* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Reading Content for Students
Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Reading content you may choose to give to students. I have taken these from various websites and the sites are listed. I have deleted some content from the original articles to lessen the material for students to read. Group 1 Leptin’s Legacy Excerpts from: http://www.hhmi.org/bulletin/mar2003/leptin/leptin2.html Scientists, of course, approach any notion of a magic bullet with supreme skepticism, if not total disdain. But electrified by leptin's potential for the treatment of obesity — the mice had lost 30 percent of their body weight in just two weeks — business pounced on the discovery. With more than half of U.S. adults overweight or obese, a cure would be a major advance in public health. Moreover, the treatment was sure to be a cash cow for its marketers. The biotech company Amgen paid $20 million to license the hormone. When Amgen sponsored a large clinical trial of leptin, however, few participants lost weight, dashing hopes that the hormone could curb obesity. "Treatment with high-dose leptin did not achieve the clinical or commercial hurdles necessary," says Amgen spokesperson Christine Brown. "The company is not looking further at using leptin in normal adult obesity." The leptin story began in 1950, when researchers at The Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine, noticed that they had a strain of mice that were obese, lethargic, insulinresistant and constantly hungry. This so-called ob/ob mouse, Friedman says, "lives in a state of perceived starvation, so ironically it becomes fat." The scientific explanation finally emerged in 1994, when Friedman and his colleagues found the mutated ob gene responsible for the syndrome. The next year, they purified the normal ob gene's product, a hormone they dubbed leptin for the Greek word leptós, which means "thin." When they gave the obese mice leptin supplements, the animals lost weight, became more active and began responding to insulin. In retrospect, it seems clear why so many people in the Amgen clinical trial failed to lose weight, says Friedman. Obese people have many fat cells, and they generally make lots of leptin. Therefore, obesity results more often from a failure to respond to leptin than from an absence of leptin. Although most people in the trial may have had sufficient leptin, a subset was probably deficient in the hormone, says Friedman. "Fifteen to 20 percent of the obese people [in the study] did in fact lose significant amounts of weight. A key unresolved issue concerns the plasma level of the hormone below which a robust biologic response can be predicted," he adds. "I don't want to protest too much, but it's as if we found that the majority of adult-onset diabetics don't respond to insulin, and concluded that insulin has nothing to do with lowering glucose." In other words, leptin resistance in the majority of participants may have masked leptin deficiency in the minority. Friedman and his colleagues are now trying to identify obese people who have low concentrations of leptin and might therefore benefit from supplements. To treat leptin resistance, scientists must have a better understanding of the signaling pathways activated by the hormone. "Leptin is designed to measure the amount of fat you carry, and once you have a molecule that can signal that, it's logical that it would send that signal to a number of physiologic systems." The leptin gene apparently conferred a selective advantage on our ancestors by enabling them to survive lean times. These days, the challenge in developed societies is to remain lean during flush times: Obesity and diabetes are far more threatening than starvation. Although leptin was not a magic bullet for obesity, many researchers say the discovery of the hormone has changed forever the study of obesity, diabetes and metabolism. "Leptin was so successful in the rodent model that people immediately became excited about it as an obesity treatment factor," says Gorden. "In reality, that was probably an enormous leap of faith." Leptin Exerpts from http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/bodyweigh t/leptin.html Leptin (from the Greek leptos, meaning thin) is a protein hormone with important effects in regulating body weight, metabolism and reproductive function. The protein is encoded by the obese (ob) gene. Leptin is expressed predominantly by fat cells. Leptin receptors are highly expressed in areas of the hypothalamus known to be important in regulating body weight. Leptin in an important component in the long term regulation of body weight. Genetically obese mice with inactivating mutations in the ob gene or the gene encoding the leptin receptor (db gene) have been known for many years and were instrumental in the initial cloning of the ob gene. Recent studies with obese and nonobese humans demonstrated a strong positive correlation of serum leptin concentrations with percentage of body fat, and also that there was a higher concentration of ob mRNA in fat from obese compared to thin subjects. It appears