* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download word document - FacStaff Home Page for CBU
Four-vector wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Potential energy wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Time in physics wikipedia , lookup
Lagrangian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnet wikipedia , lookup
Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup
Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup
Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Electro-Magnetic Forces and a Velocity-Dependent Potential Review: In generalized coordinates, Newton's Second Law is: d/dt[T/qk’] - T/qk = Qk . IF we have a force that can be put in terms of a potential energy: Qk = -V/qk where V = V(qk) but is NOT a function of the qk’ , then since V/qk’ = 0, we can write: L = T - V and get: d/dt[L/qk’] - L/qk = 0 . Basic idea: But what about the magnetic force, Fmag = qv B ? In general, we can have the Lagrangian form of Newton's Second Law if: d/dt[V/qk’] - V/qk = Qk (which does occur for the normal potential energies where V is NOT a function of the qk’ so that the V/qk’ = 0 and thus Qk = -V/qk). Here is a review of the proof: Starting with d/dt[T/qk’] - T/qk = Qk , and with L = T – V, subtracting d/dt[V/qk’] - V/qk = Qk from both sides gives d/dt[L/qk’] - L/qk = 0 . Special case: uniform magnetic field - need: d/dt[Vm/qk’] - Vm/qk = Qk . To address the magnetic force case specifically, let's first consider a uniform B field that does not change in time. Then the magnetic force, F = qv B , gives (in rectangular form) Fx = q(y’Bz - z’By), Fy = q(z’Bx - x’Bz), Fz = q(x’By - y’Bx) . Let’s just work on the Fx. We need one term that when we take the [Vm/x’] we’re left with qyBz so that when we take the d/dt of this term, we get the qy’Bz part of Fx; this means we need a term qx’yBz. We also need one term that when we take the - V/x we are left with the - qz’By ; this means we need a term qxz’By . Because of the symmetries, this suggests we define a uniform magnetic potential energy, Vm, as: Vm = q(zy’Bx + xz’By + yx’Bz) . Check: d/dt[Vm/y’] - Vm/y = d/dt [qzBx] – qx’Bz = qz’Bx – qx’Bz = Fy as required (as long as dBx/dt = 0)! This also works for the other two components as well. This gives us confidence to look more generally at electro-magnetic potentials in the hope that we can develop more general potentials that can be made part of the Lagrangian and hence the Hamiltonian. Electromagnetic Fields review: Basic laws: Coulomb’s Law: Biot-Savart Law: Ept charge = (kq/r2)r and Bsmall current length = (r2I dl r Gauss’ Law: ∫closed area E · dA = 4k*qenclosed and ∫closed area B · dA = 0 (no monopoles) [Gauss’ Law for Electric Fields is equivalent to Coulomb’s Law] Differential form: use divergence theorem: ∫ E · dA = ∫ · E dV = 4k*qenclosed = 4k ∫ dV · E = 4k Faradays’ Law: and Ampere’s Law: and ·B = 0 ∫closed loop E · dl = (d/dt) ∫ B · dA ∫closed loop B · dl = I = ∫ j dA [Ampere’s Law is equivalent to the Biot-Savart Law.] Differential form: use Stokes’ theorem: ∫closed loop E · dl = ∫ ( E ) dA E = -B/t B = j . Here is the volume charge density and j is the area current density. The may include individual charges and polarization charges. The j may include moving charges (regular currents), polarization currents, magnetization currents, and convective currents. Scalar potential: Φ This is what we called the voltage in PHYS 251. W = ∫ F · ds = -PE and so ∫ E · ds = -Φ and so Ex = - Φ/x and more generally, E = -Φ . For a single charge, Φ = kq/r , and more generally Φ = k ∫ /r dV. Vector potential: A Since · ( A) = 0 (for any vector, A), and since · B = 0, we can define a vector potential, A, where B = A . In general, A = (∫ (j /r) dV. From Faraday’s Law: E = -B/t = -[ A] /t , or E = -A/t Putting this all together: E = -Φ - A/t and B = xA . General case: Magnetic force with a not necessarily uniform magnetic field. From E&M theory (previous page): E = -Φ - A/t and B = xA where Φ is the scalar potential (electric voltage) and A is the vector potential. The electromagnetic force can now be written as: F = qE + qv B = q(-Φ - A/t) + qv ( A) . From the 3-D calculus, we have the identity: a ( b) = (a · b) - (a · )b so and so v ( A) = (v · A) - (v · )A F = qE + qv B = q{(-Φ - A/t) + [(v · A) - (v · )A]} . Let's pause a bit to consider: dA = (A/x)dx + (A/y)dy + (A/z)dz + (A/t)dt so dA/dt = (A/x)x’ + (A/y)y’ + (A/z)z’ + (A/t) so dA/dt = (v · )A + A/t so the two terms {- A/t - (v · )A} can be replaced with - dA/dt ; thus F = qE + qv B = q{(-Φ - dA/dt) + (v · A)} . If we now try: U = qΦ - q(v · A) as our electromagnetic potential energy, then d/dt[U/x’] - U/x = d/dt[-qAx] - {q(Φ/x) - q(v · A)/x} = q{-(dA/dt)x - (Φ)x + (v · A)x} = Fx , Which matches the x component of the above expression for F ! Thus, if we define the Lagrangian as L = T – U, we can get the correct equations of motion even with Electric and Magnetic forces. HOMEWORK PROBLEM #8: (9-22 in Symon) a) Show that a uniform magnetic field B in the z-direction can be represented in cylindrical coordinates by the vector potential: A = ½ Bρφ . b) Write out the Lagrangian function for a particle in such a field. c) Write down the equations of motion. d) Find three constants of the motion.