Download Proceedings

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Casualties of the 2010 Haiti earthquake wikipedia , lookup

2009–18 Oklahoma earthquake swarms wikipedia , lookup

1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes wikipedia , lookup

2008 Sichuan earthquake wikipedia , lookup

2011 Christchurch earthquake wikipedia , lookup

2010 Pichilemu earthquake wikipedia , lookup

2010 Canterbury earthquake wikipedia , lookup

April 2015 Nepal earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1906 San Francisco earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1880 Luzon earthquakes wikipedia , lookup

Column wikipedia , lookup

Earthquake engineering wikipedia , lookup

2009 L'Aquila earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1988 Armenian earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1985 Mexico City earthquake wikipedia , lookup

Seismic retrofit wikipedia , lookup

Earthquake casualty estimation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ISBN: 978-979-97606-5-4
st
1
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Bandung, November 17-18, 2011
Proceedings
st
1
Department of Civil Engineering
Parahyangan Catholic University
Editors :
Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro
Helmy Hermawan Tjahjanto
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Bandung, November 17-18, 2011
Proceedings
Department of Civil Engineering
Parahyangan Catholic University
Editors:
Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro
Helmy Hermawan Tjahjanto
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
KATA PENGANTAR
Indonesian Structural Engineering dan Materials Symposiums (ISEMS) yang diselenggarakan di tahun 2011 ini
adalah yang pertama kali diselenggarakan. Direncanakan symposium ini diselenggarakan secara berkala yaitu
dua tahun sekali. Symposium ini diselenggarakan atas inisiatif rekan-rekan dosen Jurusan Teknik Sipil
Universitas Katolik Parahyangan untuk mewadahi komunikasi ilmiah antar peneliti maupun praktisi teknik
struktur dan material. Dunia keilmuan di Indonesia saat ini mengalami dorongan yang kuat akan penelitian dan
juga kesadaran para akademisi untuk meneliti meningkat pesat dan kesadaran para praktisi akan perlunya
penguasaan ilmunya secara ilmiah juga meningkat pesat. Perancangan teknik saat ini disadari menuntut
penguasaan ilmu pada tahap yang lanjut (advanced). Untuk itulah symposium ini dibuat, yaitu mewadahi
komunikasi ilmiah antara para akademisi maupun praktisi. Pada symposium yang pertama ini disajikan
32 makalah dari berbagai topik, antara lain, analisis struktur statik dan dinamik, struktur baja, struktur beton,
material beton dan lain-lain. Makalah tersebut dibuat oleh akademisi maupun praktisi dari segala penjuru tanah
air dan meninjau aspek-aspek ilmiah dari masalah yang dibahas.
Publikasi dalam bentuk prosiding ini diharapkan tidak sekedar menjadi sebuah dokumentasi atas makalah yang
disajikan, melainkan menjadi rujukan bagi penelitian-penelitian selanjutnya, baik untuk mereka yang hadir
maupun mereka yang tidak mendapat kesempatan hadir dalam symposium.
Ketua Panitia
Paulus Karta Wijaya
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
i
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
DAFTAR ISI
Kata Pengantar ..........................................................................................................................................................i
Daftar Isi ................................................................................................................................................................. ii
Keynote Papers
PERILAKU ELEMEN STRUKTUR BETON BERTULANG BETON BUBUK REAKTIF (REACTIVE
POWDER CONCRETE) DENGAN BEBAN LATERAL STATIK MONOTONIK – Prof. Bambang Budiono,
Ruddy Kurniawan, Mohammad Junaedy Rahman ............................................................................................ K1–1
PERKEMBANGAN TERKINI TEKNOLOGI MATERIAL BETON HIJAU – Prof. Iswandi Imran,
Partogi H Simatupang. ...................................................................................................................................... K2–1
Technical Papers
NEXT GENERATION PERFORMANCE–BASED SEISMIC DESIGN: METODE ANALISIS DINAMIK
NON–LINEAR UNTUK GEDUNG TINGGI – Davy Sukamta.......................................................................... 1–1
STATUS GEDUNG TINGGI TERBANGUN TERHADAP PERSYARATAN GESER DASAR SEISMIK
MINIMUM PADA RSNI 03–1726–201x – Suradjin Sutjipto ............................................................................. 2–1
NEW DEVELOPMENT IN SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS – Sindhu Rudianto ............................................... 3–1
DAMAGE ASSESSMENT ON BUILDINGS: LESSONS FROM RECENT EARTHQUAKES
IN INDONESIA – Herman Parung...................................................................................................................... 4–1
KONSEP PERENCANAAN STRUKTUR PADA DRAFT SNI KAYU 2012 – Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro,
Bambang Suryoatmono ........................................................................................................................................ 5–1
