Download QUANTUM TUNNELING AND SPIN by Robert J

QUANTUM TUNNELING
AND SPIN
by
Robert J. Nemiroff
Michigan Tech
Physics X: About This Course
• Officially "Extraordinary Concepts in Physics"
• Being taught for credit at Michigan Tech
o Light on math, heavy on concepts
o Anyone anywhere is welcome
• No textbook required
o Wikipedia, web links, and lectures only
o Find all the lectures with Google at:
 "Starship Asterisk" then "Physics X"
o
http://bb.nightskylive.net/asterisk/viewforum.php?f=39
QUANTUM TUNNELING
The purely quantum mechanical ability for a particle to go
through a barrier.
QUANTUM TUNNELING
A classical particle would fully reflect off the barrier.
A quantum particle has chance to fully come out on the other
side.
The thicker the barrier, the smaller the chance.
Macroscopic objects have a diminishingly small chance of
tunneling through a thick barrier.
QUANTUM TUNNELING
Examples of Quantum Tunneling:
•
Radioactive decay
o A particle tunnels out of a nucleus
• Scanning Tunneling Microscope
o measure tunneling electron current between a needle and
a surface.
• Enzymes
o a factor in reaction rates(!)
QUANTUM TUNNELING
What is the chance that a human can tunnel through a wall?
So small I could not find anyone willing to estimate this. If you
know of a specific numerical estimation, please tell me.
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
A beam of neutral particles with spin enters a non-uniform magnetic
field. Given that the particles can be divided into smaller particles that
individually have electric charge, and that these particles are spinning,
the non-uniform magnetic field would deflect a classical particle by an
amount that depends on the orientation of the spin. What actually
happens?
1. A continuum of deflections.
2. Only two discrete deflections show up, corresponding to "spin up"
and "spin down" for neutral particles.
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
A classic experiment that shows a difference between quantum
and classical mechanics.
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
2. Only two discrete deflections show up, corresponding to "spin up"
and "spin down" for neutral particles.
This is an amazing result. No matter the initial orientations, the
particles come out with only two possible spin values. This is peculiar
to quantum mechanics.
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
Now, one of the beams from the previous experiment is sent into a
second Stern-Gerlach machine. All of these particles have "spin up",
but now the SG machine is on its side and can only deflect the particles
left or right. What happens?
1.
2.
3.
4.
All of the particles are deflected to the left.
All of the particles are deflected to the right.
Half of the particles are deflected left, half right.
A continuum of left, right deflections is seen.
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
3. Half of the particles are deflected left, half right.
This might not be surprising. What might be surprising is that the
orientation between the first and second SG devices need not be
exactly 90 degrees to get a nearly 50 - 50 split.
But we are not done yet!
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
Now if one of THOSE beams is sent into a third SG experiment, along
the original orientation, what happens?
1.
2.
3.
4.
One beam comes out.
Two beams come out.
A continuum of particles comes out.
Nothing until someone plugs in the experiment.
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
2. Two beams come out.
This is really strange. Shouldn't the particles all remember their
orientation exiting the first Stern-Gerlach experiment? They do
not. This is yet another non-classical result, fundamental to quantum
mechanics.
STERN- GERLACH EXPERIMENT
The SG experiment demonstrates that the act of measuring something
can affect its state. If the second SG experiment had not been done,
the third SG experiment would have found only a single beam of
particles. The act of measuring the spins of those particles in an
orthogonal direction affected the quantum states of those particles,
causing them to be measured differently the next time through.