* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Obliteration of Harmonics on a VSI Fed Induction Motor Drive
Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic compatibility wikipedia , lookup
Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup
Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Chirp compression wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Solar micro-inverter wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 3 (2016) pp 2071-2076 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com Obliteration of Harmonics on a VSI Fed Induction Motor Drive C. K. Shankar PG scholar, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India. A. P. Roger Rozario Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India. Dr. C. Ganesh Head of Department, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India. G. Leo sekar PG scholar, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India. electrical to mechanical energy conversion is done by induction motors. Induction machine has found a wide acceptance in most of the industrial applications [4]. Their rugged, simple construction, reliability at lower cost combined with the demand for less maintenance, high efficiency and need for a simple starting arrangement has made their deep penetration into energy conversion process possible. Induction motors are driven from a voltage source inverter as need for variable power at output is needed for specific applications. This can be achieved through pulse width modulation of inverter which provide internal control scheme for the variable output of inverter. Increase in use of power converters has led to increase in harmonics hence it is essential to reduce the harmonics to improve power quality in the network which will also improve the performance of the machine connected to the power system network. Voltage source inverter fed three-phase induction motor drives have high 3n ± 1(n = odd-order) harmonic currents. This is because the currents, are driven by the corresponding harmonic voltages in the inverter output and they are limited by the stator leakage impedance, as the harmonics are absent in the back electromotive force of the motor. To obliterate these harmonic currents, bulk inductive harmonic filters or complex pulse width modulation techniques have to be used. Various pulse-width-modulation techniques have been developed in the last decade for application in the industry for drive control [7-22]. A few examples can be cited, Pulse width modulation based three-phase voltage source inverters with variable voltage magnitude and variable frequency for speed control, harmonic elimination etc. The Sinusoidal PWM technique is the easiest modulation scheme to implement but this technique is unable to fully utilize the DC bus voltage available whereas SVPWM technique can increase the fundamental output voltage by 15.5% over the SPWM technique. This work accentuate in designing a harmonic obliteration scheme based on space vector pulse width modulation. Abstract Usage of power electronics converters to provide a variable power at output has increased. This need for a variable power at the output can be obtained by chopping the inverter DC input voltages using switching devices. This technique is called as Pulse Width Modulation. With advancement in power electronics, the problem of harmonics in the power system network has also been on raising side in recent years. Pulse width modulation techniques are not only used to get the desired output voltage but also to reduce the harmonic content reducing the need for a separate filter to obliterate harmonics. Various techniques such as current hysteresis controlled pulse width modulation, sinusoidal pulse width modulation, space vector pulse width modulation have been in research and implemented for harmonic obliteration. This work accentuate on the comparative analysis of the most commonly used Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation and Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation techniques which has found wide acceptance in motor drive application. The comparative analysis show that the space vector Pulse width modulation yield better harmonic obliteration compared to a Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation scheme when tested with MATLAB Simulink. Keywords: Harmonics, Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation, Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation, Total Harmonic Distortion. Introduction Discharge of power from renewable energy sources along with usage of power converter to facilitate this process has been on a rising trend in the last three decades, which demands the needs for power converters that consists of power electronic components to achieve the required power conversion; associated with the process