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF CRACK PROPAGATION OF DEAD END ANCHORS OF
POST–TENSIONED SUSPENDED SLABS – Elvira, M. Sofi, P. Mendis, D. Baweja...................................... 6–1
ELEMEN STRUKTUR HUBUNGAN BALOK BETON PRATEKAN PARSIAL – KOLOM BETON
BERTULANG TAHAN GEMPA YANG HANDAL DAN DAKTAIL PADA SRPMK –
M.D. Astawa, I.G.P Raka, Tavio ......................................................................................................................... 7–1
INOVASI PENINGKATAN KINERJA SAMBUNGAN BAUT PADA STRUKTUR BAJA RINGAN
YANG MENAHAN MOMEN SEBIDANG – Y. Djoko Setiyarto, Bambang Suryoatmono,
Paulus Karta Wijaya............................................................................................................................................. 8–1
PERAN REGEL BAJA DINDING PENYEKAT PADA PENINGKATAN KAPASITAS KOLOM IWF –
Sri Tudjono .......................................................................................................................................................... 9–1
ANALISIS KEANDALAN STRUKTUR BAJA DENGAN SIMULASI MONTE CARLO –
Dennie Supriatna, Bambang Suryoatmono ........................................................................................................ 10–1
A BREAKTHROUGH ENHANCEMENT OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD USING KRIGING
INTERPOLATION – F.T. Wong....................................................................................................................... 11–1
TEKUK TORSI LATERAL ELASTIS BALOK I DENGAN TUMPUAN LATERAL –
Paulus Karta Wijaya........................................................................................................................................... 12–1
EVALUATION OF RAYLEIGH DAMPING IN CANTILEVER BEAM–LIKE STRUCTURE –
Dina Rubiana Widarda ....................................................................................................................................... 13–1
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
ii
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
IMPLEMENTATION OF ROTATIONALLY CONSISTENT DIAGONAL MASS MATRICES
ON PLATES – Ediansjah Zulkifli, Erik Valentine Bachtiar ............................................................................. 14–1
PENERAPAN METODE ELEMEN BATAS PADA PELAT DI ATAS MEDIUM ELASTIK –
Herry Suryadi, Paulus Karta Wijaya .................................................................................................................. 15–1
FINITE ELEMENT MODELING INCORPORATING NON–LINEARITY OF MATERIAL BEHAVIOR
BASED ON THE FIB MODEL CODE 2010 – Han Ay Lie, Joko Purnomo .................................................... 16–1
STUDI EKSPERIMENTAL PERILAKU MATERIAL BETON DENGAN VARIASI MATERIAL
ABU TERBANG (FLY ASH) DALAM LINGKUNGAN KHLORIDA – Yosefine Ernestine Latupeirissa,
Irwan Lie, Jonie Tanijaya ................................................................................................................................... 17–1
PEMANFAATAN SERBUK KACA SEBAGAI POWDER PADA SELF–COMPACTING CONCRETE –
Bernardinus Herbudiman, Chandra Januar ........................................................................................................ 18–1
KOMPARASI SIFAT MEKANIK DAN KIMIA KOMPOSIT EPOXY PASIR SILIKA DAN EPOXY
SEMEN – Ivindra Z. Pane, Jonbi ....................................................................................................................... 19–1
PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES IN USING HVFA STRUCTURAL CONCRETE – Hadi Rusjanto T.,
Grace Kurniawati S. ........................................................................................................................................... 20–1
CHLORIDE ION PENETRATION RESISTANCE OF CONCRETES CONTAINING RECYCLED
AGGREGATE (RCA) – Kho Pin Verian, Jitendra Jain, Nancy Whiting, Jan Olek .......................................... 21–1
PERILAKU LENTUR BALOK BETON BERTULANG YANG MENGGUNAKAN RECYCLED
CONCRETE AGGREGATES (RCA) SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF AGREGAT KASAR – Ashari Ibrahim,
Jonie Tanijaya .................................................................................................................................................... 22–1
TINJAUAN TEKNOLOGI JEMBATAN DI INDONESIA – Lanneke Tristanto, Nandang Syamsudin,
Redrik Irawan..................................................................................................................................................... 23–1
SISTEM MONITORING KESEHATAN STRUKTUR JEMBATAN SURAMADU – Septinurriandiani,
Redrik Irawan, Anton Surviyanto ...................................................................................................................... 24–1
KONSTRUKSI JEMBATAN BALANCED CANTILEVER – PENGATURAN CAMBER
DAN DEFLEKSI JEMBATAN – Ida I Dewa G. Wijaya, Iswandi Imran, Tauhid Kurniawan ......................... 25–1
BOND–SLIP CHARACTERISTICS OF BAMBOO REINFORCEMENT FOR STRUCTURAL
CONCRETE ELEMENTS – Helmy Hermawan Tjahjanto, Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro.................................. 26–1
BAMBU SEBAGAI BAHAN BANGUNAN MASA DEPAN – Purwito......................................................... 27–1
KUAT TUMPU BAMBU (EMBEDDING STRENGTH OF BAMBOO) – Ali Awaludin,
