* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download document 8899479
History of the function concept wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard analysis wikipedia , lookup
Karhunen–Loève theorem wikipedia , lookup
Hyperreal number wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of calculus wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Dirac delta function wikipedia , lookup
Multiple integral wikipedia , lookup
Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup
Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon The Fourier-Bessel Integral of the Polar Delta of a Complex Variable and of an Analytic Function H. Vic Dannon [email protected] January, 2011 Revised December, 2014 Abstract The Fourier-Bessel Transform applies to a function of two variables that has a polar symmetry g(x , y ) = f (r) . The Transform r =¥ Bess { f (r)} = 2p ò f (r)J 0 (2pnr)rd r r =0 is the integration sum over 0 £ r < ¥ of the infinitesimal projections 2p f (r)rd r on the Polarly symmetric Bessel functions J 0 (2pnr) . The Fourier-Bessel Transform, and Integral would be particularly applicable to functions f (z ) of Complex variable z = rei q 1 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon But No attempt was made to define it. We define here the Fourier-Bessel Transform of the Complex Polar Delta Function, and the Fourier-Bessel Transform of a hyper-complex Analytic function f (z ) , along a closed path gz in the complex plane z . Then, 1. the Fourier-Bessel Integral of Hyper-complex Polar Delta is d(z - z ) = (2p)2 z ò J 0 (2pnz )J 0 (2pnz )nd n . n =dr 2. the Cauchy Integral Formula f (z ) = 1 2pi ò gz f (z ) dz , z -z yields the Fourier-Bessel Integral Theorem æ ö÷ çç ÷ f (z ) = 2p ò ççç 2p ò f (z )J 0(2pnz )zdz ÷÷÷÷J 0(2pnz )ndn . n =1 è z -z =1 ø 3. The convergence of the Fourier Integral implies the existence of the Fourier Transform of f (z ) , and its inverse transform: If f (z ) is a hyper-complex analytic function on a hypercomplex domain that includes the circle z - z = 1 , Then, 2 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1) the hyper-complex integral 2p ò f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zd z z -z =1 converges to F (n ) º ( Bessel {f (z )} )(n ) 1) the hyper-complex integral 2p ò F (n )J 0 (2pnz )nd n n =1 converges to -1 f (z ) º ( Bessel {F (n )} )(z ) Keywords: Infinitesimal, Infinite-Hyper-Real, Hyper-Real, Cardinal, Infinity. Non-Archimedean, Non-Standard Analysis, Calculus, Limit, Continuity, Derivative, Integral, Complex Variable, Complex Analysis, Analytic Functions, Holomorphic, Cauchy Integral Theorem, Cauchy Integral Formula, Contour Integral. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 26E35; 26E30; 26E15; 26E20; 26A06; 26A12; 03E10; 03E55; 03E17; 03H15; 46S20; 97I40; 97I30. 3 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Contents Introduction 1. Hyper-real Line 2. Hyper-Complex Plane 3. Hyper-Complex Function 4. Hyper-Complex Path Integral 5. Hyper-real Delta Function 6. Hyper-Complex Delta Function d(z ) 7. Cauchy Integral Formula 8. Hyper-real Fourier Transform 9. Hyper-real Polar Delta Function d(r - s) s 10. Hyper-real Fourier-Bessel Transform 11. Hyper-Complex Bessel Function J 0 (z ) 12. Hyper-Complex Polar Delta Function 13. Fourier-Bessel Transform of 14. Fourier-Bessel Integral of d(z - z ) z d(z - z ) z d(z - z ) z 15. Fourier-Bessel Integral of Analytic f (z ) 4 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 16. Fourier-Bessel Transform of Analytic f (z ) References 5 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Introduction 0.1 The Fourier-Bessel Transform The Fourier-Bessel Transform applies to a function of two variables that has a polar symmetry g(x , y ) = f (r) . The Transform r =¥ Bess { f (r)} = 2p ò f (r)J 0 (2pnr)rd r r =0 is the integration sum over 0 £ r < ¥ of the infinitesimal projections 2p f (r)rd r on the Polarly symmetric Bessel functions J 0 (2pnr) . Calculus of Limits Conditions for the Fourier-Bessel Integral Theorem stated in [Watson, p. 458], require the existence of r =¥ lim l ¥ ò r =0 æ w =l ö÷ çç f (r)ç ò J 0 (ws )J 0 (wr)wd w ÷÷÷rd r çç ÷ è w =0 ø÷ We have shown in [Dan10] that as l ¥ , the Bessel functions integral with respect to w = 2pn is singular. Hence, in the Calculus of Limits, the Transform is not defined. The Fourier-Bessel Transform would be particularly applicable to functions of Complex variable 6 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon