* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download defend, disrupt, and transform: the critical role of the
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Bayesian inference in marketing wikipedia , lookup
Internal communications wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Customer experience wikipedia , lookup
Customer relationship management wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Customer engagement wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
DEFEND, DISRUPT, AND TRANSFORM: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF THE MARKETING TECHNOLOGIST IN THE DIGITAL ERA SHELDON MONTEIRO, SEAN BURKE-GAFFNEY & NOVA HALLIWELL In collaboration with chiefmartec.com and the MarTech Conference Executive Summary In 2010, in a brilliant piece of foreshadowing, Scott Brinker, marketing expert and thought leader, heralded the rise of the marketing technologist. Since that time, the role of the MarTech professional – and by extension that of their executive counterpart the Chief Marketing Technology Officer (CMTO) – has leap-frogged into common parlance and become a regular fixture in marketing organizations. In an equally provocative point of view, Gartner analyst Laura McLellan predicted in 2012 that within the next five years, CMOs would spend more on technology than CIOs – an idea that her fellow Gartner analyst Jake Sorofman recently confirmed as fact. He notes that increasingly, marketing has become a digital activity and as “digital marketing becomes marketing in a digital world, technology is woven into virtually every planning assumption.” Why is this meaningful? Because the game has changed. Marketing organizations large and small must grapple with the effects of a digital tsunami. Most businesses are struggling not just with digitization as it relates to their customers’ world, but consequently, that of business itself. The fundamental role of Information Technology (IT) has evolved from being a commoditized tool that made businesses more efficient, to also being the primary medium of dialog with customers. And thus, it is no surprise that the role of the marketing technologist – sitting at the nexus of marketing and IT – has risen to prominence in many organizations. RESEARCH In this – our second survey of marketing technologists conducted in collaboration with Scott Brinker and the MarTech Conference – we captured the sentiment of more than 250 practicing marketing technologists, including 223 respondents in North America. This research builds upon our 2014 report, Analyzing the Chief Marketing Technologist, and further explores the evolution of this group’s skillset and responsibilities, as well as their alignment within the organization. We also examine their increasing role in digital business transformation. We use the term digital business transformation (DBT) in a literal way. Transformation. To compete in the digital age, all companies must create an overarching strategy that guides the reinvention and reimagining of the business in a customer-first, networked world. DBT is not a piecemeal approach of applying technology within different functions or deploying standalone applications to solve functional business needs. Rather, it is the thread that unites the organization’s digital efforts and compels business leaders to radically rethink the ways in which the business will meet customer needs in an always-on world. Given our thesis that the work focus of the CMTO is to change marketing, customer experience and IT – including what those functions do and how they work together – in service of creating competitive advantage, we believe that the marketing technologist should be at the center of DBT efforts, if not leading them. With that in mind, we polled marketing technologists on their views on DBT within their organizations and their role in driving it. 2 Our findings were striking: The role of the marketing technologist appears to be leaning into marketing over technology. More than half of marketing technologists (55 percent) come from a marketing background and four in ten (44 percent) report to the CMO. This data, coupled with the relatively low percentage of marketing technologists who possess a technology-related degree (21 percent) and a lack of professional experience with technology roles, implies that a significant number of MarTech professionals are learning technology on the job. Whether this trend is occurring because the organization – and in particular, the CMO – is steering individuals towards a more traditional marketing role out of habit or necessity, or because the MarTech professional herself is selecting the path because it is where she feels most comfortable, is not clear. No matter the underlying cause of this change, it is obvious that the marketing technologist is at a crossroads. Either MarTech professionals and organizations will take the necessary steps to regain much-needed technical skills and professional experience, or the field will further meld into that of a traditional marketing function. Both organizations and the individuals have equal opportunity and responsibility in charting the future of the profession – and, quite possibly, ensuring its very existence. DBT is most commonly overseen by the CMO. One point in which our survey differs from other recent research has to do with DBT ownership. Our data revealed that the executive most commonly responsible for DBT oversight is the CMO (26 percent), followed by the CEO (22 percent) and CIO/CTO (13 percent). This breakdown appears to contradict other reports which show that it is the CIO who is often asked by the CEO to take ownership of DBT. RESEARCH The most likely explanation for this discrepancy is simply that a de facto executive lead for DBT has yet to emerge. The CIO may still have an upper hand at this point, but the battle to oversee transformation efforts is still very much in play. Regardless of who comes to execute this initiative, it is our belief that the CEO must be responsible for defining the DBT vision and creating its strategy, while other members of the C-Suite, such as the CMO or CMTO, can execute the plan. It is also our view that CMTO – given her powerful blend of marketing and technology skills, as well as the collaborative nature of the position – is one executive who is primed to own execution. As the position continues to grow in terms of popularity and prominence, it is our expectation that this individual will continue to take on this important role as executor of DBT. 55% of marketing technologists come from a marketing background 44% of marketing technologists report to the CMO Fewer than 25% hold a tech-related degree Marketing technologists have a limited window into strategic metrics and KPIs. Less than one in five MarTech professionals report having accountability for long-term customer metrics, such as customer lifetime value (LTV) (14 percent) and net promoter score (NPS) (16 percent). Just over one-quarter (26 percent) oversee budget control of marketing technology assets and projects, while only one-fifth (21 percent) oversee agility and time to market. Ultimately, our data shows that MarTech