* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download natural selection - McGraw Hill Higher Education
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Hybrid (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup
Group selection wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Essentials of the Living World Second Edition George B. Johnson Jonathan B. Losos Chapter 15 Evolution and Natural Selection Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 15.1 Evolution: Getting from There to Here • The idea of evolution by means of natural selection has played a central role in the science of biology proposed by Charles Darwin in 1859 with the publication of On the Origin of Species may be summarized, as Darwin did, as “descent with modification” • all species arise from other, preexisting species 15.1 Evolution: Getting from There to Here Macroevolution is evolutionary change of a grand scale • for example, changes that result in the creation of new species Microevolution is evolutionary change at the level of a population • these are changes that occur within a species that make that species different from its immediate ancestor • adaptation results from microevolutionary changes that increase the likelihood of survival and reproduction of particular genetic traits in a population 15.1 Evolution: Getting from There to Here • Darwin did not invent the idea of evolution • Prior to Darwin there was no consensus among biologists about the mechanism causing evolution • A predecessor to Darwin, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck proposed that evolution occurred by the inheritance of acquired characteristics 15.1 Evolution: Getting from There to Here • According to Lamarck, individuals passed on to offspring body and behavior changes acquired during their lives for example, giraffes evolved long necks because ancestral giraffes tended to stretch their necks and this neck extension was passed on to subsequent generations Figure 15.1(a) How did long necks evolve in giraffes? 15.1 Evolution: Getting from There to Here • According to Darwin, the variation is not created by experience but already exists when selection acts on it populations of ancestral giraffes contained variation in neck length individuals who were able to feed higher up on the trees had more food and so were able to survive and reproduce better than their shorter-necked relatives Figure 15.1 (b) How did long necks evolve in giraffes? 15.1 Evolution: Getting from There to Here • There are two views concerning the rate of evolutionary change gradualism states that evolutionary change occurs extremely slowly • such change would be nearly imperceptible from generation to generation, but would accumulate over the course of millions of years punctuated equilibrium states that species experience long periods of little or no evolutionary change (termed stasis), interrupted by bursts of evolutionary change Figure 15.2 Two views of the pace of macroevolution 15.2 The Evidence for Evolution • There are many lines of evidence supporting Darwin’s theory of evolution fossil record comprises the most direct evidence of macroevolution fossils are the preserved remains, tracks, or traces of once-living organisms • they are created when organisms become buried in sediment • by dating the rocks in which the fossils occur, one can get an accurate idea of how old the fossils are 15.2 The Evidence for Evolution • Fossils in rock represent a history of evolutionary change fossils are treated as samples of data and are dated independently of what the samples are like successive changes through time are a data statement thus, the statement that macroevolution has occurred is a factual observation Figure 15.3 Testing the theory of evolution with fossil titanotheres 15.2 The Evidence for Evolution • The anatomical record also reflects evolutionary history for example, all vertebrate embryos share a basic set of developmental instructions Figure 15.4 Embryos show our early evolutionary history 15.2 The Evidence for Evolution • Homologous structures are derived from the same body part present in an ancestor for example, the same bones might be put to different uses in related species • Analagous structures are similar-looking structures in unrelated lineages these are the result of parallel evolutionary adaptations to similar environments • this form of evolutionary change is referred to as convergent evolution Homologous versus Analagous Structures Figure 15.5 Homology among vertebrate limbs Figure 15.6 Convergent evolution: many paths to one goal 15.2 The Evidence for Evolution • Traces of our evolutionary past are also evident at the molecular level organisms that are more distantly related should have accumulated a greater number of evolutionary differences than two species that are more closely related the same pattern of divergence can be seen at the protein level Figure 15.7 Molecules reflect evolutionary divergence 15.2 The Evidence for Evolution • Evolutionary changes appear to accumulate at a constant rate this permits changes in an individual gene, compared over a broad array of organisms, to be dated from the time of divergence this dating is referred to as a molecular clock for example, changes that have accumulated in the cytochrome c gene Figure 15.8 The molecular clock of cytochrome c 15.3 Evolution’s Critics • The theory of evolution by natural selection is the subject of often-bitter public controversy the controversy began soon after the publication of The Origin of Species but, by the turn of the twentieth century, evolution was generally accepted by the world’s