Download Cross-Border Cooperation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantitative methods in criminology wikipedia , lookup

History of criminal justice wikipedia , lookup

California Proposition 36, 2012 wikipedia , lookup

Zero tolerance wikipedia , lookup

Feminist school of criminology wikipedia , lookup

Social disorganization theory wikipedia , lookup

Broken windows theory wikipedia , lookup

Critical criminology wikipedia , lookup

Crime hotspots wikipedia , lookup

Complicity wikipedia , lookup

Counter-terrorism wikipedia , lookup

Criminology wikipedia , lookup

Right realism wikipedia , lookup

Crime wikipedia , lookup

Intelligence-led policing wikipedia , lookup

Criminalization wikipedia , lookup

Public-order crime wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Cross-Border Cooperation
November 17, 2003
Purpose
• Highlight how Canada and US advance
cross-border cooperation
 Canada-US law enforcement context
 Challenges, successes, and lessons learned
• Consider how Canada-US tools might be applied to
bilateral/multilateral relationships within the
hemisphere
2
Canada-US Relationship
• Complex relationship with many challenges
• Different methods but similar objectives
• Success relies on intelligence-led and
multi-disciplinary approaches
• Canada-US Smart Border Declaration post
9-11 renewed commitment to enhance border
cooperation
3
Cross-Border Crime Forum:
Overview
• Bilateral consultative mechanism first
established in 1997 to address emerging
problem of cross-border crime
• Has since evolved to address various
cross-border law enforcement and national
security concerns
• Focus on development of best practices and
tools to resolve operational/policy/legal
obstacles
4
Cross-Border Crime Forum:
Successes
• Joint Threat Assessments
 Applied to organized crime, firearms trafficking,
identity theft, migrant smuggling, and illicit drugs
 Leads to informed policy development
• Development of multi-agency enforcement teams
 IBETs
• Enhanced information exchange
 MOU to facilitate electronic exchange of fingerprints
5
Cross-Border Crime Forum:
Lessons Learned
• Success achieved with strong, sustained political
leadership
• Agenda set based on joint priorities
• Strong secretariat, long-term and ad hoc working
groups to drive agenda
• Ensure broad spectrum of stakeholders
• Coordination and cooperation need not be
expensive
6
Cross-Border Crime Forum:
Workshop
• Workshop will address themes raised in this
presentation
• Timeframe: March 29-April 1, 2004
(location to be determined)
7
Cross Border Law Enforcement:
Tools
• The Cross-Border Crime Forum sets
the policy direction for Canada-US
cross-border law enforcement
cooperation
• The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
develop the law enforcement tools that
we use to fight crime at the border
8
Intelligence-led Policing
• Uses criminal intelligence analysis as an
objective decision-making tool
• Develops effective policing strategies
• Involves external partnerships and a
change of culture and process
9
Criminal Operational Model
• Introduced in early 2000
• Management tool/guide for criminal operations
• Focus all resources on priorities
• Planning to become:
• Intelligence-led
• Proactive, and allows for strategic and tactical
decision making
10
Criminal Operational Model
• Integrated intelligence
• Threat Assessment (Sleipnir)
• Intelligence Sharing
• Integrated operations
• Integrated Teams
• Cross-Border Cooperation
11
SLEIPNIR
12
SLEIPNIR: Workshop
• Analytical threat-measurement technique
• Assesses the relative threat posed by crime
groups
• Sets national operational priorities based on the
level of threat
• 20 participants, 5-days, Feb 2004, South America
13
Undercover Operations: Workshop
• Establishment of an undercover program
• Benefits and dangers in undercover operations
• Selection process for undercover personnel
• Focus on the countries of the Andean sub-region.
• 20 participants, 5-day workshop, South America, Feb
2004.
14
Human Sources and Source
Witness Protection: Workshop
•
Financial and psychological support
• Security issues
• Address human rights concerns
• Consistent standards in multi-jurisdictional cases
• 20 participants, 5-days, Caribbean, 2004
15
Conclusion
• By working together to manage the
various aspects of the drug problem at
and across our hemisphere’s borders, we
will all be doing our part to address the
hemispheric drug problem
16