professionals have a limited responsibility for the organization’s performance, hindering their ability to lead strategic business initiatives, such as customer experience design and large-scale transformation efforts. What our survey does not make clear is if this disconnect is because the right metrics simply are not being tracked in their organizations or because the marketing technologist is not accountable for them. 3 Regardless, if the position is to provide leadership at the intersection of marketing, business and technology, then the individual will need access to and accountability for customer experience and technology effectiveness data and KPIs. There is a growing technology skills gap among marketing technologists. In cross-referencing the “most important” skills of the marketing technologist, with the individual’s “strongest skills,” we uncover a troubling finding, as it relates to technology skills. Our survey shows that more than half of respondents rated the following technology skills as “important”: customer relationship management (CRM) systems and platforms; data science, analytics, modeling and statistics; and website design. However, far fewer MarTech professionals ranked them as strong personal skills. Just 46 percent expressed competence in CRM and less than one-third said the same of data analysis and website design (31 percent and 27 percent, respectively). Given that the role of the marketing technologist relies upon technological prowess, it is concerning not only that this skills gap exists, but also that it appears to have widened since our previous survey was conducted in 2014. If the marketing technologist is, in fact, to maintain a hybrid role as both marketer and technologist, there is a need for individuals to upgrade their fundamental skills in computer science, algorithmic thinking, systems architecture, statistics and data science. Given the importance of these skills in executing the business’s strategic vision and transformation efforts, organizations have an incentive to create learning opportunities for MarTech professionals to jumpstart their development. RESEARCH Marketing technologists lack clarity on the organization’s Digital Business Transformation (DBT) vision and strategy. Nearly all organizations (97 percent) claim to be addressing DBT “in some way” and more than three-quarters of MarTech professionals (77 percent) report being involved in the business’s DBT initiative. At the same time, nearly half (44 percent) said that DBT was not a priority for their organization or that they don’t know if it was – implying that even if all organizations are working to address digital and most MarTech professionals are supporting the agenda, a shocking number don’t realize the critical nature of this work. Further, our study found that just one in five marketing technologists (22 percent) felt equipped to drive change - a trend that appears to hold true regardless of respondents’ number of years of experience and level of compensation. In fact, our data shows that marketing technologists - from entry level employees to the most established executive - are not confident in their ability to help transform the business. When asked to identify the most important technology skills versus their strongest personal skills, marketing technologists said: Important technology skills Strongest personal skills 56% 46% vs customer relationship management (CRM) systems and platforms 53% 31% vs data science, analytics, modeling and statistics 52% 27% vs website design It stands to reason that if marketing technologists, a group that has its finger on the pulse of both marketing and IT, are unclear of the organization’s DBT initiative, then employees throughout the broader organization are confused as well. It will be difficult – if not altogether impossible – for a business to successfully transform for the digital age without the cooperation and commitment of every member of the workforce. Organizations appear to have significant work to do on this front – both in terms of explaining the DBT vision and establishing it as a driving priority across the enterprise. 4 Marketing technologists cite an inadequate focus on customer experience in DBT initiatives. According to Gartner Research, 89 percent of companies expect to compete mostly on the basis of customer experience by the end of 2016. Yet, just one in ten marketing technologists reported that the organization was structured to deliver a seamless customer experience across all touchpoints. Nearly one-third of MarTech professionals said they are not aware of any metrics to measure their organization’s customer experience. In addition, more than one-third of marketing technologists (35 percent) said that DBT in their organization is not driven by customer insights. It is imperative that businesses organize every product and service, as well as the organization’s structure and culture, around the customer. To ensure success, organizations must not only capture and analyze customer experience metrics, but use them to inform their DBT initiatives. Further, they must communicate to their workforce what role each individual is expected to play in achieving the vision, and the metrics that matter. important work is recognized by the organization. Further, companies continue to invest in the role, as evidenced by both rising salaries for this group and their growing roots within the marketing organization. While this leads us to believe that there is a fantastic opportunity for the MarTech profession, the marketing technology role will fail to live up to its potential without addressing the alignment of the role within the organization, and realizing the core competencies needed for the role. Compounding matters is the need for organizations to transform the entire business for a digital world, rather than treat digital as an adjunct. It is becoming increasingly clear that it will be up to marketing technologists to rise as leaders and embrace that challenge. Our data leads us to make an alarming observation: The role of the marketing technologist appears to be in crisis, both in terms of influence in shaping the organization’s digital future, and the evolution of the evolution of the profession. There are challenging days ahead for marketers – and businesses are in urgent need of leadership to shape customer acquisition and intimacy in a digital world. At the same time, our survey reveals a silver lining. The majority (77 percent) of marketing technologists are involved in their organization’s DBT efforts, proving that their value and expertise in this RESEARCH 5 THE MARKETING TECHNOLOGIST ARCHETYPES The role of the marketing technologist has been introduced as a way to bridge the worlds of marketing and traditional IT. This individual combines the technical depth, business acumen, creative flair and traditional leadership skills needed to reimagine the business in a digital world. While marketing technologists possess a mix of these attributes, our 2014 report, Analyzing the Chief Marketing Technologist, identified six distinct archetypes: MARKETING MAVENS With marketing skills emphasized over technology, Mavens specialize in building marketing programs using expertise in marketing strategy, strategic positioning and promotion. INFRASTRUCTURE ARCHITECTS Enterprise-level technology chops define this archetype, but they are also business consultants and bring a high-level understanding of a company’s marketing initiatives. DATA DIVAS Divas are skilled in marketing operations management, CRM, data science, analytics and modeling. They know how to acquire, integrate and make data perform. EXPERIENCE ENGINEERS One foot in technology and another in experience. They are experts in cutting-edge technology: from eCommerce to front-end technology and mobility. CONTENT CURATORS Storytellers. Message crafters. Marketing strategists. Content Management platform experts. This type exercises considerable knowledge of the content marketing and related technologies to direct communications-oriented marketing. RESEARCH MEDIA & MARKETING ANALYZERS Specialize in research, consumer insights and strategic planning. They think strategically about segmentation and connections planning. 