z = re iq But No attempt was made to define it. f (z ) , as defined by Titchmarsh, does The Fourier Transform of not suggest a path to follow: 0.2 The Fourier Transform of f (z ) The Fourier Transform of a function of Complex variable is defined in [Titchmarsh, p. 44], in THEOREM 26. Let f (z ) be an analytic function, regular for -a < y < b , where a > 0 , b > 0 . In any strip interior to -a < y < b , and for any e > 0 , let ìï O(e-(l-e)x ), (x ¥) , f (z ) = ïí ïïO(e(m-e)x ), (x -¥) î where l > 0 , m > 0 . Then, F (w ) = 1 z =¥ ò 2p z =-¥ f (z )e i wzdz satisfies conditions similar to those imposed on f (z ) , 7 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon with a, b, l, m replaced by l, m, b, a ; and f (z ) = 1 w =¥ ò 2p w =-¥ F (w)e -i wzd w In [Dan11], we noted that the Conditions of Theorem 26 above, limit the integration path to the real line. Instead of integrating along a closed path such as which may be homologous to a unit circle, the Conditions require the function to approximately vanish out of a compact interval, and limit the admissible functions that may have a Fourier Transform. For an Analytic Function these Conditions are unnecessary, because Cauchy Theorem, Cauchy Integral Formula, and the Residue Theorem hold along paths in the complex plane. The limitation is particularly awkward considering that an Analytic function is inseparable from its disk of convergence, and 8 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon its derivative may be obtained in any radial direction. Under the limitations, the Fourier Transform F (w) is an analytic function in a strip parallel to the x axis. At the borders of the strip, the Analytic F (w) which is inseparable from its disk of convergence, will have one sided derivative. Nevertheless, similar conditions that define the Fourier-Bessel Transform of f (z ) , were not found. 0.3 Definition along a Closed Path Here, we show that Cauchy Integral Formula yields the FourierBessel Integral of an Analytic Function. That is, for an Analytic function, the Cauchy Integral Formula, and the Fourier-Bessel Integral, coincide. The Fourier-Bessel Integral defines the Fourier-Bessel Transform of an Analytic function f (z ) along a closed path. We start by recalling the Hyper-real line, and the Hyper-Complex Plane. 9 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1. Hyper-real Line Each real number a can be represented by a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers, (r1, r2 , r3 ,...) so that rn a . The constant sequence (a, a, a,...) is a constant Hyper-real. In [Dan2] we established that, 1. Any totally ordered set of positive, monotonically decreasing to zero sequences (i1, i2 , i3 ,...) constitutes a family of infinitesimal Hyper-reals. 2. The infinitesimals are smaller than any real number, yet strictly greater than zero. 3. Their reciprocals ( 1 1 1 , , i1 i2 i3 ) ,... are the infinite Hyper-reals. 4. The infinite Hyper-reals are greater than any real number, yet strictly smaller than infinity. 5. The infinite Hyper-reals with negative signs are smaller than any real number, yet strictly greater than -¥ . 6. The sum of a real number with an infinitesimal is a non-constant Hyper-real. 10 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 7. The Hyper-reals are the totality of constant Hyper-reals, a family of infinitesimals, a family of infinitesimals with negative sign, a family of infinite Hyper-reals, a family of infinite Hyper-reals with negative sign, and non-constant Hyper-reals. 8. The Hyper-reals are totally ordered, and aligned along a line: the Hyper-real Line. 9. That line includes the real numbers separated by the nonconstant Hyper-reals. Each real number is the center of an interval of Hyper-reals, that includes no other real number. 10. In particular, zero is separated from any positive real by the infinitesimals, and from any negative real by the infinitesimals with negative signs, -dx . 11. Zero is not an infinitesimal, because zero is not strictly greater than zero. 12. We do not add infinity to the Hyper-real line. 13. The infinitesimals, the infinitesimals with negative signs, the infinite Hyper-reals, and the infinite Hyper-reals with negative signs are semi-groups with respect to addition. Neither set includes zero. 11 Gauge Institute Journal 14. H. Vic Dannon The Hyper-real line is embedded in ¥ , and is not homeomorphic to the real line. There is no bi-continuous one-one mapping from the Hyper-real onto the real line. 15. In particular, there are no points on the real line that can be assigned uniquely to the infinitesimal Hyper-reals, or to the infinite Hyper-reals, or to the non-constant Hyperreals. 