arises the problem of power quality [1-3]. The world’s total of 80-90% of the total 2071 International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 3 (2016) pp 2071-2076 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation Pulse Width Modulation Space vector pulse width modulation was first introduced in 1980 by fellow German researches. Since then they have found wide acceptance as they showed several advantages over the traditional pulse width modulation techniques [713][15-17][19][20][22-24]. Their wide acceptance was made possible through more effective usage of DC voltage output peak voltage is higher in comparison to other schemes and unnecessary switching is eliminated ensuring less commutation losses. Space vector pulse width modulation is a switching scheme which is done by considering the complex reference voltage and this eliminates the need for a separate space modulator for each of the three phases. Space vector pulse width modulation provides a scope to adjust the switching frequency and also generates less harmonic distortion in both voltage and current in the output side of the inverter which would be fed as input to the motor drive. Even though this scheme seems complex compared to sinusoidal pulse width modulation it has the ease of implementation with modern micro controllers. Inverters usually perform the task of conversion of dc power to ac power with controlled voltage and frequency [1] [6]. The output waveforms depend on the switching states of the inverter switches. There are several inverter topologies available. The topology considered in this paper for study and analysis is three phase inverters as they are widely used for motor drive applications. The need for variable speed drives and needed for control over magnitude frequency and phase can be met with the help of inverter. The output voltage of an inverter can be controlled by the inverter itself. This can be achieved through varying the ON & OFF period of the inverter switches. This is termed as pulse width modulation [1] [6] [7]. Reasons behind adapting this method as a control scheme to get the desired output are necessity of additional components for control is not essential and minimization of lower order harmonic is possible. In this paper we are going to discuss about the commonly used and the most efficient pulse width modulation techniques. The commonly used technique is sinusoidal pulse width modulation. Sinusoidal pulse width modulation is implemented for single phase and three phase inverter topologies. Space vector pulse width modulation provides reduced switching loss and souped-up output voltage compared to sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation. This technique is discussed in this paper with three phase inverter topology. Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation Principle Using a space vector pulse width modulation eight possible switching combinations can be achieved in a three leg inverter [6]. The upper switches ON and OFF states are inverted states of the lower switches. The voltage corresponding to the combinations of the states are calculated and then converted into two phase stator reference frames this transformation from three phase quants to two phase quantities provide eight vectors of which six are non-zero vectors and to are zero vectors. The vectors form the axis of the hexagon as is in figure. Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation In sinusoidal pulse width modulation the width of the waveform vary in a sinusoidal manner. The width of the output voltage waveform after sinusoidal pulse width modulation depends on the carrier and reference waveform [8]. The carrier wave is a triangular wave and the reference or the modulating wave is a sinusoidal wave. The sinusoidal wave and carrier wave are compared to obtain a pulse width modulated output waveform. If the sine wave is greater than the carrier wave then the carrier triangular wave then the width of the output waveform width is high, if the reference wave is lower than the carrier wave the width of the output wave form is low thereby consists a sinusoidal output waveform on the whole. The three phase inverter topology considered for implementation of sinusoidal pulse width modulation for comparison with space vector pulse width modulation. β axis (010) V3 V2 (110) 2 3 V4 (011) (000) V0 (111)V7 4 V5 (001) 1 θ T1 V1 (100) α axis 6 5 V6 (101) Figure 2: switching vectors The zero vector is at origin and separation between two nonzero vector is 60 degrees. The locus of the maximum output voltages is formed by hexagonal envelope which is in turn formed by the non-zero voltage space vectors. Figure 1: Three phase voltage source inverter. 