* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Study on the Particularity of a Low-carbon Economy Under the
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Climate Change conference wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Carbon governance in England wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Study on the Particularity of a Low-carbon Economy Under the International Institutional Arrangements QU Jianzhong, XING Lirong School of Economy, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong, P.R.China, 255049 [email protected] Abstract: This paper studies the particularity of low-carbon economy under the international institutional arrangements of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), its Kyoto Protocol and Copenhagen Accord from the perspectives of institutional arrangements and concludes that low-carbon economy is not only a product based on the certain level of the development of productive forces and production relations, but also result of institutional arrangements. The institutional arrangements give each country the responsibilities and obligations of developing low-carbon economy and show greater, wider and further impact on every field in the world than that of other economies. The institutional arrangements combine the economic area, political area together with spiritual realm. Keywords: institutional arrangements, low-carbon economy, energy revolution, carbon trading 1. Introduction Issues such as global warming and energy security arouse strong concern among the international community, thus the concept of low-carbon economy emerged and has been frequently uses by the international community, in particular, the convening of United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December 2009. Low-carbon economy becomes the cutting-edge ideas and global hot topics once again among the academics and policy makers both at home and abroad. As at the initial stage of low-carbon economy, there are still large differences in the understanding of its implications. The main representative interpretations are as follows. (1) The Cutting-edge Concept. The low-carbon economy is a cutting-edge economic concept with broad social characteristics, guiding the direction of revolution in all areas of the society. (2) New Industrial Revolution. The low-carbon economy cored as the energy revolution is the fourth industrial revolution after the first, second and third industrial revolution marked with the invention of steam engine, electricity and computer and internet respectively. It will lead to completely changes in all aspects of global production, circulation, consumption, distribution and management system. (3) Economic Development Model. The low-carbon economy is a brand-new economic development model, evolving from the high-carbon energy to low-carbon energy, involving the full optimization of industrial structure and energy structure and complete revolution of modes of production and lifestyle. (4) New Economic Form. The low-carbon economy is a new economic form. About the economic form, there are three different views. First, the low-carbon economy is regarded as a new social economic form after the hunting economy, agricultural economy, industrial economy and information economy. Second, the low-carbon economy is viewed as a new market economic form, a kind of institutional economy. Third, low-carbon economy is considered the same as eco-economy, recycling economy and green economy, designed to solve environmental crisis and energy crisis. All the various interpretations of the low carbon economy are concerning one problem: low-carbon economy is a new economy influencing global economic development. Since it is a new economy, it has its uniqueness distinguishing from other economies. Due to the background of international institutional arrangements, low-carbon economy is given distinguished characters distinct from other economies. This paper provides some research on the above. 473 2. International Institutional Arrangements of Low-carbon Economy Douglass. C. North thought that institutions are social game rules and will provide specific incentives framework, thus creating a variety of economic, political and social organization. Institutions are made of formal rules (laws, constitution and regulations), informal rules (habits, ethics and codes of conduct) and their implementation effects. So far, international institutional arrangements of low-carbon economy refer to the “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”, and its “Kyoto Protocol” and “Copenhagen Accord”. In 1960s, United Nations began to concern the harm of global warming to human society. In 1970s, United Nations launched global climate changing process through the form of international law. Finally “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” was passed in the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992 and entered into force in March 21, 1994. From 1995, the Conference to Parties (COP) holds once a year. In 1997, the Third Conference of Parties adopted “the Kyoto Protocol” as an effective agreement of “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”. Under the Kyoto Protocol, 37 industrialized countries commit themselves to a reduction of their collective greenhouse gas (four greenhouse gases and two groups of gases) emissions during 2008~2012 by 5.2% from the 1990 level. Kyoto Protocol coming into effect in February 16, 2005, provides quantified emission-reduction targets only for the developed countries, but no legal binding emission limitation or reduction obligation requirements for developing countries. Up till now, the number of the parties to UNFCCC is 194, among which 190 members have ratified the Kyoto Protocol. However, the Kyoto Protocol does not regulate global warming gases emission-reduction after 2012. In December, 2007, on the thirteenth Conference of Parties in Bali, Indonesia, the parties reached “Bali Road Map”, deciding new agreement on post-2012 global warming shall be signed in Copenhagen on the fifteenth Conference of Parties in December, 2009. In the COP fifteenth, the parties reached a non-legally binding Copenhagen Accord. Based on the data released by the Secretariat of UNFCCC on March 31, 2010, 112 countries (111 countries plus EU containing 27 members) agree the Copenhagen Accord, among which 41 developed countries present the emission-reduction targets up to 2020 and 35 developing countries release their emission reduction action plans on the foundation of obtaining the supportive capital and technology, but still more