Download Rosacea: skin innate immunity gone awry? - PIEL

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Sepsis wikipedia , lookup

Inflammation wikipedia , lookup

Gluten immunochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup

Immune system wikipedia , lookup

Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup

Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup

Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup

Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup

Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup

Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup

Antimicrobial peptides wikipedia , lookup

Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup

Immunomics wikipedia , lookup

Plasmodium falciparum wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
© 2007 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturemedicine
NEWS AND VIEWS
cytokines8. But there is also a similarity
between IL-15 and high mobility group box-1
protein (HMGB-1), which is a transcriptional
activator of proinflammatory cytokines in
macrophages, especially in the setting of
CLP-induced sepsis9. Like IL-15, HMGB-1
is secreted by macrophages, after which it
interacts with an unidentified receptor on
these cells to induce production of proinflammatory cytokines. As such, both IL-15
and HMGB-1 act intracellularly as well as
extracellularly.
The Orinska et al.5 study echoes other
studies in which similar improvement in survival from CLP-induced sepsis was observed
when cysteine protease dipeptidyl peptidase1 (ref. 10) or Smad3 (ref. 11) were genetically
removed from mast cells. These data might
lead one to conclude that some products of
mast cells weaken the protective response
to CLP-induced sepsis; as the present study
indicates, intracellular IL-15 represses production of protective factors in mast cells. It
is likely that mast cells can contribute either
negatively or positively to defenses in sepsis,
depending on the interplay between complex
intracellular events.
In the IL-15–deficient mice, the other features of sepsis seemed to be unaffected. For
instance, the high levels of proinflammatory
cytokines induced by CLP seemed to be largely
unaltered, at least as assessed with peritoneal
fluids5. The authors infer that the cytokine
content in peritoneal fluids reflects the cytokine
content in blood, but this assumption should
be validated in future studies. Also, a matter of
considerable debate is whether the abundance
of proinflammatory cytokines during sepsis is
linked to unfavorable outcomes, or whether
their presence simply means that sepsis has
compromised cytokine homeostasis. The data
presented by Orinska et al. could suggest that
the latter case is true5.
There are several important unresolved
issues regarding the role of IL-15 in sepsis. First, because IL-15 can be synthesized
in a variety of cells, it is possible that IL-15–
deficient mice are protected from sepsis through
mechanisms involving these other cell types.
Second, the balance between the immune and
the inflammatory responses in IL-15–deficient
mice should be investigated further. Finally,
perhaps the information from the current
study can be used to therapeutic advantage in
treating sepsis in humans. It seems possible that
reduced expression of IL-15 would induce neutrophil chemoattractants, presenting a potential
treatment strategy for sepsis. The report from
Orinska et al.5 provides us with useful information about the complex series of events unfolding during sepsis, and suggests that IL-15 might
represent a target for clinical intervention.
COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT
The author declares no competing financial interests.
1. Angus, D.C. et al. Crit. Care Med. 29, 1303–1310
(2001).
2. Martin, G.S., Mannino, D.M., Eaton, S. & Moss, M. N.
Engl. J. Med. 348, 1546–1554 (2003).
3. Echtenacher, B., Mannel, D.N. & Hultner, L. Nature
381, 75–77 (1996).
4. Remick, D.G., Newcomb, D.E., Bolgos, G.L. & Call,
D.R. Shock 13, 110–116 (2000).
5. Orinska, Z. et al. Nat. Med. 13, 927–934 (2007).
6. Ohteki, T. Curr. Mol. Med. 2, 371–380 (2002).
7. Hiromatsu, T. et al. J. Infect. Dis. 187, 1442–1451
(2003).
8. Mulligan, M.S., Jones, M.L., Vaporciyan, A.A.,
Howard, M.C. & Ward, P.A. J. Immunol. 151, 5666–
5674 (1993).
9. Lotze, M.T. & Tracey, K.J. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 331–
342 (2005).
10. Mallen-St Clair, J., Pham, C.T., Villalta, S.A., Caughey,
G.H. & Wolters, P.J. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 628–634
(2004).
11. Kanamaru, Y. et al. J. Immunol. 174, 4193–4197
(2005).
Rosacea: skin innate immunity gone awry?
Charles L Bevins & Fu-Tong Liu
Rosacea is a common skin disorder marked by chronic inflammation and vascular abnormalities. Two new features
of the skin lesions have been identified: elevated levels of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptides and of a related serine
protease. These molecules of innate immunity may represent key elements of pathogenesis, as well as new targets
for effective therapies (pages 975–981).
Attractive new hypotheses about the pathogenesis of idiopathic clinical disorders
provide exciting opportunities for the development of novel therapies and new hope for