6 Findings and analysis 1 Marketing technologists lack formal technical training and professional experience, which has created a significant skills gap. In looking at the marketing technology profession as a whole, we see that this group is extremely well educated. Nearly all respondents (94 percent) hold an undergraduate degree and, of that group, four in ten (40 percent) hold an advanced degree. However, relatively few marketing technologists hold degrees in technology-related areas of study. Less than one-quarter (21 percent) hold a technical undergraduate degree and just shy of one-fifth (17 percent) hold an advanced degree in a technology-related field. By comparison, more than double (51 percent) hold a marketing or business undergraduate degree and a full three-quarters (76 percent) of those marketing technologists who possess an advanced degree do so in business- or marketing-related areas of study. Interestingly, the remaining 27 percent of respondents majored in other disciplines entirely, including communications, liberal arts or social sciences. Based on the relatively low proportion of marketing technologists with a technical background, we can deduce that today’s talent has been crossskilled on the job, likely without formal education or training. While this shows RESEARCH 51% resourcefulness and ambition on the part of marketing technologists, it is not an ideal approach for the individual or the organization. Many critical technical skills – such as enterprise architecture, software development, data science and machine learning – are difficult to learn without the benefit of the classroom environment and a structured learning program. of respondents majored in business or marketing FIGURE01 Marketing technologists are highly educated but do not have formal technical education Q: What did you major in while studying at the undergraduate level? What did you major while attending graduate school (to pursue Master’s degree or PhD)? 100% 80% 52.6% 60% 41.4% 23.7% 40% 20% 26.9% 24.4% 16.4% 13.7% 0% Business-related 15.6% 18.8% 16.5% 21.3% 7.2% 41.2% 25.3% 27.4% 10.8% Marketing-related Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 Technology-related 2014 Undergraduate 2014 Graduate Other 2016 Undergraduate 2016 Graduate 7 This point is particularly important given the growing necessity of advanced applications and emerging technologies in realizing the business’s digital strategy. For example, our survey identified machine learning and IoT as the top two applications perceived to have the greatest impact on customer experience in the near future. Within the next two years, about six in ten companies (59 percent) plan to implement an IoT initiative and even more (66 percent) expect to do the same with machine learning initiatives. At the same time, our survey found that the skills related to IoT and machine learning, in particular, are sorely lacking in most organizations. Only 14 percent of respondents identified machine learning or cognitive computing as an “extremely important” technology skill; still less (12 percent) said the same of physical computing IoT skills. Importantly, these findings track with our 2014 survey which identified big data management, physical computing and IoT as some of the most significant skills gaps for organizations. Further, when asked to identify the most important technology skills, marketing technologists ranked customer relationship management (CRM) systems and platforms (56 percent), data science, analytics, modeling and statistics (53 percent), and website design (52 percent) in the top three. However, when asked what their strongest personal skills were, less than half (46 percent) ranked CRM and less than one-third cited data-related skills (31 percent) or website design (27 percent). These findings also align with our 2014 study which identified significant skills gaps related to all three of these areas. The gap here is an alarm bell for businesses. Based on our two-year data, it appears that neither companies nor MarTech professionals have made RESEARCH an honest attempt to address existing deficiencies – or even prevent them from widening. To close the gap, businesses should redouble efforts around employee learning opportunities, particularly as they relate to the technology skills needed to successfully execute digital initiatives. Indeed, they have a vested interest in ensuring that the workforce is ready to compete in the digital era. That said, it is the responsibility of the marketing technology professional to chart the course for his or her ongoing learning and development. It is through the acquisition of new skills that the marketing technology professional will remain competitive in this ever-changing field and move up the ranks of any organization. Our recommendation? Businesses and professionals should work together to identify skills gaps on both an organizational and individual level, addressing them through formal education opportunities, mentorship and even strategic hires. FIGURE02 Plans for implementing future technologies Q: When are you considering production implementation for the following technologies? Of these emerging technologies, which do you believe will have the greatest impact on how customers experience your brand? PLANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION TECHNOLOGY This year Within 2 years No plans GREATEST IMPACT ON CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE Machine learning 22.4% 43.9% 15.7% 45.7% Internet of Things (IoT) 18.8% 40.4% 21.1% 41.7% Cognitive computing 9.9% 26.9% 23.3% 25.1% Augmented reality 4.9% 13.0% 44.4% 12.1% Smartwatches 8.5% 22.4% 35.9% 7.2% Virtual reality 5.4% 12.6% 44.4% 6.7% Wearables 5.8% 17.5% 37.7% 6.3% 3D printing 4.0% 8.1% 53.4% 1.3% Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 8 FIGURE03 Important future technology skills Out of 32 options, machine learning and cognitive computing were in the bottom quartile of technology skills important to the future success of the marketing function. Q: How important is each of the following technology job skills to the future success of the