* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PHYS6520 Quantum Mechanics II Spring 2013 HW #3
Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Density of states wikipedia , lookup
Conservation of energy wikipedia , lookup
Relational approach to quantum physics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum potential wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Condensed matter physics wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup
Time in physics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
PHYS6520 Quantum Mechanics II Spring 2013 HW #3 Due to the grader at 5pm on Friday 1 March 2013 (1) (1) We discussed in class the first order energy shifts ∆K from “relativistic kinetic energy.” (1) We also discussed ∆LS from the spin-orbit interaction, but there was a problem in that it gave a nonzero result for l = 0 states if we blindly let an l = 0 in the numerator cancel an (1) l = 0 in the denominator. In fact, ∆LS from (5.3.31) is invalid for l = 0. However, if we take into account the spread of the electron wave function in the region of changing electric field, we are led to include the “Darwin term” in the Hamiltonian. The perturbation is VD = − 1 [pi , [pi , eφ(r)]] 8m2 c2 (1) where a sum over i is implied and φ(r) is the Coulomb potential. Find ∆D and show that it is only nonzero for l = 0 states, and that it gives exactly the same result as blindly using (5.3.31) for l = 0. Then show that (1) ∆nj ≡ (1) ∆K + (1) ∆LS + (1) ∆D � mc2 (Zα)4 3 1 = − 3 2n 4n j + 1/2 � Later on in this course we will compare this expression to the result of solving the Dirac equation in the presence of the Coulomb potential. (2) These questions are meant to associate numbers with atomic hydrogen phenomena. (a) The red n = 3 → 2 Balmer transition has a wavelength λ ≈ 656 nm. Calculate the wavelength difference ∆λ (in nm) between the 3p3/2 → 2s1/2 and 3p1/2 → 2s1/2 transitions due to the spin-orbit interaction. Comment on how you might measure this splitting. (b) How large an electric field E is needed so that the Stark splitting in the n = 2 level is the same as the correction from relativistic kinetic energy between the 2s and 2p levels? How easy or difficult is it to achieve an electric field of this magnitude in the laboratory? (c) The Zeeman effect can be calculated with a “weak” or “strong” magnetic field, depending on the size of the energy shift relative to the spin-orbit splitting. Give examples of a weak and a strong field. How easy or difficult is it to achieve such a magnetic field? (3) Compute the Stark effect for the 2s1/2 and 2p1/2 levels of hydrogen. Assume that the electric field E is sufficiently weak so that eEa0 is small compared to the fine structure, but take the Lamb shift δ into account (that is, ignore 2p3/2 in this calculation). Show that for eEa0 � δ, the energy shifts are quadratic in E, whereas for eEa0 � δ they are linear in E. (4) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 5.18 (5) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 5.19 (6) Modern Quantum Mechanics, Problem 5.20