* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Attitudes
Carolyn Sherif wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Introspection illusion wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Vested interest (communication theory) wikipedia , lookup
Implicit attitude wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Attitudes The Nature of Attitudes • Attitudes central topic of study in social psychology. • 3 Approaches to Understanding Nature of Attitudes: – Attitudes as Evaluations – Attitudes as Memories – ABC Tripartite Model of Attitudes Attitudes as Evaluations • Learned predispositions to respond in a favorable or unfavorable manner to a particular person, object or idea. • Represent positive or negative evaluation of an individual, behavior, belief or thing. Abortion + Women have the right to choose - Abortion is immoral + Abortion is permissible in the first trimester - Abortion is an invasive medical procedure + Abortion solves societal problems Attitudes as Memories • Some regard as a set of memories that link cognitions regarding the topic about which the attitude is held. • An attitude is a set of inter-related memories about a particular person, object or idea. Attitudes as Memories • Memories about different types of information – Beliefs, feelings, & behavior concerning the target. • When a stimulus triggers one of these memories, activates entire network of related memories having to do with the object of the attitude. Parents College Friend Future Fr. Mike Abortion Niece Children Religion Medical Tonsils ABC Tripartite Model of Attitudes • Focuses on underlying structure of attitudes. • 3 Components: – Affective component – encompasses emotional reactions (negative and positive) • Strong positive or negative emotions associated with… – Behavioral component – Predispositions or intention to act in a way that reflects the attitude • Refers to your intention to participate in a pro-abortion or anti-abortion rally; or whether you will have one yourself. ABC Tripartite Model of Attitudes • Focuses on underlying structure of attitudes. – Cognitive component – Your beliefs or thoughts about the object of the attitude • e.g., may hold a strong religious belief that may shape your view of abortion as a legitimate procedure. Affective Component I have anxiety about the procedure I am relieved not to have an out-ofwedlock child Behavioral Component I intend to seek an abortion if necessary Cognitive Component Abortion is a women’s right Abortion is not morally wrong Abortion Formation & Maintenance of Attitudes: Affect-Based Explanations • Mere Exposure Effect Tendency to develop more positive feelings toward objects/individuals the more we are exposed to them. – Does not require behavior nor formation of beliefs • Classical Conditioning Formation & Maintenance of Attitudes: Behavioral & Cognitive Explanations • Operant Conditioning – Reinforcing behaviors congruent with attitude • Social Learning – Reinforcement of imitative behavior – Vicarious reinforcement Formation & Maintenance of Attitudes: Somatokinesthesia • Facial expression, head movement & body posture can affect attitude. – Pen in the mouth study – Facial Feedback Hypothesis • Consistent w/ Self-Perception Theory – Vascular Theory of Emotion • smiling causes air-cooled blood flow to brain – Similar findings for posture Formation & Maintenance of Attitudes: Functional Approach • Develop & change attitude to satisfy psychological need. • Instrumental Attitude - based on cost/benefit of the attitude object. – e.g., positive attitudes for acceptance by others • Symbolic Attitude - Object perceived not as it is, but as symbol of something else – e.g., environmentally conscious company Psychological Function of Attitudes Type of Attitude Function Served Perspective Utilitarian Achieve rewards; gain approval Behaviorist Knowledge Structure world; make sense Cognitive Ego Defense Protect from self-truth Psychoanal Value-Expressive Express self-concept Humanistic Do Attitudes Predict Behavior? • LaPiere (1934) • Factors: – Level of attitude-behavior specificity • e.g., Chinese in general v. specific couple – Time factors • Greater the interval between measurement & behavior - the higher the discrepancy – Private v. Public Self-Awareness Do Attitudes Predict Behavior? • Factors: – Attitude strength • Acquiring more information • Personal involvement • Direct experience – Attitude accessibility • presidential election study • Availability heuristic Beaman et al, 1979 IV = Self-Awareness DV = Attitude Behavior Consistency Mirror No Mirror 12% Took More Candy 34% Took More Candy Mean Shock Intensity 5 4 3 Mirror Condition Control 2 Audience Condition 1 0 Froming et al, 1982 Attitudes Toward a Behavior • Fishbein & Ajzen (1975) • If goal is to predict specific behavior, measure of attitude should be compatible w/ measure of behavior. – Behaviors specified along 4 dimensions: • • • • Action Target Context Time Davidson & Jaccard, 1979 Element Specified Measured Attitude Correlation w/ behavior None Birth Control .08 Target B.C. Pills .32 Target/Action Using B.C. Pills .53 Target/Action/Time Using B.C Pills next 2 years .57 Subjective Norms • Judgement about whether other people will approve of a particular behavior. • 2 Factors – Perceived expectations of significant others – One’s motivation to conform to those expectations Theory of Reasoned Action Attitude Toward a Behavior Intention Subjective Norm Behavior Perceived Behavioral Control • One’s perception of how easy/difficult to perform behavior – e.g., stopping smoking Cognitive Consistency & Attitudes • Cognitive Consistency – Introduced by Fritz Heider (1946) – has its roots in Gestalt Psychology • Expect & prefer perceptions to be coherent & harmonious – The tendency to seek consistency in one’s cognitions Cognitive Dissonance • Although appear to be logical in our thinking & behavior… – Engage in irrational & maladaptive behavior behavior to maintain cognitive consistency Cognitive Dissonance • We all have cognitions (pieces of knowledge) – About attitudes, past behaviors, current states of the world, etc. • Dissonant w/ each other when 1 follows from the opposite of the other – “I believe in gun control & I own a gun” – “I believe in democracy & I don’t vote” Cognitive Dissonance • Dissonance can arise between… – Cognitive & affective component of an attitude – Affect felt toward a person & his/her behavior – Cognitions & behavior/behavioral intentions Cognitive Dissonance • Dissonant cognitions cause an aversive motivational state (tension, irritation) – We are motivated to reduce aversive state • Change 1 cognition – “I smoke so little that it hardly counts as smoking” • Add consonant cognitions – Nobody in my family has ever had cancer, and my other good health habits compensate for the cigarettes I smoke • Reduce importance of 1 cognition – “Although some do die…” • Deny that cognitions are related – “I don’t believe that smoking causes lung cancer” Insufficient Justification • People perform, for a minimal inducement, a behavior that is discrepant with attitudes. • Festinger & Carlsmith (1959) Rating For Group 100 95 90 No Initiation 85 Mild Initiation 80 Severe Initiation 75 70 Arousal or Attribution? • Dissonance theory assumes physio. arousal as basis of attitude change – Evidence that attribution may also be involved • Self-Perception Theory – We infer our attitudes from our behavior • BEHAVIOR CAUSES ATTITUDES – Placebo studies Post-Decision Dissonance • Arises because attributes of chosen alternative not all positive, unchosen not all negative. – Altered perceptions of options – Selective exposure • Self-Justification – Maintenance of self-esteem – Escalation/Persistence of commitment