* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download M1F Foundations of Analysis Problem Sheet 2
Brouwer–Hilbert controversy wikipedia , lookup
Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup
Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup
Real number wikipedia , lookup
Collatz conjecture wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup
M1F Foundations of Analysis Problem Sheet 2 1. Prove or disprove the following statements: (a) the sum of two irrational numbers is always irrational False. √ √ 2 and − 2 are irrational numbers, but their sum is rational. (b) the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is always irrational. True. Suppose not. Then there exist integers p, q 6= 0, p0 , q 0 6= 0 and an irrational number i such that p/q + i = p0 /q 0 . Rearranging gives i = (p0 q − pq 0 )/qq 0 , which is rational. Contradiction. (c) if n and k are positive integers, then nk − n is always divisible by k False. 24 − 2 = 14 is not divisible by 4. (d) ∀n ∈ N ∃a, b ∈ N such that n = a2 + b2 . To prove this is false I must show that ∃n ∈ N such that ∀a, b ∈ N, n 6= a2 + b2 . Consider n = 3. Assume for a contradiction that n = a2 + b2 . Then a2 ≤ 3 so a < 2; similarly b < 2. Therefore the only possibilities for a and b are 0 and 1 (or just 1, depending on your view of N). Therefore the only possibilities for a2 + b2 are 0, 1, 2. But n = 3. Contradiction. 2. What is the smallest number in the set {x: x > 1} ? Justify your answer. There is no smallest number. The number 1 is not in the set, and any number x > 1 cannot be the smallest number because there is always a smaller number in the set, such as (1 + x)/2. 3. Write down a careful proof that for any two positive numbers x, y, their mean (or average, or “arithmetic mean”) 12 (x + y) is greater than or equal to their √ “geometric mean” xy: x+y √ ≥ xy. 2 When are they equal ? BE VERY CAREFUL WITH THIS PROOF: ARE YOUR IMPLICATIONS IN THE CORRECT DIRECTION ?! √ Suppose for a contradiction that it is not true, i.e. x + y < 2 xy. Squaring both sides, x2 + 2xy + y 2 < 4xy ⇒ x2 − 2xy + y 2 < 0 ⇒ (x − y)2 < 0. Contradiction. Equality holds iff it holds at every step of the above calculation, iff (x − y)2 = 0. That is, if and only if x = y. 4. Prove by induction that 7n − 3n is divisible by 4 for all n ≥ 1. (Can you also see a direct, one-line proof ?) True for n = 1: 7 − 3 = 4. Assume true for n = k ≥ 1. So 7k − 3k is divisible by 4. Then for n = k + 1, 7k+1 − 3k+1 = 7.7k − 3.3k = 7.(7k − 3k ) + 4.3k is also divisible by 4. h Direct proof: notice that xn − an is divisible by x − a. (In fact xn − an = (x − a)(xn−1 + axn−2 + i . . . + an−2 x + an−1 ).) Now put x = 7, a = 3. 5. * For which n ∈ N is 2n + 3n < 4n ? Experimentation seems to show that it is true for n ≥ 2. It is clearly false for n = 0, 1. So prove by induction that it is true for n ≥ 2. True for n = 2: 22 + 32 = 13 < 16 = 42 . Suppose true for n = k. Then for n = k + 1, 2n + 3n = 2k+1 + 3k+1 = 2.2k + 3.3k ≤ 3(2k + 3k ), which by the induction assumption is in turn < 3.4k < 4.4k = 4k+1 . 6. Suppose that an integer n is the sum of two squares (the squares being the numbers 0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ....). Show that 2n is also. (There is a small trick involved in solving this; don’t worry if you can’t spot it, just look at the answer next week.) Write n = a2 + b2 for integers a, b. Then (a + b)2 + (a − b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2 + a2 − 2ab + b2 = 2(a2 + b2 ) = 2n. 7. Prove that for every positive integer n, the number Suppose Write as √ √ 2+ √ n is irrational. √ 2 + n = r is rational. √ √ √ n = r − 2 and square to give n = r 2 − 2r 2 + 2. So either r = 0 (impossible; r ≥ √ 2) or √ 2= r 2 +2−n . 2r But this is rational, a contradiction. You should prepare starred questions * to discuss with your personal tutor.