marketing function within your organization? Percent answering “extremely important” 56.1% Customer relationship management (CRM) systems and platforms 52.5% Data science, analytics, statistics, modeling 52.0% Website design, including responsive and adaptive design 49.8% Content management and digital asset-management systems 47.1% Search engine optimization (SEO) 42.6% Website testing and optimization 40.8% Visual display of data (including infographics and dashboards) 36.3% Front-end technologies (e.g., HTML5, javascript, CSS) 34.5% Tag management and user management (unified user profile) 33.6% System performance and resiliency 32.3% Big data: techniques and technologies for handling data at extreme scale 30.9% Social media platforms and technologies 30.0% Enterprise architecture/tech selection & lifecycle management New product and service development 27.8% Information security/firewalls/encryption/data recovery 27.8% 26.0% Data engineering and management platforms (DMP) 25.1% Media mix modeling/marketing mix modeling 23.8% Ecommerce technologies and platforms 23.3% Infrastructure & cloud computing Design and development of mobile apps and platforms 19.7% Software design, programming, coding 19.7% Programmatic technology 19.7% Software development operations/IT operations 18.8% 15.7% Digital ad networks and real-time bidding 14.3% Cognitive computing and machine learning 11.7% Physical computing and the internet of things 10.3% GIS, geomapping and geotargeting 8.5% Moving image production and media 8.1% In-venue/in-store experience technology Virtual reality Augmented reality Emojis, stickers, GIFs and other visual language creation 4.5% 3.6% 1.8% Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 RESEARCH 9 SPOTLIGHT ON SKILLS: THE EVOLVING SKILL SET OF THE MARTECH PROFESSIONAL Because the role of the MarTech professional is tailored to meet the needs of the organization, it is difficult, if not impossible, to develop a definitive list of the necessary skills for every marketing technologist. At the same time, we can make some generalizations based on the current business landscape and the challenges brands face. placement within the organization. It is our assumption that the average marketing technologist possesses the basic building blocks to address issues like target market identification and content creation, while the skills needed to improve competencies in data analysis or website design simply are not part of their foundational tool kit. The skills of the marketing technologist sit at the nexus of three areas: (1) marketing and business; (2) breadth and depth in marketing technologies; and (3) their influence and leadership skills in working with different audiences across the organization. In effect, they are part business strategist and marketing professional, part technology leader and change agent. This person’s most important work focus is to change marketing, customer experience and IT—including what those functions do and how they work together—in service of creating competitive advantage. Thus, our takeaway is clear: significant skills gaps exist in both the marketing and technology portions of the MarTech professional’s role. More importantly, they have remained consistent with our findings from our 2014 survey, implying that progress has not been made to narrow the gap or keep it from growing. Perhaps most significantly, the largest gaps across both marketing and technology are in areas of significant opportunity – market targeting, CRM, data and content. While the marketing technologist is certainly capable of rising to the challenge, they must be prepared and equipped by the organization to do so – and they must understand that their role, as well as the success of their organizations, depend on it. While we have already explored the profession’s most important tech skills – and the growing technical skills gap within the group – it’s important to note that some marketing and business skills are also sorely lacking. For example, when asked about critical marketing and business skills, our respondents were most likely to cite: marketing strategy and positioning (61 percent), content creation (55 percent) and target market identification (54 percent). By comparison, just over half (51 percent) indicated that strategy and positioning was a strong skill, and less than one-quarter (22 percent) cited content creation. A mere 14 percent of marketing technologists rated target market identification as a strong skill, indicating these areas are in dire need of improvement. While it’s true that some of the gaps in marketing and business skills appear to be greater than those on the technology side, we find this deficiency slightly less concerning given the MarTech professional’s education, job experience, and FIGURE04 Top three critical marketing and business skills When asked to compare critical business and marketing skills to personal skill sets, our respondents identified the following skills gaps: 61% 51% 55% 54% 22% 14% Marketing strategy and positioning Content creation Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 RESEARCH Target market identification Critical skill Strong skill 10 2 Marketing technologists have relatively little oversight of critical IT and strategic customer metrics. While marketing technologists are expected to straddle the worlds of marketing and IT, our survey reveals that relatively few MarTech professionals oversee critical IT metrics. When asked which KPIs or business metrics they were accountable for, just over one-quarter of marketing technologists (26 percent) indicated that they are accountable for budget control of marketing technology assets and projects and only one in five (21 percent) oversee agility and time to market. By comparison, MarTech professionals are significantly more likely to be accountable for traditional marketing metrics, such as marketing return on investment (ROI) (41 percent), email marketing performance (39 percent), and inbound leads (39 percent). However, what is more troubling is that longer-term customer metrics such as customer lifetime value (LTV) and net promoter score (NPS) featured extremely low on the marketing technologist’s agenda, with just 14 percent and 16 percent, respectively, indicating accountability. In our view, the marketing technologist should have direct or, at a minimum, matrixed accountability for key IT metrics associated with the implementation and adoption of marketing technology, including project delivery metrics (e.g. ROI, time to market, agility, budget and usage rates) as well as strategic customer metrics (e.g. CLTV, NPS). If these professionals are to live up to their full potential across marketing, technology and business operations, then they will need to be made accountable for the performance indicators associated with the functions. RESEARCH 31% of marketing technologists say that their organization does not have any metrics to measure the customer experience FIGURE05 Customer experience metrics KPIs or business metrics accountable for Marketing Return on Investment (ROI) 40.8% Email Marketing performance (e.g., Delivery Rate, Click-Through Rate, etc.) 