Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Optical Soliton, and Propagating Delta Function H. Vic Dannon [email protected] February, 2011 Abstract A detailed derivation of Optical Solitons, and experimental data suggest that an Optical Soliton may be modeled by a propagating Delta Function. Keywords: Optical Temporal Solitons, Nonlinear Phase, Group Velocity Dispersion, Nonlinear Optics, Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation, Infinitesimal, Delta Function, Fourier Transform, Laplace Transform, Ultrashort Light Pulses, Ultrafast Optics, Optical Catastrophe, Free Electron Laser. 2010 Physics Astronomy Classification Scheme 42.81.Dp; 42.55.Wd; 42.60.Fc; 42.65.Jx; 42.65.Re; 42.65.Tg; 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 35C08; 35Q51; 37K40; 74J35; 76B25; 35K55; 78A60;26E35; 26E30; 26E15; 26E20; 26A06; 26A12; 03E10; 03E55; 03E17; 03H15; 46S20; 97I40; 97I30; 1 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Contents Optical Solitons 1. Non-Linear Phase Function 2. Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation 3. Dispersion and phase modulation of a Gaussian pulse 4. Non-Linear Schrödinger equation for Solitons 5. The Soliton’s Envelope Equation 6. The Fundamental Soliton solution Delta Function 7. Hyper-real Line 8. Hyper-real Integral 9. Delta Function 10. The Fourier Transform 11. The Laplace Transform 12. Pulse Compression and Delta 13. Soliton and Delta Function References 2 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Optical Solitons Optical Solitons are pulses enveloping an optical frequency carrier that keep their shape as they propagate through the optical fibers. A wave packet fed into an optical fiber, evolves into a soliton if its group velocity dispersion is balanced by its self-phase modulation in the glass. That balance is attained when the frequency ω of the carrier under the pulse, remains the same before the peak of the pulse, and beyond the peak of the pulse. The frequency ω , is the time derivative of the Non-linear phase function of the pulse in the optical fiber. the phase function is necessary to obtain an expression for the wave packet that is used to derive the Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation, the Soliton’s equation The phase function depends on the frequency ω , and on the refractive index n(ω, E 0 ) , where E 0 is the Amplitude of the wave packet, and may be approximated by a Taylor polynomial in the variables ω , and E 0 . That approximation is nowhere to be found in the literature. authors seem to know about Taylor polynomials in one variable, but not in two variables. 3 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Consequently, the literature has no substantiated derivation of the Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation. We aim to show that Solitons may be represented by a Delta function, but this requires that generation of Solitons be clearly understood. In section 1, we obtain the Taylor approximation for the nonlinear phase function, and the expression for the wave packet In section 2, we derive the Non-Linear Schrödinger equation. In section 3, we discuss dispersion and phase modulation of a Gaussian pulse, in order to gain insight about pulses in general, and solitons in particular. In section 4, we obtain the Non-linear Schrödinger equation modified for solitons, and in section 5 the equation for the Soliton’s envelope equation. in section 6, we present the known fundamental Soliton solution, in a form that will enable us to establish that it may be represented by a Delta function. We do that in the second part of the paper, in sections 7-13. 4 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1. Non-Linear Phase Function Consider a wave packet of light frequencies propagating in an optical fiber, ω =∞ ∫ ψ(z , t ) = A(ω)e i(ωt −βz )d ω . ω =−∞ The wave packet may be written as ω =∞ ψ(z , t ) = e −i ω0t A(ω)e i(ω0t −βz )e i ωtd ω ∫ ω =−∞ ω =∞ Then, it is an envelope ∫ A(ω)ei(ω0t −βz )e i ωtd ω modulating a ω =−∞ carrier with frequency ω0 . The phase function is ω0t − βz . In the air, β is a constant β0 . In the optical fiber, β is a nonlinear function of ω , and of the light intensity I . We aim to express β in terms of ω , and I . G G Let E , and B be the electromagnetic fields of the wave packet. G G By Faraday’s Law, ∇ × E = −∂t B , 5 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon G G ∇ × (∇ × E ) = ∇ × (−∂t B ) , G G G ∇(∇ ⋅ E ) − ∇2E = −∂t ∇ × B , G G = −∂t ∇ × (M + μ0H ) G ρ Assuming a scalar dielectric coefficient ε = ε0 εr , and ∇ ⋅ E = . ε G Assuming no electric charges, ρ = 0 , and ∇ ⋅ E = 0 . G Assuming no magnetic charges, M = 0 , and G G −∇2E = −μ0∂t ∇ × H G G G By Ampere’s Law, ∇ × H = J + ∂t D . G G G Assuming no current, J = 0 , ∇ × H = ∂t D , and G G ∇2E = μ0∂t2D G = μ0∂t2 (ε0εr E ) G 2 = ε0μ0∂t (εr E ) Assuming a Plane Electromagnetic wave propagating in the z G direction, E = ⎡⎢ E (z , t ), 0, 0 ⎤⎥ , and ⎣ ⎦ ∂z2E = ε0 μ0∂t2 (εr E ) . The refractive index is n = εr , β = ω0 n, c0 and where 6 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1 c0 = ε0μ0 is the speed of the light in the vacuum. Since εr = n 2 , and since εr = 1 + χ , where χ is the susceptibility of the optical fiber, we have n2 = 1 + χ . In a Non-Linear Optical Medium, χE may depend on powers of the electric field E χE = χ(1)E + χ(2)E 2 + χ(3)E 3 + ... + χ(N )E N , where the coefficients χ(1), χ(2)...