
Section 3 - Web4students
... Complex Zeros of Polynomials with Real Coefficients Let f(x) be a polynomial whose coefficients are real numbers. If r = a + bi is a zero of f(x), then the complex conjugate a – bi is also a zero of f. Example 15: Find the remaining zeros of a polynomial function. Do # 2, page 263 ...
... Complex Zeros of Polynomials with Real Coefficients Let f(x) be a polynomial whose coefficients are real numbers. If r = a + bi is a zero of f(x), then the complex conjugate a – bi is also a zero of f. Example 15: Find the remaining zeros of a polynomial function. Do # 2, page 263 ...
M1F Foundations of Analysis Problem Sheet 2
... (b) the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is always irrational. True. Suppose not. Then there exist integers p, q 6= 0, p0 , q 0 6= 0 and an irrational number i such that p/q + i = p0 /q 0 . Rearranging gives i = (p0 q − pq 0 )/qq 0 , which is rational. Contradiction. ...
... (b) the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is always irrational. True. Suppose not. Then there exist integers p, q 6= 0, p0 , q 0 6= 0 and an irrational number i such that p/q + i = p0 /q 0 . Rearranging gives i = (p0 q − pq 0 )/qq 0 , which is rational. Contradiction. ...
Proof
... states the postulate that can be used to show that A, H, and D are coplanar? A. Through any two points on the same line, there is exactly one plane. B. Through any three points not on the same line, there is exactly one plane. C. If two points lie in a plane, then the entire line containing those po ...
... states the postulate that can be used to show that A, H, and D are coplanar? A. Through any two points on the same line, there is exactly one plane. B. Through any three points not on the same line, there is exactly one plane. C. If two points lie in a plane, then the entire line containing those po ...
P Q
... the problem solver begins with the given facts of the problem and a set of legal moves or rules for changing state Search proceeds by applying rules to facts to produce new facts, which are in turn used by the rules to generate more new facts This process continues until (we hope!) it generates ...
... the problem solver begins with the given facts of the problem and a set of legal moves or rules for changing state Search proceeds by applying rules to facts to produce new facts, which are in turn used by the rules to generate more new facts This process continues until (we hope!) it generates ...
More on Proofs – Part III of Hammack
... First, mathematical statements can be diided into two categories. One category consists of all statements that have been proved to be true (e.g., theorems, propositions, lemmas, corollaries). There are also some trivial statements in this category (e.g., 2 = 2). At the other end of the spectrum is a ...
... First, mathematical statements can be diided into two categories. One category consists of all statements that have been proved to be true (e.g., theorems, propositions, lemmas, corollaries). There are also some trivial statements in this category (e.g., 2 = 2). At the other end of the spectrum is a ...
PPTX
... logic statements by application of equivalence and inference rules, especially in order to massage statements into a desired form. • Devise and attempt multiple different, appropriate strategies for proving a propositional logic statement follows from a list of premises. ...
... logic statements by application of equivalence and inference rules, especially in order to massage statements into a desired form. • Devise and attempt multiple different, appropriate strategies for proving a propositional logic statement follows from a list of premises. ...
Formal power series
... In the ring of formal power series, the binomial theorem tell us that if n is any non-negative integer, (1+f)^n is equal to the “infinite sum” 1 + [n ]f + [n(n-1)/2] f^2 + [n(n-1)(n-2)/6] f^3 + ... (which isn’t so infinite, since all but finitely many terms vanish). But in fact this is true for neg ...
... In the ring of formal power series, the binomial theorem tell us that if n is any non-negative integer, (1+f)^n is equal to the “infinite sum” 1 + [n ]f + [n(n-1)/2] f^2 + [n(n-1)(n-2)/6] f^3 + ... (which isn’t so infinite, since all but finitely many terms vanish). But in fact this is true for neg ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.