39.0% Increase in inbound leads 38.6% Sales Growth 36.3% Leads/Cost per Lead 36.3% Search metrics (e.g., SEO rankings, organic vs. paid etc.) 35.9% Goal completion rate (e.g., call-to-action performance) 34.5% Project completion metrics for marketing technology projects (schedule/cost/quality) 32.7% Engagement scores 26.0% Total cost of ownership/budget control of marketing technology assets/projects 26.0% Content quality and/or quantity 24.7% Purchase funnel impact 23.3% Social metrics (e.g., sentiment) 23.3% Agility and time to market 21.5% Internal user satisfaction (e.g., marketing operations team member feedback) 18.8% Net promoter score 16.1% Customer Lifetime Value 13.9% IT Service Level Agreement for Marketing Technology Platforms (e.g., System uptime) 12.1% None of these 5.8% Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 11 3 and those with business titles declined sharply from 23 percent to 17 percent. Marketing technologists with technology titles remained constant at 17 percent. The “Marketing Technologist” title has become more common, but the position is becoming more firmly rooted within the marketing function. As more organizations recognize the differentiated skill set and unique value proposition of the marketing technologist, many are assigning job titles that capture this dual role. In fact, our 2016 survey revealed that 16 percent of respondents report having a marketing technology title – more than double the amount in 2014 (7 percent). To account for this change, the number of participants with marketing job titles fell slightly from 49 percent to 46 percent, Our survey also revealed a notable shift in the reporting structure for marketing technologists, with nearly half of respondents (44 percent) reporting to the CMO or other marketing executive – an increase from 31 percent in 2014. Meanwhile, one-quarter (24 percent) report to the CEO and only 5 percent to the CIO or CTO – as compared to 24 percent and 9 percent, respectively, in 2014. These figures, which may not be noteworthy on their own, take on new meaning when viewed within the context of our first two findings about technical skills and technology metrics. While organizations are taking the important step of positioning the marketing tech- nologist as separate and apart from their traditional marketing counterparts, it appears that the opposite is happening: the marketing technologist is reverting to a pure marketing role. We say this in light of the growing technical skills gap, the lack of oversight on key business and technology metrics, and increasing alignment with the marketing function. For the marketing technologist to continue to act as an agent of change within the organization, both businesses and professionals will need to make a concerted effort to differentiate it from traditional marketing roles. To that end, individuals must strengthen technology-related skills, demand accountability for technology and strategic customer-related metrics and ensure they are working beyond the office of the CMO. Ultimately, it is up to the marketing technologist to decide if his or her role will remain a hybrid, or if the profession will be absorbed by the marketing function. FIGURE06 Looking back: The changing profile for the marketing technologist Marketing technologists are more likely to report to the CMO The proportion of marketing technology job titles appears to be growing There is an influx of marketing technologists from the marketing/ communications field 2014 2016 2014 2016 2014 31% 44% 7% 16% 33% percent report to the CMO hold marketing technology titles 2016 55% have a marketing/communications background Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 RESEARCH 12 FOLLOWING THE MONEY TRAIL As demand for MarTech professionals has grown over the past two years, so too has their average salary. Our 2016 survey found that 40 percent of respondents earned more than $150K annually – up from 31 percent in 2014. More than one-third (35 percent) were paid between $100-150K, while just 25 percent earned less than six figures. This stands in sharp contrast to our 2014 results, which showed that about two in five (38 percent) earned less than $100K. One possible explanation for this income growth may be related to the type of organization where marketing technologists are choosing to work. In 2016, our survey found the top two employers of MarTech professionals are corporations (44 percent) and software vendors (23 percent), an increase from 40 percent and 15 percent, respectively, in 2014. More importantly, marketing technologists appear to be shying away from positions at advertising/marketing firms with employment in this sector falling by almost half, from 21 percent to 11 percent, between 2014 and 2016. While we cannot determine the reason for this shift, it’s possible that it is salary-driven, as just 57 percent of those employed by advertising/marketing firms have salaries exceeding $100K, compared to 79 percent of those who work for corporations and 69 percent of software company employees. It is not yet clear if these employment changes indicate a long-term trend or simply that our survey yielded more responses from certain industries. However, the overall rise in compensation indicates that employers are paying handsomely for the blended skill set of the marketing technologist. Further, this group’s increasing salary implies that the skills of this group are valued at many organizations and very much in demand. Companies that wish to tap into the industry’s best talent must be prepared to offer a competitive employment package – looking not just at pay, but also learning opportunities, career advancement, culture and other benefits. RESEARCH FIGURE07 Top Employers for MarTech Professionals Q: What type of organization do you work for? Percent working at each type of company 50% 45% 40% 44.4% 40.3% 35% 30% 25% 23.3% 21.1% 20% 14.6% 15% 11.2% 10% 8.1% 9.6% 5% 7.2% 8.2% 4.5% 3.2% 0% Corporation Software vendor Advertising/ marketing Consulting firm Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 Non-profit 1.3% 2.5% College/ university 2014 Other 2016 FIGURE08 2016 Income Income 40.4% 34.5% 25.1% Under $100K $100K to $149K $150K+ US/Canada Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 13 4 The vast majority of marketing technologists appear ill-equipped to drive change due to organizational deficiencies. In light of some of our earlier findings, it may not come as a surprise that the vast majority of MarTech professionals are not confident in their ability to effect change. As noted earlier, our survey found that only one in five respondents (22 percent) felt “fully equipped” to drive change within the organization – a point that stands in stark contrast to the business’s expectation that marketing technologists will play a critical role in reimagining the business for the digital age. Again, this finding applies to the whole of the profession – from entry level employees to experienced executives. While significant on its own, this point takes on an added level of concern when considering the marketing technologist’s reasoning. When asked what the top barriers to their effectiveness