χ(N ) are very small. In Optical Fibers, we put χ(2) = 0 , and assume a cubic nonlinearity χE = χ(1)E + χ(3)E 3 . Therefore, n 2E = (1 + χ)E = (1 + χ(1) )E + χ(3)E 3 . Substituting a harmonic Electric field E = E 0 (z , t )cos(ωt − kz ) , n 2E 0 cos(ωt − kz ) = (1 + χ(1) )E 0 cos(ωt − kz ) + χ(3)E 03 cos3 (ωt − kz ) Since E 0 ≠ 0 , 7 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon n 2 cos(ωt − kz ) = (1 + χ(1) )cos(ωt − kz ) + χ(3)E 02 cos3 (ωt − kz ) Now, cos3 (ωt − kz ) = = 1 2 3 1 3 2 (ei(wt −kz ) + e −i(wt −kz ) )3 (e 3i(wt −kz ) + 3ei(wt −kz ) + 3e−i(wt −kz ) + e−3i(wt −kz ) ) In Optical Fibers, the third harmonics 3(wt − kz ) is negligible, and cos3 (ωt − kz ) ≈ = 3 3 2 (e i(wt −kz ) + e−i(wt −kz ) ) 3 cos(ωt − kz ) 4 Substituting into the equation for n 2 , n 2 cos(ωt − kz ) = (1 + χ(1) )cos(ωt − kz ) + 3 (3) 2 χ E 0 cos(ωt − kz ) 4 Since cos(ωt − kz ) does not vanish identically, n 2 = (1 + χ(1) ) + 3 (3) 2 χ E0 . 4 Denoting 1 + χ(1) ≡ n0 , we have 1 ⎛ n 3 χ(3) 2 ⎞⎟⎟2 = ⎜⎜⎜ 1 + E ⎟ . ⎜⎝ n0 4 n02 0 ⎠⎟ Since χ(3) is very small, 8 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 3 χ(3) 2 ≈1+ E . 8 n02 0 Thus, 3 χ(3) 2 n ≈ n0 + E . 8 n0 0 The dependence of n on the frequency ω is implicit, and we shall expand n = n(ω, E 0 ) in a Taylor Polynomial of the second order about the point ω = ω0 , n(ω, E 0 ) = n(ω0 , 0) + 1 ∂2n + 2 ∂ω 2 ∂n ∂ω ω = ω0 E0 =0 E0 = 0 . (ω − ω0 ) + ∂2n (ω − ω0 ) + ∂ω ∂ E 0 ω = ω0 2 E0 =0 ∂n ∂E 0 ω = ω0 E0 =0 E0 + 1 ∂2n (ω − ω0 )E 0 + 2 ∂E 02 ω = ω0 E0 =0 Here, ∂n ∂E 0 ∂2n ∂ ω ∂E 0 ω = ω0 E0 =0 = 3 χ(3) E 4 n0 0 ω = ω0 E0 =0 = 3 ⎛⎜ χ(3) ⎞⎟ ⎟E ⎜∂ 4 ⎜⎝⎜ ω n0 ⎠⎟⎟ 0 1 ∂2n 2 ∂E 02 3 χ(3) = 8 n0 ω = ω0 E0 =0 ω = ω0 E0 =0 Therefore, 9 = 0, ω = ω0 E0 =0 =0 ω = ω0 E0 =0 E 02 Gauge Institute Journal n(ω, E 0 ) = n(ω0 , 0) + Multiplying by k 0 = k0n(ω, E 0 ) = k0n(ω0 , 0) + β ( ω ,E 0 ) β0 H. Vic Dannon ∂n ∂ω ω = ω0 E0 =0 (ω − ω0 ) + 1 ∂2n 2 ∂ω 2 ω = ω0 E0 =0 (ω − ω0 )2 + 3 χ(3) 2 E 8 n0 0 ω0 , c0 ∂(k0n ) ω 3 χ(3) 2 1 ∂2(k0n ) (ω − ω0 ) + (ω − ω0 )2 + 0 E ∂ω ω = ω0 2 ∂ω 2 ω = ω0 c0 8 n 0 0 E0 = 0 E0 = 0 ∂β ≡ β1 ∂ω ∂ 2β ∂ω 2 ≡ β2 Denoting 3 χ(3) ≡ n2 , 4 c0ε0n02 we have, 1 1 β(ω, E 0 ) = β0 + β1(ω − ω0 ) + β2 (ω − ω0 )2 + ω0ε0n0n2E 02 . 2 2 Denoting I ≡ 1 c0 ε0n 0E 02 , 2 the refractive index is n(ω, I ) ≈ n0 + n2I , and β(ω, I ) = β0 + β1(ω − ω0 ) + ω 1 β2 (ω − ω0 )2 + 0 n2I . 2 c0 Therefore, the phase function is ⎡ ⎤ ω 1 ω0t − ⎢ β0 + β1(ω − ω0 ) + β2 (ω − ω0 )2 + 0 n2I ⎥ z , ⎢ ⎥ 2 c0 ⎣ ⎦ and the wave packet is 10 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon ω =∞ ψ(z , t ) = e−i ω0t ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ ω0t −[ β0 + β1 ( ω −ω0 )+ β2 (ω−ω0 )2 + 0 n2I ]z ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 2 ⎠⎟ i ωt e dω . ω =−∞ This wave packet leads to the Non-Linear Schrödinger equation. 11 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 2. Non-Linear Schrodinger Equation The wave packet ω =∞ ψ(z , t ) = e −i ω0t ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ ω0t −[ β0 + β1 ( ω−ω0 )+ β2 (ω −ω0 )2 + 0 n2I ]z ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 2 ⎠⎟ i ωt e dω ω =−∞ ω =∞ = ei(ω0t −β0z ) ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )( ω−ω0 )− β2 (ω−ω0 )2 z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ c0 2 ⎝⎜ ⎠⎟ dω ω =−∞ E 0 (z ,t ) is an envelope ω =∞ E 0 (z , t ) = ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )( ω−ω0 )− β2 ( ω−ω0 )2 z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 2 ⎠ dω ω =−∞ modulating the carrier e i (ω0t −β0z ) . We show that the envelope satisfies the Non-Linear Schrodinger Equation. 2 1 1 ∂z E 0 + β1∂t E 0 − i β2∂tt E 0 + i ω0ε0n0n2 E 0 E 0 = 0 2 2 ω =∞ ∂z E 0 (z , t ) = ∂z ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )( ω−ω0 )− β2 ( ω−ω0 )2 z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 2 ⎠⎟ dω ω =−∞ 12 Gauge Institute Journal ω =∞ = −i ∫ A(ω)e H. Vic Dannon ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ (t − β1z )( ω − ω0 )− β2 ( ω − ω0 )2 z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 2 ⎠⎟ ω =−∞ ω =∞ = −β1 i ∫ (ω − ω0 )A(ω)e ⎡ ⎤ ω ⎢ β1[ω − ω0 ] + 1 β2[ω − ω0 ]2 + 0 n2I ⎥ d ω ⎢ ⎥ 2 c0 ⎣ ⎦ ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )( ω −ω0 )− β2 (ω −ω0 )2 z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 2 ⎠⎟ dω ω =−∞ ∂t E 0 ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )( ω−ω0 )− β2 ( ω−ω0 )2 z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 2 ⎠⎟ ω =∞ 1 +i β2 i 2 ∫ (ω − ω0 )2 A(ω)e dω 2 ω =−∞ ∂tt E 0 ω =∞ ⎛ ⎜ 1 2 ω0 ⎞⎟ i ⎜ (t −β1z )( ω −ω0 )− β2 ( ω −ω0 ) z − n2Iz ⎟⎟ ω0 ⎜⎝ 2 c0 ⎠⎟ ω −i n 2I A ( ) e dω ∫ c0 =−∞ ω 1 ωnn E 2 0 0 2 0 2 E0 Therefore, 2 1 1 ∂z E 0 = −β1∂t E 0 + i ∂tt E 0 − i ω0ε0n 0n2 E 0 E 0 . , 2 2 We proceed to explore the possibility of a Soliton solution for the Non-Linear Schrödinger equation. To that end, we follow the propagation of a Gaussian pulse through the optical fiber. 