Download Discussion of “Coordinating Business Cycles” Christophe Chamley May 14, 2015

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Internal rate of return wikipedia , lookup

Global saving glut wikipedia , lookup

Investor-state dispute settlement wikipedia , lookup

Stock selection criterion wikipedia , lookup

Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup

International investment agreement wikipedia , lookup

Investment banking wikipedia , lookup

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

Land banking wikipedia , lookup

History of investment banking in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Investment fund wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Discussion of “Coordinating Business Cycles”
Christophe Chamley
Conference on Multiple Equilibria and Financial Crises
May 14, 2015
Multiple equilibria in a model of investment for
productivity increase
Fixed aggregate labor (only input)
Each firm: if investment at cost c, then constant marginal
lowered from 1 to α < 1.
Profit fixed fraction of sales, ⇒ profit increase proportional to
sales px: πi,j .
πi,j , i, j ∈ {0, 1} with i = 1 when firm invests, j = 1 when
other firms invest.
1
1
1
π1,0 = ( )σ−1 π0,0 , π1,1 = ( )σ−1 π0,1 , π0,1 = ( )ασ−1 π0,0 .
α
α
α
π0,1 > π0,0 iff σ < 2.
Multiple equilibria if
(α1−σ − 1)π0,0 < c(1 + ρ) < (α1−σ − 1)π0,1 .
With more substitution (endogenous labor and capital), the
upper-bound on σ increases above 2.
costs and prices
Multiple equilibria in a model of investment for
productivity increase (2)
p
1
αp
α
Demand!
with no!
aggr.!
investment
Demand!
with !
aggregate!
investment
Profit !
(no investment)
Profit !
(solo investment)
Profit (with investment!
and all firms investing)
quantity
Remarks
Extension to growth (many equilibria).
In the STD model, the individual decision is not investment but a
“capacity utilization”. Because of the equivalence of price and
production in the imperfect competition model, this is equivalent
to a lower cost of production.
Endogenous labor (and capital) in the STD model, condition
σ < S with S > 2.
STD assumption on the fundamental
Aggregate productivity parameter θt = ρθt−1 + t .
At the end of each period t, agents learn θt perfectly (from the
production).
Global game because of the possibility of arbitrarily large jumps
of t .
A simplified model for comparisons
Mass 1 of agents, action 0 (low) or 1 (high). xt is the mass of “high”
in period t.
Payoff of low is 0, payoff of high is E[θ(x + 1) − c. (c cost of high).
Perfect information: multiple equilibria if c/2 < θt < c.
Imperfect information: θt − b = a(θt−1 − b) + ηt , ηt ∼ N (0, 1/qη )
agent information sit = θt + t , t ∼ N (0, 1/q )
√
Critical value s∗ . Mass of investment xt (θt − s∗t ) = F ( pη (θt − s∗t )).
Marginal s∗ : E[θt (xt + 1)|s∗t ] = c.
R
√
E[θt |s∗t ] + θF ( pη (θt − s∗t ))dFs∗t (θ) = c.
Assume that the precision q is arbitrarily large: s∗ ≈ 2c/3
Because the distribution is highly concentrated, most agents invest if
θt > 2c/3.
Evolution of output
!!!!!! No hysteresis!
Serial correlation of output!
comes from the fundamental
(STD)
LOW ACTIVITY
c/2
HIGH ACTIVITY
2c/3
c
θ
Comparison with Guimaraes and Machado, 2014
!!!!!! No hysteresis!
Serial correlation of output!
comes from the fundamental
(STD)
LOW ACTIVITY
HIGH ACTIVITY
2c/3
c/2
c
(Guimaraes and Machado, 2014)
X
1
No!
investment
0
Investment
θ
Comparison with Chamley, “Coordinating Regime
Switches,” QJE 1999
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!No hysteresis!
Serial correlation of output comes from the fundamental
(STD)
LOW ACTIVITY
c/2
HIGH ACTIVITY
2c/3
c
θ
HIGH ACTIVITY
(C)
LOW ACTIVITY
!!
Hysteresis!
Serial correlation of output: learning the fundamental and coordination
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!