were, respondents most often cited: conflicting priorities (65 percent); a lack of resources (62 percent); and insufficient collaboration between departments (47 percent). With that further context, it appears that the marketing technologist’s ability to drive change may not stem from a skills deficiency on an individual level, but rather a lack of alignment within the organization. RESEARCH In order for the marketing technologist to help enable transformation, he or she must be empowered to do so – and the business must be organized in a way that allows it. Our recommendation is for companies to take a holistic approach to change – beginning with the development of an overarching digital strategy, customer experience vision, execution plan and corresponding timeline, as well as ongoing evaluation of resource allocations, budgets, technological assets and other key metrics. With these pieces in place, it is possible to chip away at some of the obstacles that the marketing technologist claims prohibitive. Only 1-in-5 respondents felt “fully equipped” to drive change within the organization While we believe organizations must do their part to set the enterprise up for success and equip the MarTech professional to do his or her best work, at the same time, we believe marketing technologists must embrace the spirit of transformation, and step up to lead change with diligence and tenacity. FIGURE09 Barriers to being effective in your job Q: What barriers stand in your way of being effective in your job? 64.6% Too many conflicting priorities 61.9% Lack of resources 46.6% Lack of collaboration between departments 26.0% Lack of executive sponsorship Other None 2.7% 4.0% Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 Total 14 5 Marketing technologists are pivotal to DBT efforts – but appear unsure of the organization’s vision and strategy. For most businesses, there should be no agenda item more critical than DBT. In fact, our survey showed that nearly all organizations (97 percent) claim to be addressing DBT “in some way” and more than three-quarters of MarTech professionals (77 percent) report being involved in the business’s DBT initiative. These findings are what we might expect – businesses addressing the issue head-on and the MarTech professional playing a key role in the efforts. 44% However, our survey also found that nearly half (44 percent) said that DBT was not a priority for their organization or that they don’t know if it was. This implies that even as most companies claim to recognize the importance of DBT and most MarTech professionals are supporting the plan, a staggering amount do not realize the critical importance of this work. said that DBT was not a priority for their organization or that they don’t know if it was If there is a silver lining to these findings, it’s that most organizations are still in the early phases of planning and implementing a comprehensive DBT strategy – which means that those companies who have yet to adopt a formal digital strategy have time to catch FIGURE10 Addressing the role of digital The majority of organizations (96.9%) are addressing digital in some way. Most are transforming customer experience holistically across all channels or transforming operational processes. Q: How is your organization addressing the role of digital? We are... 96.9% of organizations are transforming their businesses in some way 56.5% 60% 54.3% 50% 49.8% 48.4% 39.0% 40% 30% 20% 10% 3.1% 0% Transforming customer Transforming operational Transforming customer experience holistically processes experience across all channels with specific channels Transforming IT capabilities to be more agile/ continuous Transforming business models No significant initiatives in digital Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 RESEARCH 15 up and those who are in the process of executing have an opportunity to widen their lead. For example, our survey showed that less than six in ten (57 percent) have launched an initiative aimed at improving operational processes and even fewer (54 percent) are uniting the customer experience holistically across all channels. In fact, it appears extremely rare for a company to design a multifaceted DBT strategy – one that includes both operations and customer experience, as well as IT agility and the reevaluation of business models. The digital era may be upon us, but the winners have not yet been determined. Importantly, the success of a DBT initiative will rest on the people who carry it out. To that end, we believe DBT should be infused into the very culture of the organization with every member of the company – from the CEO to the intern – embracing the imperative and the solution. Our recommendation is for all businesses to treat DBT not as a side-project within the organization, but as a driving priority across the enterprise. Marketing technologists, given their blend of technical, marketing and business skills, are poised to be especially valuable to organizations as they undertake these plans. DBT: MORE THAN TECHNOLOGY In today’s digital age, organizations must reinvent and reimagine every aspect of the business to compete in a customer-first, networked world. This requires more than a piecemeal approach of applying technology within different functions or deploying standalone applications to solve functional business needs. Rather, the organization must unite its digital efforts and compel business leaders to radically rethink the ways in which it will meet customer needs. DBT is a full-scale business transformation. For example, our survey revealed that two thirds (66 percent) plan to launch a machine learning initiative and almost as many (59 percent) will do the same with IoT within the next two years. Still others see promise in technologies like augmented/virtual reality, wearables and 3D printing. While important to the overall development of a DBT strategy, these technologies are not synonymous or interchangeable with DBT itself. They are merely part of the overall plan. KEY POINTS: DBT BY THE NUMBERS 97% 77% Organizations are addressing digital in some way MarTech professionals are involved with a DBT initiative within the organization Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 RESEARCH Further, we caution businesses to remember that many of these technologies are still in their infancy. We have relatively few metrics by which to measure their success or gauge their impact on business results. These applications serve as an excellent way to leapfrog competition or differentiate in a crowded field, but they will not provide the foundation of a formal DBT initiative. 