13 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 3. Dispersion, and Phase Modulation of a Gaussian Pulse Since the wave packet is ω =∞ ψ(z , t ) = e −i ω0t ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜⎜ ω0t −[ β0 + β1 (ω −ω0 )+ β2 (ω −ω0 )2 + 0 n2I ]z ⎟⎟⎟ c0 2 ⎝ ⎠⎟ i ωt e dω , ω =−∞ we have, ω =∞ ψ(0, t ) = ∫ A(ω)ei ωtdω . ω =−∞ Therefore, t =∞ 1 A(ω) = ψ(0, t )e −i ωtdt . ∫ 2π t =−∞ Let ψ(0, t ) be a Gaussian pulse enveloping the carrier e i ω0t , − ψ(0, t ) = Ce t2 2σt2 i ω0t e . Then, t =∞ A(ω) = 1 ∫ Ce 2π t =−∞ 14 − t2 2σt2 i ω0t −i ωt e e dt Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1 2π =C ⎤ 1 ⎡ t2 − ⎢⎢ −2i (ω0 −ω )t ⎥⎥ 2 2 ⎦⎥dt e ⎣⎢ σt t =∞ ∫ t =−∞ t =∞ =C 1 ∫ 2π t =−∞ ⎤2 1 1⎡ t − ⎢ −i σt ( ω0 −ω ) ⎥ − σt2 ( ω0 −ω )2 ⎢ ⎥ 2 ⎦ e 2 ⎣ σt dt ⎛ t =∞ 1 ⎡ t ⎤2 ⎞ ⎟⎟ −1 σ 2 (ω −ω )2 ⎢ −i σt ( ω0 −ω ) ⎥ ⎜ − 1 ⎜⎜ ⎥ 2 ⎢⎣ σt ⎦ dt ⎟ ⎟⎟e 2 t 0 =C ⎜⎜ ∫ e ⎟⎟ 2π ⎜ t =−∞ ⎜⎝ ⎠⎟ Put τ = t 1 − i σt (ω0 − ω) σt 2 1 dt σt dτ = Then, 1 A(ω) = C σ 2π t τ =∞ ∫ 1 1 − τ2 − σt2 ( ω0 −ω )2 2 e dτ e 2 τ =−∞ 2π =C 1 2π 1 − σt2 ( ω−ω0 )2 σte 2 . Denoting ω − ω0 ≡ ω , A(ω) = C 1 2π The wave packet is 15 σt 1 − σt2ω2 e 2 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon ω =∞ ψ(z , t ) = e −i ω0t ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ ω 1 i ⎜⎜ ω0t −[ β0 + β1 ( ω−ω0 )+ β2 (ω −ω0 )2 + 0 n2I ]z ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ 2 c0 ⎠⎟ i ωt e dω ω =−∞ =e ⎛ ⎞ ω =∞ ω i ⎜⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ c0 ⎝ ⎠⎟ ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ 1 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )(ω−ω0 )− β2 (ω−ω0 )2 z ⎟⎟⎟ ⎝⎜ 2 ⎠⎟ dω ω =−∞ =e ⎛ ⎞ ω ω =∞ i ⎜⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎟ c0 ⎝ ⎠ ∫ A(ω)e ⎛ ⎞ 1 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )ω− β2ω 2z ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ 2 ⎠⎟ d ω =−∞ ω Plugging in the A(ω) of a Gaussian Pulse, ψ(z, t ) = C =C 1 2π σte 1 2π ⎛ ⎞ ω =∞ ω i ⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 ⎠⎟ ∫ ⎛ ⎞ 1 2 ⎟ 1 ⎜ − σt2 ω2 i ⎜⎜ (t −β1z )ω − β2ω z ⎟⎟⎟ 2 ⎠ e 2 e⎝ dω ω =−∞ σte ⎛ ⎞ ω =∞ ω i ⎜⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ c0 ⎝ ⎠⎟ ∫ 1 − ω2 σt2 +i β2z +i ( (t −β1z )ω ) . e 2 dω ( ) =−∞ ω The exponent of the integrand is 1 − ω 2 ( σt2 + i β2z ) + i(t − β1z )ω = 2 2 1 1 ⎛ ⎞ − 1⎜ 1 (t − β1z )2 ⎟⎟ 2 2 2 2 ⎜ ( σt + i β2z ) − i ( σt + i β2z ) (t − β1z ) ⎟ − = − ⎜ω ⎟⎟ 2 ⎜⎝ 2 σt2 + i β2z ⎠ ωˆ Denote ˆ = ω ( ω σt2 1 2 + i β2z ) − i ( σt2 − + i β2z ) Then, d ωˆ = ( σt2 1 2 dω , + i β2z ) 16 1 2 (t − β1z ) Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon and the wave packet is ψ(z , t ) = C 2π σte ⎛ ⎞ ω i ⎜⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ c0 ⎝ ⎠⎟ ˆ =∞ 1 ω − 2 ( σt2 + i β2z ) ∫ 1 (t −β1z )2 1 2 − ˆ − ω 2 2 e 2 d ωˆ e σt +i β2z ˆ =−∞ ω 2π = C σte ⎛ ⎞ ω i ⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c0 ⎠⎟ − ( σt2 + i β2z ) (t −β1z )2 1 −1 2 2 e 2 σt +i β2z Simplifying, 1 ( σt2 1 2 = + i β2z ) ( ( σt2 σt4 1 2 − i β2z ) + 1 2 2 2 β2 z ) 1 ⎛β z ⎞ ⎞ ⎛ 1 −i arctan⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟⎟ ⎟2 ⎜⎜ ⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟ ⎟ ⎝ σt ⎠ ⎟ ⎜⎜ ( σt4 + β22z 2 )2 e ⎟⎟ 1⎜ ⎟ ⎜⎝ 2⎜ ⎠⎟⎟ 1 = ( σt4 + β22z 2 ) = − e 1 (t −β1z )2 2 σt2 +i β2z − =e =e e ⎛ β z ⎞⎟ 1 − i arctan⎜⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟⎟ 2 ⎝⎜ σt2 ⎠⎟ ( 1 2 2 4 β2 z σt4 + ) 1 σt2 −i β2z (t −β1z )2 2 σt4 + β22z 2 σt2 β2z −1 1 (t −β1z )2 i (t −β1z )2 4 2 2 4 2 σt + β2 z 2 σt + β22z 2 e Hence, 17 Gauge Institute Journal ψ(z , t ) = C σte H. Vic Dannon ⎛ ⎞ ω i ⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ c ⎠⎟ 0 ( σt4 + −σt2 = C σte e ⎛ β z ⎞⎟ 1 − i arctan⎜⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟⎟ 2 ⎝⎜ σt2 ⎠⎟ σt4 + β22z 2 ( σt4 + (t −β1z )2 e 1 2 2 4 β2 z 1 2 2 4 β2 z e β2z 1 −σt2 1 (t −β1z )2 i (t −β1z )2 2 σt4 + β22z 2 2 σt4 + β22z 2 e ) ⎛ ⎛ β z ⎞⎟ 1 β z ⎞⎟ ω 1 2 i ⎜⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz − arctan⎜⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟⎟+ (t −β1z )2 ⎟⎟⎟ c0 2 ⎝⎜ ⎝⎜ σt2 ⎠⎟ 2 σt4 + β22z 2 ⎠⎟ ) The Power of the Pulse is proportional to −2σt2 ψ(z , t ) 2 = 4 2 2 C 2σt2e σt + β2 z (t −β1z )2 1 2 2 2 β2 z ( σt4 + . ) Amplification along optical fibers, renders them loss-less medium, and the pulse power does not dissipate with z . Alternatively, we may take β22z 2 1 σt4 . Then, ψ(z, t ) ≈ Ce ⎛ ⎛ β z ⎞⎟ β z ⎞⎟ ω 1 −1 (t −β1z )2 i ⎜⎜⎜ ω0t −β0z − 0 n2Iz − arctan⎜⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟⎟+ 2 (t −β1z )2 ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝ ⎜⎝ σt2 ⎠⎟ σt4 2 c0 σt2 ⎠⎟ e Hence, −2 2 2 σt2 ψ(z, t ) ≈ C e and the Gaussian Pulse power is 18 (t −β1z )2 , . Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon −2 σt2 P(t ) = P0e (t −β1z )2 . The intensity of the field in an optical fiber is P(t ) Aeff I = −2 = P0e σt2 (t −β1z )2 Aeff where Aeff is the effective area of the fiber’s cross section. Therefore, the phase of ψ(z, t ) is ϕ(t ) = ω0t − β0z − ω0 βz βz 1 n2Iz − arctan 2 + 2 (t − β1z )2 = 2 c0 σt2 σt4 −2 = ω0t − β0z − σt2 (t −β1z )2 ω0 P0e n c0 2 Aeff βz βz 1 z − arctan 2 + 2 (t − β1z )2 . 