16. No neighbourhood of a Hyper-real is homeomorphic to an n ball. Therefore, the Hyper-real line is not a manifold. 17. The Hyper-real line is totally ordered like a line, but it is not spanned by one element, and it is not one-dimensional. 12 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 2. Hyper-Complex Plane Each complex number a + i b can be represented by a Cauchy sequence of rational complex numbers, r1 + is1, r2 + is2 , r3 + is 3 ... so that rn + isn a + ib . The constant sequence (a + i b, a + i b, a + i b,...) is a Constant Hyper-Complex Number. Following [Dan2] we claim that, 1. Any set of sequences (i1 + i o1, i2 + i o2 , i3 + i o3 ,...) , where (i1, i2 , i3 ,...) belongs to one family of infinitesimal hyper reals, and (o1, o2 , o3 ,...) belongs to another family of infinitesimal hyper-reals, constitutes a family of infinitesimal hypercomplex numbers. 2. Each hyper-complex infinitesimal has a polar representation dz = (dr )eif = o*e if , where dr = o* is an infinitesimal, and f = arg(dz ) . 3. The infinitesimal hyper-complex numbers are smaller in length, than any complex number, yet strictly greater than 13 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon zero. 4. Their reciprocals ( 1 , 1 , 1 i1 +i o1 i2 +i o2 i3 +io3 ) ,... are the infinite hyper- complex numbers. 5. The infinite hyper-complex numbers are greater in length than any complex number, yet strictly smaller than infinity. 6. The sum of a complex number with an infinitesimal hypercomplex is a non-constant hyper-complex. 7. The Hyper-Complex Numbers are the totality of constant hyper-complex numbers, a family of hyper-complex infinitesimals, a family of infinite hyper-complex, and nonconstant hyper-complex. 8. The Hyper-Complex Plane is the direct product of a HyperReal Line by an imaginary Hyper-Real Line. 9. In Cartesian Coordinates, the Hyper-Real Line serves as an x coordinate line, and the imaginary as an iy coordinate line. 10. In Polar Coordinates, the Hyper-Real Line serves as a Range r line, and the imaginary as an iq coordinate. Radial symmetry leads to Polar Coordinates. 11. The Hyper-Complex Plane includes the complex numbers separated by the non-constant hyper-complex 14 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon numbers. Each complex number is the center of a disk of hyper-complex numbers, that includes no other complex number. 12. In particular, zero is separated from any complex number by a disk of complex infinitesimals. 13. Zero is not a complex infinitesimal, because the length of zero is not strictly greater than zero. 14. We do not add infinity to the hyper-complex plane. 15. The hyper-complex plane is embedded in ¥ , and is not homeomorphic to the Complex Plane . There is no bicontinuous one-one mapping from the hyper-complex Plane onto the Complex Plane. 16. In particular, there are no points in the Complex Plane that can be assigned uniquely to the hyper-complex infinitesimals, or to the infinite hyper-complex numbers, or to the non-constant hyper-complex numbers. 17. No neighbourhood of a hyper-complex number is homeomorphic to a n ball. Therefore, the Hyper-Complex Plane is not a manifold. 18. The Hyper-Complex Plane is not spanned by two elements, and is not two-dimensional. 15 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 3. Hyper-Complex Function 3.1 Definition of a hyper-complex function f (z ) is a hyper-complex function, iff it is from the hyper-complex numbers into the hyper-complex numbers. This means that any number in the domain, or in the range of a hyper-complex f (x ) is either one of the following complex complex + infinitesimal infinitesimal infinite hyper-complex 3.2 Every function from complex numbers into complex numbers is a hyper-complex function. 3.3 sin(dz ) has the constant hyper-complex value 1 dz 16 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon (dz )3 (dz )5 Proof: sin(dz ) = dz + - ... 3! 5! sin(dz ) (dz )2 (dz )4 = 1+ - ... dz 3! 5! 3.4 cos(dz ) has the constant hyper-complex value 1 (dz )2 (dz )4 + - ... Proof: cos(dz ) = 1 2! 4! 3.5 edz has the constant hyper-complex value 1 Proof: e dz (dz )2 (dz )3 (dz )4 = 1 + dz + + + + ... 2! 3! 4! 1 1 1 3.6 e dz is an infinite hyper-complex, and e dz = e dr 1 1 Proof: e dz = e dr Re[e-if ] 1 = e dr cos f cos f . . 