* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Principles of Transplantation
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
PROPERTIES Allow user to leave interaction: Show ‘Next Slide’ Button: Completion Button Label: Anytime Show always View Presentation Principles of Transplantation Karl D. Pilson MD Suresh Agarwal MD, FACS, Boston University Medical School Boston Medical Center Boston, MA ™ Principles of Transplantation • Advances in immunology and pharmacology have greatly increased graft survival in organ transplantation • Kidney graft survival 90%, 86%, 78% at 1, 3 and 5 yrs. Respectively • Liver graft survival 87%, 84% at 1 and 5 years • Cardiac graft survival 90%, 80% at 1 and 5 years • Pancreas graft survival 75%, 70% at 1 and 5 years ™ Page 3 Hyper acute Rejection • Techniques such as mixed lymphocyte culture to prescreen patients make this a rarity. Pre-formed, specific, cytotoxic antibodies in recipient react with vascular endothelium in the graft activating the complement cascade with subsequent thrombosis of the graft. Irreversible and often occurs in the OR. ™ Page 4 Acute Rejection • Usually occurs 4-7 days after transplantation but may subsequently occur due to withdrawal of medications • May occur through T-cells directly recognizing donor antigens with MHC molecules and releasing IL-2 with development of CD-4/8+ effector T-cells which cause antigen-specific damage to the graft directly or via the release of cytotoxic antibodies • May also occur via stimulation of Th2 cells with production of IL-4/IL-5 promoting the production of Bcells and release of graft specific antibodies ™ Page 5 Chronic Rejection • Occurs months to years after transplantation and is due to proliferation of endothelial cells in the graft vascular lumen. May result from indirect allorecognition of the graft by host T-cells • Both acute and chronic rejection are potentially reversible with immunotherapy • All rejection is likely due to activation of graft endothelium by the inflammatory process ™ Page 6 Cell Types in Rejection • Most immunosuppressive drugs target T-cells but many cell types are involved in rejection • B-cells are known to reside in the graft forming an intragraft tertiary lymphoid organ • Antibody therapy targeting B-cells are increasingly important in treating rejection ™ Page 7 Post-operative care of the Transplant Patient • General principles of care are similar to that of most critical care patients with specific attention to infection, graft function and immunosuppressive regimens ™ Page 8 Post-Transplant Infection • Consider things potentially missed pre-op. Dental abscesses, dialysis catheters, surgical site infections, hematomas, bilomas, urinomas • Latent infections such as CMV may become active posttransplant • Travel history consider Coccidioides, Blastomyces, Histoplasma, etc. • Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis and Nocardia is important ™ Page 9 AntimicrobialImmunosuppressive interactions • Azole group on macrolides and anti-fungal agents are potent CYP inhibitors and increase levels of calcineurin inhibitors • Quinolones increase CSA levels • Aminoglycosides and other known nephrotoxic agents will generally increase the nephrotoxic effects of calcineurin inhibitors ™ Page 10 Kidney Graft Function • A steady reduction in bun and creatinine along with a vigorous urine output is reassuring • Diuretics may be useful but at the discretion of the transplant surgeon as opinions vary • Post-operative complications such as hematomas, urinomas, ureteral leakage and vascular thrombosis may be reliably diagnosed with ultrasound modalities • As with all transplants early diagnosis of problems is the key to graft survival ™ Page 11 Post-transplant management • Kidney- Expect high urine output and replace fluids as needed • Generally enteral route can be used early • Hypertension is common • Hyperkalemia is common • Early ambulation • Early ultrasound (24 hrs.) ™ Page 12 Liver Transplantation • Lack of donors and liver regeneration has led to increased use of split livers • Living related donor is increasing • Primary non-function can be as high as 9% necessitating re-transplant • Vascular complications between 5-9% easily diagnosed with US ™ Page 13 Liver Transplantation • Biliary complications are most common as high as 20% • Early diagnosis of biliary complications with prophylactic antibiotic use and percutaneous drainage have drastically