than 80 countries do not express their ideas on the Copenhagen Accord. United Nations plan to continue negotiations and try to reach a “post-Kyoto agreement” in November 29 to December 10, 2010 in Cancun summit in Mexico. International institutional arrangements of low-carbon economy give each country the responsibility and obligations to develop low-carbon economy and integrate the economic field, political field and spiritual realm. Some experts point out “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”, known as the United Nations “Climate Constitution”, together with its “Kyoto Protocol” and the forthcoming second commitment period surrounding the “post-Kyoto agreement”, with “UN Charter”, “Establishment of WTO Agreement”, will become the world’s most important legal documents and generate great impact on the world’s political and economic structure. In addition, in order to put pressure and influence on the countries’ carbon emission reduction, reports, reviews, initiatives and protests on carbon emissions also belong to an international low-carbon system arrangements no matter they are from intergovernmental international organizations (such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, the International Energy Agency, etc.) or non-governmental international organizations (such as the World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, etc.). 3. Analysis on the Particularity of Low-carbon Economy in the International Institutional Arrangements 474 The formation of a new type of economy is bound to have a major impact on various aspects of social reproduction and change its operation mode and mechanism, further influence and restrain people’s economic action and lifestyle. International institutional arrangements of the low-carbon economy make it distinct from any of the formation and development of the economy. The apparent uniqueness are as follows. 3.1 Characteristics of institutional economy of low-carbon economy in the international institutional arrangements “The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”, and its “Kyoto Protocol” and the “Copenhagen Accord” propose the requirement of greenhouse gases emission reductions and specific reduction targets and obligations on major countries. Although still a non-binding regulation, the Accord clearly defines countries in the world “common, but differentiated responsibilities of global climate change” and stresses the problem of global climate changing which can not be solved by any one country and has to depend on the joint efforts of all the countries in the world. Under this circumstance, irrespective of energy, environment and the needs for human’s survival, low-carbon economy is not an economy whether a country is willing to implement or not, but has to implement just from the perspectives of social responsibility of institutional arrangements. Parties in order to achieve emission reduction targets certainly implement institutional reforms at home first, such as establishing carbon emission standards, levying carbon taxes, implementing compensation paid for carbon credits. Low-carbon domestic institutional arrangements surely push this country on the way of low-carbon development. Unlike other economies mainly achieving through market role, low-carbon economy has to depend on both market roles and institutional roles. Low-carbon economy is a significant problem involving global human security and sustainable development and no country shall shirk its responsibilities. 3.2 Obvious characteristics of carbon diplomacy of low-carbon economy in the international institutional arrangements Carbon diplomacy refers to the bilateral and multilateral diplomatic negotiations on the problem of reducing greenhouse gas emissions among countries or regions within the framework of international collaboration under the “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” and its “Kyoto Protocol” and “Copenhagen Accord”. In addition to the organization and promotion of United Nations, low-carbon economy has been implemented by some countries and regions, such as the European Union, the United States and Japan by virtue of its technical advantages in this area for realizing various political and economic purposes, protecting the environment, improving climate. These countries practice the UNFCCC and carbon diplomacy frequently. Multilateral carbon diplomacy mainly relates to the problems of global coordination of carbon emissions and distribution of carbon emissions space, while bilateral carbon diplomacy concerns more about low-carbon innovation, cooperation and competition for low-carbon technologies and product development space, because each country hopes to share larger market and greater profit in the area of new energy and low-carbon technology. In short, based on international carbon institutional arrangements, the diplomatic background is the unique feature that any other economy does not own. Therefore, carbon diplomacy has increasingly become the focus of global diplomacy. For instance, characteristics of carbon diplomacy have been rather obvious in the bilateral US-China high-level contacts since 2009 and the field of climate changes is the core issue of bilateral cooperation. 3.3 Great impact on the national foreign trade policy of low-carbon economy in the international institutional arrangements Any kind of previous economy does not have such direct and clear influence on the national foreign economic and trade policies as low-carbon economy because of international institutional arrangements. 3.3.1 The international low-carbon institutional arrangements provide a basis for foreign trade and 475 economic policies For example, according to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), its Kyoto Protocol and Copenhagen Accord, countries such as EU and US prepare to collect carbon taxes on the high-carbon products. Carbon taxes collection is to urge countries to respond to and implement international conventions, thus to decrease carbon emission. Although carbon tariffs have not been implemented so far, with the rising pressure of climate warming and energy and gradual promotion of international negotiations under the “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” together with the further development of low-carbon economy, it is not impossible to implement carbon tariffs. Once implemented, carbon tariffs will have a significant impact on trade in energy-intensive products. 