46% 25% Organizations make DBT the sole responsibility of a dedicated team IoT 42% Machine learning IoT and machine learning are the two DBT-related initiatives perceived to have the greatest impact on customer experience 16 6 DBT efforts are not often linked to customer needs and preferences. Every business is operating in the age of the customer. And yet, more than one-third of marketing technologists (35 percent) claim that their organization’s DBT initiative is not driven by customer insights. In another 42 percent of organizations, DBT is driven “somewhat” by the customer. In fact, less than one-quarter of the respondents (23 percent) “strongly agreed” that their company organized DBT efforts around the customer – this despite endless thought leadership and research expounding on the importance of the customer experience and the known current gap between what experience organizations think they deliver, and what their customers say they actually encounter. In today’s digital world, the customer experience cannot be underestimated. Any new entrant or disruptor can compete with a long-established leader on product, price, place and promotion. But no one can duplicate how a brand experience makes the customer feel. Those organizations that consistently organize around their customers – as opposed to simply selling products or services – have the ability to build longterm loyalty and brand affinity. Nearly all organizations have work to do in this regard. Our survey revealed that only one in ten of respondents say that their organization is structured to deliver a seamless customer experience across all customer touchpoints. About half (48 percent) are “somewhat ready” while 42 percent say they aren’t ready 35% at all. The bottom line is that businesses that claim to be addressing digital but are not organizing around the customer in a thoughtful and meaningful way, aren’t embracing DBT at all. said that DBT is not driven by customer insights To that end, every digital marketing and transformation initiative should have a clear and compelling link to the customer. While the company’s initiative should address business issues and operational challenges, it must do so with the customer foremost in mind. In fact, the customer should be put at the center of all experiences – and it is this experience that serves as the brand differentiator. FIGURE11 How is DBT viewed? Q: Is DBT driven by customer insights? Strongly agree Somewhat agree 23.1% 64.8% said “our digital business transformation initiatives are driven by customer insights” 41.7% Q: What are the major obstacles to the successful implementation of your organization’s digital business transformation initiatives? Obstacles in implementation 38.0% Conflicting priorities 35.2% Lack of dedicated resources, including staff allocation 29.6% Lack of organization alignment 26.4% Budget concerns/lack of investment 18.5% Lack of vision from leadership 17.1% Inadequate IT capabilities 14.8% Lack of skills 13.9% Lack of governance/coordination Lack of a clear business case 10.6% Lack of plan 10.6% 9.7% Lack of awareness of market forces 8.8% Regulation/security concerns None Other 3.7% 0.9% Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 RESEARCH 17 7 DBT is most often owned by the CMO – who tends to dedicate more significant resources to the initiative. While DBT is owned by a variety of members of the C-Suite, our survey found that the executive most commonly responsible for its oversight is the CMO (26 percent), followed by the CEO (22 percent) and CIO/CTO (13 percent). The Chief Marketing Technology Officer (CMTO), a relatively new addition to the C-Suite, owns DBT in 6 percent of organizations. Notably, these findings seem to contradict several other recent studies, which show that the CIO is emerging as the typical lead for DBT. While it is possible, and perhaps even likely, that our results were influenced by the fact that we surveyed marketing technologists, it seems equally or more likely that this discrepancy exists because leadership of DBT is still very much in flux. In time, we may see one member of the C-Suite take clear ownership of these efforts, but for now it appears that the responsibility varies from organization to organization. Interestingly, the structure of the team supporting DBT initiatives also appears to vary significantly based on the executive overseeing the initiative. For example, when the CMO is leading DBT, projects are far more likely to be executed by a dedicated person or team, as opposed to a task force where members have a wider range of responsibilities. In fact, the CMO is more than three times as likely to use a dedicated team as compared to a CTO or CIO (35 percent vs. 11 percent). RESEARCH These findings beg the question: How can DBT be a priority for the organization if it is not the priority of a single team? In order to effectively embrace transformation and manage its challenges, DBT not only needs to be an item on the C-Suite agenda, it must also be championed by the most senior leader within the organization, the CEO. The CMTO – given her powerful blend of marketing and technology skills, as well as the collaborative nature of the position – is one executive who is primed to own its execution. The CMO is more than 3x as likely to use dedicated team as compared to a CTO or CIO 34.5% CMO CTO/CIO 11.1% FIGURE12 Who helps the leader of DBT? Q: Which executive is responsible for leading digital business transformation in your organization? Who within your organization works on digital business transformation? CEO is leader CMO is leader 64.6% 34.5% 27.1% 41.8% 23.6% 8.3% Dedicated person or team Task force No one Dedicated person or team Task force No one CIO/CTO is leader 59.3% 29.6% 11.1% Dedicated person or team Task force No one Source: SapientNitro, chiefmartec.com, and MarTech, 2016 18 Conclusion There is urgency and momentum building behind digital business transformation, as organizations reimagine, reshape and retool for an era in which traditional boundaries are being broken. DBT compels business leaders to radically rethink the ways in which their entire organization will meet the needs of consumers, many of whom are far more advanced in their adoption and use of technology than the businesses serving them. Based on the findings of this study, and the experience we have in working with our clients, we see daily the struggles that the entire MarTech community has in uniting the marketing, business and IT functions, aligning priorities and rationalizing investments across the all too often siloed functions. What is not clear, and why we believe there is a crisis upon us, is how organizations are addressing the imperatives of the digital world in a business context. Yes, DBT has become table stakes. Yet, our data clearly points to a yawning gap in tying the DBT efforts to customer experience. From our vantage point, many departments within the organization are doing a stellar job of transforming themselves and their work into a digitally focused context. But what concerns us is that these examples are the exception, not the rule. We have not achieved a critical mass. The vast majority of organizations are struggling because there is no clear leader in the DBT journey. Still more fail to acknowledge the need to invest in the capability of their staff to lead them over the abyss. Hybrid roles, in particular, such as the marketing technologist, are crucial in these times of disruption to serve a RESEARCH bridging function within the organization and galvanize efforts to change and transform. In both our 2014 and 2016 research findings, we come away with an emphasis on marketing technologists and the importance of their