2 σt2 σt4 The frequency of the carrier is ω(t ) = ∂t ϕ ω P = ω0 − 0 n2 0 c0 Aeff −2 ⎛ 4 ⎞⎟ 2 (t −β1z )2 βz + 2 (t − β1z ) z ⎜⎜⎜ − (t − β1z ) ⎟⎟e σt ⎜⎝ σt2 σt4 ⎠⎟ −2 ⎛ ⎞ (t −β1z )2 ⎜⎜ ω0 P0 β2z ⎟⎟⎟ (t − β1z ) σt2 ze = ω0 + ⎜⎜ 4 n2 + ⎟ Aeff ⎜⎜ c0 σt2 ⎟⎟⎟ σt2 ⎝ ⎠ The frequency of the carrier is ω0 , only at the peak of the pulse 19 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon That is, at t = β1z . Otherwise, the frequency depends on the sign of −2 2 (t −β1z ) ω0 P0 βz σt2 ze 4 n2 + 2 . c0 Aeff σt2 The two terms in the sum have opposite signs, because in Optical Fibers n2 > 0 , and β2 < 0 . There are three cases (I) Group Velocity Dispersion If −2 2 (t −β1z ) ω0 P0 βz σt2 ze 4 n2 + 2 > 0. c0 Aeff σt2 Then, The frequency decreases before the peak of the pulse, and the carrier vibrations get dispersed The frequency increases beyond the peak of the pulse, and the carrier vibrations get compressed. (II) Self-Phase Modulation If 20 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon −2 2 (t −β1z ) 2 ω P βz 4 0 n2 0 ze σt + 2 < 0. c0 Aeff σt2 Then, The frequency increases before the peak of the pulse, and the carrier vibrations get compressed The frequency decreases beyond the peak of the pulse, and the carrier vibrations get dispersed. (III) Optical Soliton If −2 2 (t −β1z ) ω0 P0 βz σt2 ze 4 n2 + 2 = 0. c0 Aeff σt2 Then, The frequency remains the same ω0 before the peak of the pulse, and beyond the peak of the pulse. the carrier vibrations dispersion is balanced by their compression. We will modify the Non-Linear Schrödinger equation to generate a Soliton solution. 21 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 4. Non-Linear Schrodinger Equation for Solitons The condition for the evolution of a Gaussian pulse into an Optical Soliton, involves a transformed time t − β1z σt where σt is the standard deviation of the Gaussian distribution. Thus, we should expect an optical Soliton time to be of the form t − β1z , T where T is the time-width of the Soliton. But Soliton width which is not known at this point, can be introduced in a natural way after further developments. Rather than introduce an unknown T ,we transform the time t to τ = t − β1z . Then, the Soliton’s envelope moves at the group velocity vg = 1 , β1 The Non-Linear Schrödinger equation 22 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 2 1 1 ∂z E 0 + β1∂t E 0 − i β2∂tt E 0 + i ω0ε0n0n2 E 0 E 0 = 0 , 2 2 will transform to an equation that depends on T . The modulating envelope is E 0 (z , t ) = f (z , τ ) Then, ∂E 0 ∂f ∂ z ∂ f ∂ τ = + ∂z ∂z ∂ ∂z z ∂τ N N −β1 1 = ∂z f − β1∂ τ f ∂E 0 ∂f ∂ z ∂ f ∂ τ = + ∂t ∂t ∂z N ∂ t ∂τ N 0 1 = ∂τ f ∂2E 0 ∂t 2 = ∂(∂ τ f ) ∂z ∂(∂ τ f ) ∂τ + ∂z N ∂t ∂τ N ∂t 0 1 = ∂ ττ f Hence, the equation transforms to 2 1 1 ∂z E 0 + β1 ∂t E 0 − i β2 ∂tt E 0 + i ω0ε0n0n2 E 0 E 0 = 0 N N 2 N 2 ∂z f −β1∂ τ f ∂τ f ∂ ττ f f That is, 1 1 ∂z f − i β2∂ ττ f + i ω0ε0n 0n2 f 2 2 23 2 f = 0. 2 f Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 5. The Soliton’s Envelope Equation The Non-Linear Schrödinger equation 1 1 ∂z f − i β2∂ ττ f + i ω0ε0n0n2 f 2 2 2 f = 0. describes the propagation of a wave packet envelope in the optical fiber, in a coordinate system (z, τ ) that moves with the pulse peak. Since a Soliton’s envelope does not depend on z , a Soliton solution has the form f (z, τ, a ) = au(τ )eiφ(z ) , where u(τ ) is the Soliton’s envelope, τ = t − β1z . φ(z ) the Soliton’s phase, depends only on z . φ '(τ ) is unchanged with time, and a is the maximal amplitude. That is, 0 < u(τ ) ≤ 1 . Substituting in the Nonlinear Schrodinger equation, 1 1 au(τ )e iφ(z )iφ '(z ) − i β2au ''(τ )e iφ(z ) + i a 3 ω0ε0n 0n2u 2ue iφ(z ) = 0 . 2 2 24 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1 1 u(τ )φ '(z ) − β2u ''(τ ) + a 2ω0ε0n0n2u 3 = 0 2 2 φ '(z ) = 1 u ''(τ ) 1 2 β2 − a ω0ε0n0n2u 2 . 2 u(τ ) 2 Thus, both sides equal to a constant α . Hence, φ(z ) = αz , and α= 1 u ''(τ ) 1 2 β2 − a ω0ε0n0n2u 2 2 u(τ ) 2 Therefore, u ''(τ ) = 1 2αu + a 2ω0ε0n0n2u 3 ) ( β2 is the Soliton’s Envelope Equation. 25 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 6. The Fundamental Soliton solution To solve the Soliton envelope equation u ''(τ ) = 1 2αu + a 2ω0ε0n0n2u 3 ) , ( β2 multiply it by the integration factor 2u '(τ ) . 2u ' u '' = 2 Dτ ( u ' ) = 1 4αuu '+ 2a 2ω0ε0n0n2u 3u ' ) ( β2 ⎞ 1 ⎛⎜ 1 2 2 4 ⎟ 2 + α D u a ω ε n n D u ) 2 0 0 0 2 τ ( ) ⎠⎟⎟ ⎜ τ( β2 ⎜⎝ Integrating both sides with respect to τ , 2 (u ' ) = ⎞⎟ 1 ⎛⎜ 1 2 2 4 ⎜⎜ 2αu + a ω0ε0n 0n2u + C 1 ⎟⎟ . 2 β2 ⎝ ⎠ Assuming that if τ → ∞ , then u ' → 0 , and u → 0 , we have C1 = 0 , and 2 (u ' ) = ⎞ 1 ⎛⎜ 1 2 2 4⎟ 2 + α u a ω ε n n u ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 2 2 β2 ⎜⎝ ⎠⎟ = ⎞ 1 2 ⎛⎜ 1 u ⎜ 2α + a 2ω0ε0n0n2u 2 ⎟⎟⎟ 2 β2 ⎜⎝ ⎠ At τ = 0 , u(τ ) peaks to u = 1 . Then, u ' = 0 , and the equation 26 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon becomes 0= ⎞⎟ 1 ⎛⎜ 1 2 ⎜⎜ 2α + a ω0ε0n0n2 ⎟⎟ 2 β2 ⎝ ⎠ Hence, 1 2α = − a 2 ω0ε0n 0n2 . 