I GL Bagus Eratodi ............................................................................................................................................ 28–1
KUAT LENTUR BALOK LAMINASI–BAUT KAYU INDONESIA – Yosafat Aji Pranata,
Bambang Suryoatmono, Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro ........................................................................................ 29–1
FAKTOR STABILITAS BALOK DAN KOLOM KAYU – Bambang Suryoatmono, Bondan Pratama,
Maulana Aziz ..................................................................................................................................................... 30–1
THE COMPRESSION STRENGTH OF NAIL–LAMINATED SHORT TIMBER COLUMN –
Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro, Fengky.................................................................................................................. 31–1
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
iii
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
DAMAGE ASSESSMENT ON BUILDINGS: LESSONS FROM RECENT
EARTHQUAKES IN INDONESIA
Herman Parung1
1
Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Hasanudin University, Makassar.
ABSTRAK
In the past ten years, Indonesia has experienced several major earthquakes. The large earthquakes
have caused not only casualties but also damage to engineered and non-engineered buildings.The
paper presents damage assessment on buildings at several locations, namely Nabire (Papua), ToliToli (Central Sulawesi), Banda Aceh and Simeulue (NAD) and Padang (West Sumatera). The
assessment shows that most of the damaged buildings have very similar type of damages, and the
damages actually could have been avoided by better implementation of design code. The
supervision of the building construction on the remote areas has to be improved, because it has
been observed that even during the reconstruction of damaged buildings, the new buildings are still
vulnerable to new earthquakes.
Keywords: damages, supervision, code
1.
Introduction
In the year 2004, Nabire district of Papua was hit twice by strong earthquakes, namely on 6 February 2004 and
on 26 November 2004. Both earthquakes have caused collapsed of buildings and casualties.
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, western Sumatera was hit by a shallow major (strong) earthquake with the
magnitude of 7.3 on the Richter scale, followed by several smaller earthquakes. Several people witnessed that
the earthquake felt in three different directions, namely two horizontal directions and one vertical direction. The
total houses damaged were reported 1,350 unit; 455 units were heavily damage while 895 units had light damage
(Kompas daily, 23 February 2008). Several buildings near the building under consideration were totally collapse.
A one-story house approximately 150 m from the building was totally collapse. Also, a puskesmas building, a
police resort under construction and the newly completed Pendopo Kecamatan were collapsed. This fact
indicates that the MMI (Modified Mercally Intensity – MMI) in this particular area was high.
On September 30, western parts of Sumatera, especially around Padang and Pariaman was also hit an earthquake
measured 7.9 on the Richter scale. High number of casualties and buildings collapse (modern and nonengineered) attracted many intention so live coverage on TV screen for several days could be viewed.
2.
Reports on Damages of Buildings
It can be witnessed from direct observation, that many buildings were partially or completely damaged. The
types of damages were common for each area considered in this study.
a. Nabire Earthquake:
Mesjid Baiturrahman:
The mosque was heavily damage in the middle parts (Figure 1), especially in the beams and columns. The weak
column strong beam was observed in this building, as shown by damage at the column ends. It could also be
observed that several columns were not continuous from the lower to the upper part of the building. Cracks on
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
4-1
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
the brickwalls were caused by lack of shear resistance. It could also be concluded that the short-column
phenomenon took place due to the addition of walls.
Figure 1.
Damages on Mesjid Baiturrahman
Mesjid Al-Falah:
The mosque was totally collapse due to the earthquake (Figure 2). The observation showed that poor connection
of reinforcing bars of pedestal columns and upper columns caused the collapse of buildings. It could also be
observed that the stiffness of the frame building was not evenly distributed, as shown by unsymmetrical layout
of columns. One other possible cause was the absence of torque reinforcing bars for tall beams as used for this
building (80 cm high). The column to column spacing was approximately 10 m, the thickness of slab was 15 cm.
Grid system of beams was used, but it was difficult to check whether the reinforcing bars were put accordingly.
Figure 2.
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
Damages on Mesjid Al-Falah
4-2
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
Gereja Tabernakel:
The church experienced very serious structural and non-structural damages. When the earthquake occurred, the
