Download Implications For Transition-State Analogs And Catalytic

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Ligand binding assay wikipedia , lookup

Photosynthetic reaction centre wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup

Glass transition wikipedia , lookup

Immunoprecipitation wikipedia , lookup

Catalytic triad wikipedia , lookup

Enzyme wikipedia , lookup

Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Antibody wikipedia , lookup

Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Catalytic Antibody – AZ-28 Oxy Cope
Rearrangement Biocatalyst
CHEM*4450 – Biochemistry and Structure of Macromolecules
Seminar Series
Presented By: Woo-Jin Yoo
Seminar Outline
1. Introduction
2. Implications For Transition-State Analogs And Catalytic
Antibodies
3. AZ-28: Oxy-Cope Rearrangement Catalytic Antibody
4. Structure And Function Relationship Of AZ-28 With
Transition State Analog
5. Structure And Function Relationship Of AZ-28 And
Germline Antibody
6. Concluding Remarks
7. References
Introduction
Rationale for the development of biocatalyst
Advantages:
• high regio- and stereoselectivity
• environmentally friendly
• non-toxic
Biocatalysts: enzymes, bioengineered microorganisms, ribozymes,
catalytic antibodies
Advantage of catalytic antibodies:
Potential to design a biocatalyst for a specific reaction
Implications For Transition-State Analogs
And Catalytic Antibodies
How do enzymes accelerate chemical reactions?
For one substrate to product situation:
Corresponding Energy Diagram:
Enzymes accelerate chemical reactions by stabilizing the transition
state.
What are the available physical/chemical forces available for
binding and catalysis?
•Van der Waal
•Hydrogen bonding
•Hydrophobic effect
•Ionic Interactions
Designing a protein to catalyze a chemical reaction:
Idea: Proteins which binds transition state strongly should be able to
catalyze a chemical reaction
Application: Immunize an animal using a transition state analog as a
hapten to form antibodies that bind to the transition state
analog
Example: Oxy-Cope rearrangement catalytic antibody AZ-28
1. Determination and synthesis of the hapten (transition state analog)
2. Attachment of hapten to a macromolecule
BSA = Bovine Serum Albumin
KLH = Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin
3. Preparation of monoclonal antibodies
AZ-28: Oxy-Cope Rearrangement Catalytic
Antibody
Background Information
• rearrangement is based on a diradical, cyclohexane TS intermediate
• driven by the formation of a keto-enol compound
Why is this reaction slow/not possible at room temperature?
• transition state is a six-membered ring in the chair conformation
• in solution, there are possible rotation of sigma bonds
Hapten design: Rationale
• transition state is a cyclohexane intermediate
•
•
strong preference for aromatic rings for catalytic antibodies
CONH(CH2)3COOH – is the tether to BSA/KLH
Structure And Function Relationship Of AZ28 With Transition State Analog
AZ-28: Unliganded Mature OxyCope Catalytic Antibody
Binding interactions between AZ-28 and Transition State Analog
5-phenyl group
• at the bottom of cavity
• surrounded by large number of
aromatic and hydrophobic residues
• -stacking with H103His
2-phenyl group
• at the opening of the binding pocket
• orientation is fixed by -stacking with
H96His and van der waal interaction
with side chain of L91Tyr
Cyclohexane ring
• position fixed by H-bonding with OH
group and the imidazole ring of H96His
• van der waal contact with L33Asn
H101Asp
Mechanistic proposal for the Oxy-Cope rearrangement with AZ-28
1. Entopic Effect
Extended conformation is fixed into the energetically unfavorable conformation by the
binding site of the antibody
G = H - TS
Fixing conformation = S , G 
2. Electronic Effect
Side chain of H96His and H-bonding of bridging water to H50Glu increases the
electron density of oxygen
Increased electron density on the oxygen will increase the rate of Oxy-Cope
rearrangement
Structure And Function Relationship Of AZ-28
And Germline Antibody
Fab of Mature Antibody
Fab of Germline Antibody
What the heck is going on?
AZ-28 binds the TS analog more tightly than the germline antibody, but the
germline antibody is a better catalyst
Comparison of AZ-28 with germline antibody
AZ-28 bound with TSA
germline bound with TSA
Reason for increased catalysis of germline antibody
Recall:
The transition state of the Oxy-Cope
rearrangement is a diradical
The radical can be stabilized by the aromatic group
Molecular orbital reasons for increased catalytic activity
Note: stabilization of the transition state decreases the energy
requirements for catalysis
When radical is in the same
plane as aromatic ring
When radical is perpendicular
to the aromatic ring
• The germline antibody fixes the TSA so that the aromatic rings are
63.2o (5-phenyl) and 57.9o (2-phenyl) to the cyclohexane framework
• AZ-28 fixes the TSA so that the aromatic rings are 81o (5-phenyl)
and 85o (2-phenyl) to the cyclohexane framework
Electron density diagram of the active site for AZ-28
Structural reasons for difference in aromatic ring angle between AZ-28 and
germline antibody
Primary sequence difference
Structural basis for catalytic properties of germline and affinity matured antibody
Only L34 amino acid residue is at the active site
AZ-28 – L34Asn
Germline – L34Ser
Liganded AZ-28 – 2.6 Å
Unliganded AZ-28 – 3.2 Å
Liganded Germline – 3.0 Å
Unliganded Germline – 3.7 Å
Result:
Increased flexibility of active
site for germline antibody
lowers the rotational barrier
for the C2-phenyl
Concluding Remarks
Comments: AZ-28 binds more tightly to the TSA than germline antibody.
However, germline antibody is a better catalyst
Reason: Flaw in the design of TSA. True TS possess sp2 carbons attached
to the aromatic groups. TSA have sp3 carbons and in solution, the
aromatic groups prefer to be perpendicular to the cyclohexane
framework
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ulrich, H.D., Mundorff, E.C., Santarsiero, B.D., Driggers, E.M., Stevens, R.C., and
Schultz, P.G. (1997) Nature 389, 271-275.
Driggers, E.M., Cho, H.S., Liu, C.W., Katzka, C.P., Braisted, A.C., Ulrich, H.D.,
Wemmer, D.E. and Schultz, P.G. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 1945-1958.
Mundorff, E.C., Hanson, M.A., Varvak, A., Ulrich, H.D., Schultz, P.G., and Stevens,
R.C. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 627-632.
Braisted, A.C. and Schultz, P.G. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 2211-2212.
Mader, M.M., and Bartlett, P.A. (1997) Chem. Rev., 97, 1281-1301.