2 Substituting into the Soliton envelope equation 2 (u ' ) = ⎞ 1 2 ⎛⎜ 1 2 1 u ⎜ − a ω0ε0n0n2 + a 2 ω0ε0n0n2u 2 ⎟⎟⎟ 2 β2 ⎜⎝ 2 ⎠ = 1 a 2 ω0ε0n0n2u 2 ( 1 − u 2 ) −2β2 In optical Fibers β2 < 0 , and since the maximum of u is 1 , the square root of the right hand side is real positive, and we have 1 u' = a ω0ε0n0n2 u 1 − u 2 . −2β2 1 T Denoting a 1 1 ω0ε0n0n2 ≡ , T −2β2 u' = 1 u 1 − u2 , T where T > 0 . du u 1 − u2 Integrating both sides, 27 = 1 dτ . T Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon ∫u du 1−u 1 T = 2 ∫ dτ + C2 . From Integration Tables, [Spiegel, p.69], 1 + 1 − u2 τ − log = + C2 . u T At τ = 0 , u(τ ) peaks to u = 1 . Then, 1 + 1 − 12 0 − log = + C2 1 T That is, 0 = C2 , and τ − 1 + 1 − u2 =e T, u τ − T (ue 2 1−u = =u − 1)2 , τ −2 e T 2 − τ − 2ue T τ ⎡ −2 τ − ⎢ T T 0 = u ⎢ u(e + 1) − 2e ⎢⎣ τ −2 u(e T τ − T u(e + 1) = τ T +e u = τ − 2e T )=2 2 τ − T e 28 τ T +e ⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥⎦ +1 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1 ⎛τ⎞ cosh ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟⎟ ⎜⎝T ⎠ = = Since a 1 ⎛ t − z / vg cosh ⎜⎜⎜ ⎜⎝ T ⎞⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎠⎟ 1 1 ω0ε0n 0n2 = , −2β2 T a = −2β2 , ω0ε0n0n2 1 T and 1 αz = − a 2ω0ε0n 0n2z 4 = β2 2T 2 z. Thus, the Fundamental Soliton solution to the Non-linear Schrödinger equation is 1 f (z , τ,T ) = T −2β2 ω0ε0n 0n2 1 ⎛ t − z / vg cosh ⎜⎜⎜ T ⎝⎜ ⎞⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎠⎟ e −i β2 2T 2 z . The Soliton’s amplitude depends on its width T . 29 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Delta Function We aim to show that the Fundamental optical Soliton can be modeled by a propagating Delta Function. The description of the Delta Function as the limit of a Delta sequence leads to divergent integrals, and to meaningless equality to the inconceivable infinity. In the Calculus of Limits, the Delta function is not defined, and its power to describe physical singularities is restricted. Using infinitesimals, and infinite hyper-real numbers, the Delta Function can be defined on the hyper-real line, an infinite dimensional line that has room for infinitesimals, and their reciprocals, the infinite hyper-reals. Then, the Delta function is the whole infinite Delta sequence, and serves to model singularities. In the next sections, we sum up the main points necessary for the definition, and the application of the Delta function 30 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 7. Hyper-real Line Each real number α can be represented by a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers, (r1, r2 , r3 ,...) so that rn → α . The constant sequence (α, α, α,...) is a constant hyper-real. In [Dan2] we established that, 1. Any totally ordered set of positive, monotonically decreasing to zero sequences (ι1, ι2 , ι3 ,...) constitutes a family of infinitesimal hyper-reals. 2. The infinitesimals are smaller than any real number, yet strictly greater than zero. 3. Their reciprocals ( 1 1 1 , , ι1 ι2 ι3 ) ,... are the infinite hyper-reals. 4. The infinite hyper-reals are greater than any real number, yet strictly smaller than infinity. 5. The infinite hyper-reals with negative signs are smaller than any real number, yet strictly greater than −∞ . 6. The sum of a real number with an infinitesimal is a non-constant hyper-real. 7. The Hyper-reals are the totality of constant hyper-reals, a family of infinitesimals, a family of infinitesimals with 31 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon negative sign, a family of infinite hyper-reals, a family of infinite hyper-reals with negative sign, and non-constant hyper-reals. 8. The hyper-reals are totally ordered, and aligned along a line: the Hyper-real Line. 9. That line includes the real numbers separated by the nonconstant hyper-reals. Each real number is the center of an interval of hyper-reals, that includes no other real number. 10. In particular, zero is separated from any positive real by the infinitesimals, and from any negative real by the infinitesimals with negative signs, −dx . 11. Zero is not an infinitesimal, because zero is not strictly greater than zero. 12. We do not add infinity to the hyper-real line. 13. The infinitesimals, the infinitesimals with negative signs, the infinite hyper-reals, and the infinite hyper-reals with negative signs are semi-groups with respect to addition. Neither set includes zero. 14. The hyper-real line is embedded in \∞ , and is not homeomorphic to the real line. There is no bi-continuous one-one mapping from the hyper-real onto the real line. 15. In particular, there are no points on the real line that can be assigned uniquely to the infinitesimal hyper-reals, or 32 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon to the infinite hyper-reals, or to the non-constant hyperreals. 16. No neighbourhood of a hyper-real is homeomorphic to an \n ball. Therefore, the hyper-real line is not a manifold. 17. The hyper-real line is totally ordered like a line, but it is not spanned by one element, and it is not one-dimensional. 