO,…)



=>Improved projections/scenarios => better
abatement strategies, mitigation options
Increased public and stakeholder awareness
Increased sustainability of national
inventory system
Linkages between RER/01/G31
and SNC
Deliverable (Sustainable National
Inventory System)
Project
SNC
Inventory
Updated
1994
Compiled
2000
Manual of procedures
Develop
Use
Inventory Report (NIR)
Structure Elaborate
Regional –national EFs, AD
Strategy
QA/QC plan
Improve
Use
Develop
Develop
Elaborate
Use
Archive
Establish
Maintain
Thank you for your attention