* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture slides
Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wikipedia , lookup
Moral hazard wikipedia , lookup
Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup
Financial economics wikipedia , lookup
Public finance wikipedia , lookup
Global saving glut wikipedia , lookup
Shadow banking system wikipedia , lookup
Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Asset-backed commercial paper program wikipedia , lookup
Securitization wikipedia , lookup
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
United States housing bubble wikipedia , lookup
The financial crisis: Initial conditions, basic mechanisms, and appropriate policies. Olivier Blanchard Munich lecture, November 2008 Nr. 1 1. Introduction • Much too early to give a definitive assessment. • Not too early to think about the basic mechanisms, and whether/how we can prevent similar events in the future. • A first pass, in the midst of the action. With thanks to the IMF team. Nr. 2 The basic question: How could such a small trigger have such enormous effects on world output? Initial Subprime Losses and Subsequent Declines in World GDP, US Households Real Estate Wealth, and US Stock Market Capitalization (in Billions US Dollars) ' Ͳ $ " ) " ! % # " " . & ' * # ' " ( + ) 0 , - " " " ! / ' " 3 + 1 2 1 ' " $ ! + 3 1 1 2 " 0 $ $ Source: IMF Global Financial Stability Report; World Economic Outlook November update and estimates; Federal Reserve Flow of Funds Accounts; World Federation of Exchanges. Nr. 3 Organization • Initial conditions • Two amplification mechanisms • Interconnections and dynamics • Implications for policy now and in the future Nr. 4 Setting the stage: Initial conditions • The trigger: The issuance of risky assets, with undervaluation of risk. Subprime mortgages. Causes? Large world demand for safe assets, and bad regulation. • The determinants of amplification. – Complexity and opacity of assets on balance sheets of financial institutions, so low liquidity. Causes? Better risk allocation, and bad regulation. – Increased leverage (lower capital relative to assets). Causes? Bad, and sometimes perverse regulation. Nr. 5 A visual sense of the complexity. From mortgages to securities Residuals Loan proceeds Subprime Borrower Loan cash flow Lines of credit Subprime Servicer Loan cash flow Bought by both low and high riskseeking investors Banks provide liquidity to lenders Subprime Lender Loan cash flow Bought by more riskseeking investors Subprime Securitization Structure Securitization Underwriting Bought by less risk-seeking investors ABCP Conduits / SIVs buy ABS and issue shortterm debt Bam ks prov ide financing to CDOs Subprime BBBthrough Single A bonds Subprime AAA & AA bonds Banks provide credit lines to conduits / SIVs Banks ABCP ABS are bought by CDOs and tranched into CDO structured debt products, financed Bought by by issuing debt other CDOs Nr. 6 Provide insurance on CDOs, ABS and some SIVs Insurers CDO equity Bought by more risk-seeking investors Amplification mechanism 1. Runs • Bad (or doubtful) assets on balance sheets • Runs (not only by depositors, but by other investors) • Need to sell assets. • Not enough deep pocket investors to buy. • Firesale prices. P < EN P V . • Worse balance sheets. More incentives to run, etc Nr. 7 Amplification mechanism 2. Capital • Bad (or doubtful) assets on balance sheets • Decrease in capital ratio (Assets minus liabilities, over Assets) • Need to sell assets (deleverage) • Not enough deep pocket investors to buy. • Firesale prices. P < EN P V . • Lower capital ratio. More incentives to sell assets, etc Nr. 8 The two mechanisms: Conceptually separate but strongly interacting • Run on financial institution 1 • Cut credit to financial institution 2 – Sale of assets at depressed prices Low capital, so further sales – Or cut credit to financial institution 3 Examples. From US banks to Hungary. From subprimes to other assets. Nr. 9 The dynamics in real time • Increase in probability of insolvency. • Increase in counterparty risk. • Decrease in volume and maturity of interbank lending. • Contagion across institutions. From direct exposure to subprime onwards. • Contagion across countries. From the US to Europe, to emerging market countries. • Increasing effects on the ultimate borrowers: households and firms. Nr. 10 Contagion across institutions, assets, and countries Heat Map: Developments in Systemic Asset Classes Emerging markets Corporate credit Prime RMBS Commercial MBS Money markets Financial institutions Subprime RMBS Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Source: IMF, Global Financial Stability Report, October 2008 Nr. 11 Oct-08 Counterparty risk: Difference between the lending rate between banks and the riskless rate 5.0 Ted Spreads: 3-month Libor Rate minus T-bill Rate (in percent) 4.0 Sep 15, 2008 Lehman Files for Bank ruptcy 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 01/01/07 08/01/07 US 03/01/08 Euro Japan 10/01/08 UK Nr. 12 Emerging market