33 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 8. Hyper-Real Integral In [Dan3], we defined the integral of a Hyper-real Function. Let f (x ) be a hyper-real function on the interval [a, b ] . The interval may not be bounded. f (x ) may take infinite hyper-real values, and need not be bounded. At each a ≤ x ≤b, there is a rectangle with base [x − dx2 , x + dx2 ] , height f (x ) , and area f (x )dx . We form the Integration Sum of all the areas for the x ’s that start at x = a , and end at x = b , ∑ f (x )dx . x ∈[a ,b ] If for any infinitesimal dx , the Integration Sum has the same hyper-real value, then f (x ) is integrable over the interval [a,b ] . Then, we call the Integration Sum the integral of f (x ) from x = a , to x = b , and denote it by x =b ∫ f (x )dx . x =a 34 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon If the hyper-real is infinite, then it is the integral over [a, b ] , If the hyper-real is finite, x =b ∫ f (x )dx = real part of the hyper-real . , x =a 8.1 The countability of the Integration Sum In [Dan1], we established the equality of all positive infinities: We proved that the number of the Natural Numbers, Card ` , equals the number of Real Numbers, Card \ = 2Card ` , and we have Card ` Card ` = (Card `)2 = .... = 2Card ` = 22 = ... ≡ ∞ . In particular, we demonstrated that the real numbers may be well-ordered. Consequently, there are countably many real numbers in the interval [a, b ] , and the Integration Sum has countably many terms. While we do not sequence the real numbers in the interval, the summation takes place over countably many f (x )dx . The Lower Integral is the Integration Sum where f (x ) is replaced by its lowest value on each interval [x − dx2 , x + dx2 ] 35 Gauge Institute Journal 8.2 H. Vic Dannon ∑ x ∈[a ,b ] ⎛ ⎞ ⎜⎜ inf f (t ) ⎟⎟⎟dx ⎜⎝ x −dx ≤t ≤x + dx ⎠⎟ 2 2 The Upper Integral is the Integration Sum where f (x ) is replaced by its largest value on each interval [x − dx2 , x + dx2 ] 8.3 ⎛ ⎞⎟ ⎜⎜ f (t ) ⎟⎟dx ∑ ⎜⎜ x −dxsup ⎟ dx ≤t ≤x + ⎠⎟ x ∈[a ,b ] ⎝ 2 2 If the integral is a finite hyper-real, we have 8.4 A hyper-real function has a finite integral if and only if its upper integral and its lower integral are finite, and differ by an infinitesimal. 36 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 9. Delta Function In [Dan5], we defined the Delta Function, and established its properties 1. The Delta Function is a hyper-real function defined from the ⎧ ⎪ 1 ⎫⎪ hyper-real line into the set of two hyper-reals ⎪ ⎬ . The ⎨ 0, ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ dx ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎭ 0, 0, 0,... . The infinite hyper- hyper-real 0 is the sequence real 1 depends on our choice of dx . dx 2. We will usually choose the family of infinitesimals that is spanned by the sequences 1 1 1 , , ,… It is a n n2 n3 semigroup with respect to vector addition, and includes all the scalar multiples of the generating sequences that are non-zero. That is, the family includes infinitesimals with 1 will mean the sequence n . dx negative sign. Therefore, Alternatively, we may choose the family spanned by the sequences 1 n 2 , 1 n 3 , 1 n 4 ,… Then, 1 dx will mean the sequence 2n . Once we determined the basic infinitesimal 37 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon dx , we will use it in the Infinite Riemann Sum that defines an Integral in Infinitesimal Calculus. 3. The Delta Function is strictly smaller than ∞ 1 dx δ(x ) ≡ 4. We define, where χ ⎡ −dx , dx ⎤ (x ) , ⎢⎣ 2 2 ⎦⎥ χ ⎧1, x ∈ ⎡ − dx , dx ⎤ ⎪ ⎢⎣ 2 2 ⎥⎦ . ⎪ ⎡ −dx , dx ⎤ (x ) = ⎨ ⎪ ⎣⎢ 2 2 ⎦⎥ 0, otherwise ⎪ ⎩ 5. Hence, for x < 0 , δ(x ) = 0 at x = − dx 1 , δ(x ) jumps from 0 to , 2 dx 1 . x ∈ ⎡⎢⎣ − dx2 , dx2 ⎤⎦⎥ , δ(x ) = dx for at x = 0 , at x = δ(0) = 1 dx dx 1 , δ(x ) drops from to 0 . 2 dx for x > 0 , δ(x ) = 0 . x δ(x ) = 0 6. If dx = 7. If dx = 8. If dx = 1 n 2 n 1 n , δ(x ) = , δ(x ) = χ χ (x ), 2 [− 1 , 1 ] 2 2 1 , χ (x ), 3 [− 1 , 1 ] 4 4 2 , (x )... [− 1 , 1 ] 6 6 3 2 cosh2 x 2 cosh2 2x 2 cosh2 3x ,... , δ(x ) = e−x χ[0,∞), 2e−2x χ[0,∞), 3e−3x χ[0,∞),... 38 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon x =∞ 9. ∫ δ(x )dx = 1 . x =−∞ 39 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 10. The Fourier Transform In [Dan6], we defined the Fourier Transform and established its properties 1. F { δ(x )} = 1 2. δ(x ) = the inverse Fourier Transform of the unit function 1 1 = 2π ω =∞ ∫ e i ωxd ω ω =−∞ ν =∞ ∫ = e 2πixd ν , ω = 2πν ν =−∞ ω =∞ 1 3. e i ωxd ω ∫ 2π ω =−∞ = x =0 1 = an infinite hyper-real dx ω =∞ ∫ ω =−∞ ei ωxd ω =0 x ≠0 4. Fourier Integral Theorem k =∞ ⎛ ξ =∞ ⎞⎟ ⎜⎜ 1 ⎟ ikx −ik ξ f (x ) = ⎜⎜ ∫ f (ξ )e d ξ ⎟⎟e dk ∫ ⎟ 2π k =−∞ ⎜⎝ ξ =−∞ ⎠⎟ does not hold in the Calculus of Limits, under any conditions. 40 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 5. Fourier Integral Theorem in Infinitesimal Calculus If f (x ) is hyper-real function, Then, the Fourier Integral Theorem holds. x =∞ ∫ f (x )e−i αxdx converges to F (α) x =−∞ α =∞ 1 F (α)e −i αxd α converges to f (x ) ∫ 2π α =−∞ 41 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 11. The Laplace Transform In [Dan7], we have shown that 1. The Delta function δ(t ) , for t ≥ 0 is represented by Sequence δn (t ) = ne−nt 2. If in = χ [0,∞ ) (t ) . 1 , δ(x ) = e−t n χ [0,∞ ) (t ), 2e−2t χ [0,∞ ) (t ), 3e−3t χ [0,∞ ) (t ),... 3. L { δ(t )} = 1 4. δ(t ) = the inverse Laplace Transform of the unit function 1 1 = 2πi s =i ∞ ∫ estds . s =−i ∞ s = γ +i ∞ 1 5. 