building was being renovated. Balcony was being added to the main structure of the cbuilding, in which the
beam was connected to the columns by means of short reinforcing bars anchorage. The new configuration of the
building caused the change in the resistance of buildings. The columns in the mid-height resist high moments
during the earthquake, while initially the moments in the mid-height were low. Poor anchorage of reinforcing
bars from the beams balcony caused also the beams to separate from the columns. As can be seen from Figure 3,
there were horizontal cracks along the side of the church.
Figure 3.
Gereja Tabernakel
b. Padang Earthquake:
Kantor DPD Badan Pembudayaan Kejuangan 45:
The building mosque was very badly damage as shown by broken columns at the first floor (Figure 4). As
observed, the number of shear reinforcement (stirrup) was insufficient so in the even of stromg earthquake, the
induced shear force could not be resisted by the available stirrup. Consequently, concrete spalling was occurred,
followed by collapsed of columns. One other reason for the collapse was the insufficient bars splices, which was
also observed in Padang area.
Three story building:
One other building observed shows different type of damage (Figure 5). The three story building was still
standing but the middle section of the building sank to the ground. Because the building ccould not be closely
observed, it was assumed that there were two possibilities for the damage namely liquefaction caused local
settlement of columns in the middle or the columns were broken (less likely).
Hotel Bumi Minang:
Damage on the Hotel Bumi Minang (Figure 6) was shear failure type, which were observed mainly at the joints.
The damages were caused by improper design of joint resistance or by poor construction of joints, so the
induced shear forces could not be resisted by the available joints reinforcing bars.
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
4-3
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
Figure 4.
Kantor DPD Badan Pembudayaan Kejuangan45
Figure 5.
Three Story Building
Figure 6.
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
Hotel Bumi Minang
4-4
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
c. Aceh Earthquake:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Simeulue Island in Sumatera was hit by a shallow major (strong) earthquake
with the magnitude range 7.3 on the Richter scale, followed by several smaller earthquakes. Several people
witnessed that the earthquake felt in three different directions, namely two horizontal directions and one vertical
direction. A one-story house approximately 150 m from the market building is totally collapse. Also, a
puskesmas building, a police resort under construction and the newly completed Pendopo Kecamatan (Subdistrict Residence) are collapsed. This fact indicates that the MMI (Modified Mercally Intensity – MMI) in this
particular area is high.
A 2 story building (Figure 7) was currently under construction when the earthquake hit, and most of the
structural components have been completed. After the earthquake, it was reported that the structure is damage.
The overall stability of the structure was still maintained although there were damages on the columns and
beams. There was no permanent horizontal deformation to either major direction of the buildings. This can also
be confirmed by the fact that the roof truss and the metal roofs do not experience any damage or fall down.
Formation of plastic hinges at beam ends and column bases comply with the design code requirement (SNI, page
50), which is called capacity design (strong column weak beam).
Figure 7.
Two Story Building
Plastic hinges (cracks), as sign of the earthquake energy dissipation, formed at column bases. There were also
small cracks at upper end of the ground floor columns. Columns at the upper floor are in good condition, except
diagonal cracks at two beam-column joints. The absence of 2-3 stirrups (hoops) at two particular columns just
under the beam-column joints has resulted in the concrete spalling (crushing) during the earthquake. This is due
to high shear stress caused by the seismic excitation, which should have been resisted by the shear reinforcement
(hoops/stirrups). After the concrete crushed, eventual load is carried only by the steel so they bent.
Most of beams cracked at the beam ends, which indicate the formation of plastic hinges as energy dissipation
mechanism. Some cracks are large, but the other cracks are smaller (hair cracks). For the assessment purpose,
most of the beam with large cracks was destroyed with hammer in order to check the depth of cracks. The
construction of the roofs was almost completed. Some workers were working at the roof when the earthquake
hit. There is no single roof fall down, and the roof truss is also still in good condition.
Parts of the bricks already constructed totally collapse, including the brick walls at the second floor at the seaside. The interior brick walls under construction, which have not been yet connected to tie beam or practical
column, is also damage. Separation of brick walls of the toilette at the ground floor from the main structure is
