Download DragForce

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Derivation of the Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup

Balloon wikipedia , lookup

Drag (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Drag Force
Purpose: The purpose of this experiment is to determine the relationship between the
drag force (due to air resistance) and velocity and shape. 1
Theory: The relationship between the drag force and velocity depends upon the
mechanism involved. If viscous forces are causing the object to slow, we can use Stokes
Law which tells us
Fd(v) = 6rv
1
for a sphere of radius r moving at a velocity v where the viscosity of the fluid is . If
inertial forces are causing the object to slow, for a sphere of radius r moving at a
velocity v,
1
Fd(v) =2 CDAv2
2
where  is the density of the medium and CD is a coefficient which depends on the form
of the object and the medium. This equation comes from the fact that a falling object
sweeps out a volume V = Avt where A is the cross sectional area, v is the velocity and
t is the time interval. The number of particles the object collides with will be equal to
N=V/m, where m is the mass of the particles. Each collision will produce an average
change in momentum of p=mv. Use this information to derive equation 2.
The equation of motion for an object of mass M falling in a fluid is
dv
M dt =M*g - Fd(v)
3
Where M* is the effective mass of the object taking into account the Archimedes
Principle which results in a buoyant force due to the displaced fluid. (Luckily, M* is the
value a scale measures when you place the balloon on it.) Note that if an object is
allowed to reach terminal velocity vt
Fd(vt) = M*g
So the question remains...is Fd proportional to v or v2?
Procedure: You will be given a sonic ranger, which is basically a motion detector, a
balloon, and some masses to vary the mass of the balloon. Using a computer, you can
use the sonic ranger to collect distance vs. time data for the balloon as it drops. You
should be able to collect distance vs. time data for 5 to 7 different balloon masses
(keeping the volume of the balloon constant). You should have between 5 and ten trials
for each balloon mass.
How will you determine whether Fd is proportional to v or v2?
Determine the relationship between Fd and v and estimate CD.
Using the differential equation 3, find v(t). This derivation is analogous to the one on
page 62 of your text book (Classical Dynamics by Marion and Thornton.)
1 "Measuring air resistance in a computerized laboratory" by Ken Takanhash and D. Thompson,
American Journal of Physics 67 (8) August 1999, p 709.
Now we can determine how the drag force depends on the radius of the balloon.
Essentially we repeat the experiment, only this time we change the radius of the
balloon. Since the balloon reaches a terminal velocity, we have the following equation:
Fd(vt) = M*g rm vn
or
M* A m
=
r
vn g
where K is some constant. From the previous experiment, you have determined the
dependence of the drag force on v, whether n= 1 or 2. Now by making the appropriate
graph, you can determine how the drag force depends on r. Does m = 1? 2? 3?
Be careful to measure the mass of the balloon each time you
change the radius. Even though you may not change the amount
of material present, when you change the volume, you change
the bouyant force acting on the balloon, which changes its
effective mass, M*.
F=bouyant force
Weight = M*g = mg - Bouyant force
Therefore, M*= (mg -Bouyant force)/g
F = mg
Theory: According to theory, whether an object falls with linear
or quadratic drag depends on whether a certain parameter, the Reynolds number, is
larger than a certain value. Look up what you can find on this quantity, and determine
whether your findings are consistent with theory.
1 "Measuring air resistance in a computerized laboratory" by Ken Takanhash and D. Thompson,
American Journal of Physics 67 (8) August 1999, p 709.