scientific community more recent criticism has come from the following sources • • • • the Fundamentalist Movement the Scientific Creationist Movement Local Action Intelligent Design 15.3 Evolution’s Critics • Critics have raised a variety of objections to Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection “Evolution is just a theory.” “No one ever saw a fin on the way to becoming a leg.” “The organs of living creatures are too complex for a random process to have produced.” “A jumble of soda cans doesn’t by itself jump neatly into a stack—things become more disorganized due to random events, not more organized.” “Hemoglobin has 141 amino acids. The probability that the first one would be leucine is 1/20, and that all 141 would be the ones they are by chance is (1/20)141, an impossibly rare event.” “No scientist has come up with an experiment where fish evolve into frogs and leap away from predators.” “Because the peptide bond does not form spontaneously in water, amino acids could never have spontaneously linked together to form proteins.” 15.3 Evolution’s Critics • The previous quotations attack evolution on the following grounds, which have been refuted by biologists evolution is not solidly demonstrated there are no fossil intermediates the intelligent design argument evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics natural selection does not imply evolution life could not have evolved in water 15.3 Evolution’s Critics • The irreducible-complexity fallacy refers to claims by proponents of intelligent design that the molecular machinery of the cell is irreducibly complex • Yet natural selection acts on the systems and not the parts so that, at every stage of evolution, the system is functioning for example, the mammalian blood clotting system has evolved in stages from much simpler systems Figure 15.10 How blood clotting evolved 15.4 Genetic Change Within Populations: The Hardy-Weinberg Rule • Population genetics is the study of the properties of genes in populations • Gene pool is the sum of all of the genes in a population, including all alleles in all individuals 15.4 Genetic Change Within Populations: The Hardy-Weinberg Rule • Variation within populations puzzled many scientists why don’t dominant alleles drive recessive alleles out of populations? • G.H. Hardy and W. Weinberg, in 1908, studied allele frequencies in a gene pool in a large population in which there is random mating, and in the absence of forces that change allele frequencies, the original genotype proportions remain constant from generation to generation because the proportions do not change, the genotypes are said to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium If the allele frequencies are not changing, the population is not evolving 15.4 Genetic Change Within Populations: The Hardy-Weinberg Rule • Hardy and Weinberg arrived at their conclusion by analyzing the frequencies of alleles in successive generations frequency is the proportion of individuals with a certain characteristic compared to an entire population knowing the frequency of the phenotype, one can calculate the frequency of the genotypes and alleles in the population 15.4 Genetic Change Within Populations: The Hardy-Weinberg Rule • By convention, the frequency of the more common of the two alleles is designated by the letter p and that of the less common allele by the letter q • Because there are only two alleles, the sum of p and q must always equal 1 15.4 Genetic Change Within Populations: The Hardy-Weinberg Rule • In algebraic terms, the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is written as an equation p2 + 2pq + q = 1 Figure 15.11 Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 15.4 Genetic Change Within Populations: The Hardy-Weinberg Rule • The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium only works if the following five assumptions are met 1. The size of the population is very large or effectively infinite. 2. Individuals can mate with one another at random. 3. There is no mutation. 4. There is no immigration or emigration. 5. All alleles are replaced equally from generation to generation. 15.4 Genetic Change Within Populations: The Hardy-Weinberg Rule • Most human populations are large and randomly mating with respect to most traits and thus are similar to an ideal population envisioned by Hardy and Weinberg for example, the frequency of heterozygote carriers for recessive genetic disorders can be estimated using the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Five factors can alter the proportions of homozygotes and heterozygotes enough to produce significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg predictions 1. mutation 1. migration 2. genetic drift 3. nonrandom mating 4. selection 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Mutation is a change in a nucleotide sequence in DNA mutation rates are generally too low to significantly alter Hardy-Weinberg proportions mutations must affect the DNA of the germ cells or the mutation will not be passed on to offspring however, no matter how rare, mutation is the ultimate source of variation in a population 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Migration is the movement of individuals between populations the movement of individuals can be a powerful force upsetting the genetic stability of natural populations • the magnitude of the effects of migration is based on two factors – the proportion of migrants in the population – the difference in allele frequencies between the migrants and the original population 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Genetic