* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download weird
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Gamma spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
It’s all done with Mirrors •Many of the predictions of quantum mechanics are verified with ordinary matter particles (like electrons), but these experiments are hard •The calculations are harder, but the results are similar when you use photons •And we are very good at manipulating light! •Ordinary mirrors reflect light with nearly 100% effectiveness •If you make the reflecting layer thin enough, you can get it to reflect only half the light mirror half-mirror Half-mirrors and photons: Let’s send photons through a half-mirror •The photon gets split into two equal pieces •Each detector sees 50% of the original photons •Even if we send photons in one at a time •Never in both detectors •If you send in a wave the other way, the same thing happens •There’s a “phase difference”, but since we square the amplitude, the probabilities are the same •50% in each detector 50% A 50% Detectors B 50% 50% Interferometry Now use two mirrors and two half-mirrors •We can reconstruct the original waves •The photon gets split into two equal pieces •The two halves of the photons are recombined by the second half-mirror •Always goes to detector A •Even one photon at a time •If you send in a wave the other way, the photon is still split in half •The “phase difference” lets it remember which way it was going A 0% •Always in detector B 100% Interferometry requires that we carefully position the mirrors 100% B 0% Non-Interferometry How does the photon remember which way it was going? •Replace one mirror with a detector •The photon gets split into two equal pieces •Half of them go to detector C •The other half gets split in half again •Detectors A and B each see 25% •Even if you do it one photon at a time •The “memory” of which way it was going is in both halves A C 25% •Depending on which experiment you do, photons sometimes act like particles and sometimes act like waves 50% B 25% The Copenhagen Interpretation Pretend you are a photon approaching the first mirror •Should you act like a particle or a wave? 100% 0% A The Copenhagen interpretation •The photon gets split into two equal pieces •When it reaches one of the detectors, it either: •Suddenly is all there, and not at all the other place (50%), or •Suddenly is all the other place, and not there (50%) •This change occurs instantly 100% B •Faster than the speed of light 0% •There is no way to use this to communicate faster than light, however •This process is probabilistic, you can’t predict which of these two outcomes will occur Called “Collapse of the Wave Function” Can you have your cake and eat it too? •When you do interference, you can tell the photon went both ways •For other experiments, you can measure which way it went The plan: •Can we do both? •Do experiment in space (no friction, etc.) •Carefully measure momentum of mirror before you send one photon in •Check photon goes to detector A •Remeasure momentum and determine the path pbefore A 100% pafter B 0% p if upper path 0 h if lower path The problem •If you measure the mirror’s initial momentum accurately, you have small p, and big x •Poor positioning of mirror ruins the interference Assessing Quantum Mechanics The Good: •Schrödinger’s Equation can be used to calculate lots of things: •Energy, Dynamics, Probability of outcomes The Bad: •When you perform a measurement, something complicated happens •Probabilistic, Non-local •What it means is under dispute •The term “measurement” isn’t defined The Ugly: •In the Copenhagen Interpretation, 80% of the rules describe how you do measurements •But 90% of calculations deal only with Schrödinger’s equation Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics All of the following are taken seriously by some people •Copenhagen interpretation •Collapse of the wave function happens as soon as you measure •Probabilistic, instantaneous quantum transmission of information •Bohm Pilot wave theory •The “wave function” guides the “particle”, which has an actual place •Instantaneous transmission of information •Not clear if it can be generalized to all QM •Advanced Wave •At measurement, information gets transmitted backwards in time •Weird, but it works •Quantum Mechanics as Statistical Mechanics •Quantum mechanics only describes probabilities – infinitely repeated experiments •Not clear what this has to do with the real world •Many Worlds •Wave functions, instruments, and people never collapse waves •Defies common sense – “Meet your Maker” game show