reduced morbidity ™ Page 14 Pancreas Transplantation • In whole pancreas transplantation the donor duodenum may be anastomosed to the sm. Bowel or bladder • Rejection is the major cause of graft loss. • Glucose intolerance occurs late in rejection so it is often diagnosed late ™ Page 15 Lung Transplantation • May be done with or without heart. – Usual signs of declining pulmonary function often indicate rejection • Transbronchial biopsy and BAL useful for diagnosis • Absence of lymphatic drainage make the transplant highly susceptible to fluid overload ™ Page 16 Lung Transplant • Poor vascularity of bronchi make the anastomosis highly susceptible to leakage which can be catastrophic • Low airway pressures and early extubation are critical • Collections in the mediastinum can be rapidly lethal ™ Page 17 Immunosuppression • Steroids remain a mainstay • Antimetabolites, azathioprine (imuran) and mycophenolate mofetil (cellcept) • Calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine (sandimmune, neoral) and tacrolimus (prograf, FK 506) • Proliferation signal inhibitors, sirolimus (rapamune), everolimus • Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies ™ Page 18 Corticosteroids • A mainstay of post-transplant immunosuppression • Many deleterious effects • Growing emphasis on early withdrawal of steroids in transplant ™ Page 19 Antimetabolites • Azathioprine (Imuran) Purine antimetabolite derivative of 6-mercaptopurine • Mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) ™ Page 20 Calcineurin Inhibitors • Cyclosporin (Sandimmune, Neoral) The first T-cell selective agent, nephrotoxic • Tacrolimus (Prograf, FK 506) • Proliferation signal inhibitors Sirolimus (Rappamune), Everolimus ™ Page 21 Calcineurin Inhibitors ™ Page 22 Mono and Polyclonal Antibodies • (ATG)Antithymocyte globulin-Gamma globulin from rabbits, binds to multiple T-cell receptors and is cytotoxic • OKT3- Anti CD3 antibodies cause internalization of the receptor preventing antigen recognition • Daclizumab- Anti CD25, likely binds to IL-2 receptor of activated T-cells, does not cause depletion ™ Page 23 Antibodies • Campath (Alemtuzumab) Anti CD52 on multiple different lymphocytes causing lympholysis • Infliximab (Remicade) Anti TNF, binds to receptor and prevents TNF activation of lymphocytes ™ Page 24 Treating Acute Rejection • High dose corticosteroids- methylprednisolone 5001000mg/day for 3 days followed by a taper • Mono or polyclonal antibody therapy for 1-2 wks. • Reassessment of the patient’s current immunosuppressive regimen ™ Page 25 Strategies • Induction therapy-For patients at high risk for rejection or to avoid CNI in dysfunctional transplant. Anti-CD25, OKT3, ATGAM • Maintenance therapy, usually triple therapy. • Studies are ongoing evaluating early steroid withdrawal ™ Page 26 Organ Donation • Scarcity of organs for transplant • Brain death and cardiac dysfunction • Brain death and endocrine dysfunction • Support of the potential donor • Donation after cardiac death (DCD) • Early involvement of the OPO ™ Page 27 References • Parasuraman R, Samarapungavan D, Venkat K, Updated principles and caveats in the management of infection in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation reviews 24 (2010) 43-51 • Colledan M, Split liver transplantation: technique and results ™ • Chiang A, Platt J, The role of antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation Reviews 23 (2009) 191-198 • Zarkhin V, Chalasani G, Sarwal M, The yin and yang of B-cells in graft rejection and tolerance. Transplantation reviews 24 (2010) 67-78 Page 28 References Cont. • Vo A, Peng A, Toyoda M, Kahwaji J, Cao K, Lai C, Reinsmoen N, Villicana R, Jordan S, Use of intravenous immune globulin and rituximab for desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation • Chadban S, Morris R, Hirsh H, Bunnapradist S, Arns W, Budde K, Immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Transplantation reviews 22 (2008) 241-251 • Jimenez C, Lopez M, Gonzalez E, Selgas R, Ultrasonography in kidney transplantation: value and new developments ™ Page 29 References Cont. • D’Alessandro A, The process of donation after cardiac death: a US perspective. Transplantation reviews 21 (2007) 230-236 • Goodman and Gillman’s Pharmacology, McGraw-Hill Co. 2005 ™ • Francis D, Transplantation surgery: Blackwell Co; 2006 • Wood K, McCartney J, Management of the potential organ donor. Transplantation reviews 21 (2007) 204-218 Page 30