Download “I Sing of Warfare and a Man of War”

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
“I Sing of Warfare and a Man
of War”
“My soul would sing of
Metamorphoses. . .
Unit 3, Lecture 2: The Epic
Contrasts of Virgil and Ovid
Historical Background I: (Long
View)
• From Athenian Decline to Hellenistic Empire
– Peloponnesian war (431-404 BC) means end of
Athenian dominance in Greece
– Expansive ambitions of Phillip of Macedonia (380336) and his son Alexander the great (356-323)
replace independent Greek city states with a
“Hellenistic empire” in 4th century BC
– This empire was dedicated to spreading Greek
culture and language as well as political conquest
– After Alexander, empire fell into states fragmented
politically but united culturally
– Ultimately absorbed by expanding Roman empire
Historical Background (2) Origins
and Nature of Roman Republic
• Roman origins
– Legendary beginnings of “city on the seveh hills”
– Etruscan dominance (654-508)
– Overthrow of Tarquinius the Pround and establishment of the
republic
• Roman government
– Republican form of government distributed ower among. . .
• Consuls
• Senate (selected from “patrician” or aristocratic families
• Tribunes (representatives of the {“plebians’ before Consuls
and Senate
• Roman character (“to play a Roman’s [not] a lover’s part”)
• Devotion to state
• Devotion to family and household gods.
• Defined by “citizenship”
Background (3): From Republic to
Empire
• External expansion
– 3 Punic wars to conquer Carthage (246-146 BC)
– Wars to South and East conquering Greece, Eygpt,
and Middle East
– Wars to North and west conquered most of Europe
and British Isles
• Internal changes
– Julius Caesar and nephew Octavian lead change
from republican to “imperial” government
– Octavian (Caesar Augustus”) creates autocracy and
stabilizes empire
Virgil (70-19 B.C.)
• His career
– Educated “farm boy” from Mantua
– Lived during transition from republic to empire
– His “Eclogues” and :”Georgics” (poetic discussion of
farming techniques!) established fame
– Augustus commissioned an epic to glorify Rome
• His contradictory character
The man who most eloquently sung the majesty and
destiny of Rome would never show the hard
masculinity of the Roman stock, but would touch . . .
Strings of mysticism, tenderness and grace rare in
the Roman breed. (Will Durant, Caesar and Christ,
235)
Virgil’s Serious Epic
• Two types of epic
– “Primary” Epic “The primary epic simply wants a heroic story and cares
nothing about great national subject” (Lewis: A reface to Paradise Lost
29).
– “Secondary” Epic (a “great subject” as well as a great hero)
• Virgil’s great subject: founding of Rome as decreed by gods
– A Roman founding myth to rival that of Greeks
– Material: shadowy stories of a Trojan hero rescued to found a “new”
Troy
– Modeled upon the Homeric Epics
• First six books are Aeneas’s Odyssey; last six are his Iliad.
• Differences:
– Historical destiny is foremost unliike Homer
– Events in the story have either a predictive or symbolic correspondence
to historical developments (i.e., Dido’s curse foreshadowing wars
between Rome and Carthage)
Ovid (43 B.C.-17 A.D.), the “antiVirgil”
• His career
– Born in pleasant valley of Apennines
– Abandoned law carer for intensely eortic and popular
poetry such as Amores (14 B.C.) and Ars Amatoria (2
B.C>)
– His greatest work is the fast-moving, gracefully written
Metamorphoses (“Transformations”) (A.D.7)
– Banished and works banned, A.D. 8)
• His character
– “Light of heart and head” (Durant 253)
– Dedicated to Venus, not Mars
Ovid’s “Naughty” Epic
• Characteristics of Metamorphosis
– “”Epic” only in sense it recites a series of mythological
“transformations” from world’s beginning down through history
– Polished story-telling
– Witty and psychologically penetrating
– Constant change of narrative perspective and technique
• Contrasts with Virgil
– “Unofficial” narration of entertaining misdeeds instead of “official”
upholding of public virtue
– Great fluidity vs. fixed historical purpose
– Undermining rather than exaltation of authority.