2072 International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 3 (2016) pp 2071-2076 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com β axis b Table I: List of switches in ON condition each state SVPWM STATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Vdc α axis a Vdc LIST OF ON SWITCHES 126 136 436 435 425 125 135 462 Applying Kirchhoff voltage law on inverter output the following equations are derived. Sine PWM c Figure 3: Locus comparison of maximum output voltage in Sinusoidal PWM and SVPWM The relationship between line to line voltages and switching variable vector [a b c]t is given by =- Vabl + Vabi =- Vbcl + Vbci =- Vcal + Vcai By applying Kirchhoff current law to nodes a, b and c respectively, the following current equations are derived. =Vdc The relationship between phase voltage and switching variable vector [a b c]t is given by = Iai + Ica = Iab + Ial => Iai+ Cf = Cf + Ial Ibi + Iab = Ibc + Ibl => Ibi+ Cf = Cf + Ibl Ici + Ibc = Ica + Icl => Ici+ Cf = Cf + Icl Solving the above three equations the following voltage equations are obtained. The adjacent two non-zero vector Vm,Vm+60 and zero vector should be used for calculation. The list of switches in ON state is as follows = Iabi - Iabl = Ibci - Ibcl = Icai - Ical Applying Kirchhoff voltage law on load side the following equations are derived. =- Iabl + Vabl =- Ibcl + Vbcl =- Ical + Vcal Equations A, B and C can be represented in matrix form as Figure 4: Possible eight switching combinations =- Vl + Vi = Ii - Il =- Il + Vl The plant model can be expressed as the following continuous state space modulation. (t)=AX(t)+Bu(t) Where X= Figure 5: Circuit of inverter output to the load 2073 International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 3 (2016) pp 2071-2076 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com The value of Tmax & T min can be found from the reference phases. The algorithm to find the values of Tmin and Tmin are 1. Initially assume Tmax=TAS & Tmin =TAS 2. Compare with TBS & TCS If (TBS>Tmax) Then {Tmax=TBS} If (TBS<Tmin) Then {Tmin=TBS} If (TCS>Tmax) Then {Tmax=TCS} If (TCS>Tmin) Then {Tmin=TCS} Finally to calculate the gating time of the switching devices we need to find Toffset A= B= u= where Ii is inverter output current, Vl is load side line to line voltage and Il is load current. The output equation can be represented as y=Cx+Du where y= Toffset = ( The duration for which the top switches are turned ON are TS1=TAS+ Toffset TS3=TBS+ Toffset TS5=TCS+ Toffset C= x= Simulation & Results D=0 U=[ ] The voltage across the load is taken as the control variable. Model of three phase voltage source inverter fed induction motor with SPWM control and SVPWM control is simulated using MATLAB Simulink with the following data: Vdc=400V, frequency=50 Hz, R= 0. 3 ohm, L= 9.55e-4 H for each phase of the induction motor. SVPWM is most popular and convenient technique for digital implementation and shows reduction in THD compared to most widely used sine pulse width modulation as shown in Table III. Figure 6, 7 & 8 show line voltage waveforms of space vector pulse width modulation and figure 9, 10 & 11 show line to line voltages by sinusoidal pulse width modulation. These waveforms show an increase in fundamental voltage level in space vector pulse width modulation when compared with sinusoidal pulse width modulation. Steps Involved In Implementation of Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation: 1. Calculation of Vα & Vβ 2. Estimation of T1, T2 &T0 The generalized equation for Vα & Vβ is as follows Vα= Vβ= VA (VB – VC) The generalized equation for T1 & T2 for representation of non-zero vectors is as follows Table II Value of T1 & T2 in sector SECTOR 1 2 3 4 5 6 T1 TAS-TBS TAS-TCS TBS-TCS TBS-TAS TCS-TAS TCS-TBS - Tmin) Table III: THD values for three phase VSI fed Induction motor drive T2 TAS-TBS TAS-TBS TAS-TBS TAS-TBS TAS-TBS TAS-TBS USING SPWM 0. 5051 THD LEVEL USING SVPWM 0. 4481 where TAS=TS * [ ] TBS=TS * [ ] TCS=TS * [ ] The value of T0 can be found from T0=Tsample - Teffective Teffective=Tmax-Tmin Figure 6: Line to line voltage waveform Vabl SVPWM 2074 International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 3 (2016) pp 2071-2076 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com Figure 7: Line to line voltage waveform Vbcl SVPWM Figure 11: Line to line voltage waveform Vcal using SPWM Figure 8: Line to line voltage waveform Vcal using SVPWM Figure 12: THD for sinusoidal pulse width modulation Figure 9: Line to line voltage waveform Vabl using SPWM Figure 13: THD for Space vector pulse width modulation Conclusion This article provides an comparative assay on typical sinusoidal pulse width modulation and space vector pulse width modulation schemes for a three phase voltage source inverter fed induction motor drive and divulge that the space vector pulse width modulation scheme provide a 15% increase in fundamental voltage with waned THD level