* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download – H F R
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
HEART FAILURE ROTATION – FELLOW CURRICULUM EDUCATIONAL GOALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Gain experience in the clinical management of patients with heart failure. Gain experience in the acute and chronic management of patients following cardiac transplantation. Develop an understanding of cardiac transplant immunology and the use of immunosuppressives. Develop a competence in performing and interpreting right heart catheterizations. Understand the metabolic abnormalities of exercise physiology in patients with heart failure. Gain experience in selecting patients for VAD and following patients post-VAD placement. EXPECTATIONS FOR THE FIRST-YEAR FELLOW: OUTPATIENT HEART FAILURE Prior to the start of the rotation, Jill Griswold will ask the fellow which available HF clinics he or she would like to attend. Once selections are made, the fellow must attend those clinics. If a conflict arises, Jill Griswold and the clinic attending must be notified as soon as possible. In clinic, the fellow will be expected to interview, examine, and develop a treatment plan for patients with advanced HF or pulmonary hypertension. In order to do this effectively, the fellow must have a detailed understanding of the patient’s prior history and management strategies. The fellow will then present the patient to the HF attending prior to seeing the patient with the HF attending. The fellow will be expected to write the note for the clinic visit in MiChart in a timely fashion. The fellow will spend time in the right heart catheterization lab. There, the fellow will perform right heart catheterizations under the supervision of a HF attending. He or she will also observe the performance of cardiac biopsies. Between procedures, the HF attending and fellow will discuss findings from prior catheterizations. The fellow will be expected to attend Thursday afternoon HF conferences from 2-5 PM. EXPECTATIONS FOR THE SECOND-YEAR FELLOW: INPATIENT HEART FAILURE The fellow should be an active participant on rounds. With attending supervision, the fellow will lead the HF team that is composed of nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and case managers. The fellow will guide clinical decision-making, educate team members and patients when necessary, and explain the plan of care to each patient on the service. The attending and fellow will ultimately choose one of two approaches: The fellow sees all the patients on the service with the attending and HF team. The fellow sees half of the service patients with nurse practitioners and a pharmacist. The fellow then rounds separately with the attending on these patients later in the day. The fellow would be expected to briefly present each patient and provide a treatment plan for the day. No matter the approach, the fellow should know the patient’s history, clinical course, and treatment plan in detail. If this is not the case, active participation will be difficult. The fellow will see all HF consults and staff them with the HF attending. In the case that the CCU attending is not a HF specialist, the fellow will round on all patients with advanced HF in the CCU. The patient would then be discussed and seen with the HF attending later in the day. Following rounds, the fellow should be available to assist members of the HF team with issues that arise. At the end of the day, the fellow is expected to “run the list” with the attending and HF team touching on important clinical issues and decisions that arise during the work day. Each week, the fellow will work every weekday and at least one weekend day. Weekend coverage should be discussed with the HF attending at the start of the rotation. The fellow will be excused for continuity clinic. The fellow will be expected to attend Thursday afternoon HF conferences from 2-5 PM. IMPORTANT TOPICS Pathophysiology Role of neurohormonal activation in the progression of HF Relationship of LaPlace’s law to progression of HF Pathophysiology Understand the Frank-Starling relationship, pressure-volume loops, and the force-tension curve. Understand how preload, afterload, and contractility impact myocardial performance (SV). Understand how inotropes, vasopressors, and vasodilators alter myocardial performance (SV). Classification/Etiologies ACC/AHA Stages of HF (Stages A-D) Classification of HF symptoms based on NYHA Functional Classification (I-IV) Common causes of cardiomyopathy Diagnostic Evaluation Class I recommendations for the initial workup of HF (history, labs, EKG, imaging, etc.) Indications and approach to evaluation of CAD and revascularization in patients with HF Indications for right heart catheterization, coronary angiography, and endomyocardial biopsy Diagnostic and prognostic utility of serum BNP levels Indications patient has progressed to Stage D HF despite optimal medical therapy Treatment Evidence-based medical therapies for patients with Stage B HFREF (ACE, BB) Evidence-based medical therapies for patients with Stage C-D HFREF (ACE, BB, AA, Hydralazine-Nitrate) Recommended medical therapies for the treatment of HFPEF Role of inotropic agents in the treatment of HF Clinical events/findings suggesting advanced, Stage D HF Device Therapy, MCS, and Transplantation Selection criteria for ICD implantation for prevention of SCD Selection criteria for chronic resynchronization therapy Indications and contraindications