also noted. Parts of the falling bricks are totally separated from the mortar.
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
4-5
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
3.
Similarities of Damages
As can be observed from several different areas of Indonesia, there are several damages which are common
found in the event of strong earthquake.
The most common failure is the collapse of brick walls, even after moderate earthquake. This can be attributed
to lack of confinement, which is usually supplied by the so-called practical columns.
Failure at the column bases due to interruption of reinforcing bars of the foundation to column is also found. As
can be seen from the previous photo, it is common in the less prone region to cut the reinforcing bars of the
foundation just above the ground. After the foundation is completed, the reinforcing bars are simply connected to
the reinforcing bars of columns by means of wire. In case of earthquake, cyclic loading will easily cause the
reinforcing bars of the foundation and the columns to separate which later will result in concrete spalling and
eventually collapse of the structure.
In the Nabire earthquake, several mosques and churches experienced similar damages. Additional construction
of structural elements such as balcony and curve beams which were directly attached to the column
approximately at the mid-height, caused the change in the stiffness configuration. The mid-height which was
originally designed to have low moments will be forced to resist higher moments.
Cracks at the beam column joints were also observed at several buildings. Placing stirrup at the core of the joints
is considered time consuming and difficult by some workers, so they tend to avoid placing the rebar in this area.
Most shear reinforcing bars will be placed just outside the column face. In the event of strong earthquake,
absence of just one stirrup at the joint area could cause damage, as shown in the event of Aceh earthquake.
4.
Concluding Remarks
The damages on buildings as described shows that if a structure designed to resist forces less than the actual
force, there is potential damage to the building. Good design if not followed in the field, such as deleting stirrup
around the joint, will also cause the same problem.
In order to reduce the potential impact of earthquake, all relevant parties should take own responsibility. All
design should be prepared by certified engineer, and the authority should issue building license only if
administrative and technical aspects are fulfilled. If considered necessary, random site inspection should be
carried out by the authority to ensure that all buildings are constructed in accordance with the approved
documents. To this task, the staff should also has the qualification and power to carry out the checking.
It is also need to be addressed that the main principle of the earthquake resistant design is the strong column
weak beam concept. It means that damages only allowed in the beams, and not in the columns. Reduction of the
effective area of column due to placement of plumbing pipes in the columns, very common in Makassar area,
should be avoided. Other practice that can be seen in Makassar is the concreting of columns using manual mixer,
while the beams and slab using ready mix concrete. With this practice, it cannot be guaranteed that the strength
of the concrete columns will be higher than the beams.
The number of steel frames built in Makasar areas is steadily increase due to the ease of erection. However, there
is also potential risk because the strength of the steel concrete composite beams is underestimated. The design
engineer should consider that the plastic moment capacity of composite frame is much higher than the plastic
moment capacity of steel beam so the determination of the column section should be based on the composite
beam capacity.
The lack of knowledge among the design engineer or worker in the remote areas of Indonesia should also be
considered. Training or workshop should be organized either by government body or professional association in
order to reduce mistakes in the design or construction phases. It is hoped that if this particular area can be
improved, the number of casualties or buildings damages can be reduced significantly.
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
4-6
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
5.
References
1) Department of Public Works (PU) of Indonesia. Guide lines for repairing of building after an earthquake, (kumpulan
brosur, kliping dll)
2) EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute). Post-Earthquake Investigation Guideline, California, USA
3) Parung, H. (1999). Seismic Resistance of Composite Structures, Konferensi Nasional Rekayasa
Kegempaan,. Bandung:
4) Parung, H. (2003). Test on Composite Beam-Column Sub-Assemblages, Jurnal Hi-Tech, Edisi O1/Tahun V,
Fakultas Teknik Unhas
5) Penelis and Kappos Works. Earthquake Resistant Concrete Structures
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
4-7
The 1st INDONESIAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SYMPOSIUM
Department of Civil Engineering – Parahyangan Catholic University
Bandung, 17–18 November 2011
4-8