3.3.2 The domestic low-carbon institutional arrangements provide a basis for foreign economic and trade policies For instance, those countries imposing carbon tariffs on imports usually impose carbon tax measures on domestic products to restrain high-carbon products. The implementation of carbon tariffs is to follow the principle of national treatment and fair competition. 3.4 The characteristics of simultaneous development of virtual economy and real economy of low-carbon economy in the international institutional arrangements The real economy of low-carbon economy mainly refers to production and distribution activities of low-carbon products, technologies and services. Virtual economy of low-carbon economy mainly refers to financial activities serving the greenhouse gas emissions reduction. The reason for simultaneous development of virtual and real economy is the formation of a special carbon market in international low-carbon institutional arrangements. Any economy will generate some new products, technologies and services market, but in an international low-carbon institutional arrangements low-carbon economy forms a kind of carbon credits exchange market, apart from the formation of low-carbon products, technologies and services markets. Carbon credits exchange market is quite different from general product, technology and service market in trading participants, transaction objects, trading modes, price formation mechanisms. “Kyoto Protocol” provides three “offshore emissions” flexible mechanisms for developed countries meeting their greenhouse gas emission reduction obligations. One is Emission Trading (ET). It means a country may sell the remaining credits to those countries that may not fulfill their obligation, if this country over fulfills its obligation, that is, its emissions lower than the required standards in the Convention for those developed countries with emission reduction obligations. One is Joint Implementation (JI). The other is Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The latter two mechanisms mean countries bearing emission reduction obligations may invest in other low-cost countries and the saving emission reduction credits are returned to the investing countries offsetting their emission reduction obligations. The difference between the latter two mechanisms is that the second is applicable among developed countries while the last is available between developed countries and developing countries. These three mechanisms allow the rapid expansion of carbon trading market in some countries both domestically and internationally. According to World Bank statistics, global carbon turnover was 31.2 billion U.S. dollars in 2006, 63.01 billion U.S. dollars in 2007, 135.1 billion U.S. dollars in 2008, 143.7 billion U.S. dollars in 2009. The United Nations and the World Bank predicts that market capacity of global carbon trading is about 190 billion U.S. dollars in 2012 and will exceed the oil market to become the world’s largest market. Inevitably carbon credits will replace oil as the world’s largest commodity. The expansion of global carbon trading market enhances the level of carbon currency. Carbon emissions further derivative as financial assets with investment value and liquidity, driving the development of global carbon finance market, thus low-carbon swaps, low-carbon stock, low-carbon futures, low-carbon funds, low-carbon project development financing and other related financial intermediary activities emerge. The development of carbon finance further promotes global carbon market value chain division 476 and the carbon emissions trading market further expands. 3.5 Special international social responsibility of a company given by low-carbon economy in the international institutional arrangements Low-carbon economy in the international and national institutional arrangements is not only just an economic development model, but also a rule to affect the operation of the global economy and businesses philosophy, model, and changing means through the power of regulation, media, morality and idea. Businesses and consumers are given a kind of social responsibilities to protect environment and resources, so that low-carbon products and low-carbon operation become new competitive factors in the global economy. Some multinational companies have begun to consider low-carbon as an important condition for selection of suppliers. For example, Wal-Mart, Procter & Gamble, Unilever and other companies require suppliers to measure and report their greenhouse gas emissions, urging suppliers to provide low-carbon products. The purpose is to respond to national carbon tax policies and consumer resistance to high-carbon products, meanwhile to enhance the image of corporate social responsibility. This can give the global corporate international social responsibility, which other economy can never do. 4. Conclusion The above analysis shows that low-carbon economy in the international carbon institutional arrangements possesses obvious specialty compared with other forms of economies. Low-carbon economy is not only a product based on the certain level of the development of productive forces and production relations, but also the promotion of institutional arrangements. The institutional arrangements give countries the responsibilities and obligations of developing low-carbon economy and show greater, wider and further impact on every field in the world than that of other economies. The institutional arrangements combine the economic area, political area together with spiritual realm. Low-carbon economy has become the development trend of world economy and all the state, enterprises and individuals should promote low-carbon concept, develop low-carbon industries and products and advocate low-carbon life, thus to promote sustainable development of economy and society. References [1]. Zhou Hongchun. The World’s Carbon Trading Market and Inspiration. China Soft Science, 2009: No. 12, p. 39~48( In Chinese) [2]. Chen Liuqin. Low-carbon Economy: a New Model of Economic Development. Central South Forestry University (Social Science Edition) 2010: No. 1, p. 80~85 ( In Chinese) [3]. Su Zhenfeng. Low-carbon Economy, Ecological Economy, Circular Economy and Green Economy. China Social Science Report (edition 009), 2010: April 3 ( In Chinese) [4]. Zhuang Guiyang., Low-carbon Economy Leading the World Economic Development. World Environment, 2008: No. 2, p. 34~36 ( In Chinese) [5]. Christopher L. Weber, Glen P. Peters. Climate Change Policy and International Trade: Policy Considerations in the US, Energy Policy, 2009: 2, p. 432~440 [6]. Ian Bailey. Copenhagen and the New Political Geographies of Climate Change, Political Geography, 2010: 3, p. 127~129 477