when compared with sinusoidal pulse width modulation scheme with the help of MATLAB Simulink simulation results. Figure 10: Line to line voltage waveform Vbcl using SPWM References [1] [2] 2075 Dr. P. S. Bimbhra, “Power Electronics” Khanna Publishers, New Delhi, 3rd Edition, 2003. M. H. Rashid, “A Power Electronics Handbook” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 3 (2016) pp 2071-2076 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] Trzynadlowski. A. M, & Legowski. S, “Minimumloss vector PWM strategy for three-phase inverters”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,9(1), 2634, 1994. [19] Van Der Broeck. H. W, Skudelny. H. C, & Stanke, G. V, “Analysis and realization of a pulsewidth modulator based on voltage space vectors”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,, 24(1), 142150, 1988. [20] Ogasawara. S, Akagi. H, & Nabae. A, “A novel PWM scheme of voltage source inverters based on space vector theory”, Archiv für Elektrotechnik, 74(1), 33-4, 1990. [21] Blasko. V. (1997), “Analysis of a hybrid PWM based on modified space-vector and triangle-comparison methods”, Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, 33(3), 756-764. [22] Liu. Y, Wu. X, & Huang. L, “Implementation of three-level inverter using a novel space vector modulation algorithm”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology,. (Vol. 1, pp. 606-610), 2002. [23] Seo. J. H, Choi. C. H, & Hyun. D. S, “A new simplified space-vector PWM method for three-level inverters”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,, 16(4), 545-550, 2001. [24] Seixas. P. F, Mendes. M, Donoso-Garcia. P, & Lima, A. M. N, “A space vector PWM method for threelevel voltage source inverters”. Fifteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, (Vol. 1, pp. 549-555), 2000. [25] Radhakrishnan. S & Jayapal. R, “Linear current booster for solar FED DC pumps”, IEEE International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies, (pp. 1-6), 2015. [26] Venugopal L. V, & Jayapal. R, “Matrix converter based energy saving for street lights”, IEEE International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies, (pp. 1-6), 2015. [27] Yuvaraj. V, Deepa. S.N, & Kumar & Et al, “Improving grid power quality with FACTS device on integration of wind energy system”, Fifth Asia Modelling Symposium (AMS), (pp. 157-162), 2011. Academic Press, 2001. B. K. Bose “Power electronics and ac drives” Prentice hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986. Kumar, “Induction and Synchronous Machines”. Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd, 2000. http://in. mathworks. com. http://nptel. ac. in/courses/108108077. Holtz. J, “Pulsewidth modulation for electronic power conversion”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 82(8), 1194-1214, 1994. Kumar. K. V, Michael. P. A, John. J. P, & Kumar.D. S. S, “Simulation and comparison of SPWM and SVPWM control for three phase inverter”, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5(7), 61-74,2010. Rathnakumar.D, LakshmanaPerumal.J, & Srinivasan. T, “A new software implementation of space vector PWM”, SoutheastCon, 2005. Proceedings. IEEE (pp. 131-136),2005. Nisha. G. K, IAENG, U. S, & Lakaparampil. Z. V, “Harmonic elimination of space vector modulated three phase inverter”, Proceedings of the International Multi conference of Engineer and Computer Scientists,Vol. 2, 2012. Erfidan. T, Urgun. S, Karabag. Y, & Cakir. B, “New software implementation of the space vector modulation”, 12th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA, 2004. Hariram. B, & Marimuthu. N. S, “Space vector switching patterns for different applications-a comparative analysis”, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology pp. 14441449,2005. Ahmad. R. H, Karady. G. G, Blake. T. D, & Pinewski. P, “Comparison of space vector modulation techniques based on performance indexes and hardware implementation”,23rd International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, IECON 97, Vol. 2, pp. 682687),1997. Suresh. N & Babu.R. S. R, “Review on Harmonics and its Eliminating Strategies in Power System”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(13), 2015. Pal. S, & Dalapati. S, “Digital simulation of two level inverter based on space vector pulse width modulation”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(4), 2557-2568, 2012. Mondal. S. K, Bose. B. K, Oleschuk. V, & Pinto. J. O, “Space vector pulse width modulation of threelevel inverter extending operation into over modulation region”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 18(2), 604-611,2003. Zhou. K, & Wang. D, “Relationship between spacevector modulation and three-phase carrier-based PWM: a comprehensive analysis [three-phase inverters]”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,, 49(1), 186-196,( 2002. 2076