* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Climate change, emerging trends in global energy use and the role
Energiewende in Germany wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Fossil fuel phase-out wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Carbon capture and storage (timeline) wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, emerging trends in global energy use and the role of CCS Kelly Thambimuthu FTSE, Chairman, IEA Greenhouse Gas Program, (Emeritus Scientist, CO2CRC, Australia) [email protected] Outline • • • • Climate Change Global energy use and emissions GHG Abatement options The role for CCS Climate change – to date IPCC_AR4 _2007 Stern Review - Projected impacts of climate change Expected Pathway Current Energy Policies Observations to Date Expected Pathway New Energy Policies Scenario Pathways towards stabilization Characteristics of stabilization scenarios Stabilization level (ppm CO2-eq) Global mean temp. increase at equilibrium (ºC) Year CO2 needs to peak Year CO2 emissions back at 2000 level Reduction in 2050 CO2 emissions compared to 2000 445 – 490 2.0 – 2.4 2000 - 2015 2000- 2030 -85 to -50 490 – 535 2.4 – 2.8 2000 - 2020 2000- 2040 -60 to -30 535 – 590 2.8 – 3.2 2010 - 2030 2020- 2060 -30 to +5 590 – 710 3.2 – 4.0 2020 - 2060 2050- 2100 +10 to +60 710 – 855 4.0 – 4.9 2050 - 2080 +25 to +85 855 – 1130 4.9 – 6.1 2060 - 2090 +90 to +140 Mitigation efforts over the next 2-3 decades will have a large impact on opportunities to achieve lower stabilization levels IPCC_AR4 _2007 Stern Review - CO2 reduction for stabilization scenarios 450-550 ppm CO2e Dollars per barrel (2009) International oil price assumptions – World Energy Outlook 2010 140 Current Policies Scenario 120 New Policies Scenario 100 450 Scenario 80 60 40 20 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 The age of cheap oil is over, though policy action could bring lower international prices than would otherwise be the case Growth in Energy Demand – NPS World Energy Outlook 2011 From IEA WEO 2011 Importance of renewables & gas in increased energy use - WEO 2011 Gas grows nearly twice as fast as total energy…..WEO 2011 Gas Supplement Mtoe World primary energy demand by fuel in the GAS Scenario 5 000 Oil Gas 4 000 Coal Biomass 3 000 Nuclear 2 000 Other renewables Hydro 1 000 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 Gas overtakes coal before 2030, meets one quarter of global energy demand by 2035 – demand grows 2% annually, compared with just 1.2% for total energy Power sector drives gas demand – WEO 2011 Gas Supplement Change in power generation by fuel in the GAS scenario, 2010-2035 Gas Wind Other renewables Coal Hydro Nuclear Oil -1 000 0 1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 TWh Total electricity demand increases 70% by 2035, underpinned by a near doubling of gas-fired generation – but renewables and nuclear still account for more than half of new capacity added globally Overall value of subsidies for growth in renewables – WEO 2011 Are we entering a Golden Age of Gas ? - WEO 2011 Gas Supplement Objectives of the report: Examine factors that could result in a more prominent role for gas Assess implications for all fuels, energy security & climate change Key drivers of the GAS Scenario Widespread development of unconventional gas Lower gas prices Gas targets in China’s 12th Five-Year Plan Reduced growth of nuclear energy Increased deployment of natural gas vehicles WEO-2010 New Policies Scenario serves as benchmark for comparison Natural gas: recoverable unconventional resources match conventional – WEO 2011 Gas Enhances security of supply: resources double and exceed 250 years of current production; while in each region, resources exceed 75 years of current consumption The sources of natural gas supply - WEO 2011 Environmental concerns with unconventional gas Existing regulatory regimes are being tested Hydraulic fracturing: water use, contamination & disposal Greenhouse-gas emissions But regulatory & operational best practices can mitigate the risks Ensuring gas, water & chemicals cannot enter other formations Minimising water use Treating & disposing of water appropriately Limiting gas venting Using best practice, “well-to-burner” emissions from shale gas production are 3.5% higher than from conventional gas CO2 emissions drop, but only slightly - WEO 2011 Gas Supplement Gt CO2 emissions in the GAS Scenario compared with the WEO 2010, New Policies Scenario – in 2035 36.5 Increase due to: Higher energy demand 36.0 Less nuclear 35.5 Less renewables 35.0 Reduction due to: Substitution of coal & oil by gas 34.5 34.0 New Policies Scenario GAS Scenario CO2 emissions are just 160 Mt lower than the New Policies Scenario in 2035. Replacement of coal & oil by gas cuts emissions by 740 Mt, but offset by other effects – but with emissions remaining on pathway to 650 ppm and 3.5 C rise The door to 2oC is closing - WEO 2011 Projected Emissions Pathway of the Current Policies Scenario Projected Emissions Level Point of the 3.5oC New Policies Scenario Cutting energy emissions in support of 2050 climate stabilisation goals at 450 ppm CO2e – based on the 2008 World Energy Outlook -12Gt (25%) Gap will be less than 48Gt A revision expected to this IEA ETP 2008 energy technology outlook scenario Requires a portfolio of options to reduce CO2 emissions Carbon Neutral Energy H2 Economy (?), De-carbonised electricity Conservation, efficiency and lower carbon fuels Nuclear fission & Fusion (?) Renewables CO2 capture & storage and low emission coal & gas Fossil Fuels The rationale for CO2 (carbon) Capture and Storage (CCS) • With promised new policies, global emissions increase by 2050, leading to a 650 ppmv, 3.5oC temperature rise - WEO 2011 • CCS can provide one-fifth of the needed CO2 reductions in 2050 to peg temperature rise to around 2oC (450 ppmv scenario) – WEO and ETP 2008 • Without CCS, cost of stabilization rises by 70% - WEO and ETP 2008 • CCS is the only low-carbon solution for gas/coal, cement, and iron & steel sectors CCS is not just “clean coal” Coal power will only make up around 40% of stored CO2 emissions in 2050 (WEO and ETP 2008) From IEA WEO 2008 & ETP 2008 Energy demand is also driven by soaring transport - WEO 2011 Options for the development of low emission plants with CCS Centralised power and industrial plants Combustion Gasification Gas, Coal and/or Biomass CO2 to storage Distributed energy & products Chemical products Distributed heat & power CO2 capture Chemicals Hydrogen Liquid Fuels Transport vehicles Power Generation Very favourable for gas to liquid fuels, requires biomass offsets for coal derived transport fuels Electricity Technology Maturity of CCS Integrated Power Plant (Gas & Coal) • • • Power generation with post combustion capture – SC/USC pulverised coal and NGCC power plants are reliable and proven – Scale up of solvent capture units/integration with power cycle is unproven. Power generation with pre-combustion capture – IGCC for coal (1 GWe) is near commercial and proving reliability, better experience with 3 GWe of IGCC capacity on oil and petcoke. No experience to date with reforming/POX/ATR based natural gas power plants – Solvent capture units for CO2 available at scale, integration and power block hydrogen utilisation issues Power generation with oxy-fuel combustion – No proven experience of commercial scale operation of pulverised coal plants in an oxyfuel combustion mode – the issue is “confidence building” – Large scale air separation units for O2 production proven and reliable. – Some development needed for tail end CO2 purification – CO2 or hybrid turbines do not exist for oxy-fuel combined cycles All in need of work to reduce the energy penalty and cost of capture Members and Sponsors Thank you [email protected] www.ieaghg.org