2πi s ∫ e stds = γ −i ∞ = t =0 1 = an infinite hyper-real dt s = γ +i ∞ ∫ s = γ −i ∞ e stds = 0. t ≠0 6. Laplace Integral Theorem If f (t ) is hyper-real function, Then, the Laplace Integral Theorem holds. 42 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon s = γ +i ∞ ⎛ τ =∞ ⎞⎟ 1 − τ st ⎜ s f (t ) = e ⎜⎜ ∫ e f (τ )d τ ⎟⎟⎟ds ∫ ⎟ 2πi s =γ −i∞ ⎜⎜⎝ τ =0 ⎠⎟ t =∞ ∫ e −st f (t )dt , converges to F (s ) t =0 s = γ +i ∞ 1 e st F (s )ds converges to f (t ) . ∫ 2πi s = γ −i ∞ 43 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 12. Pulse Compression and Delta Pulse Compression is used to generate Optical Solitons, with narrower width T , and larger amplitudes proportional to 1 that T are used to generate even more compressed Solitons. An infinite sequence of compressed pulses with indefinitely narrowing widths and growing amplitudes constitutes a Delta function. The narrowing widths include less carrier cycles, and require higher carrier frequencies. At X-ray frequencies the laser mirrors have to be replaced by dielectric mirrors, and as the frequency increases, at Attosecond (Atto=10-18 ) pulses, no mirrors will do, and a different compression method has to be applied. Physically, such Delta Pulse Sequence is unattainable. However, similarly to considering the sizes of a charge or a point light source as infinitesimal and representing them by a Delta function, we shall ignore the physical limitations on realizing an ideal infinitesimal-width Optical Soliton, and model the sequence of narrowing Solitons by a Delta function. 44 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 12.1 Pulse Width, and Delta A system that combines dispersion with self-phase modulation will generate a narrower output pulse. In [Siegman, p.393] an input pulse of 5,900 f sec , (femto=10-15 ) enters a 3 meter optical fiber, and is broadened to a pulse of 10,000 f sec . That pulse enters a diffraction grating that compresses it into an output pulse of 200 f sec . That pulse enters a 0.55 meter optical fiber, followed by a diffraction grating, that compresses it into an output pulse of 90 f sec . Pulses of 90 f sec generated in a Dye laser have been compressed to 30 f sec -the shortest width attained in 1986. A Titanium-Sapphire laser [W-1] generates pulses in the range of 100 f sec , down to 10 f sec . The shortest width attained in 1999 was 5.5 f sec . In 2008, 2.5 f sec pulses, containing only one or two cycles of the carrier, were used in the [W-3] experiment. Narrower pulses were generated, but not in optical fibers, and not as Solitons with amplitude that grows as the width narrows. 45 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon [W-2] describes the evolution up to 2008, of Ultrashort Pulses into the Attosecond range (Atto=10-18 ). Evolution of ultrashort light pulses up to 2008. (from [W-2]) The Attosecond flushes were attained, by firing ultrashort laser pulses into a cloud of neon gas, generating carrier in the extreme ultraviolet range. In [W-2] such Attosecond flushes from Argon, were used to stroboscope-light and film the motion of an electron, after it was separated from an atom, in time period of a single carrier cycle. By [W-3], the shortest such flush in 2011 is 80 Attoseconds. In Comparison, an electron circles the nucleus in 150 Attosecond. 12.2 Pulse Power, and Delta By [W-6], A carrier wave from an Argon or Nd:YVO4 laser with average output power of 0.5 to 1.5 Watts, pumps a Titaniumsapphire laser of mode-locked oscillator type. 46 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon The Ti:Sapphire oscillator generates pulses with duration as short as 5 f sec . According to [Weiner,p.405], at 100 f sec , the peak power of the pulse is 104 Watts. This Corresponds to maximum intensity 108 W/m2 =1012 W/cm2. By [W-6], this pulse is supplied to a Titanium-sapphire laser of Chirped-pulse amplifier type, designed to withstand the damaging power of the pulse. The Ti:Sapphire laser amplifier may use Chirped mirrors [W-7] to guide the beam several times through the crystal, while keeping the pulse width below the damage threshold, or it may use optical switches, to insert the pulse in the cavity, and retrieve it later. The Ti:Sapphire amplifier generates pulses with duration of 20 to 100 f sec with energy of 5 mJouls . At 100 f sec , the peak power of the pulse is 50 GegaWatts . An electric power plant peaks to 1 GW. This corresponds to maximum intensity (25)1020 W/m2 =(25)1024 W/cm2 Thus, the Delta function is suitable to describe short energetic Optical Fiber Solitons. 47 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 13. Solitons and Delta Sequence 13.1 Soliton’s Delta The Soliton 1 f (z , t,T ) = T −2β2 ω0ε0n0n2 1 ⎛ t − z / vg cosh ⎜⎜⎜ ⎜⎝ T ⎞⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎠⎟ e −i β2 2T 2 z , has the envelope 1 T −2β2 ω0ε0n0n2 1 ⎛ t − z / vg cosh ⎜⎜⎜ T ⎝⎜ ⎞⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎠⎟ , where 3 χ(3) n2 = , 4 c0ε0n02 n(ω, E 0 ) ≈ n0 + n2 ( 12 c0ε0n0E 02 ) is the refractive index, β ≡ β2 ≡ ω0 n(ω, E 0 ) , c0 ∂2 β ∂ω 2 , ω = ω0 E0 =0 vg is the envelope velocity, T is the Soliton’s width. 