affected individuals. Rosacea is a common
chronic skin disorder often characterized
by persistent erythema (redness) accompanied by visible blood vessels across the central portion of the face. Called the ‘curse of
Charles L. Bevins is in the Departments of
Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine,
and Graduate Group in Immunology, University of
California, Davis, California 95616, USA; Fu-Tong
Liu is in the Department of Dermatology, School
of Medicine, and Graduate Group in Immunology,
University of California, Sacramento, California
95817, USA.
e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
904
the Celts’, rosacea typically affects those of
northern European descent, but its etiology
is unclear1. The most cited theory links this
disorder to abnormal cutaneous vasculature2.
Dilated blood vessels feature prominently
in the affected skin, which explains the persistent erythema3. On the other hand, as in
acne, microbes and their associated immune
responses are often implicated in the possible pathogenesis of rosacea2,4. In this issue
of Nature Medicine, Yamasaki et al. show that
high levels of an antimicrobial peptide and
its processing serine protease are features of
rosacea lesions, which suggests that aberrant
innate immunity is central to this disease5.
Cathelicidins, a major family of antimicrobial
peptides in mammals and in other vertebrates,
are expressed in leukocytes and in the epithelial
cells of many tissues, where they play key roles
in innate immune responses6,7. In addition to
their function as endogenous antibiotics, cathelicidins are also signaling molecules, coordinating local vascular function, leukocyte migration
and wound healing responses (Fig. 1a).
Human cathelicidin begins as an 18-kDa precursor molecule that is cleaved into an N-terminal propeptide of approximately 100 amino
acids and a C-terminal antimicrobial peptide,
LL-37, named for the two leucines that comprise
its first two N-terminal residues and its length
of 37 amino acids. Depending on the tissue,
specific serine proteases process cathelicidin
to liberate active peptides, including stratum
corneum tryptic enzyme (SCTE, also known as
kallikrein 5) in the skin.
Cathelicidin expression correlates with
effective antibacterial defense in skin tissue
in dermatological disorders such as psoriasis
VOLUME 13 | NUMBER 8 | AUGUST 2007 NATURE MEDICINE
and atopic dermatitis8. For example, in psoriatic lesions, LL-37 and other antimicrobial
peptides are upregulated, and secondary
infection is rare. By contrast, in atopic dermatitis the expression of these antimicrobial
peptides is dampened and skin infection is
more common8. In light of these facts, and
knowing that the downstream effects of
cathelicidin signaling mimic some features
of rosacea, Yamasaki et al. proposed that
abnormal expression of cathelicidin may be
a salient component of this disease5.
Yamasaki et al. found that cathelicidin
expression is significantly elevated in rosaceaaffected skin as compared to healthy skin5.
Additionally, the rosacea samples contained
several additional cathelicidin processing
isoforms, creating a rosacea-specific peptide
profile. Two of the rosacea-specific peptides,
but not a peptide found in normal skin,
induced the release of the pro-inflammatory
cytokine interleukin (IL)-8 from cultured
human keratinocytes. What’s more, when the
two rosacea-associated peptides were injected
subcutaneously in mice in amounts similar to
those seen in lesions, they induced erythema,
vascular dilation and cutaneous inflammation. These results suggested that high expression and abnormal processing of cathelicidin
might underlie the inflammation associated
with rosacea.
Yamasaki et al. also detected high levels
of the dermal processing serine protease
SCTE in rosacea lesions, suggesting that
the elevated activity of this enzyme generated the rosacea-specific peptide profile.
To test this, the authors performed a series
of experiments to raise SCTE levels and
to determine the resulting inflammatory
response. Subcutaneous injection of SCTE
at concentrations similar to those found in
rosacea lesions caused erythema and cutaneous inflammation, and generated a peptide profile from the endogenous mouse
cathelicidin precursor that resembled the
rosacea-specific profile observed in the
human clinical samples. Inactivated SCTE
did not show this proteolytic activity, and
cathelicidin-deficient mice had markedly
reduced SCTE-induced cutaneous pathology.
Together, these findings provide strong
evidence that the elevated levels of SCTE
and cathelicidin peptides found in rosacea-affected skin contribute to the chronic
inflammatory response that characterizes
rosacea skin lesions (Fig. 1b).
One question that remains is why cathelicidin
and SCTE levels are elevated in rosacea and, in
particular, whether this occurs in response to
specific triggers. Unlike in acne, no microorganism has been firmly associated with rosacea, but
a
b
Normal
Cathelicidin
precursor
Cathelicidin
precursor
Normal
SCTE-mediated
processing
LL-37
Chemotactic
Rosacea
SCTE
LL-37 and
variant peptides
Angiogenic
Bactericidal
Proinflammatory
activities
Effective innate
immunity
Chronic
inflammation
Katie Ris-Vicari
© 2007 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturemedicine
