* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download No Slide Title
Basil Hiley wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot cellular automaton wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup
Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
OPTICAL QUANTUM COMPUTING Jonathan P. Dowling Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Department of Physics and Astronomy Quantum Science and Technologies Group Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana USA quantum.phys.lsu.edu PQE, 03 January 2006, Snowbird Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Quantum Science & Technologies Group H.Cable, C.Wildfeuer, H.Lee, S.Huver, W.Plick, G.Deng, R.Glasser, S.Vinjanampathy, K.Jacobs, D.Uskov, JP.Dowling, P.Lougovski, N.VanMeter, M.Wilde, G.Selvaraj, A.DaSilva Not Shown: MA.Can, A.Chiruvelli, GA.Durkin, M.Erickson, L.Florescu, M.Florescu, KT.Kapale, SJ.Olsen, S.Thanvanthri, Z.Wu Two Roads to C-NOT I. Enhance Nonlinear Interaction with a Cavity or EIT — Kimble, Walther, Lukin, et al. II. Exploit Nonlinearity of Measurement — Knill, LaFlamme, Milburn, Franson, et al. Cavity QED WHY IS A KERR NONLINEARITY LIKE A PROJECTIVE MEASUREMENT? LOQC KLM Photon-Photon XOR Gate Cavity QED EIT Photon-Photon Nonlinearity Projective Measurement Kerr Material Linear Single-Photon Quantum Non-Demolition The success probability is less than 1 (namely 1/8). D0 |1 The input state is constrained to be a superposition of 0, 1, and 2 photons only. Conditioned on a detector coincidence in D1 and D2. D1 D2 /2 |1 /2 Effective = 1/8 22 Orders of Magnitude Improvement! |0 |in = 2 cn |n n=0 |1 P. Kok, H. Lee, and JPD, PRA 66 (2003) 063814 Projective Measurement Yields Effective “Kerr”! G. G. Lapaire, P. Kok, JPD, J. E. Sipe, PRA 68 (2003) 042314 A Revolution in Nonlinear Optics at the Few Photon Level: No Longer Limited by the Nonlinearities We Find in Nature! NON-Unitary Gates KLM CSIGN Hamiltonian Effective Unitary Gates Franson CNOT Hamiltonian Quantum Metrology H.Lee, P.Kok, JPD, J Mod Opt 49, (2002) 2325. AN Boto, DS Abrams, CP Williams, JPD, PRL 85 (2000) 2733 N-Photon Absorbing Lithographi c Resist a† N a N Showdown at High-N00N! How do we make N00N!? |N,0 + |0,N With a large cross-Kerr nonlinearity!* H = a†a b†b |1 |0 |N |0 This is not practical! — need = but = 10–22 ! *C. Gerry, and R.A. Campos, Phys. Rev. A 64, 063814 (2001). Projective Measurements to the Rescue single photon detection at each detector a’ a 3a3 b b’ b 6 4 2 0 a a a a 0 2 4 6 b b 3a1b b 1a3b 4 a' 0 b' 0 a' 4 b' b Probability of success: 3 64 Best we found: 3 Not 16 Efficient! H. Lee, P. Kok, N.J. Cerf, and J.P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. A 65, R030101 (2002). |10::01> |10::01> |20::02> |20::02> |30::03> |40::04> |30::03> What’s New with N00N States? KT Kapale & JPD, A Bootstrapping Approach for Generating Maximally Path-Entangled Photon States, [quant-ph/0612196]. NM VanMeter, P Lougovski, DB Uskov, K Kieling, J Eisert, JPD, A General Linear-Optical Quantum State Generator, [quant-ph/0612154]. Durkin GA, Dowling JP, Local and Global Distinguishability in Quantum Interferometry, [quant-ph/0607088]. High-N00N Meets Phaseonium Quantum Fredkin Gate (QFG) N00N Generation KT Kapale and JPD, quant-ph/0612196. • With sufficiently high cross-Kerr nonlinearity N00N generation possible. • Implementation via Phaseonium Gerry and Campos, PRA 64 063814 (2001) Quantum Fredkin Gate (QFG) N00N Generation KT Kapale and JPD, quant-ph/0612196. Two possible methods • As a high-refractive index material to obtain the large phase shifts – Problem: Requires entangled phaseonium • As a cross-Kerr nonlinearity – Problem: Does not offer required phase shifts of as yet (experimentally) Phaseonium for High Index of Refraction Re Im Im Re N 1015 cm-3 Re( ) 100 cm-3 n 10cm -3 With larger density high index of refraction can be obtained N00N Generation via Phaseonium as a Phase Shifter The needed large phase-shift of can be obtained via the phaseonium as a high refractive index material. However, the control required by the Quantum Fredkin gate necessitates the atoms be in the GHZ state between level a and b Which could be possible for upto 1000 atoms. Question: Would 1000 atoms give sufficiently high refractive index? N00N Generation via PhaseoniumBased Cross-Kerr Nonlinearity • Cross-Kerr nonlinearities via Phaseonium have been shown to impart phase shifts of 7 controlled via single photon • One really needs to input a smaller N00N as a control for the QFG as opposed to a single photon with N=30 roughly to obtain phase shift as large as . • This suggests a bootstrapping approach In the presence of single signal photon, and the strong drive a weak probe field experiences a phase shift Implementation of QFG via Cavity QED Ramsey Interferometry for atom initially in state b. Dispersive coupling between the atom and cavity gives required conditional phase shift Low-N00N via Entanglement Swapping: The N00N gun • Single photon gun of Rempe PRL 85 4872 (2000) and Fock state gun of Whaley group quant-ph/0211134 could be extended to obtain a N00N gun from atomic GHZ states. • GHZ states of few 1000 atoms can be generated in a single step via (I) Agarwal et al. PRA 56 2249 (1997) and (II) Zheng PRL 87 230404 (2001) • By using collective interaction of the atoms with cavity a polarization entangled state of photons could be generated inside a cavity • Which could be out-coupled and converted to N00N via linear optics. N0 0N Bootstrapping • Generation of N00N states with N roughly 30 with cavity QED based N00N gun. • Use of Phaseonium to obtain cross-Kerr nonlinearity and the N00N with N=30 as a control in the Quantum Fredkin Gate to generate high N00N states. • Strong light-atom interaction in cavity QED can also be used to directly implement Quantum Fredkin gate.