3.7 log(dz ) is an infinite hyper-complex, and log(dz ) > dr1 Proof: log(dz ) = [log(dr )]2 + f2 > log(dr ) > 17 1 dr Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 4. Hyper-Complex Path Integral Following the definition of the Hyper-real Integral in [Dan3], the Hyper-Complex Integral of f (z ) over a path z (t ) , t Î [a, b ] , in its domain, is the sum of the areas f (z )z '(t )dt = f (z )dz (t ) of the rectangles with base z '(t )dt = dz , and height f (z ) . 4.1 Hyper-Complex Path Integral Definition Let f (z ) be hyper-complex function, defined on a domain in the Hyper-Complex Plane. The domain may not be bounded. f (z ) may take infinite hyper-complex values, and need not be bounded. Let z (t ) , t Î [a, b ] , be a path, g(a, b ) , so that dz = z '(t )dt , and z '(t ) is continuous. For each t , there is a hyper-complex rectangle with base [z (t ) - dz2 , z (t ) + dz2 ] , height f (z ) , and area f (z (t ))dz (t ) . We form the Integration Sum of all the areas that start at z (a) = a , and end at z (b ) = b , 18 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon å f (z (t ))dz (t ) . t Î[ a, b ] If for any infinitesimal dz = z '(t )dt , the Integration Sum equals the same hyper-complex number, then f (z ) is Hyper-Complex Integrable over the path g(a, b ) . Then, we call the Integration Sum the Hyper-Complex Integral of f (z ) over the g(a, b ) , and denote it by ò f (z )dz . g (a ,b ) If the hyper-complex number is an infinite hyper-complex, then it ò equals f (z )dz . g (a ,b ) If the hyper-complex number is finite, then its constant part equals ò f (z )dz . g (a ,b ) The Integration Sum may take infinite hyper-complex values, such as 1 dz , but may not equal to ¥ . The Hyper-Complex Integral of the function f (z ) = 1 over a path z that goes through z = 0 diverges. 4.2 The Countability of the Integration Sum 19 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon In [Dan1], we established the equality of all positive infinities: We proved that the number of the Natural Numbers, Card , equals the number of Real Numbers, Card = 2Card , and we have Card Card = (Card )2 = .... = 2Card = 22 = ... º ¥ . In particular, we demonstrated that the real numbers may be well-ordered. Consequently, there are countably many real numbers in the interval [a, b ] , and the Integration Sum has countably many terms. While we do not sequence the real numbers in the interval, the summation takes place over countably many f (z )dz . 4.3 Continuous f (z ) is Path-Integrable Hyper-Complex f (z ) Continuous on D is Path-Integrable on D Proof: Let z(t ) , t Î [a, b ] , be a path, g(a, b ) , so that dz = z '(t )dt , and z '(t ) is continuous. Then, f (z (t ))z '(t ) = ( u(x (t ), y(t )) + iv(x (t ), y(t )) )( x '(t ) + iy '(t ) ) 20 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon = éë u(x (t ), y(t ))x '(t ) - v(x (t ), y(t ))y '(t ) ùû + U (t ) +i éë u(x (t ), y(t ))y '(t ) + v(x (t ), y(t ))x '(t ) ùû V (t ) = U (t ) + iV (t ) , where U (t ) , and V (t ) are Hyper-Real Continuous on [a, b ] . Therefore, by [Dan3, 12.4], U (t ) , and V (t ) are integrable on [a, b ] . Hence, f (z (t ))z '(t ) is integrable on [a, b ]. Since t =b ò f (z (t ))z '(t )dt = t =a ò g (a ,b ) f (z ) is Path-Integrable on g(a, b ) . 21 f (z )dz , Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 5. Hyper-real Delta Function In [Dan5], we defined the Hyper-real Delta Function, and established its properties 1. The Delta Function is a Hyper-real function defined from the ïì 1 ïü Hyper-real line into the set of two Hyper-reals ïí 0, ïý . The îïï dx þïï Hyper-real 0 is the sequence real 0, 0, 0,... . The infinite Hyper- 1 depends on our choice of dx . dx 2. We will usually choose the family of infinitesimals that is spanned by the sequences 1 1 1 , , ,… It is a 2 3 n n n semigroup with respect to vector addition, and includes all the scalar multiples of the generating sequences that are non-zero. That is, the family includes infinitesimals with negative sign. Therefore, 1 will mean the sequence n . dx Alternatively, we may choose the family spanned by the 22 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 1 sequences 2n , 1 3n 1 , 4n ,… Then, 1 dx will mean the sequence 2n . Once we determined the basic infinitesimal dx , we will use it in the Infinite Riemann Sum that defines an Integral in Infinitesimal Calculus. 