48 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Denote γ ≡ −2β2 , ω0ε0n0n2 τ ≡ t − z / vg , T = dz . The Delta function representing this envelope is the Hyper-real function 1 γ dz For dz = 1 ⎛ t − z / vg cosh ⎜⎜⎜ ⎜⎝ dz ⎞⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎠⎟ . 1 , this Delta function is represented by the sequence n γ 2γ 3γ ,... , , cosh ( t − z / vg ) cosh 2 ( t − z / vg ) cosh 3 ( t − z / vg ) 13.2 Each δn (τ ) = n 1 π cosh n τ τ =∞ has the sifting property ∫ τ =−∞ is continuous peaks at τ = 0 to δn (0) = Proof: By [Spiegel, p.88], 49 n π δn (τ )d τ = 1 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon τ =∞ τ =∞ n 1 n2 nτ d arctan ( e ) τ = ∫ π cosh n τ τ =−∞ πn τ =−∞ = 2 [arctan(∞) − arctan(0)] π π /2 0 = 1 ., Thus, the sequence represents the hyper-real Delta Function 13.3 δ(τ ) = 1 2 3 , , ,... cosh τ cosh 2τ cosh 3τ plots in Maple, the 50th component, 50 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon plots in Maple the 200th component, 51 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon References [Bowman] Bowman, Frank, Introduction to Bessel Functions, Dover, 1958 [Dan1] Dannon, H. Vic, “Well-Ordering of the Reals, Equality of all Infinities, and the Continuum Hypothesis” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.6 No 2, May 2010; [Dan2] Dannon, H. Vic, “Infinitesimals” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.6 No 4, November 2010; [Dan3] Dannon, H. Vic, “Infinitesimal Calculus” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.7 No 3, August 2011; [Dan4] Dannon, H. Vic, “Riemann’s Zeta Function: the Riemann Hypothesis Origin, the Factorization Error, and the Count of the Primes”, in Gauge Institute Journal of Math and Physics, November 2009. [Dan5] Dannon, H. Vic, “The Delta Function” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.7 No 4, November 2011; [Dan6] Dannon, H. Vic, “Delta Function, the Fourier Transform, and Fourier Integral Theorem” September 2010, posted to www.gauge-institute.org [Dan7] Dannon, H. Vic, “Delta Function, the Laplace Transform, and Laplace Integral Theorem” September 2010, posted to www.gauge-institute.org [Dan8] Dannon, H. Vic, “Polar Delta Function, and the 2-D Fourier-Bessel Transform” October 2010, posted to www.gauge-institute.org [Dan9] Dannon, H. Vic, “Radial Delta Function, and the 3-D Fourier-Bessel Transform” October 2010, posted to www.gauge-institute.org [Dirac] Dirac, P. A. M. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition, Oxford Univ press, 1935. [Gray] Gray, Andrew, and Mathews, G.B., A Treatise on Bessel Functions and their applications to Physics, Dover 1966 52 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon [Hen] Henle, James M., and Kleinberg Eugene M., Infinitesimal Calculus, MIT Press 1979. [Hosk] Hoskins, R. F., Standard and Nonstandard Analysis, Ellis Horwood, 1990. [Keis] Keisler, H. Jerome, Elementary calculus, An Infinitesimal Approach, Second Edition, Prindle, Weber, and Schmidt, 1986, pp. 905-912 [Laug] Laugwitz, Detlef, “Curt Schmieden’s approach to infinitesimals-an eyeopener to the historiography of analysis” Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Preprint Nr. 2053, August 1999 [Mikus] Mikusinski, J. and Sikorski, R., “The elementary theory of distributions”, Rosprawy Matematyczne XII, Warszawa 1957. [Rand] Randolph, John, “Basic Real and Abstract Analysis”, Academic Press, 1968. [Riemann] Riemann, Bernhard, “On the Representation of a Function by a Trigonometric Series”. (1) In “Collected Papers, Bernhard Riemann”, translated from the 1892 edition by Roger Baker, Charles Christenson, and Henry Orde, Paper XII, Part 5, Conditions for the existence of a definite integral, pages 231-232, Part 6, Special Cases, pages 232-234. Kendrick press, 2004 (2) In “God Created the Integers” Edited by Stephen Hawking, Part 5, and Part 6, pages 836-840, Running Press, 2005. [Schwartz] Schwartz, Laurent, Mathematics for the Physical Sciences, Addison-Wesley, 1966. [Siegman] Siegman, Anthony, Lasers University Science, 1986. 53 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon [Spiegel] Spiegel Murray, Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables. McGraw-Hill, 1968. [Temp] Temple, George, 100 Years of Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 1981. pp. 19-24. [Watson] Watson, G. N., A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, 2nd Edition, Cambridge, 1958. [Weiner] Weiner, Andrew, Ultrafast Optics, Wiley 2009. [W-1] http://www.rp-photonics.com/titenium_sapphire_lasers.html [W-2] http://web.archive.org/web/20080303014710/www.atto.fysik.lth.se/research/research.html [W-3] http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14172-fastestever-flashgun-captures-image-of-light... [W-4] http://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/free-electron_laser [W-5] http://www.digitaltrends.com/international/u-s-navys-giant-laser-beam-program-achieves-... [W-6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ti-sapphire_laser [W-7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirped_mirror http://www.rp-photonics.com/titanium_sapphire_lasers.html 54