spreads Emerging Markets Sovereign Srpeads - Composite Index (1/2/06 - 11/12/08) Nr. 13 08 /2 / 10 08 7/ 2/ 08 4/ 2/ 08 1/ 2/ 07 /2 / 10 07 7/ 2/ 07 4/ 2/ 07 1/ 2/ 06 /2 / 10 06 7/ 2/ 06 4/ 2/ 1/ 2/ 06 Bank lending standards 100 80 Bank Lending Standards 60 40 20 0 -20 3/ 30 /0 6/ 5 30 /0 9/ 5 30 /0 5 12 /3 0/ 05 3/ 30 /0 6/ 6 30 /0 9/ 6 30 /0 6 12 /3 0/ 0 3/ 6 30 /0 6/ 7 30 /0 9/ 7 30 /0 7 12 /3 0/ 0 3/ 7 30 /0 6/ 8 30 /0 9/ 8 30 /0 8 -40 U.S.: C&I loans U.S.: Mortgages ECB: Large company loans ECB: Mortgages Change in the Balance of Respondents Between “Tightened Considerably-Tightened Somewhat” and “Eased Somewhat-Eased Considerably” in Percent of Respondents. Source: Haver Analytics. Nr. 14 Financial policies for the short run Need to dampen/eliminate the two amplification mechanisms. • Runs: Provide liquidity to a broader set of institutions. Done. Still problem with institutions, countries without access to lender of last resort (Iceland). • Capital. – Buy bad assets. For two reasons: Clarify price. Move price closer to EPDV. – Increase capital. Many institutions may still need recapitalization. So need to add capital (buy shares). • Second leg takes time to implement. May need guarantees for depositors, and for interbank claims. To start interbank lending. Nr. 15 Basic financial architecture in place in advanced countries • A crucial weekend in October, but: • Problems with speed/scope of recapitalization • Coherence across countries • Still hidden land mines. for example: CDS positions. • Problems in emerging market countries. Sudden stops. Need access to international liquidity provision. Nr. 16 Counterparty risk since September 3-month Libor Rate 5.0 8.0 Ted Spreads: 3-month Libor Rate minus T-bill Rate 4.5 7.0 4.0 6.0 3.5 5.0 3.0 4.0 2.5 2.0 3.0 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 8/1 8/16 US 8/31 9/15 Euro 9/30 Japan 10/15 10/30 UK 8/1 8/16 8/31 US Nr. 17 9/15 Euro 9/30 Japan 10/15 10/30 UK Sovereign spreads since September 3500 3000 Sovereign CDS Spreads (index 7/2/07=100) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 7/2/07 9/2/07 11/2/07 1/2/08 3/2/08 5/2/08 7/2/08 9/2/08 Current account deficit larger than 5% of 2007 GDP Current account surplus, or small deficit Nr. 18 11/2/08 From the financial crisis to the economic crisis • Not a side show. Direct effects: Credit growth, stock prices, exchange rates Indirect effects, through confidence, and wait and see • A Keynesian recession Worsens the financial crisis Back to fiscal and monetary policy (in addition to financial policies) Nr. 19 Decrease in stock prices 500 120 110 Equity Markets in Advanced Economies (March 2000 = 100; national currency) 450 Equity Markets in Emerging Economies (Index 2001=100; national currency) 400 100 350 90 300 80 250 70 200 60 150 50 100 40 50 30 WILSHIRE 5000 DJ EURO STOXX TOPIX n0 Au 0 g0 Ma 0 r -0 Oc 1 tMa 01 yD e 02 c0 Ju 2 l- 0 Fe 3 bS e 04 p0 Ap 4 r-0 No 5 v0 Ju 5 n0 Ja 6 n0 Au 7 g0 Ma 7 r -0 Oc 8 t -0 8 Ja Ja nA u 00 gMa 00 r -0 Oc 1 tMa 01 yD e 02 c0 Ju 2 lFe 03 bS e 04 pA p 04 r-0 No 5 vJu 0 5 nJa 06 nA u 07 gMa 07 rOc 08 t -0 8 0 ASIA LATIN AMERICA EASTERN EUROPE Source: Bloomberg and IMF staff estimates. Nr. 20 Decrease in confidence 65 170 60 150 5 0 130 55 -5 110 50 -10 90 45 -15 Euro area 40 70 United States Emerging economies 50 EU (right scale) -20 U.S. (left scale) 35 -25 Manufacturing PMIs (Values greater than 50 indicate expansion) Ja n Au -00 gM 00 ar O 01 ct M -01 ay De -02 c0 Ju 2 l-0 Fe 3 bSe 04 pAp 04 r No -05 vJu 05 nJa 06 nAu 07 gM 07 ar O 08 ct -0 8 Ja n0 Au 0 g0 M 0 ar -0 Oc 1 tM 01 ay -0 De 2 c02 Ju l-0 Fe 3 b0 Se 4 p0 Ap 4 r-0 No 5 v0 Ju 5 n0 Ja 6 n07 Au g0 M 7 ar -0 Oc 8 t-0 8 30 Consumer Confidence (United States, 1985 = 100; Euro Area, percent balance) Nr. 21 Growth forecasts 8 Real and Potential GDP Forecasted Growth Rates for 2009; in percent 7 5.2 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -0.7 -0.4 -0.2 -1 -2 United States Euro Area Real GDP Japan Emerging & Developing Economies Potential GDP Nr. 22 Looking forward. How to avoid a repeat? • Back to the trigger and the two mechanisms: • To limit the build up of systemic risk. Broader regulation and monitoring systemic risk. Limit leverage. More transparent pricing and tracing of assets. Centralized trading rather than over the counter. • For runs: Broader liquidity provision. Across institutions, in exchange for regulation, Across countries, for runs on claims in foreign currency. • For capital: Procyclical capital ratios. A public fund to purchase illiquid assets at EN P V − x? Nr. 23 The international dimension • Need to coordinate regulation, national policies. Ireland and unilateral guarantees. • Need to monitor risk at a global level. Exposure of Austria and Belgium to Hungary, of France to Belgium. Exposure of emerging markets to sudden stops. • Need to organize multilateral liquidity provision. Swaps, and the new IMF facility. • Need for burden sharing rules if recapitalization. National approaches have large spillovers. Nr. 24