3. The Delta Function is strictly smaller than ¥ d(x ) º 4. We define, 1 dx where c é -dx , dx ù (x ) , êë 2 2 úû c ïïì1, x Î éê - dx , dx ùú ë 2 2 û. é -dx , dx ù (x ) = í ïï 0, otherwise ëê 2 2 ûú î 5. Hence, for x < 0 , d(x ) = 0 at x = for 1 dx , d(x ) jumps from 0 to , dx 2 1 x Î éêë - dx2 , dx2 ùûú , d(x ) = . dx at x = 0 , at x = d(0) = 1 dx 1 dx , d(x ) drops from to 0 . dx 2 for x > 0 , d(x ) = 0 . x d(x ) = 0 23 Gauge Institute Journal 6. If dx = 7. If dx = 8. If dx = 1 n 2 n 1 n , d(x ) = H. Vic Dannon c , d(x ) = 2 2 1 , ò c (x ), 3 [- 1 , 1 ] 4 4 2 , (x )... [- 1 , 1 ] 6 6 3 2 cosh2 x 2 cosh2 2x 2 cosh2 3x ,... , d(x ) = e -x c[0,¥), 2e-2x c[0,¥), 3e-3x c[0,¥),... x =¥ 9. c (x ), 2 [- 1 , 1 ] d(x )dx = 1 . x =-¥ 24 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 6. Hyper-Complex Delta Function d(z ) In [Dan9], we introduced the Complex Delta Function: 1) The Hyper-Complex Delta Function is defined from the HyperComplex plane into the set of two hyper-complex numbers, ìïï 1 üïï í 0, ý. ïîï 2pidz ïþï The hyper-complex 0 is the sequence The infinite hyper-complex Arg z = f . 0, 0, 0,... . 1 1 1 1 -if = e depends on 2pi dz 2pi dr 1 will mean the sequence n . dr 2) d(z ) is an infinite hyper-complex on the infinitesimal hyper-complex disk z £ dr . In particular, d(z ) < ¥ 3) For any infinitesimal dz , on the disk, z - z 0 £ dr , d(z - z 0 ) = 25 1 1 . 2pi dz Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon off the disk, for z - z 0 > dr , d(z - z 0 ) = 0 . 4) d(z - z 0 ) = c 1 1 -i(f-f0 ) e { z -z 0 £dr }(z ) , 2pi dr where f = arg z , f0 = arg z 0 ì 0, z - z 0 > dr ï ï ( z ) . = í { z -z 0 £dr } ï 1, z z dr £ 0 ï î c 1 1 e -inf 5) (d(z ))n = 6) d(z - z ) = 7) d 1 1 d(z - z ) = dz 2pi (z - z )2 n n (2pi ) (dr ) c{ d 1 ( Log(z - z ) ) dz 2pi in the disk z - z £ dr , c{ 8) dz k d(z - z ) = c{ , n = 2, 3, ... z -z £dr }(z ) z -z £dr }(z ) d 1 1 -2i q d(z - z ) = . e dz 2pi (dr )2 off the disk, in z - z > dr , dk z £dr }(z ) 1 k! 2pi (z - z )k +1 d d(z - z ) = 0 . dz c{ k z £dr }(z ) in the disk z - z £ dr , d k d(z - z ) = dz 26 k! 1 e -i (k +1)q , + 1 k 2pi (dr ) Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon off the disk, in z - z > dr , 9) d(az ) = 10) dz k d(z - z ) = 0 . 1 d(z ) a z1 = only zero of f (z ) , f '(z1 ) ¹ 0 d( f (z )) = 11) dk 1 d(z - z1 ) f '(z1 ) z1, z 2 are the only zeros of f (z ) ; f '(z1 ), f '(z 2 ) ¹ 0 d( f (z )) = 12) d(z 2 - a 2 ) = 1 1 d(z - z1 ) + d(z - z 2 ) f '(z1 ) f '(z 2 ) 1 1 d(z - a ) + d(z + a ) 2a 2a 13) d ( (z - a )(z - b) ) = 1 1 d(z - a ) + d(z - b) a -b b -a 14) z1,...zn are the only zeros of f (z ) ; f '(z1 ),.., f '(zn ) ¹ 0 d( f (z )) = 1 1 d(z - z1 ) + ... + d(z - zn ) f '(z1 ) f '(zn ) 27 Gauge Institute Journal 15) H. Vic Dannon z1, z 2 ,... are zeros of f (z ) , f '(z1 ), f '(z 2 ),... ¹ 0 d( f (z )) = 1 1 d(z - z1 ) + d(z - zn ) + ... f '(z1 ) f '(zn ) 16) d(sin z ) = .. + d(z + 2p) - d(z + p) + +d(z ) - d(z - p) + d(z - 2p) + .. ò 17) d(z - z )d z = 1 z -z =dr 18) If f (z ) is Hyper-Complex Differentiable function at z ò Then, f (z )d(z - z )d z = f (z ) z-z =dr 19) 20) d f (z ) = dz dk dz k f (z ) = ò f (z ) z -z =dr ò d d(z - z )dz dz f (z ) z -z =dr 28 dk dz k d(z - z )dz Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 7. Cauchy Integral Formula 7.1 Cauchy Integral Formula If f (z ) is Hyper-Complex Differentiable function on a Hyper- Complex Simply-Connected Domain D . Then, f (z ) = 1 2pi f (z ) ò z - z d z , g for any loop g , and any point z in its interior. f (z ) is Differentiable z -z on the Hyper-Complex Simply-Connected domain D , and on Proof: The Hyper-Complex function a path that includes g and an infinitesimal circle about z . 29 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon Then, the integrals on the lines between g and the circle have opposite signs and cancel each other. The integral over the circle has a negative sign because its direction is clockwise, and by Cauchy Integral Theorem, f (z ) ò z - z d z - ò g z -z =dr f (z ) dz = 0 . z -z Therefore, ò g f (z ) dz = z -z ò z -z =dr = 2pi f (z ) dz z -z ò f (z ) z -z =dr 1 1 dz . 2 i z p z d (z -z ) f (z ) 30 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 8. Hyper-real Fourier Transform In [Dan6], we defined the Fourier Transform and established its properties 1. { d(x )} = 1 2. d(x ) = the inverse Fourier Transform of the unit function 1 w =¥ 1 = ei wxd w ò 2p w =-¥ n =¥ ò = e 2pixd n , w = 2pn n =-¥ 1 3. 2p w =¥ ò e i wxd w w =-¥ = x =0 1 = an infinite Hyper-real dx w =¥ ò w =-¥ ei wxd w =0 x ¹0 4. Fourier Integral Theorem k =¥ æ x =¥ ÷÷ö ikx çç 1 -ik x f (x ) = ò ççç ò f (x )e d x ÷÷÷÷e dk 2p k =-¥ è x =-¥ ø does not hold in the Calculus of Limits, under any 31 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon conditions. 