drift describes random changes in allele frequencies in small populations, the frequencies of particular alleles may be changed drastically by chance alone in extreme cases, individual alleles of a given gene may be • all represented in few individuals • accidentally lost if individuals fail to reproduce or die 15.5 Agents of Evolution • A series of small populations that are isolated from one another may come to differ strongly as the result of genetic drift founder effect occurs when one of a few individuals migrate and become the founders of a new, isolated population at some distance from their place of origin • the alleles that they carry will become a significant fraction of the new population’s genetic endowment bottleneck effect occurs when a population is drastically reduced in size • the surviving individuals constitute a random genetic sample of the original population 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Nonrandom mating occurs when individuals with certain genotypes mate with one another either more or less commonly than would be expected by chance sexual selection is choosing a mate based on, often, physical characteristics nonrandom mating alters genotype frequencies but not allele frequencies 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Selection, according to Darwin, occurs if some individuals leave behind more progeny than others the likelihood that they will do so is affected by their individual characteristics • in artificial selection, a breeder selects for the desired characteristics • in natural selection, conditions in nature determine which kinds of individuals in a population are the most fit Table 15.1 Agents of Evolution 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Stabilizing selection is a form of selection in which both extremes form an array of phenotypes are eliminated the result is an increase in the frequency of the already common intermediate phenotype for example, human birthweight is under stabilizing selection Figure 15.14 (a) Forms of selection found in nature 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Disruptive selection is a form of selection in which the two extremes in an array of phenotypes become more common in the population selection acts to eliminate the intermediate phenotypes for example, beak size in African blackbellied seedcracker finches is under disruptive selection because the available seeds are only large or small Figure 15.14 (b) Forms of selection found in nature 15.5 Agents of Evolution • Directional selection is a form of selection that occurs when selection acts to eliminate one extreme from an array of phenotypes for example, the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase has a cold-adapted form that is more common in northern latitudes Figure 15.14 (c) Forms of selection found in nature Figure 15.13 Three kinds of natural selection 15.6 Sickle-Cell Anemia • Sickle-cell anemia is a hereditary disease affecting hemoglobin molecules in the blood the disorder results from a single nucleotide change in the gene encoding β-hemoglobin • this causes the sixth amino acid in the chain to change from glutamic acid (very polar) to valine (nonpolar) • as a result, the hemoglobin molecules clump together and deform the red blood cell into “sickleshape” Figure 15.16 Why the sickle-cell mutation causes hemoglobin to clump 15.6 Sickle-Cell Anemia • Persons homozygous for the sickle-cell genetic mutation frequently have a reduced lifespan the sickled form of hemoglobin does not carry oxygen atoms the red blood cells that are sickled do not flow smoothly through capillaries • Heterozygous individuals make enough function hemoglobin to keep their red blood cells healthy 15.6 Sickle-Cell Anemia • The frequency of sickle-cell allele is about 0.12 in Central Africa one in 100 people is homozygous for the defective allele and develops the fatal disorder sickle-cell anemia strikes roughly two African Americans out of every thousand • If natural selection drives evolution, why has natural selection not acted against the defective allele in Africa and eliminated it from the population here? 15.6 Sickle-Cell Anemia • The defective allele has not been eliminated from Central Africa because people who are heterozygous are much less susceptible to malaria the payoff in survival of heterozygotes makes up for the price in death of homozygotes • this is called heterozygote advantage • stabilizing selection occurs because malarial resistance counterbalances lethal anemia Figure 15.17 How stabilizing selection maintains sickle-cell anemia 20% of individuals are heterozygous and survive malaria 1% of individuals are homozygous and die of sickle cell anemia 15.7 Selection on Color in Guppies • Guppies are colorful fish that a popular for aquariums on the island of Trinidad, guppies are found in two very different stream environments • in pools above waterfalls, the guppies are found along with the killifish, a seldom predator of guppies • in pools below waterfalls, the guppies are found in pools along with the pike cichlid, a voracious predator of guppies • guppies can move between pools by swimming upstream during floods 15.7 Selection on Color in Guppies • Guppy populations above and below waterfalls exhibit many differences guppies in high-predation pools are not as colorful as guppies in low-predation pools guppies in high-predation pools tend to reproduce at an earlier age and attain relatively smaller adult body sizes these differences suggest the function of natural selection Figure 15.18 The evolution of protective coloration in guppies 15.7 Selection