• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Chapter 4, Mathematics
Chapter 4, Mathematics

(pdf)
(pdf)

... One important distinction to make is that fuzzy logic is NOT probability. Although both employ values between 0 and 1 that represent something about the symbol or event, it is the meaning of this number that differs. In probability, the number represents the likelihood of an event’s occurrence. In f ...
Heyting-valued interpretations for Constructive Set Theory
Heyting-valued interpretations for Constructive Set Theory

of odd perfect numbers - American Mathematical Society
of odd perfect numbers - American Mathematical Society

(pdf)
(pdf)

Subset Construction Subtleties
Subset Construction Subtleties

... ( M , n) denotes the # of states in the minimal DFA equivalent to minimal NFA M with n states. Proof outline: To show that all the states in P(Q) are reachable in the subset construction, use induction on the cardinality of the set concerned. Basis: Cardinality 0,1: All k+1 such states are reachabl ...
On Generalized Fermat Numbers 32n + 1 1 Background
On Generalized Fermat Numbers 32n + 1 1 Background

... tame large integers as these. Such scenario was properly applied to F (10) in [2], to name one successful case. n The generalized Fermat numbers Fa (n) = a2 + 1 share most of the arithmetic properties enjoyed by F (n). While primality concern for Fermat numbers is considered settled, at least theore ...
Theorem 4.2: W6n+k - The Fibonacci Quarterly
Theorem 4.2: W6n+k - The Fibonacci Quarterly

Full text
Full text

Proof that 2is irrational - Biblical Christian World View
Proof that 2is irrational - Biblical Christian World View

... the law of the excluded middle, asserts that for any given statement that is provable, either the statement itself or its negation is true. Another transcendental law, the law of contradiction, asserts that a provable statement and its negation cannot be true simultaneously. Therefore, according to ...
On a conjecture of Chowla and Milnor
On a conjecture of Chowla and Milnor

Prime Numbers - KSU Web Home
Prime Numbers - KSU Web Home

... actually not as good as the estimate for n = 15; 485; 863. Nonetheless, we know that as n ! 1, the value of (n) =n approaches 0 at the “same rate” that 1= ln (n) approaches 0. We are guaranteed by the Prime Number Theorem that we can make the value of ...
PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC 1 Propositional Logic - Glasnost!
PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC 1 Propositional Logic - Glasnost!

EMBEDDING AN ANALYTIC EQUIVALENCE RELATION IN THE
EMBEDDING AN ANALYTIC EQUIVALENCE RELATION IN THE

NORMAL FAMILIES, ORDERS OF ZEROS, AND OMITTED VALUES
NORMAL FAMILIES, ORDERS OF ZEROS, AND OMITTED VALUES

"The Asymptotic Equipartition Property". In: Elements of Information
"The Asymptotic Equipartition Property". In: Elements of Information

... random variables drawn from the probability mass function p(x). We wish to find short descriptions for such sequences of random variables. We divide all sequences in 2” into two sets: the typical set A:’ and its complement, as ...
A constructive approach to nonstandard analysis*
A constructive approach to nonstandard analysis*

... Moerdijk and Reyes [20] use topos theory to develop calculus with different kinds of infinitesimals. The logic used in the formal theories of their approach is intuitionistic, but the necessary properties of their models are not proved constructively. In Moerdijk [19] a constructive sheaf model of n ...
Congruence Properties of the Function that Counts Compositions
Congruence Properties of the Function that Counts Compositions

... Encyclopedia [8]; one can find numerous references there. Congruence properties of b(n) modulo powers of 2 were first observed by R. F. Churchhouse [5] (the main congruence was given without a proof as a conjecture). This conjecture was later proved by H. Gupta [6] and independently by Ø. Rødseth [7 ...
Prime factorization of integral Cayley octaves
Prime factorization of integral Cayley octaves

... the maximal order are, by a result of Mahler, generated by rationals hence useless for a factorization theory of octaves. But using the results of Coxeter one has division with residue. Unfortunately, Euclid’s division algorithm, executed formally, does not always compute common right divisors of tw ...
Infinitely Many Carmichael Numbers for a Modified Miller
Infinitely Many Carmichael Numbers for a Modified Miller

Lowness notions, measure and domination
Lowness notions, measure and domination

LOWNESS NOTIONS, MEASURE AND DOMINATION
LOWNESS NOTIONS, MEASURE AND DOMINATION

Discrete Mathematics and Logic II. Formal Logic
Discrete Mathematics and Logic II. Formal Logic

CHAPTER 5 SOME EXTENSIONAL SEMANTICS
CHAPTER 5 SOME EXTENSIONAL SEMANTICS

2.13 Factors and Integral Roots – Day 2
2.13 Factors and Integral Roots – Day 2

< 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report