NEWS AND VIEWS
Figure 1 Rosacea and proteolytic processing of cathelicidin peptides. (a) Cathelicidin peptides in
normal cutaneous innate immunity. Cathelicidin is initially expressed as a propeptide that requires
proteolytic processing to generate biologically active LL-37 peptide. In the skin, processing is mediated
by stratum corneum tryptic enzyme (SCTE). LL-37 contributes to effective innate immunity through
its bactericidal, chemotactic, angiogenic and other biological activities. (b) A model for cathelicidin
peptides in rosacea. Yamasaki et al. show that expression of cathelicidin and its proteolytic processing
enzyme, SCTE, is significantly elevated in rosacea. Increased expression of the biologically active
LL-37 and several unusual processing isoforms is detected in rosacea lesions. The proinflammatory
(chemotactic and angiogenic) activities of these processed peptides are central to the chronic
inflammatory changes of rosacea, according to the new model proposed by Yamasaki et al.
a cutaneous mite of the genus Demodex has been
implicated2. These tiny creatures can be found
in the skin of most healthy adults, but their
numbers are significantly higher in rosaceaaffected skin1,2. It is possible that Demodex influences the expression levels and the processing
of cathelicidin. House dust mites, for example,
have enzymes that can cleave human proteins
and activate host protease-activated receptors
(PARs). PARs induce both the expression of
antimicrobial peptides9 and the upregulation of
proinflammatory cytokines in epithelial cells10.
Perhaps Demodex activates PARs in the skin,
promoting both cathelicidin induction and
inflammation.
Alternatively, the larger numbers of Demodex
mites on rosacea-affected skin may be a result,
rather than the cause, of abnormal cathelicidin processing. As Yamasaki et al. point out,
the change in the local antimicrobial peptide
expression profile may influence the population
of commensal microbes, including Demodex, in
rosacea-affected skin, which may in turn contribute to the inflammatory response.
The cathelicidin peptides also regulate
blood vessels, and this study therefore offers
insight into the vascular phenotypes associated with rosacea. For example, LL-37
can induce angiogenesis through a direct,
receptor-mediated effect on endothelial
cells11. Yamasaki et al. noted that injection
of LL-37 into the skin caused erythema and
vascular dilation, together with the influx
of inflammatory cells. Whether the vascular
NATURE MEDICINE VOLUME 13 | NUMBER 8 | AUGUST 2007
response precedes or follows the inflammatory response remains to be determined.
Finally, the findings by Yamasaki et al. suggest that therapeutic agents targeting cathelicidin peptides or SCTE could be useful for
the treatment of rosacea. Although a number
of treatments exist, many of rosacea’s clinical
features, especially the persistent erythema, are
difficult to remedy. Interestingly, tetracycline
is one of the most commonly used treatments
for this disease and, in addition to its antibiotic
activity, this drug can inhibit metalloproteases12.
Perhaps tetracycline lowers proinflammatory
cathelicidin peptide levels by inhibiting metalloprotease activity in skin or by indirectly affecting
SCTE. Direct measurement of LL-37 before and
after tetracycline treatment could test this possible connection. Based on the new data, it will
also be interesting to determine whether topical
application of serine protease inhibitors could
treat rosacea lesions. Additionally, because the
innate immune system may be compromised in
rosacea lesions, new antimicrobial therapies may
be effective in eradicating microbes that might
contribute to the disease.
COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
1. Buechner, S.A. Dermatology 210, 100–108 (2005).
2. Crawford, G.H., Pelle, M.T. & James, W.D. J. Am. Acad.
Dermatol. 51, 327–341 (2004).
3. Neumann, E. & Frithz, A. Int. J. Dermatol. 37, 263–266
(1998).
4. Fredricks, D.N. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 6,
167–169 (2001).
5. Yamasaki, K. et al. Nat. Med. 13, 975–981 (2007).
905
NEWS AND VIEWS
6. Nizet, V. et al. Nature 414, 454–457 (2001).
7. Zanetti, M. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 7, 179–196
(2005).
8. Ong, P.Y. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 1151–1160
(2002).
9. Chung, W.O., Hansen, S.R., Rao, D. & Dale, B.A.
J. Immunol. 173, 5165–5170 (2004).
10. Asokananthan, N. et al. J. Immunol. 169, 4572–4578
(2002).
11. Brown, A. et al. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 29, 381–
389 (2003).
12. Koczulla, R. et al. J. Clin. Invest. 111, 1665–1672
(2003).
13. Acharya, M.R., Venitz, J., Figg, W.D. & Sparreboom, A.
Drug Resist. Updat. 7, 195–208 (2004).
David A Thorley-Lawson & Karen A Duca
The role of microbial pathogens in human cancer is a fertile area of research, with important implications for treatment.
Two pathogens implicated in Burkitt’s lymphoma have now been shown to directly interact with one another.
Some microbial pathogens are known to play
a role in the development of human cancers;
topping the list are agents such as Helicobater
pylori (gastric carcinoma), human papilloma
virus (cervical carcinoma) and hepatitis B