development. In the case of DBT specifically, the success of a company’s efforts will not rest solely on technology – but also on the people who lead and execute the company’s vision. In much the same way that the customer is at the center of the business, it is employees who are at the core of transformation. Therefore, it is the skills of the workforce, their ability to effect change, and their understanding of the business’s goals that are among the most essential elements in the successful development and execution of DBT. For businesses to grow in today’s digital age, they must develop a workforce that possesses the skills needed for success. It is our belief that this is the single biggest investment we can make in our future. About the survey The survey was an online questionnaire distributed through two primary channels—chiefmartec.com and the 2016 San Francisco MarTech conference (March 21-22). Survey responses were collected from March 21 to April 26, 2016. A total of 256 surveys were completed, including 223 from North America. A total of 256 surveys were completed, including 223 from North America. Unless otherwise noted, the figures referenced in this report relate to the North American sample. Global data available upon request. The distribution of the sample appears to be representative of the marketing technology community, as defined by the blog and attendees from the 2016 MarTech conference. SapientNitro sponsored the study and worked alongside Decision Analyst, a market research firm, to design and execute it. The authors are grateful to Scott Brinker, the host of the MarTech conference, and owner of the chiefmartec blog for his support, as well as the organizers of the MarTech conference for their help in distributing the survey. 19 ABOUT SAPIENTNITRO CMTO UNIVERSITY Companies need a new breed of technologist. This individual sees around corners, paints the big picture, and “gets” marketers, IT leaders, what keeps the CEO up at night, and how to help all of them. They are scrappy innovators, who also understand scale and complexity, and, who are awesome at influencing people. We often joke – that’s not a marketer or a technologist… that’s a unicorn. While marketing technology talent is in very high demand, there is an enormous industry skills gap. Academia has yet to create programs that address their hybrid role in marketing and technology and the skills needed to enable DBT. The demand for marketers who understand technology, data and algorithms is as pressing and urgent as the need for technologists who have a grasp of marketing, advertising and the art of growing customers. With this in mind, SapientNitro decided to create CMTO University, an internal leadership development program that grows some of our best technologists by focusing on three core topic areas: technology, business/marketing, and communicating with influence. It is a year-long experience that combines elements of a corporate leadership development program with the rigor, challenge and learning of an executive MBA. RESEARCH RESEARCH Modeled as a cohort-based program, our students are selected through a competitive application process which includes a formal application from the prospective student, internal business sponsorship and references, and a reference interview with a SapientNitro client who has worked closely with the applicant and can attest to her prowess. SapientNitro technologists hailing from any of our global offices at the Vice President, Director and Senior Manager career levels are eligible to apply. Participants are required to commit to investing an extra 10-15 hours every week over the course of the program year, in addition to their demanding jobs. The curriculum includes four intensive workshops, conducted in different SapientNitro locations around the globe, with “interim” periods between the workshops. Each intensive and interim has a specific focus; activities include group projects, weekly individual assignments and discussions through an online collaboration tool, and semi-weekly virtual classroom sessions with presentations, held over the weekend. Students must also complete an independent study project, the capstone experience of the CMTOu program. Similar to a thesis, the independent study demonstrates competency in a specific aspect of critical marketing technology as well as the opportunity to effectively and creatively communicate their thinking. Participants select a topic, and then design, plan and complete this work with the assistance of internal and outside advisors, including several industry luminaries. Each student is required to present in public at a conference held during the final intensive. Sessions are taught by SapientNitro thought leaders across the globe, industry and academic external experts, and by the participants themselves as their skills and knowledge are honed. Throughout the program, participants are assessed for progress, share feedback with their peers, and receive personalized coaching from the program faculty. The curriculum is designed and delivered in collaboration with Hyper Island, a leader in digital learning and executive training. This program also imparts the tools to ensure the graduates continue to stay on top of what’s next – a critical skill in the digital world, as many marketing technologies become obsolete and new ones rise in importance. Our clients reap the benefits through the work we produce, and our participants see the impact of their collective transformation throughout the program, both in the curriculum and on client work. 20 Sheldon Monteiro Global Chief Technology Officer, SapientNitro Chicago [email protected] Sheldon leads global technology capabilities, engineering, quality, methods, DevOps, and tools. He sponsors and is a senior faculty member at SapientNitro’s CMTO University, an in-house executive development program to grow SapientNitro’s marketing technologists. Sean Burke-Gaffney Director Technology, Sapient|Razorfish Southeast Asia [email protected] Sean also is the APAC lead for the eXperience Technology practice of SapientNitro and is a graduate with Distinction of the SapientNitro CMTO University class of 2015. Nova Halliwell Senior Manager, SapientNitro New York [email protected] Nova is a member of SapientNitro’s global marketing team. She specializes in content strategy and development. INSIGHTS ON THE GO For additional interactive and related content download the SapientNitro Insights App. It features all the same provocative thinking from thought leaders – and more – to your on-the-go fingertips. SapientNitro®, an active element of Publicis.Sapient, is a trusted advisor to clients looking to imagine new business models, new services and new possibilities for the age of the customer – driven by the power of technology. Our capabilities across brand and marketing; sales and service; technology and operations and deep industry expertise allows us to drive measurable business impact for today’s leading brands by putting customer experience at the heart of their organization. For more information, visit www.sapientnitro.com. COPYRIGHT 2016 SAPIENT CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.