that as adipocytes increase in size due to accumulation of triglyceride, they synthesize more and more leptin. Daily injections of leptin into ob/ob mice (i.e. the obese mutants unable to synthesize leptin) led to a dramatic reduction in food intake within a few days, and to roughly a 50% reduction in body weight within a month. Weight loss resulting from administration of leptin appears to result from a combination of at least two fundamental effects: Decreased hunger and food consumption Increased energy expenditure As expected, injections of leptin into db/db mice, which lack the leptin receptor, had no effect. When leptin was given to normal mice, they lost weight, showed profound depletion of adipose tissue and manifest increases in lean mass. The mechanisms by which leptin exerts its effects on metabolism are largely unknown and are likely quite complex. Control of Leptin Synthesis and Secretion The amount of leptin expressed by fat cells correlates well with the lipid content of the cells. Disease States Mice with inactivating mutations in the gene encoding leptin or its receptor have indistinguishable, recessive phenotypes of obesity, with roughly three times the body weight and five times the fat mass of normal mice. They also manifest diabetes, and show cold intolerance, depressed immune function and infertility. Blood concentrations of leptin are usually increased in obese humans, suggesting that they are in some way insensitive to leptin, rather than suffering from leptin deficiency. Mutations in ob or db genes appear to be a very rare cause of morbid obesity in humans, but both have been described. The effect of such mutations on body weight is dramatic, as shown here. The figure to the right depicts the growth curve for a young girl found to have homozygous inactivating mutations of the ob gene, contrasted to normal children (2nd to 98th percentiles). Will ob protein be useful for treating human obesity? Perhaps, but considerable work remains to be done to characterize its effects and, as described above, it appears that frank deficiencies in leptin secretion are a rare cause of human obesity. Leptin therapy will require either frequent injections or genetic therapy, precluding its use for trivial purposes. GROUP 2: Hello Protein, Goodbye Fat From: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2006/09/06-02.html A high protein diet can prevent weight gain by curbing short-term appetite. But just how this diet works on a physiological level has remained a mystery. Now, a new study suggests that the key is a tiny protein fragment called peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36), which dampens hunger in response to high levels of dietary protein. In August 2002, endocrinologist Stephen Bloom and colleagues at Imperial College London showed that when they injected PYY3-36 into rodents and humans, it decreased hunger for 12 hours or more. Rodents on the peptide also curbed their weight gain, leading some to herald PYY3-36 as a potential new anti-obesity drug. However, not all groups have been able to replicate these results, leaving the peptide's promise in the lurch. A former member of Bloom's team, endocrinologist Rachel Batterham of the University College London and colleagues, took another stab, this time from a different angle. They first fed a group of normal-weight and obese men a diet high in either protein, carbohydrate, or fat. As expected, volunteers on the high-protein diet felt significantly less hungry than those on the other diets for up to 3 hours after the meal. The high-protein dieters also had the highest levels of PYY3-36 in their blood than the other dieters. Mice showed similar effects, and high blood levels of PYY3-36 in the rodents corresponded to a reduction in the mRNA levels of certain fatness-inducing messenger proteins in the brain. To seal the deal, the team created a knockout mouse that lacked the PYY gene. The knockouts were obese and loved to eat: by 10 weeks of age, PYY knockout mice weighed about 37.5% more than normal mice and had about 12% more body fat. A high-protein diet did not curb their hunger. Giving PYY3-36 to the knockout mice led to a drastic reduction in their eating habits and consequently their body fat and body weight. The wild-type mice showed little or no change with the same treatment, the researchers report in this month's issue of Cell Metabolism. The new study hasn't entirely settled things. "There are still elements of controversy," says endocrinologist Jeffrey Flier at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts. The relationship between PYY levels and dietary protein is "extremely well supported by the data," he says, but in the light of previous work by two other groups who failed to get an obese phenotype with slightly different PYY knockout mice, future work is needed to reconcile this discrepancy. GROUP 3: 'Hunger Hormone' May be Key in Weight Loss – Study is the First to Document the Effects of Low-calorie Dieting Verses Gastric Bypass Surgery on Ghrelin Levels Release 5 p.m. ET May 22, 2002 from http://www.research.va.gov/news/press_releases/hungerhormone052202.cfmSEATTLE - Thousands of obese Americans know firsthand that gastric bypass surgery can achieve long-term weight loss when dieting, exercise and medications have failed. The reason for the difference may hinge on a recently discovered appetite-stimulating hormone, according to an article in the May 23 New England Journal of Medicine. A study led by a team at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington (UW) compared blood samples from dieters and gastricbypass patients and found dramatic differences in the levels of "ghrelin," a hormone secreted by the stomach. The hormone was first identified by Japanese researchers in 1999, and was shown by British scientists last year to trigger appetite in humans – the first known hormone to do this. The new findings may explain why keeping off excess weight through dieting, exercise or even medication is often a constant uphill battle, whereas obese patients who lose up to 200 pounds or more through gastric bypass surgery tend to keep off the pounds permanently. The study shows that dieting raises ghrelin, while gastric bypass surgery sharply reduces it, almost to undetectable levels. The research is the first to document the effects of low-calorie dieting versus gastric bypass surgery on ghrelin levels. According to lead author David E. Cummings, M.D., the findings not only shed light on what may be an underlying reason for the success of gastric bypass surgery, but raise the possibility of a new generation of safer, more effective weight-loss drugs. "If the absence of ghrelin contributes to the effectiveness of gastric bypass surgery, then we may be able to achieve at least some of that weight loss by antagonizing [blocking] ghrelin medically. If this approach works, then it might be something we could use even for people who are only modestly overweight," said Cummings, an endocrinologist with VA and UW. He added that researchers have yet to develop an antagonist, or molecular blocker, for the hormone. Currently available weight-loss drugs work mainly by raising levels of the serotonin and norepinepherine (neurotransmitters), which can increase metabolism and reduce appetite or by blocking the absorption of fat in the digestive tract. But many of these medications have potentially serious side effects, such as hypertension. Two drugs – dexfenfluramine and fenfluramine – were pulled from the market in 1997 after being linked to heart damage. Fenfluramine had been used together with phentermine, the combination popularly known as "fen-phen." Gastric bypass surgery, according to conventional medical wisdom, works because it dramatically reduces the portion of the stomach that is available to accept food. In the operation, 95 percent of the stomach is sewn shut so it can't receive food. As a result, the patient feels full much sooner and eats less at each meal. However the new study suggests another mechanism may be at work. The research team believes the cells in the stomach that produce ghrelin become inactive when they are no longer exposed to food in the gut. "We think ghrelin cells 'go to sleep' when they're deprived of contact with ingested nutrients," Cummings said. To test the theory, the researchers analyzed blood samples from 13 obese patients before and after a six-month low-fat, low-calorie diet, and from five patients who had undergone gastric-bypass surgery within the past one to three years. Ten normal-weight patients served as a control group. The dieters lost an average of 17 percent of their body weight, and their ghrelin levels rose 24 percent. The surgery group had lost an average of 36 percent of their weight, and their ghrelin levels remarkably had sunk to 77 percent below normal, and 72 percent below the dieters' level. The very low levels of the surgery group did not show the pre-meal increases and post-meal decreases that were found in normal adults. According to Cummings, the rise in ghrelin caused by dieting and several other forms of weight loss is part of the body's normal adaptive response. When we lose weight, the body senses this as famine, and triggers a survival mechanism to keep our weight constant – the metabolism rate drops, and we feel hungrier, so we'll eat more. That's the ostensible reason, notwithstanding the new findings on ghrelin, why most diets fail: Will power can forestall the urge to eat more for only a limited time. Gastric-bypass surgery is the only method known to short-circuit this normal body response, perhaps in part by disabling ghrelin-producing cells. Cummings now plans to study how gastroplasty, or stomach stapling, affects ghrelin. That procedure has been shown in clinical trials to be less effective than gastric bypass surgery, and its usage has declined as a result. Gastric bypass surgery, though not without risks, is seeing a boom in popularity. It is recommended only for so-called "morbidly obese" patients-those with a body mass index of 40 or more, or 35 or more with known medical problems due to obesity. "It's reasonable to wonder if the difference in efficacy between the two procedures arises because one shuts off ghrelin and the other doesn't," said Cummings.