for MCS and cardiac transplantation Frequently encountered complications from LVADs. Be familiar with immunosuppression and antibiotic prophylaxis used for cardiac transplantation Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Inheritance pattern and the underlying pathology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Understand how changes in preload, afterload, and contractility affect LVOT obstruction in HCM Indications for medical and surgical therapy of HCM Recommended medical and surgical therapies for HCM Risk factors used to determine need for ICD placement in HCM patients Pulmonary Hypertension Diagnostic criteria and WHO classification of pulmonary hypertension Cellular targets for the commonly used pharmacologic therapies Indications and evidence for Prostacyclins, ERAs, PDE-5 Inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers General approach to selecting pharmacologic therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension Treatment goals for pharmacologic therapy of pulmonary hypertension BOOK CHAPTERS Braunwald’s Heart Disease Chapters 24-32 (located on shared drive) 2012 ACC BOARD REVIEW LECTURES Heart Failure 1: Pathophysiology (Drazner) Heart Failure 2: Cardiomyopathies (Russell) Heart Failure 3: Treatment (Fang) Pulmonary Hypertension (Mathier) Heart Failure 4: Cases (Drazner, Russell, Fang, Mathier) EP 8: ICD and CRT Therapies (Hundley & Verdino) MAYO BOARD REVIEW LECTURES Systolic Heart Failure: Pathophysiology, Etiology, Initial Evaluation Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure Cardiac Device and Transplant Therapy Diastolic Heart Failure The Cardiomyopathies Ventricular Function GUIDELINES 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy REVIEW ARTICLES & OTHER STUDIES HFREF and HFPEF McMurray (2010). Systolic heart failure. NEJM. Maisel et al. (2008). Using natriuretic peptide levels in clinical practice. Eur J Heart Failure. Cohn (1996). The management of chronic heart failure. NEJM. Butler et al. (2014). Developing therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JACC HF. Wan et al. (2014). Pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction. JACC. Heart Failure Pharmacotherapy Overgaard & Dzavik (2008). Inotropes and Vasopressors. Circulation. Francis et al. (2014). Inotropes. JACC. Ambrosy et al. (2014). The use of digoxin in patients with worsening heart failure. JACC. Mechanical Circulatory Support and Transplantation Aaronson et al. (1997). Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation. Stewart & Givertz (2012). Mechanical circulatory support for advanced HF. Circulation. Lund, Matthews, and Aaronson (2010). Patient selection for left ventricular assist devices. EJHF. Miller & Guglin (2013). Patient selection for ventricular assist devices. JACC. Burke & Givertz (2014). Assessment and management of HF after LVAD implantation. Circulation. Wilson et al. (2009). Ventricular assist devices: the challenges of outpatient management. JACC. Pulmonary Hypertension McLaughlin & McGoon (2006). Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. Galie et al. (2013). Updated treatment algorithm of pulmonary arterial hypertension. JACC. Hoepper et al. (2013). Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. JACC. McLaughlin et al. (2013). Treatment goals of pulmonary hypertension. JACC. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Maron et al (2014). Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. JACC. RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS Beta Blockers Carvedilol Metoprolol Succinate Bisoprolol ACE Inhibitors Captopril Lisinopril Enalapril Ramipril Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Valsartan Candesartan Losartan Aldosterone Antagonists Spironolactone Eplerenone CAPRICORN: Post-MI patients with EF ≤ 40% COPERNICUS: Severe HF and EF < 25% COMET: Carvedilol vs. Metoprolol Tartrate US Carvedilol Trial: Mild-Severe HF and EF ≤ 35% MERIT-HF: Class II-IV HFREF patients CIBIS-II: Class III-IV HFREF patients SAVE: Post-MI patients with EF ≤ 40% w/o HF ATLAS: Class II-IV HF patients with EF ≤ 30% SOLVD: Patients with HFREF with EF ≤ 35%. CONSENSUS: Class IV HF patients AIRE: Clinical HF in patients admitted for MI HOPE: Patients at ↑ risk for CV events with NL EF PEACE: Stable CAD patients with normal EF VALIANT: ARB alternative to ACE in HFREF Val-HeFT: NYHA II-IV with EF < 40% and LVE CHARM-Alternative: ARB alternative to ACE HEAAL: Class II-IV HFREF with EF ≤ 40% Elite II: Losartan vs. Captopril in HF with EF ≤ 40% RALES: NYHA Class III-IV HF and EF ≤ 35%. EPHESUS: Post-MI (3-14d), EF ≤ 40%, HF or DM EMPHASIS-HF: NYHA Class II HF w/ EF ≤ 30% Hydralazine & Isosorbide Dinitrate Taylor 2009: African-Americans w/ III-IV HFREF V-HEFT I: Men with HF and EF ≤ 45% or LVE V-HEFT II: Hydralazine/Isosorbide Dinitrate vs. Enalapril Digoxin DIG Trial: Patients with HF and EF ≤ 45%. Diuretics DOSE: Evaluates diuretic dosing for ADHF Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids GISSI-HF: Class II-IV HFREF and HFPEF patients Pulmonary Artery Catheterization ESCAPE: Role of PA catheter in ADHF treatment Exercise Training HF-ACTION: Stable outpatients with HFREF Revascularization STICH: CABG vs. OMT in HFREF (EF ≤ 35%) Chronic Resynchronization Therapy CARE-HF: CRT in pts with ↓EF + dyssynchrony MADIT-CRT: Class I-II, EF ≤ 30%, QRS > 130 Left Ventricular Assist Device REMATCH: Role for Destination LVAD INTERMACS: Risk stratification scheme. Slaughter 2009: Continuous vs. Pulsatile LVAD