5. Fourier Integral Theorem in Infinitesimal Calculus If f (x ) is a Hyper-real function, Then, the Fourier Integral Theorem holds. x =¥ ò f (x )e-i axdx converges to F (a) x =-¥ 1 2p a =¥ ò F (a)e -i axd a converges to f (x ) a =-¥ 6. 2-Dimesional Fourier Transform y =¥ x =¥ { f (x , y )} = ò ò f (x , y )e -i wx x -i wyy dxdy y =-¥ x =-¥ y =¥ x =¥ = ò ò f (x , y )e -2 pi (nx x + nyy ) dxdy , y =-¥ x =-¥ wx = 2pnx wy = 2pny 7. 2-Dimesional Inverse Fourier Transform -1 { F (wx , wy )} = wy =¥ wx =¥ 1 2 (2p) ò ò wy =-¥ wx =-¥ 32 F (wx , wy )e i ( wx x + wy y ) d wxd wy Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon ny =¥ nx =¥ ò = ò F (2pnx , 2pny )e 2 pi (nx x +nyy ) d nxd ny , ny =-¥ nx =-¥ 8. wx = 2pnx wy = 2pny 2-Dimesional Fourier Integral Theorem æ h =¥ x =¥ ÷÷ö i (wx x + wyy ) çç -i wx x -i wy h f (x , y ) = d xd h ÷÷e d wxd wy ò ò ç ò ò f (x, h)e ÷÷ (2p)2 w =-¥ w =-¥ ççè h =-¥ x =-¥ ø y x 1 wy =¥ wx =¥ w =¥ w =¥ æ ö æ ÷ö çç 1 y çç 1 x i wy (y - h ) ÷÷ i wx (x -x ) ÷ ÷ ÷ = ò d wx ÷d x çç e d wy ÷d h ò f (x, h)ççç 2p ò e ÷÷ ÷÷ çç 2p ò è wx =-¥ ø è wy =-¥ h =-¥ x =-¥ ø h =¥ x =¥ ö÷ æ nx =¥ ö÷ æç ny =¥ wx = 2pnx çç 2 pi ny (y - h ) ÷ 2 pi nx (x -x ) ÷ ç d nx ÷÷d x çç ò e d ny ÷÷d h , = ò ò f (x, h)ççç ò e ÷ ÷ wy = 2pny è nx =-¥ ø÷ èçç ny =-¥ h =-¥ x =-¥ ø÷ h =¥ x =¥ 9. 2-Dimesional Delta Function wy =¥ w =¥ æ ö÷çæ ÷ö÷ çç 1 x 1 i wyy i wx x ÷ ç d ( x, y ) = ç e d wx ÷÷çç e d wy ÷÷ ÷ çç 2p ò ÷÷çç 2p ò è wx =-¥ øè wy =-¥ ø÷ ö æ nx =¥ öæç ny =¥ ÷ wx = 2pnx ÷ çç p n 2 i y ÷ = ç ò e 2pi nx xd nx ÷÷÷ççç ò e y d ny ÷÷ , ÷÷ wy = 2pny çç ÷÷çç è nx =-¥ øè ny =-¥ ø 33 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 9. d(r - s ) Hyper-real Polar Delta s In [Dan10], we defined the Hyper-real Polar Delta Function, and established its properties: Denoting d(r - s ) = 1 dr c[s- d(f - q) = 1 df c[q- (r) , r - s ³ 0 , dr ,s + d r ] 2 2 (f) , 0 £ f - f0 £ 2p , df ,q + d f ] 2 2 1) Transforming between Polar and Cartesian Coordinates x = r cos f , y = r sin f x = s cos q , h = s sin q d(x - x )d(y - h ) = 2) s > 0, 1 d(r - s )d(f - q) , s 2pd(x - x )d(y - h ) = 34 d(r - s) s Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon d(r - s) = 2pd(x - x )d(y - h) s 3) is the Polarly Symmetric Delta Function, 4) Transforming between Polar and Cartesian Coordinates x = r cos q y = r sin q wx = w cos g , wy = w sin g x = s cos f h = s sin f n =¥ d(x - x )d(y - h ) = (2p)2 ò J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns)ndn n =0 d (r - s ) 5) s n =¥ 3 = (2p) ò J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns )nd n n =0 w =¥ = 2p ò J 0 (wr)J 0 (ws)wd w w =0 6) Sifting by dPolar (r - s) s =¥ ò s =0 d(r - s ) sd s = 1 s 35 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon w =¥ d(r - s) = 2ps ò J 0 (wr)J 0 (ws )wd w w= 0 7) n =¥ 3 = (2p) s ò n =0 36 J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns)nd n Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 10. Hyper-real 2-D Fourier-Bessel Transform In [Dan10], we defined the Hyper-real 2-D Fourier-Bessel Transform, established its properties, and showed that the Fourier-Bessel Integral holds: 1) The 2-D Fourier-Bessel Transform r =¥ Bess { f (r)} = 2p ò f (r)J 0 (rw)rd r r =0 r =¥ = 2p ò f (r)J 0 (2pnr)rd r , w = 2pn r =0 2) The 2-D Inverse Fourier-Bessel Transform -1 Bess 1 { F (w ) } = 2p w =¥ ò F (w)J 0 (rw)wdw , w= wx2 + wy2 w =0 n =¥ = 2p ò F (2pn )J 0 (2pnr)nd n , w = 2pn n =0 37 Gauge Institute Journal 3) H. Vic Dannon Fourier-Bessel Integral Theorem If f (r) is Hyper-real function, Then, the Fourier-Bessel Integral Theorem holds. n =¥ æ s =¥ ö÷ çç f (r) = 2p ò ç 2p ò f (s)J 0 (2pns )sd s ÷÷÷J 0 (2pnr)nd n ç ÷ è s =0 ø÷ n =0 ç s =¥ = ò s =0 4) n =¥ æ ÷ö÷ çç 2 f (s )ç (2p) ò J 0 (2pns )J 0 (2pnr)nd n ÷÷ sds . çç ÷÷ è ø n =0 Existence of the Transform, and its Inverse If f (r) is Hyper-real function, Then, s =¥ 2p ò f (s)J 0 (2pns )sd s converges to F (2pn ) s =0 n =¥ 2p ò F (2pn )J 0 (2pnr)nd n converges to f (r) n =0 38 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 11. Hyper-complex Bessel Function J 0 (z ) for any complex number z in , z = x + iy = re if , The Hyper-Complex Bessel Function J 0 (z ) is defined [Abramowitz] as the sum of its Taylor Series, J 0 (z ) = 1 - 1 4 z2 (1!)2 + ( 14 z 2 )2 (2!)2 - ( 14 z 2 )3 (3!)2 + ... and in [Watson, p.16], z2 z4 z6 = 1 - 2 + 2 2 - 2 2 2 + ... 