
Beginning Deductive Logic
... one has set aside enough time and space to craft at least a sustained essay, or perhaps even a book. Well, we fancy ourselves brave; here goes; all done in but one sentence: Logic is the science and engineering of reasoning. Maybe you don’t find this answer enlightening. If so, that could be because ...
... one has set aside enough time and space to craft at least a sustained essay, or perhaps even a book. Well, we fancy ourselves brave; here goes; all done in but one sentence: Logic is the science and engineering of reasoning. Maybe you don’t find this answer enlightening. If so, that could be because ...
Truth in the limit
... We shown that the first order logic is correct and complete inference tool for sl–semantics. Unfortunately, interesting theories of potentially infinite domains usually are not axiomatizable in the standard sense. However this is true also for classical semantics which allows actually infinite model ...
... We shown that the first order logic is correct and complete inference tool for sl–semantics. Unfortunately, interesting theories of potentially infinite domains usually are not axiomatizable in the standard sense. However this is true also for classical semantics which allows actually infinite model ...
Elementary Number Theory Definitions and Theorems
... for proof problems. The definitions given here (e.g., of divisibility) are the “authoritative” definitions, and you should use those definitions in proofs. The results stated here are those you are free to use and refer to in proofs; in general, anything else (e.g., a theorem you might have learned ...
... for proof problems. The definitions given here (e.g., of divisibility) are the “authoritative” definitions, and you should use those definitions in proofs. The results stated here are those you are free to use and refer to in proofs; in general, anything else (e.g., a theorem you might have learned ...
1-9 Coordinate Plane
... and is often written in if-then form. Deductive reasoning is a process that uses facts and rules to reach a valid conclusion. A counterexample is a specific example that can be used to show that a statement is false. ...
... and is often written in if-then form. Deductive reasoning is a process that uses facts and rules to reach a valid conclusion. A counterexample is a specific example that can be used to show that a statement is false. ...
Logic, Proofs, and Sets
... P if and only if Q has the same meaning as the statement if P, then Q and if Q, then P. This statement asserts a kind of equality – that P and Q have the same meaning: P is true exactly when Q is. The phrase if and only if is frequently abbreviated iff, especially in definitions. The mathematical sy ...
... P if and only if Q has the same meaning as the statement if P, then Q and if Q, then P. This statement asserts a kind of equality – that P and Q have the same meaning: P is true exactly when Q is. The phrase if and only if is frequently abbreviated iff, especially in definitions. The mathematical sy ...
Godel`s Proof
... Starting from scratch, AM discovered many concepts of number theory. Rather than logically proving theorems, AM wandered around the world of numbers, following its primitive esthetic nose, sniffing out patterns, and making guesses about them. As with a bright human, most of AM’s guesses were right, s ...
... Starting from scratch, AM discovered many concepts of number theory. Rather than logically proving theorems, AM wandered around the world of numbers, following its primitive esthetic nose, sniffing out patterns, and making guesses about them. As with a bright human, most of AM’s guesses were right, s ...
Quotients of Fibonacci Numbers
... Cor.2, p.15]. In particular, ϕ, ϕ̃, and 5 each belong to OK . An ideal in OK is a additive subgroup i of OK so that αi ⊆ i for all α ∈ OK . A prime in OK refers to a prime ideal in the ring OK . A prime ideal is an ideal p ⊆ OK with the property that, for any α, β ∈ OK , the condition αβ ∈ p implies ...
... Cor.2, p.15]. In particular, ϕ, ϕ̃, and 5 each belong to OK . An ideal in OK is a additive subgroup i of OK so that αi ⊆ i for all α ∈ OK . A prime in OK refers to a prime ideal in the ring OK . A prime ideal is an ideal p ⊆ OK with the property that, for any α, β ∈ OK , the condition αβ ∈ p implies ...
Proof
... A formal proof of a conclusion, given premises p1 , p2 , . . . pn consists of a sequence of steps, each of which applies some inference rule to premises or to previously-proven statements (as antecedents) to yield a new true statement q (the consequent). A proof demonstrates that if the premises are ...
... A formal proof of a conclusion, given premises p1 , p2 , . . . pn consists of a sequence of steps, each of which applies some inference rule to premises or to previously-proven statements (as antecedents) to yield a new true statement q (the consequent). A proof demonstrates that if the premises are ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.