
THE DISCRETE COUNTABLE CHAIN CONDITION
... Theorem 2.3. A regular space R is Lindelof if and only if it is paracompact and satisfies the DCCC. This result follows from a theorem of E. Michael [8]. A regular topological space is paracompact if and only if every open covering has a cr-discrete open refinement. We also note that a metric space ...
... Theorem 2.3. A regular space R is Lindelof if and only if it is paracompact and satisfies the DCCC. This result follows from a theorem of E. Michael [8]. A regular topological space is paracompact if and only if every open covering has a cr-discrete open refinement. We also note that a metric space ...
THE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM CLOCK FIGURE 1. The
... the periodic nature of remainders. Moreover, some small arithmetical problems may be visualized on the Clock dial (see Section 4). Last but not least the Clock can be entertaining (also for non-mathematicians): anybody who simply wants to play around with numbers may have found something for him. Fu ...
... the periodic nature of remainders. Moreover, some small arithmetical problems may be visualized on the Clock dial (see Section 4). Last but not least the Clock can be entertaining (also for non-mathematicians): anybody who simply wants to play around with numbers may have found something for him. Fu ...
MULTIVARIATE BIRKHOFF-LAGRANGE INTERPOLATION
... In this section we study the relation between cartesian sets of nodes and the regularity of the Birkhoff-Lagrange schemes. We will show the following, whose particular case appearing in Lemma 3.1 below can be seen as an analogue of Theorem 12.3.1 of [3]. Proposition 3.1. Given two lower sets S and S ...
... In this section we study the relation between cartesian sets of nodes and the regularity of the Birkhoff-Lagrange schemes. We will show the following, whose particular case appearing in Lemma 3.1 below can be seen as an analogue of Theorem 12.3.1 of [3]. Proposition 3.1. Given two lower sets S and S ...
CHAPTER I: The Origins of the Problem Section 1: Pierre Fermat
... When we think of the most brilliant people in mathematics in the last 500 years, names like Rene Descartes, Carl Gauss, Isaac Newton, Gottfried Leibniz, and Blaise Pascal are sure to come to mind. Descartes was a renowned philosopher who created analytic geometry, Gauss was a genius in number theory ...
... When we think of the most brilliant people in mathematics in the last 500 years, names like Rene Descartes, Carl Gauss, Isaac Newton, Gottfried Leibniz, and Blaise Pascal are sure to come to mind. Descartes was a renowned philosopher who created analytic geometry, Gauss was a genius in number theory ...
WaiCheungChingHo
... of whether or not a large number is prime. Several theorems including Fermat’s theorem provide idea of primality test. Cryptography schemes such as RSA algorithm heavily based on primality test. ...
... of whether or not a large number is prime. Several theorems including Fermat’s theorem provide idea of primality test. Cryptography schemes such as RSA algorithm heavily based on primality test. ...
Solutions to Homework 6 Mathematics 503 Foundations of
... then there are two integers j and k such that m = 2j + 1 and n = 2k. So m2 − n2 = (2j + 1)2 − 4k 2 = 4j 2 + 4j + 1 − 4k 2 . This is an odd number, so is not divisible by 4. Suppose that m is even and n is odd. If so, then there are two integers j and k such that m = 2j and n = 2k + 1. So m2 − n2 = 4 ...
... then there are two integers j and k such that m = 2j + 1 and n = 2k. So m2 − n2 = (2j + 1)2 − 4k 2 = 4j 2 + 4j + 1 − 4k 2 . This is an odd number, so is not divisible by 4. Suppose that m is even and n is odd. If so, then there are two integers j and k such that m = 2j and n = 2k + 1. So m2 − n2 = 4 ...
The sum of divisors of n, modulo n
... We cannot prove that there are infinitely many near-perfect numbers, though we have certain Euclid-style families. For instance, if Mp := 2p − 1 is prime, then 2p−1 Mp2 is near-perfect with redundant divisor Mp . In the opposite direction, we can prove the following: ...
... We cannot prove that there are infinitely many near-perfect numbers, though we have certain Euclid-style families. For instance, if Mp := 2p − 1 is prime, then 2p−1 Mp2 is near-perfect with redundant divisor Mp . In the opposite direction, we can prove the following: ...
RESEARCH PROJECTS 1. Irrationality questions
... The irrationality measure µirr (α) is defined to be the infimum of the bounds and need not itself be a bound. Liouville constructed transcendental numbers by studying numbers with infinite irrationality measure, and Roth proved the irrationality measure of an algebraic number is 2 (see [MT-B]). Curr ...
... The irrationality measure µirr (α) is defined to be the infimum of the bounds and need not itself be a bound. Liouville constructed transcendental numbers by studying numbers with infinite irrationality measure, and Roth proved the irrationality measure of an algebraic number is 2 (see [MT-B]). Curr ...
Ch. 2 - Northwest ISD Moodle
... a. A florist has 24 daisies, 40 zinnias, and 32 snapdragons. She wants to divide the flowers evenly to make bouquets for her display case. The florist can determine the greatest common factor to calculate how many bouquets he can create. Factors of 24: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 Factors of 40: 1, 2, 4 ...
... a. A florist has 24 daisies, 40 zinnias, and 32 snapdragons. She wants to divide the flowers evenly to make bouquets for her display case. The florist can determine the greatest common factor to calculate how many bouquets he can create. Factors of 24: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 Factors of 40: 1, 2, 4 ...
GAUSSIAN INTEGER SOLUTIONS FOR THE FIFTH POWER
... (P2n+3 +1)5 +(P2n+3 −1)5 = (P2n+3 +i(P2n+3 +P2n+2 ))5 +(P2n+3 −i(P2n+3 +P2n+2 ))5 . It does seem interesting that the ancient Pell number sequence should figure so neatly in the above set of solutions, with integers on the left, Gaussian integers on the right. The proof of Theorem 2.1 is by simple e ...
... (P2n+3 +1)5 +(P2n+3 −1)5 = (P2n+3 +i(P2n+3 +P2n+2 ))5 +(P2n+3 −i(P2n+3 +P2n+2 ))5 . It does seem interesting that the ancient Pell number sequence should figure so neatly in the above set of solutions, with integers on the left, Gaussian integers on the right. The proof of Theorem 2.1 is by simple e ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.