2 24 246 = J 0 (-z ) which is even in z . The Series converge, and J 0 (z ) is Analytic for any z in . 39 in Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 12. Hyper-Complex Polar Delta d(z - z ) Function z Denote z = x + iy = reif , z = x + i h = sei q , n =¥ 12.1 d(z - z ) 1 (2p)2 ò J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns )nd n , = q i z i se n =0 = Proof: 1 d(r - s ) -i Arg(z ) e 2pi s d(z - z ) 1 d(x - x + i[y - h ]) = if z se = 1 se if d(x - x )d(i[y - h ]) . Since d(i[y - h ]) = 1i d(y - h ) , = 1 i se if d(z - z ) is z d(x - x )d(y - h ) 40 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon n =¥ Since by 9.4, d(x - x )d(y - h ) = (2p)2 ò J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns)ndn , n =0 n =¥ d(z - z ) 1 (2p)2 ò J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns )nd n = f i z i se n =0 = 1 2pi se if n =¥ 3 (2p) ò J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns )nd n n =0 n =¥ Since by 9.7, d(r - s ) = (2p)3 ò J 0 (2pnr)J 0 (2pns )nd n , n =0 d(z - z ) 1 d(r - s ) -i Arg(z ) . e = 2pi z s 41 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 13. Fourier-Bessel Transform of d(z - z ) z 13.1 The Fourier-Bessel Transform of hyper-complex f (z ) The Fourier-Bessel Transform of the hyper-complex function f (r) = u(r) + iv(r) of a hyper-real r is the Integration Sum r =¥ 2p å f (r)J 0 (2pnr)rd r . r =0 As r varies, the infinitesimal projections of 2p f (r)d r on J 0 (2pnr) , namely, 2p f (r)J 0 (2pnr)d r , sum up to the Fourier-Bessel Transform of f (r) . We define the Fourier-Bessel Transform of a hyper-complex function f (z ) ( Bessel {f (z )} )(n ) along a closed path g(z ) by the Integration Sum 2p å f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zd z . z Îg 13.2 Fourier-Bessel Transform of 42 d(z - z ) z Gauge Institute Journal Bessel { H. Vic Dannon d(z - z ) } = 2p å d(z - z )J 0 (2pnz )d z . z z Îg Without loss of generality, g may be the unit circle z = eif . Therefore, Bessel { 13.3 Proof: Bessel { d(z - z ) } = 2pJ 0 (2pnz ) z d(z - z ) } = 2p z ò d(z - z ) J 0 (2pnz )zd z z ò d(z - z )J 0 (2pnz )d z z =1 = 2p z =1 By Cauchy Theorem, = 2p 1 2pi ò z =dr 1 J (2pnz )d z z -z 0 By Cauchy Integral Theorem, = 2pJ 0 (2pnz ) z =z = 2pJ 0 (2pnz ) . 43 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 14. Fourier-Bessel Integral of d(z - z ) z 14.1 Inverse Complex Fourier-Bessel Transform of HyperComplex F (n ) We define the Inverse Fourier-Bessel Transform of a hypercomplex function F (n ) -1 {F (n )} )(z ) ( Bessel along a closed path g(n ) by the Integration Sum 2p å F (n )J 0 (2pnz )nd n . n Îg 14.2 Fourier-Bessel Integral of d(z - z ) = (2p)2 z ò d(z - z ) z J 0 (2pnz )J 0 (2pnz )nd n n =dr Proof: Since Bessel { d(z - z ) } = 2pJ 0 (2pnz ) , z 44 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon the inverse Transform of 2pJ 0 (2pnz ) is d(z - z ) . z That is, -1 {2pJ 0 (2pnz )} = Bessel d(z - z ) . z By 14.1, the Inverse Transform along a closed path g(n ) is the Integration Sum 2p å {2pJ 0 (2pnz )}J 0 (2pnz )nd n . n Îg Therefore, d(z - z ) = 2p å {2pJ 0 (2pnz )}J 0 (2pnz )nd n z n Îg Taking g(n ) to be the infinitesimal circle n = dr = 2p ò {2pJ 0 (2pnz )}J 0 (2pnz )nd n . n =dr By Cauchy Integral Theorem, the integration path may be along the unit circle. Hence, 14.3 Fourier-Bessel representation of d(z - z ) d(z - z ) = (2p)2 z ò J 0 (2pnz )J 0 (2pnz )ndn n =1 45 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 15. Fourier-Bessel Integral of an Analytic f (z ) 15.1 Fourier-Bessel Integral Theorem for hyper-complex Analytic f (z ) , along infinitesimals paths If f (z ) is a hyper-complex analytic function, Then, the Complex Fourier-Bessel Integral Theorem holds: ö÷ æ çç ÷ f (z ) = 2p ò çç 2p ò f (z )J 0(2pnz )zdz ÷÷÷÷J 0(2pnz )ndn , n =1 ç è z -z =e ø where e is infinitesimal Proof: By the Cauchy Integral Formula, 5.1, f (z ) = 1 2pi f (z ) ò z - z d z , g By Cauchy Integral Theorem, = 1 2pi ò z -z =dr 46 f (z ) dz , z -z Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon By the definition of d(z ) , = ò f (z )d(z - z )d z , z -z = e Substituting from 14.3, d(z - z ) = (2p)2 z ò J 0 (2pnz )J 0 (2pnz )nd n , n =1 æ ö÷ çç ÷ 2 f (z ) = ò f (z )ççç (2p) z ò J 0(2pnz )J 0(2pnz )nd n ÷÷÷÷d z . z -z = e n =1 è ø By changing the Summation order, æ ö÷ çç ÷ f (z ) = 2p ò ççç 2p ò f (z )J 0(2pnz )zdz ÷÷÷÷J 0(2pnz )nd n . n =1 è z -z = e ø Similarly, we obtain 15.2 Fourier Integral Theorem for f (z ) on Unit Circles If f (z ) is