
COMPOSITIONS, PARTITIONS, AND FIBONACCI NUMBERS 1
... As we proceed, let us visualize an example. Let us take a to be 1+1+1+9+1+1+5+3, which has MacMahon bit sequence 111 000000001 1 1 00001 00. Notice that because all of the parts in a are odd, the corresponding MacMahon bit sequence must have zeros appear in strings of even length. Let us now map a t ...
... As we proceed, let us visualize an example. Let us take a to be 1+1+1+9+1+1+5+3, which has MacMahon bit sequence 111 000000001 1 1 00001 00. Notice that because all of the parts in a are odd, the corresponding MacMahon bit sequence must have zeros appear in strings of even length. Let us now map a t ...
(6) Prove that the equation x
... the function be continuous. This is the content of the next theorem. Theorem 6 (Intermediate Value Theorem). Let f be a function that is continuous on the interval [a, b]. Then, if f (a) = y1 and f (b) = y2 and y is a real number that is between y1 and y2 , then there exists x ∈ [a, b] such that f ( ...
... the function be continuous. This is the content of the next theorem. Theorem 6 (Intermediate Value Theorem). Let f be a function that is continuous on the interval [a, b]. Then, if f (a) = y1 and f (b) = y2 and y is a real number that is between y1 and y2 , then there exists x ∈ [a, b] such that f ( ...
Three Solutions to the Knower Paradox
... of the system, or is immediately deducible from the earlier ones ...
... of the system, or is immediately deducible from the earlier ones ...
Basic Combinatorics - Math - The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
... M = {1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1}. One sometimes encounters multisets written in “exponential” notation, where the “exponent” indicates the frequency of occurrence of an object in the multiset. With this notation, one would write M = {13 , 24 , 31 }. The list of objects belonging to a multiset is always ...
... M = {1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1}. One sometimes encounters multisets written in “exponential” notation, where the “exponent” indicates the frequency of occurrence of an object in the multiset. With this notation, one would write M = {13 , 24 , 31 }. The list of objects belonging to a multiset is always ...
1.4 Deductive Reasoning
... Inductive*reasoning*is*not*a*proof*of*anything*except*for*possibilities*that*you*tested.* There*could*always*be*a*counterexample*just*around*the*corner.* ...
... Inductive*reasoning*is*not*a*proof*of*anything*except*for*possibilities*that*you*tested.* There*could*always*be*a*counterexample*just*around*the*corner.* ...
The Cantor Expansion of Real Numbers
... e, the irrationality of which follows by (2) immediately: if e = riq take n = q to get the contradiction 1 = 0. 2. In an analogous ...
... e, the irrationality of which follows by (2) immediately: if e = riq take n = q to get the contradiction 1 = 0. 2. In an analogous ...
Sets, Numbers, and Logic
... But N0 is defective: you can add and multiply without leaving the system, but not always subtract: to solve x + 5 = 3, the system must be expanded to Z = {. . . , −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, . . .} : the integers. This causes some problems: negative numbers are traumatic — they don’t count anything, which is w ...
... But N0 is defective: you can add and multiply without leaving the system, but not always subtract: to solve x + 5 = 3, the system must be expanded to Z = {. . . , −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, . . .} : the integers. This causes some problems: negative numbers are traumatic — they don’t count anything, which is w ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.