* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Notes on Jamieson, chapter 2
Survey
Document related concepts
Ethics in religion wikipedia , lookup
Catholic views on God wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Euthyphro dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Cultural relativism wikipedia , lookup
Moral development wikipedia , lookup
The Sovereignty of Good wikipedia , lookup
School of Salamanca wikipedia , lookup
Divine command theory wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE) Notes on Dale Jamieson, Ethics and the Environment, chapter 2 Chapter Two: Human Morality • • • The Nature and Functions of Morality Three Challenges to Morality What Can These Challenges Teach Us? The Nature and Functions of Morality • • • Jamieson’s definition of morality = “a behavioral system, with an attendant psychology, that has evolved among social animals for the purposes of regulating their interactions” (pp. 26-7). Hobbesian solution to the problem of a “war of all against all.” Morality, then, is a “pattern of behavior” that enables social cooperation and reciprocation among individuals. Three Challenges to Morality • • • Amoralism Theism Relativism Amoralism • • An amoralist = someone who thinks that “there is no such thing as right or wrong” and so “chooses to opt out of morality altogether” (p. 31). Thought experiment: Dirk the Amoralist (pp. 32-3) Theism • • A theist thinks that “morality comes only from God” and is not, as Jamieson claims, a “human construction” (p. 33). Two reasons why someone might worry that “without God, everything is permitted” (p. 34): (1) Without god, morality would have no content. (2) Without God, we would not be motivated to act morally. Relativism • • • A relativist = someone who “denies the possibility of moral claims transcending the moral system of the speaker’s own society” (p. 39). Theoretical and practical objections to relativism Strengths of relativism What Challenges to Morality Can Teach Us • • • Morality is ubiquitous and difficult to escape. Morality does not need the support of God. Morality is not culture-bound.