virus (hepatocellular carcinoma). But the
granddaddy of them all is Epstein-Barr virus
(EBV), which was discovered in the endemic
form of Burkitt’s lymphoma (eBL) about 40
years ago. Interestingly, the virus was discovered thanks to studies on a different pathogen—malaria. It is now generally accepted
that both malaria and EBV are concurrent
risk factors for eBL. In a recent study in
PLoS Pathogens1, it has now been shown that
malaria and EBV interact with one another,
raising the intriguing possibility that eBL
may provide another first in human cancer
biology—the first human cancer known to
be causally associated with two interacting
pathogens.
Endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma was first
described almost 50 years ago2 for its unusual
presentation, notably in the jaw and in the
orbit of the eye. The cancer has a striking
epidemiology, being mostly restricted to
the tropical regions of Africa, where it is
the most common childhood cancer, with
an incidence of 1–20 cases per 100,000 per
year. This distribution closely follows that
of holoendemic Plasmodium falciparum
malaria infections3, an observation that led
to the original hypothesis that mosquitoes
are a vector for an infectious agent that is
responsible for the tumor.
Searches for this agent revealed that EBV
David A. Thorley-Lawson is in the Department of
Pathology, Tufts University School of Medicine,
150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts
02111, USA. Karen A. Duca is in the Department of
Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology, Kumasi,
Ghana.
e-mail: [email protected]
906
was often present in the tumor cells, but this
discovery was serendipitous because it was
immediately realized that EBV is not spread
by insect vectors. Nevertheless, the potential role of EBV in eBL lymphomagenesis
appeared to be confirmed by the findings
that >95% of eBLs contain the virus, and
that the virus potently transforms B lymphocytes in vitro4. Malaria is now recognized as
a risk factor for eBL in its own right, as both
anti-malarial treatment and migration of
human hosts to areas of low malarial infection reduce the risk for eBL.
Chêne et al. have now shown that malaria
may join forces with EBV to heighten the
risk for eBL. P. falciparum is highly mitogenic for B cells5 (Fig.1). The P. falciparum
erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1)
contains a cysteine-rich inter-domain region
1α (CIDR1α) that acts as a potent activator
and stimulator of B lymphocyte proliferation6. It is particularly active against memory
B cells7, which, coincidentally, are where EBV
persists in vivo8. Chêne et al. show that when
CIDR1α bound to B cells with latent EBV,
the virus reactivated and began replicating1.
The authors observed this reactivation both
in the EBV-infected Akata cell line and in
latently infected primary B cells derived from
the peripheral blood and tonsils of healthy
EBV carriers. This is the first demonstration that EBV can be reactivated directly by
another pathogen.
Chêne et al. propose that this interaction
may account for the higher viral loads of
EBV found in children with malaria, which
in turn is thought to be a risk factor for eBL
development1. Malaria, however, is known
to have general immunosuppressive effects9,
and EBV is activated when the immune system is compromised10. Consequently, the
increased viral loads seem more likely to arise
from this immunosuppression than from the
modest reactivation-related effects reported
in this study5. What’s more, the observed
Arnaud Chêne
© 2007 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturemedicine
Pathogens cooperate in lymphomagenesis
Figure 1 Plasmodium falciparum–infected red
blood cells (labeled red) bind tightly to human
B lymphocytes (labeled green). This binding
is mediated through P. falciparum erythrocyte
membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) produced by
the parasite. If this B cell happened to contain
latent EBV, the virus would be reactivated by
this interaction. The left panel shows light
microscopy of the same cells with the presence of
the malarial parasites indicated by white arrows.
Images from Chêne et al.1
increase in viral replication seems too small
to constitute a risk for eBL. Individuals who
are immunosuppressed experience much
greater increases in viral load but do not
develop eBL. How, then, could EBV and
malaria promote eBL together? We would
like to propose an alternative explanation.
eBL has been an annoyingly uncooperative
tumor for fans of the tumor virus hypothesis.
EBV is found in virtually every eBL, but the
viral transforming proteins are not expressed
in these tumors. In another paradox, EBV
is a potent transforming virus of B cells in
vitro and virtually everybody is infected with
it, yet most people don’t develop Burkitt’s
lymphoma. This is most likely because EBV
persists in memory B cells in a dormant
state, during which none of the viral proteins are expressed11. When reactivated by
immunosuppression, EBV is a risk factor for
EBV-positive lymphoma, but the tumors,
immunoblastic lymphomas, resemble in
vitro–transformed cells and are a completely different tumor type from Burkitt’s
lymphoma10.
VOLUME 13 | NUMBER 8 | AUGUST 2007 NATURE MEDICINE