a hyper-complex analytic function, in a hyper-complex domain that contains the unit circle z - z = 1 Then, the Complex Fourier-Bessel Integral Theorem holds. æ ö÷ çç ÷ f (z ) = 2p ò ççç 2p ò f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zd z ÷÷÷÷J 0(2pnz )nd n n =1 è z -z =1 ø Proof: By the Cauchy Theorem, the Fourier-Bessel summation 47 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 2p ò f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zd z , z -z = e along the infinitesimal circle z - z = e , can be done along the unit circle. Hence it equals 2p ò f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zd z . z -z =1 Therefore, ö÷ æ çç ÷ f (z ) = 2p ò ççç 2p ò f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zdz ÷÷÷÷J 0 (2pnz )nd n n =1 è z -z = e ø æ ÷÷ö çç = 2p ò çç 2p ò f (z )J 0(2pnz )zd z ÷÷÷÷J 0(2pnz )nd n . n =1 ç è z -z =1 ø It follows that due to 14.3, the Fourier-Bessel representation of d(z - z ) , 15.3 For an Analytic Hyper-Complex Function f (z ) , the Fourier-Bessel Integral is the Cauchy Integral Formula for f (z ) 48 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 16. Fourier-Bessel Transform of an Analytic f (z ) The convergence of the Fourier Integral of a hyper-complex analytic function f (z ) , implies the existence of the Fourier Transform of f (z ) , and its inverse transform 16.1 If f (z ) is a hyper-complex analytic function on a hypercomplex domain that includes the circle z - z = 1 , Then, 2) the hyper-complex integral 2p ò f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zd z z-z =1 converges to F (n ) º ( Bessel {f (z )} )(n ) 3) the hyper-complex integral 49 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon 2p ò F (n )J 0 (2pnz )nd n n =1 converges to -1 f (z ) º ( Bessel {F (n )} )(z ) Proof: The convergence æ ö÷ çç ÷ = 2p ò ççç 2p ò f (z )J 0(2pnz )zd z ÷÷÷÷J 0(2pnz )nd n = f (z ) n =1 è z -z =1 ø mandates that 1) The Complex Fourier-Bessel Transform of f (z ) , 2p ò f (z )J 0 (2pnz )zd z , z-z =1 converges to a hyper-complex function F (n ) , some of its values may be infinite hyper-complex, like the complex Delta Function. 2) The Inverse Complex Fourier-Bessel Transform of F (n ) 2p ò F (n )J 0 (2pnz )nd n n =1 converges to the hyper-complex function f (z ) . 50 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon References [Abramowitz] Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I., “Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas Graphs and Mathematical Tables”, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, 1964. [Bremermann] Hans Bremermann, “Distributions, Complex Variables, and Fourier Transforms” Addison-Wesley, 1965 [Dan1] Dannon, H. Vic, “Well-Ordering of the Reals, Equality of all Infinities, and the Continuum Hypothesis” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.6 No 2, May 2010; [Dan2] Dannon, H. Vic, “Infinitesimals” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.6 No 4, November 2010; [Dan3] Dannon, H. Vic, “Infinitesimal Calculus” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.7 No 4, November 2011; [Dan4] Dannon, H. Vic, “The Delta Function” in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.8 No 1, February 2012; [Dan5] Dannon, H. Vic, “Infinitesimal Vector Calculus” in Gauge Institute Journal [Dan6] Dannon, H. Vic, “Circular and Spherical Delta Functions” in Gauge Institute Journal [Dan7] Dannon, H. Vic, “Infinitesimal Complex Calculus” in Gauge Institute Journal, Vol. 10 No. 4, November 2014. [Dan8] H. Vic Dannon, “Delta Function, the Fourier Transform, and Fourier Integral Theorem”, in Gauge Institute Journal Vol.8 No 2, May 2012. [Dan9] “Complex Delta Function” in Gauge Institute Journal 51 Gauge Institute Journal H. Vic Dannon [Dan10] “Polar Delta Function, the 2-D Fourier-Bessel Transform, and the 2D Fourier-Bessel Integral” in Gauge Institute Journal [Dan11] “The Fourier Integral of the Complex Delta Function and of an Analytic Function” in Gauge Institute Journal [Needham] Tristan Needham, “Visual Complex Analysis” Oxford U. Press, 1998 (with corrections) [Paley, Wiener] Raymond Paley, and Norbert Wiener, “Fourier Transforms in the Complex Plane” American Mathematical Society, 1934 [Sneddon] Ian Sneddon, “Fourier Transforms”, McGraw-Hill, 1959. [Titchmarsh] E. C. Titchmarsh “Introduction to the theory of Fourier Integrals”, Third Edition, Chelsea, 1986. nd [Watson] Watson, G. N., A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, 2 Edition, Cambridge, 1958. 52