on Color in Guppies • John Endler conducted experiments on guppies to determine whether predation risk was really the driving selective force in this system in a controlled laboratory setting, he created artificial pool environments in which he placed guppies in one of three conditions: • • • with no predator present with killifish present (low predation risk) with cichlid present (high predation risk) after 10 guppy generations, he found that the guppies from no or low predation risk pools were both larger and more colorful than the guppies from the high predation risk pool he later found the same results in field experiments Figure 15.19 Evolutionary change in spot number 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • Speciation is the macroevolutionary process of forming new species from preexisting species it involves successive change • first, local populations become increasingly specialized • then, if they become different enough, natural selection may act to keep them that way 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • Ernst Mayr coined the biological species concept, which defines species as “groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups” • Populations whose members do not mater with each other and cannot produce fertile offspring are said to be reproductively isolated and, thus, members of different species 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • Barriers called reproductive isolating mechanisms cause reproductive isolation by preventing genetic exchange between species prezygotic isolating mechanisms • prevent the formation of zygotes postzygotic isolating mechanisms • prevent the proper functioning of zygotes once they have formed 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • There are six different prezygotic reproductive isolating mechanisms geographical isolation ecological isolation temporal isolation behavioral isolation mechanical isolation prevention of gamete fusion 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • Geographical isolation occurs simply in cases when species exist in different areas and are not able to interbreed • Ecological isolation results from two species who occur in the same area but utilize different portions of the environment and are unlikely to hybridize Figure 15.20 Lions and tigers are ecologically isolated 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • Temporal isolation results from two species having different reproductive periods, or breeding seasons, that preclude hybridization • Behavioral isolation refers to the often elaborate courtship and mating rituals of some groups of animals, which tend to keep these species distinct in nature even if they inhabit the same places 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • Mechanical isolation results from structural differences that prevent mating between related species of animals and plants • Prevention of gamete fusion blocks the union of gametes even following successful mating 15.8 The Biological Species Concept • If hybrid matings do occur, and zygotes are produced, many postzygotic factors may prevent those zygotes from developing into normal individuals in hybrids, the genetic complements of two species may be so different that they cannot function together normally in embryonic development even if hybrids survive the embryo stage, they may not develop normally finally, many hybrids are sterile Figure 15.21 Postzygotic isolation in leopard frogs. Table 15.2 Isolating Mechanisms 15.10 Working with the Biological Species Concept • Speciation is a two-part process first, initially identical populations must diverge second, reproductive isolation must evolve to maintain these differences • There are two mechanisms for speciation allopatric speciation • geographically isolated populations become new species due to their evolving reproductive isolation sympatric speciation • one species splits into two at a single locality 15.10 Working with the Biological Species Concept • Speciation is much more likely in geographically isolated populations for example, allopatric speciation can explain how isolated populations of kingfishers in New Guinea are strikingly different from each other and from the mainland population Figure 15.22 Populations can become geographically isolated for a variety of reasons 15.10 Working with the Biological Species Concept • Instantaneous sympatric speciation occurs when an individual is reproductively isolated from all other members of its species through polyploidy, a process common in plants polyploidy can arise in two ways • autopolyploidy involves all sets of chromosomes come from the same individual • allopolyploidy arises when two different species hybridize and the resulting offspring have a mixture of chromosomes the polyploids can either self-reproduce or breed with other polyploids 15.10 Working with the Biological Species Concept • There are some problems associated with the biological species concept many recognized species of plants and some animals can still hybridize • these observations suggest that reproductive isolation may not be the only force maintaining species integrity nothing is known about extinct species’ reproduction the concept is irrelevant to the many kinds of organisms who do not reproduce sexually Inquiry & Analysis • At what latitude do fish populations exhibit the greatest variability in allele a frequency? • Where along this latitudinal gradient in the frequency of allele a would you expect to find the highest frequency of heterozygous individuals? Pie chart and graph on effect of latitude on allele frequency