* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Trade Capacity Building in Sub-Saharan Africa: Impact and
Disinvestment from South Africa wikipedia , lookup
Corporate venture capital wikipedia , lookup
Leveraged buyout wikipedia , lookup
Private equity wikipedia , lookup
Private equity in the 2000s wikipedia , lookup
Capital gains tax in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup
International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup
Private equity in the 1980s wikipedia , lookup
Private Capital Flows to Africa: Opportunities, Risks and Way Forward Patrick N. Osakwe UN Economic Commission for Africa 1 I. Background The most important challenge facing Africa is how to eradicate poverty and extreme hunger Africa is still the region with the highest percentage of people in extreme poverty and deprivation The 2007 MDG Report indicates that it is the only region at risk of not meeting any of the MDGs. Mobilization of finance is crucial to reversing the current trend and increasing the likelihood of African countries meeting the MDGs by the target date. 2 World leaders recognized the importance of finance in meeting the MDGs when they adopted the Monterrey Consensus in 2002 The mobilization of private capital flows is one of the six core areas of the Monterrey Consensus. Mobilization of domestic resources for development Mobilization of international financial resources (Private Capital Flows) Promoting international trade as an engine of development Increasing international financial and technical cooperation for development External debt Systemic issues 3 II. Forms of Private Capital Flows Equity Flows FDI (equity stake with control) Portfolio investment (equity stake without control) Debt Flows Bank loans Bonds 4 Trends in Private Capital Flows (US$ billion) 1998 2000 2005 Developing countries 193.4 187 551.4 East Asia & the Pacific 6.5 28.8 169.7 Middle East & North Africa 9.2 3.9 24.3 Sub-Saharan Africa 13.9 10.2 29.6 5 Private Capital Flows to North Africa (billion $) 1990 2005 Net FDI Inflows 0.96 11.2 Portfolio Equity 0.01 0.80 Net Debt Flows -0.52 3.14 Worker’s Remittances 7.25 13.97 6 III. Theoretical Arguments for Capital Mobility Lifts the constraints on domestic investment imposed by low national savings Leads to more efficient allocation of resources Allows countries to smooth consumption over time Borrow during a negative shock and repay during a positive shock thereby making consumption less volatile than income In practice investors are reluctant to lend to developing countries experiencing negative shocks (case of Chile in 1998) 7 Permits domestic residents to diversify risks through holding diversified international portfolios Risks are less correlated between countries than within countries Provides access to intellectual property Technological know-how Managerial expertise Access to foreign markets It subjects countries to the discipline of the international market Fear of capital flow reversal is often a stimulus to more responsible economic policies 8 IV. Concerns about Capital Mobility Capital mobility increases macroeconomic volatility and this has negative consequences for an economy Exposes countries to new shocks (external) Can magnify the effect of domestic shocks It increases vulnerability to large and rapid reversals of capital flows (often leading to financial crises) These crises are very costly. In the case of East Asia it led to losses of more than 10 percent of GDP. Large inflows resulting from capital mobility also contribute to real exchange rate appreciation and loss of competitiveness 9 V. The Evidence The key question here is whether the benefits of capital mobility offset the costs? The evidence is mixed Several studies found no evidence that capital account liberalization leads to faster growth (Rodrik 1998; Kraay 1998; Edison 2002; Prasad et al 2003) Few studies found that liberalization had a positive impact (Quinn 1997) There are several messages from these results If there is a relationship between capital mobility and growth, it is neither strong nor robust The composition of capital flows as well as domestic economic conditions may be important in determining whether or not capital mobility has a positive impact on an economy. 10 VI. Managing Capital Flows: The Way Forward The benefits of capital mobility are not automatic. They accrue to countries that have taken appropriate steps to exploit them The key policy challenge facing African countries is how to maximize the benefits and minimize the costs. This requires several actions at the national level 11 Adopting a gradual approach to capital account liberalization. This gives room for Development of financial infrastructure Complementary investments in education and physical infrastructure to increase absorptive capacity of flows Paying more attention to the composition of capital flows and ensuring that they go to sectors with high potential for employment creation Putting in place policies to limit vulnerability to financial crises Sound Macroeconomic Policies Protection of property rights and the rule of law Political stability 12 Managing capital flows to avoid risk of real exchange rate appreciations that lead to loss of competitiveness Adoption of exchange rate regimes that give room for dealing with capital flows Use of selective capital controls when necessary 13 THANK YOU 14